Quote# 120237

(referring to a Trump vs Clinton poll)

Truth is she's two points behind.Brexit should be the guide,the poles showed it wouldn't win either.A lot of people voting for trump will not say so as not to be labeled racist,like why do they care but they do. I am a racist and don't care who knows.The country is waking up,taking notice and the shitskins faggots and white cucks days are numbered.In a few years the loading of the trains will begin.


johny_kikebuster, daily stormer 8 Comments [7/4/2016 4:11:28 AM]
Fundie Index: 5

Quote# 120236


loading of the trains will begin.

Let's spread the word! WE ARE ALL RACISTS! All White MEN must boldly embrace the charge of racism, because racial consciousness, and racial nationalism, is the foundation of White Nationalist beliefs and convictions, which all Whites should embrace, just as wilfull blindness and fanciful rejection of human nature and the natural order of things is the foundation of liberalism.

No person who isn't racially conscious can love his own race.

Additionally, accusation by our enemies, the jews, and other nonwhites, of what they consider as the blackest evil, "racism", ought to be taken by Whites as a compliment, as it thereby separates us by the widest margin from what we regard as the blackest evil, those who are working to eliminate and destroy Whites and their culture.

Racism is a political doctrine that rejects the liberal dogma of racial equality. Racism by definition, embraces racial inequality, WHICH IS REALITY! -- which necessarily calls for racial consciousness, i.e., the conviction that mankind falls into identified races that are readily distinguishable. The notion "we are all the same", is patently ABSURD! I am racially conscious, so I must be a racist and so must you be, also. Embrace it, White Man! Run with it! There's nothing negative about it. It's common sense. Races are not equal! They are different!

Actually, if you will simply observe, race and skin shade seems to be the ONLY thing negroes think about. They even discriminate among their own kind and yet through their enablers, the jews, they try to shame and demonize Whites for understanding the obvious, that we are different from them, and absolutely nothing like them.

I would further point out that, before the dawn of modern liberalism, driven and then normalized by jews, every culture on Earth was racially conscious, and most still remain so -- those not programmed and indoctrinated by jewsmedia and jew Hollywood. They didn't call it ‘racism’, because it was simply common reason -- common sense and it is still common sense, something liberals and the politically correct reject, and nonwhites pretend to reject, -- in order to intimidate unawakened, cowardly, Whites, while blacks and other nonwhites embrace acting in their own racial interests for themselves 100%.

Incidentally, much of what mystifies leftists concerning human behavior is remarkably apparent to anyone with racial consciousness. Obviously blacks, hispanics, and jews are hyper-racially conscious, and work in their own racial interests, while they call Whites who are racially conscious, "racists". A clear double standard. Plainly, smear and namecalling, which of course is all they have in the face of TRUTH!


DICARLO, daily stormer 9 Comments [7/4/2016 4:11:14 AM]
Fundie Index: 6

Quote# 120223

Last week The Ryersonian reported on an incident that involved two first-year journalism students who were turned away from an event organized by Racialized Students' Collective because they are white. Since then there has been a lot of commentary on the piece and a lot of debate -- a lot of the criticism is valid.

There are two sides to the story: 1) the media has a right to attend public events and report on matters that are in the public interest. The student media needs to cover initiatives that are happening on campus so that we draw attention to them and in turn create awareness (The Ryersonian reported that one student said he was covering the meeting for an assignment). 2) Marginalized groups have a right to claim spaces in the public realm where they can share stories about the discrimination they have faced without judgment and intrusion from anyone else.

I am a person of colour and a journalist and so there are two conflicting voices inside my head. But in this case one voice, that of a person of colour, is louder and my conscience does not allow me to be impartial. I have to take a side.

The organizers of the event, the Racialized Students' Collective, should have done a better job of labelling this event as a safe space on the Ryerson Students' Union online calendar. They should label safe spaces clearly and maybe even host events that educate the public on what they mean. Doing so will help the public and the media have a better understanding of the purpose and value of these spaces.

However, the point to note is not that two white students were asked to leave the event, but rather that this was a safe space and that we as a newsroom, as a campus and as a society are not as knowledgeable as we should be about what these spaces mean.

It's not just important, but it's essential, for marginalized groups to have safe spaces on campus to engage with people who understand what they go through. Though this group is funded by Ryerson's student union, it works to serve a particular group and a particular purpose. Many students at Ryerson have encountered racism in their life that is impossible to forget and many are exposed to discrimination on a daily basis. This group and these sort of events allow people of colour to lay bare their experiences and to collectively combat this societal ailment. These spaces are rare places in the world not controlled by individuals who have power, who have privilege.

These spaces, which are forums where minority groups are protected from mainstream stereotypes and marginalization, are crucial to resistance of oppression and we, as a school and as a society, need to respect them.

Earlier in the week a newsroom colleague and I went to an ad-hoc committee meeting on sexual assault policy. When we arrived we were told it was a safe space, and that we would not be able to report on anything that would be discussed in the meeting.

We understood the value of these sorts of events, where people can share their common struggles. Our understanding let us attend and contribute to the conversation, even if we couldn't report about it.
We understood the people there had a right to privacy. They had a right to collectively work through the challenges society had imposed on them. They had a right to claim parts of the campus, parts of the world, for a few hours in hopes of creating broader social change.

The two students who tried to enter the RSC meeting said that they were embarrassed when they were asked to leave and that the group was being counterproductive in sectioning themselves off. Similarly, some of the comments on the piece written about these students speaks to the idea that excluding certain people from these events, this dialogue, is encouraging racial tension. Their embarrassment isn't as important as the other issues involved here.

Segregation was imposed on people of colour by people of privilege, not the other way around. The very fact that individuals organizing to help each other get through social barriers and injustices are being attacked and questioned for their peaceful assembly is proof that they were right to exclude those students.

Racialized people experience systemic discrimination on a daily basis, on many levels, and in ways that white people may never encounter. The whole point of these safe spaces is to remove that power dynamic. That's partly what makes them spaces for healing.

The presence of any kind of privilege puts unnecessary pressure on the people of colour to defend any anger or frustrations they have, to fear the outcome of sharing their stories. The attendees are trying to move forward by supporting each other and they should not have to defend themselves, they should not fear the consequences of raising their voices.

Instead of focusing on why those students were asked to leave, we should be thinking about the history of oppression that makes these kinds of groups and these kinds of places so very important. We should be focusing on how to be aware and respectful of the rights of both the press and marginalized groups. We have to find a way to coexist peacefully.

The West has a history of oppressing people of colour: from Africans who were enslaved and brought to the New World, to native people whose land was stolen by Europeans. This kind of oppression is still witnessed today, in the way the black community is treated in the United States, in the state of African nations trying to recover from the collapse of the previous colonial rule, and in the continuing struggles of indigenous peoples.

White people may experience occasional and unacceptable prejudice, but not racism. They do not experience the systemic racism that makes it hard for them to find jobs, housing, health care and justice in the legal system.

Racism is not personal, it is structural. Unlike the arena of mainstream media, the educational system, religious institutions and judicial systems that reinforce hurtful stereotypes, these spaces remind the oppressed that they are human, that they deserve respect.

Aeman Ansari, Huff Post Living 9 Comments [7/3/2016 5:26:15 PM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Denizen

Quote# 120219

University of Missouri graduate and activist Tiffany Melecio stood in front of a microphone outside the Boone County Courthouse in Columbia, Missouri, and addressed the crowd gathered Monday evening.

It was vigil honoring the victims of the deadly Orlando terror attack at a gay nightclub the day before. But Melecio — who’s Hispanic and bisexual, the College Fix said — talked about something else.

“I was really nervous to get up here because there’s a lot of white people in the crowd,” she said to her audience. When a chuckle was heard, she added, “That wasn’t a joke.”

“I wish this many people came out to our racial demonstrations and our Black Lives Matter movement,” Melecio said before deciding to take a moment to “list out some facts that many of you probably don’t know.”

She then shrugged her shoulders and added, “Because you’re white.”

“I’m tired of the black-and-white dichotomy that happens every time we talk about race or anything that goes on in our country,” Melecio continued, using a noticeably monotone, almost tired, delivery as she seemed to lecture the crowd. “But we never take the time to consider the shades in between — like mine.”

The Orlando terrorist attack occurred on “Latin Night” at the Pulse nightclub.

She noted it’s “awesome that there’s so many people here today, but it’s like, who are you really here for?”

One woman in the audience yelled out an answer: “We’re here for everybody!”

That exclamation drew cheers and applause, and then Carl Brizendine added his own retort.

“We are here to be uniting, not dividing, which is what you are doing now,” he yelled toward the stage.

Brizendine, along with his husband Daniel, began walking away from the vigil when Stephanie Hernandez Rivera — Mizzou’s Multicultural Center Coordinator — took over the microphone.

“So if you feel uncomfortable with the fact that people who are murdered are Latino people, that is a personal problem!” she said, according to the College Fix. “You cannot be an ally to one person … and I don’t have to argue with you!”

As another voice in crowd protested: ”It’s about everybody, not just one person … or one color! It’s about all of us! All of us that have to live on this earth! It’s got nothing to do with white, black, Indian, hispanic, anything!”

At that point the Brizendines were interviewed outside the vigil, and they were angry that the gathering became a racial flashpoint.

Tiffany Melecio, The Blaze 6 Comments [7/3/2016 3:53:52 AM]
Fundie Index: 9
Submitted By: Denizen

Quote# 120166

Black lives don’t matter.

If they did, people would be rioting to burn down Planned Parenthood locations, which have been intentionally located in minority neighborhoods since the group’s racist founder Margaret Sanger decided that it was the easiest way to exterminate them. In 1922 she said:

“We should hire three or four colored ministers, preferably with social-service backgrounds, and with engaging personalities. The most successful educational approach to the Negro is through a religious appeal. We don’t want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.”

They’ve been wildly successful. New York City aborted more black babies than were born alive in 2013.

Black lives don’t matter.

Black women having abortions are the most prolific serial killers of blacks, murdering 10,000-1 more than cops.

Black lives don’t matter.

Black-on-black violence accounts for thousands of murders every year and hundreds of thousands of assaults… but you pretend that a handful of incidents involving police is where the problem lies?

Black lives don’t matter.

In hip-hop culture, women are degraded as nothing more than sexual conquests, criminality is celebrated, and education, family and hard, honest work is not just ignored, but spat upon.
Black lives don’t matter.

If black lives did matter, they’d rebel against the toxins in their own culture that account for the vast majority of violence, poverty, and death, instead of celebrating “thug life.”

Black lives don’t matter. At least, they don’t matter unless they’re killed by a white cop as they commit crimes, and then everyone loses their fool minds.

Black lives matter?

Your actions day in and day out when there isn’t someone else to scapegoat say otherwise.
But it is easier to put on a song and dance and say, “hands up, don’t shoot” and go back to listening to Jay Z and Tupac and refusing to actually do anything to change a toxic culture that taught Trayvon that it is okay to try to beat a “creepy a** cracker” to death because he thought he was being followed, or for Michael Brown to attempt to murder a cop, or for Eric Garner to collect government benefits and sell illegal cigarettes because he was–in his wife’s words–too lazy to get a job.

Black lives matter?

Show us, don’t tell us.

Maybe when you start acting like you believe it yourselves, the rest of the world will take you seriously.

Bob, Bob Owens 8 Comments [7/2/2016 4:28:53 AM]
Fundie Index: 8