Quote# 104478

Re: What's the difference between black features and white features?

If you want to get philosophical and deep about it, there are many things, but I'll just mention three things.

1. Symmetry - It's always been known that symmetry is an aspect of beauty since the ancient Greeks. The European nose I think is more attractive because it adds an element of symmetry. And the long face also adds to this ideal.
2. Proportion - Similar to symmetry is that of proportion. We're a race that is middling. And the divine proportion, also discovered and advocated by our people is the golden mean. We are the golden mean between the other main races (Blacks/Asians). Think of the three little bears, not too hot and not too cold. Just right. Whites have a since of proportion, which is why we can occupy every niche that a human can occupy. But our bodies are also very proportional. We aren't squat or dangly. Our hair isn't a matte of pubes, nor is it so fine that it can't have some curliness now and then. Facial hair allows a White man to have a baby-face or grow a beard and look like a rough manly man. And so on and on when it comes to proportion.
3. Whiteness - I used to think this was a non-issue, but have completely changed my mind on it. Whiteness is seen by everyone as an archetype of various good attributes. I'm on the fence as to whether Whites became White because we were good (evolutionarily or religiously), or whether it's just a genetic quirk that happens to be considered more attractive, and therefore flourished on one group, with no deeper meaning involved.

There are many other things, but these are some examples.

arete, Stormfront.com 13 Comments [11/4/2014 3:58:45 AM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: HEIL SATAN

Quote# 104468

My beautiful white neighborhood started to have light infestations on Halloween; it started with a few idiot parents letting their kids bring along a Negro friend. Did you know that blacks don't know the "Trick or treat" and "Thank you" routine? Did you know they really scowl if you make them say it? And did you know they really, really scowl if you don't give them the candy bar they want? A few years of that and many homes on our main street quit giving candy so the neighborhood kids have to hit the cul-de-sacs for their loot. And that seems to have gotten rid of the dark ones because they're either too lazy to walk cul-de-sacs (many are hilly) or their mammys can't get their ghetto cruisers turned around in the cul-de-sacs. Either way it's restored sanity and safety - for now.

Stay safe everyone and save the good candy for the good kids.

????, stuff black people dont like 14 Comments [11/3/2014 3:58:21 AM]
Fundie Index: 8

Quote# 104467

Last year I was acting like I was putting candy into the bags of the negro children, and I would softly kick the bottom of the bag to make it sound like I gave them something. They all fell for it.
Screw them, let them trick or treat in their own neighborhood. There are not any negroes in this subdivision.

Anonymous Delysid , stuff black people dont like 10 Comments [11/3/2014 3:57:20 AM]
Fundie Index: 14
Submitted By: Tony

Quote# 104465

Obama, in his sick, twisted, black marxist mind, absolutely believes that White first worlders, especially Americans, owe something to Africa/Africans. Of course he is 100% wrong. The problems of Africans, and blacks in general for that matter, are entirely their own fault. We owe nothing to Africa and nothing to blacks anywhere in the world. They started the Ebola epidemic by eating "bush meat" and they continue to do so even though they have been told not too do this. They do this because they have no impulse control. The same way they continue spread the AIDS epidemic in Africa and elsewhere through rape and "down low" homosexual behavior.

Also, these mostly White health care workers going to Africa are not heros. Far from it. They are irresponsible, attention seeking faux martyrs. They are putting healthy, decent productive White citizens at risk so they can feel good about themselves and brag to their liberal friends about how they "care", and "help black people".

We need a complete travel ban (health care workers and all) to/from Sub-Saheran Africa, and we also need a permanent ban on ALL third world immigration to the US. Basically, we need to repeal the 1965 immigration act and return to pre-1965 percentages and requirements.

AutomaticSlim, WND 9 Comments [11/3/2014 3:55:59 AM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 104461

What could possibly be offensive about the Blackhawks logo? It is a picture of a native American. Is that offensive to native Americans, to be "depicted?" Are they like, Mohammad or something? We're not allowed to show their image anywhere? There's nothing to be offended about here. This is a fake nonstory.

Art, Indian Country Today Media Network 6 Comments [11/3/2014 3:54:59 AM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 104460

The act of marriage, according to natural law, is the consensual union of a male and a female of one particular kind. This is instinctively known and seen throughout the animal world, where one particular kind breeds exclusively with its own kind. The only time you may see an exception to this is when man interferes and produces creatures such as the mule and the liger. It is only recently that marriage has been divorced from this act and associated with having a ceremony and a written contract instead.

The word ‘bastard’ means an illegitimate child, the offspring of a male and female who were not lawfully married. What then was an illegitimate child, before there was a legal document to show marriage? An illegitimate child was one born of two different races. A child born of an unlawful marriage that broke the natural law, an unnatural union between male and female.

There is an old Greek adage that the bastard will forever be the enemy of the true-born. This does not mean that a child born from two people who live together and do not have a certificate will be an enemy, but that the child born of two different races can never be anything but a threat to the pure race. This is true regardless of how the offspring behave, as there will always be the danger that they may seduce members of the pure race and destroy their lineage too.

All the offspring of race-mixers are bastards and all so-called marriages between the races are unlawful, as they break the natural law of reproducing after your own kind. Mules and ligers are bastard animals and mulattoes and mestizoes are bastard people. They are an affront to God and a living offence against nature.

It may be said that because viable offspring can be produced from unions between the races that it is natural for us to procreate with them, but just because something is possible does not make it right. It is possible to create viable offspring between bulls and mares and some types of goat with sheep, but that does not mean that they are of the same species. It is possible to cross-breed not just with different species, but with different genera and even different orders entirely. This does not create a new species though, it just completely destroys the original species and leaves a degenerate abomination in its place.

The reason why it is possible to race-mix is that there would be no virtue to staying within your own kind if it were not possible to leave it. Still being a member of the White race today, millennia after our first ancestors walked the earth, is an achievement to be proud of in and of itself, as it means that none of our ancestors were ever bastards.

The bastard has no loyalty to any race, no place of his own, no history, no inheritance and no natural spirit or soul. His image is not one of God, but of a mockery of God. He is a lasting reminder of what became of the rest of the ancient White nations and empires, as he scratches out a living among their ruins, claiming them as his own by default, rather than by descent. They are a living reason why we should be thanking and honoring our ancestors each day, for obeying God’s law and not making us like them.

It is the most valuable thing in the world to be born White and the sea of bastards surrounding our island, is a constant proof of this.

Sven Longshanks, Daily Stormer 9 Comments [11/3/2014 3:54:40 AM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: Yossarian Lives

Quote# 104454

White people are obsessed with morality, compassion, altruism, and fairness. Of all the races that have screwed over other people in their own interests at some point in their history (which means all of them), ours is the only race that seriously worries it might have been the wrong thing to do. Haiti doesn't lose any sleep over genociding all the Whites off the island. Asians don't get down on their knees and apologize to Europe for unleashing a plague on them during a siege that subsequently wiped out 33% of the population. Semites certainly aren't lining up to apologize for taking the Middle East from us. No, only Whites do things like that.

Liberals would not be able to sell movies and television to White people if those programs didn't have some sort of moral underpinning to them. When we see Star Trek, the Blacks and Asians and so on all have to act like White people. Showing these races the way they really are would not allow them to live harmoniously together, and would not make for good ethical viewing.

Ironically, the Blacks complain about this. The characters don't seem real to them. Of course, they are correct; that's NOT what Blacks are really like. They are not intelligent, respectful, dignified, and driven by ethics. Blacks see the anomaly. White Nationalists see it. White liberals cannot.

I just find it interesting that Whiteness, as an ethical foundation, has to remain even in movies about--and starring a majority of--non-Whites. Whiteness is the desired state of being even for Black people. It is the state that asks profound questions, puts moral questions above personal gain. Searches the soul--something that again seems uniquely White.

Fading Light, Stormfront.com 6 Comments [11/2/2014 5:52:54 AM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: HEIL SATAN

Quote# 104453

I avoid groups of young black people at all costs.

I grew up in a black neighborhood. I know from experience how they behave.

Any honest black person would tell you to do the same.

I don’t say this to advocate racism, which I loathe. I say it to raise awareness of a very real danger.

As a rule, if you find yourself around a group of young black people, you are in danger, period.

I know the “kindhearted” liberals would say otherwise, but I’ve seen too much to buy into that BS. They’re dangerous.

Ragnars Repos, The Blaze 8 Comments [11/2/2014 5:50:49 AM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 104448

Through their high capacity for affective empathy and empathic guilt, these Northwest Europeans had an edge in adapting to later cultural environments that would be structured not by kinship but by other ways of organizing social relations: the State, ideology, and the market economy.

This has been one path that leads to advanced societies, but it is not the only one. East Asian societies have pursued a similar path of cultural evolution while having relatively low levels of affective empathy and empathic guilt. They seem to have done so by relying more on external means of behavior control (shaming, family discipline, community surveillance) and by building on cognitive empathy through learned notions of moral duty.

Meanwhile, Northwest European societies have had their capacity for empathy pushed to the limit, as seen in the commonly heard term “aid fatigue.” And there is no easy way to turn it off. The only real way is to convince oneself that the object of empathy is morally worthless.

Was it all an evolutionary mistake? Time will tell.

Peter Frost, Unz 6 Comments [11/1/2014 9:22:41 AM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 104447

Mr. Taylor gave examples of the absurd sacrifices whites make for non-whites and asked, “can you imagine anyone of any other race going insane in quite the same way?” He then speculated on why whites are so easy for others to put to work for alien interests.

He spoke of the extreme individualism of whites, and also of their unique concern for the interests of others. This concern takes the form of the institutions that are the hallmarks of Western society: freedom of speech, rule of law, respect for women, good sportsmanship, public charity, concern for the environment. These things show a high regard for the interests of others—not just other people but for other species and for unborn generations that will live on our planet.

Mr. Taylor argued that this concern for others has been disastrously perverted, and now requires whites to believe it is their duty to sacrifice their homelands and cultures to other races. He argued that if we are to change the minds of whites, we must realize that we are trying to overthrow the liberal moral paradigm, and that to be successful we cannot simply be right. We must be generous. Arrogance or mean-spiritedness will only drive away our fellow whites and confirm their prejudices about us as selfish, wicked people.

Mr. Taylor concluded with an appeal to duty—that duty is the message we read in all the great achievements of our civilization, in the faces of our sons and daughters, and on the tombstones of our great-grandparents.

Jared Taylor, American Renaissance 5 Comments [11/1/2014 9:21:23 AM]
Fundie Index: 1

Quote# 104430

Italy mayor wants separate buses for Roma people

An Italian mayor’s plan to use separate bus lines for Roma people has sparked controversy among the town’s politicians over what has been called the latest in a series of “ridiculous” human-rights violations that plague the Roma in Europe.

Claudio Gambino, mayor of the northern town of Borgaro Torinese, wants separate buses for Roma, who live in a camp of about 600 inhabitants on the town’s outskirts and, he said, "have been afflicting us for more than 20 years." Numerous protests, petitions and Facebook pages have been dedicated to the camp's prompt removal.

"To guarantee the security of our citizens, we need two buses. One for citizens, the other for Roma people," Italian media on Friday quoted Gambino as saying, adding that buses have been plagued by theft and petty violence. Last week a Roma passenger was accused of attempting to steal a 13-year-old boy’s backpack on his first day of school, Italian newspaper La Stampa reported.

City officials said at a town council meeting that there have been constant criminal incidents targeting passengers and that the bus plan does not constitute racism.

More than 80 percent of respondents to a La Stampa reader poll — about 9,000 people — said they agreed with the mayor’s suggestion of separate bus lines.

Human rights activists have sounded alarms over rising discrimination against Roma in the European Union. In France police last year detained a 15-year-old undocumented Roma girl during a school trip and deported her to her native Kosovo under a French government policy that targets Roma for expulsion. In Hungary, home to the far-right Jobbik party — which campaigns on anti-immigration policies — attacks on Roma people regularly make headlines, Amnesty International reported.

Andrey Ivanov, head of the Roma and migrant integration program of the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA), an EU-sponsored think tank, said Roma are “facing marginalization everywhere.” He called Gambino’s proposal “ridiculous.”

“Any form of racial segregation is illegal,” he said.

Only 15 percent of young Roma adults in EU member states have completed high school or vocational education, compared with more than 70 percent of the general population, according to FRA numbers. Fewer than 30 percent of Roma have paid jobs, and nearly half live in households lacking an indoor kitchen, a toilet, electricity or a shower or bath.

Nichi Vendola, leader of Italy’s Left Ecology Freedom party, told La Stampa on Saturday that "giving people different rights is called apartheid."

Micaela Campana, human-rights supervisor for Gambino's Democratic Party, said the party warned Gambino that "marginalization is never the solution" and that "answering violence by excluding people will not help."

But the bus plan has won the support of the anti-immigration Northern League party, with senior parliamentarian Roberto Calderoli saying, "These are the real problems. I send my compliments to Borgaro's administration, which — despite being left wing — has listened to the people."

Claudio Gambino, america.aljazeera.com 3 Comments [11/1/2014 5:05:52 AM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: HEIL SATAN

Quote# 104427


Typical Gypsy wagon/trailer laager. Note that these Mongrel vermin are entirely useless in quite literally every sense of the word. Definitely an invasive species, and possibly more parasitical than the Jew.

The mayor of a northern Italian municipality has finally announced his abject disgust at the slimy and criminal nature of the local Gypsy tribe, and has put forward plans to institute segregated bus lines for the freeloading creatures, a welcome development indeed.

Borgaro Mayor Claudio Gambino, oddly enough a slight Leftist, declared his intentions Friday afternoon to a crowed room’s applause, although both Marxists and Right-Wing politicians were quick to offer criticism for this stroke of brilliant logic.

While those clinging to the utterly-discredited ideology of “tolerance” and “equality” squealed about the “marginalization” of the violent subhumans, members of the Piedmont Northern League seemed to allude to the idea that segregation is not harsh enough, citing the region’s growing “Gypsy Problem,” and the “immigration question.”

[...]

For centuries, the non-White Gypsies have proved to be nothing but a boil on the collective back of European communities, shunning normal activities and work in favor of vice, petty crime, and filth. They truly have no place in our nations, being foreign pests to the extreme, and catalysts for an overall decline of living standards.

Perhaps this is the beginning of a trend that will end with the total expulsion of these atrocious piles of genetic refuse, and may open the door to discussion of even more pressing issues, such as the Jewish Problem and feral savage migration.

Expect the usual suspects to come out swinging over this political initiative, as it threatens to unravel decades of steady subversion in favor of aggravated White Men asserting their right to live a quiet, unscathed existence.

Marcus Cicero, Daily Stormer 13 Comments [11/1/2014 4:03:29 AM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Yossarian Lives

Quote# 104426

The Jew Archbishop of Canterbury has come out and condemned “racism” in the UK, and demanded that the country continue to be destroyed by invading hordes from everywhere.

He admitted that there wasn’t really any actual racism, but suspected that maybe people are racist in secret.

"“What we are seeing is an upsurge in minor racist, anti-Semitic, anti-Islamic, anti-foreigner xenophobia,” Justin Welby said. “Not major things, just comments being made, things being said which are for the people who come from those backgrounds seriously uncomfortable, really quite frightening.”

The cleric’s comments came just a day after Michael Fallon, the Conservative defence secretary, was criticised for suggesting that some parts of Britain felt “swamped” by immigrants and were “under siege” from foreign arrivals. Mr Fallon admitted on Monday that his remarks had been “a little careless”.

While he did not refer to the defence secretary directly, the archbishop appeared to draw a link between politicians’ anti-immigration rhetoric and rising levels of xenophobia detected by his Anglican colleagues.
“Do I worry about the language? Yes, I do, I really do,” Mr Welby said during a lunch at the parliamentary press gallery.

…

He added that while government had to be careful not to “overburden communities”, it also had a Christian duty to be humane.

“At the heart of Christian teaching about the human being is that all human beings are of absolutely equal and infinite value and the language we use must reflect the value of the human being and not treat immigration as just a deep menace that is somehow going to overwhelm a country,” Mr Welby said. “It is part of the strength and brilliance of this country that we are so good at this, and I would hate to see us lose that.”"

It seems to me the Jew is a bit confused about what Christianity is – as is generally the case with Jews. In fact, during the Christian era, when Muslims tried to get into Europe we killed them. It is only in the post-Christian era that anyone ever even thought it might be a good idea to purposefully invite our blood enemies into our base.

Modern Christianity is a product of liberalism, not the other way around. The liberals then exploit and confuse specific passages in the Bible that always meant something completely different and say it means “more Muslim, more gay sex, more feminism, stop the hate.”

Daily Stormer, Daily Stormer 7 Comments [11/1/2014 4:02:51 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Yossarian Lives