1 2 3 4 5 7 | bottom
Quote# 132040

(This person is talking about Go Topless Day, a day where women go topless)

Heterosexual men are incapable of seeing breasts as merely body parts like their own as they have long been fetishized sex objects to lust and wank over. Therefore any bloke advocating for women to be able to go topless is going to be getting his rocks off at the prospect, not earnestly hoping for women's equality. This is why women getting their tits out "like men" merely achieves hard-ons and hysteria in the male species, nothing else.

There is no female "empowerment" in having men with their dicks in one hand, camera in the other, leering at a spectacle of "women's lib" that is basically fulfilling every straight teenaged boy's porny-fantasy. Women with their tits out! Everywhere! And the fact the guy (guy: that should have set off alarm bells to any sane woman anyway) who started this is a recognized pervert and pedophile comes as no great surprise.....

Sabine, Feminist Current 15 Comments [9/24/2017 10:29:51 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 132039

This is a really great article about how "terf" has become not only a slur but hate speech but you left out a huge part of the problem that TRAs have with women: lesbians. Lesbians are one of the most vulnerable groups of women already and the vitriol hurled at them for being lesbians is disgusting. Lesbians who acknowledge that a lesbian is a female homosexual, and only attracted to females, is automatically branded a "terf" because TRAs have decided that lesbians are attracted to gender, not sex.

This happens to lesbians who aren't radfems or even gender critical; they're lesbians who seek out females and they are punished for that. There are so few lesbian spaces anymore, having been invaded by TIMs who say they are lesbians and therefore lesbians must consider them viable partners. Lesbians are called bigots for exercising their right to be a female homosexual who is not attracted to males and simply saying that they are not attracted to TIMs brands them "terfs". See Riley J Dennis. While this article was great, leaving out lesbians is a huge disservice to them.

Lesbians endure more than their share of hate piled on them simply because they don't see TIMs as viable dating or sex partners because lesbians are not attracted to males. The transactivist movement is not only incredibly misogynist but also incredibly homophobic by telling lesbians that if they don't see TIMs as women they are disgusting bigoted terfs, and they must consider TIMs as partners because "trans women are women". It's quite akin to corrective rape. I realise this is kind of rambly and out of order, I'm extremely tired right now but wanted to get these thoughts down before I forgot.

cinderchild, Feminist Current 6 Comments [9/24/2017 10:29:40 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 132038

Replace "TERF" with Jew, "trans" with German, and "deplatform" with "kick out of their homes," and frankly, the translation is perfect... I have thought that for a while now. If the trans cult ever comes to power, the first thing they will do is isolate and persecute feminists and lesbians...

Hierophant2, Feminist Current 5 Comments [9/24/2017 10:29:37 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 132037

Nothing is being done about this, because transgender ideology is now mainstream liberal doctrine. Masses of people have been successfully confused, and those who won't give in to this mass delusion are intimidated into silence. And articulate transsexual and gender-nonconforming persons who are critical of gender doctrine have faced abuse and threats.

Kamilla Vaski, Feminist Current 3 Comments [9/24/2017 10:29:35 AM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 132036

I think anything which limits pornography is a step in the right direction, especially enforcing age restrictions. But this bill doesn't nearly go far enough. People who defend pornography while decrying misogyny and racism are the biggest hypocrites on the planet.

Snork Maiden, Feminist Current 4 Comments [9/24/2017 10:29:32 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 132035

Porn involves the dehumanization of others, mainly women, solely so men can masturbate. This is what it is in a nutshell, and it should not exist. It requires the exploitation of others, often trafficked women, just so men can masturbate to the images. It is poison and has no place in any society. It is not "free speech" but a human rights violation.

susannunes, Feminist Current 9 Comments [9/24/2017 10:29:29 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 132034

What is so disturbing is that even saying that trans people need their own shelters or that it could trigger women fleeing domestic violence to have dudes around seems to be a no-no. Trans women are women end of story!! I'm also concerned about abusive men disguising themselves as trans to find the shelters.

Women who work and help out at shelters usually are among the most knowledgable on just how horrible abusive men can be towards women and how far they can go to gain control, so I find this surprising and disturbing, this seeming naiveté and lack of concern. I wonder if there currently are any Western countries not buying this stuff.

rainbows99, r/GenderCritical 3 Comments [9/24/2017 10:29:26 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 132033

How do you cope with living in this horrible male infested world? I hate how men and patriarchy are the cause of all evilness towards women, animals and the planet and yet nobody recognize it!!! My happiness is almost gone because I found out how horrible the prostitution and porn industry is, but everyday I see people who watch porn and some acquaintances talk about it (even females) like if it was normal and funny.

I feel so alone, I have no feminist friends in my country neither online and I think I will always be alone sorrounded by males and handmaidens and there's nothing I can do to change society on my own. Men have indoctrinated women into thinking their own oppression is sexy and normal, and some women even like BDSM and porn and their sexual desires are based on porn and not in what they really want because porn is all about pleasing the dick, not about female pleasure.

Men trained women to like being submissive and serve men sexually and women think they like that. Everyday I find out about more horrible things that men do to women, like the pedophile elite, the oppression in music and film industry, the rape culture, the horrible inhumane conditions of women and girls in many countries, men kill them for not having sons, for not wanting to be with them, for resisting abuse, they control every aspect of their lives, they kill baby girls, they force the abortion of baby girls, they deny education to girls and force actual female children to marry men, legally!

They mutilate our genitals, they call us witches they throw acid at us they see us as sexual holes to fuck, they sexually abuse us, they call themselves women bc they have a "lady brain", they want to have sex with their own daughters, they shame us for having sex, they indoctrinate us to think we are inferior with their religions, we always fear to be raped when we're alone, men control the political and economical elites, they are trafficking us to sex slavery, they exploit us in the most horrible ways and they have the society tell them it's ok for a man to go to a strip club but it's BAD for a woman to be a stripper and bad to be a prostitute, and it's not cool for a woman to go and see naked men dancing or hire a male prostitute, that's just for high class women before their wedding.

The hipocrisy and the oppression is so evident and yet everything is so normalized and nobody cares about it. Even feminists are defending porn and ignoring important issues. I am so tired. Sorry for the long rant and for the english if it's not correct, if anyone can tell me how do they cope, what do they do to feel better that will help a lot. Thank you.

Rainyiceberg, r/GenderCritical 5 Comments [9/24/2017 10:29:22 AM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 132032

Homosexuality is an innate attraction. BDSM is an attraction forged by social pressures. They are inherently different. I'll admit, I've been practicing BDSM as long as I've been sexually active, and still do. I can say as someone who still partakes, it is ABSOLUTELY a mirror of fucked up attitudes towards gender roles and power imbalances.

It takes something frightening or taboo and makes it rewarding. BUT self-medication is self-medication and is usually not the best way to address issues. I know all this, but I still do it. The only thing I'd say in defense of doms is that most of the ones I've known are as likely to be abuse victims looking to fix the betrayal of a loved one abusing them, as people who are wired to want to hurt others.

I wouldn't say it is good or healthy, especially now that it's become so mainstream you don't even get the thoughtful examination of why we engage in potentially harmful practices. It's a lot like trans in a way- gender roles and the patriarchy have harmed you, but here's something you can do to recontextualize it as rewarding. So TLDR, it's not the same as homosexuality, and being judgemental is a good thing!

Black_Phillipa, r/GenderCritical 4 Comments [9/24/2017 10:29:19 AM]
Fundie Index: 1
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 132030

As long as there is a systematic oppression on women by men and a mental conditioning on women from their birth, I don't believe there's real consent in heterosexual acts. And I do believe that women identified women (aka women living for themselves according to their own codes, free from patriarchal conditioning, nothing to do with identity politic and trans bs) should avoid having hetero intercourses, as long as the oppression is here.

Wich does'nt necessarily mean a complete separation from males of course, just no sexual or romance stuff. And it doesnt mean not having kids either. But that's just pure theory of course, if a woman wants to have sex with a male i'm not going to prevent her. I just don't believe in the reality of «choice», there's too much factors. But there is a moral difference between things that should be banned and things we should just criticize.

RadFHarva, r/Ask_Radical_Feminists 3 Comments [9/24/2017 10:29:11 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 132019

If I were to be totally honest, I never had a femoid as a friend, and nor do I ever want to, truth be told. Because for starters, I despise femoids and can't stand them. Second, I literally see no point in having them as just as friends -- it's just nothing but a waste of time.

I mean, what could you possibly gain from having a femoid cunt as your friend? They are not going to give you sex. That's obviously never going to happen. Also, being just friends with them so you could get various advice from them is the most dumbest thing a man could do. They are pathological liars, so they'll never give you advice that you really seek. So, the only thing that is going to happen when you have a femoid as a friend is that you'll become her personal tampon.

You'll get the chances to listen to all those emotional sob stories in how Chad won't commit to her and all that bull-fucking-shit. Oh, you'll also get the chance to do favors towards her. Like, helping her in her work/studying and getting stuff for her -- not exactly the favors that you would want to do. The bitch, however, will never really do you any favors; whatever it maybe. Men and femoids are not friends. If there isn't any kind of sexual activity involved there is literally no point in having bitches as friends.

Lookismisreal, r/incels 13 Comments [9/24/2017 6:42:14 AM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 132018

So, here I was walking towards my local gym, which is a walking distance from my house -- and I see two femoids coming towards me from the front -- I don't mind them, of course. So anyway, as they were walking past me, I glanced at them only to notice that they were looking at me.

But as you can imagine not in a good way at all. Once I made eye contact with these two cunts for a brief second one of them rolled her eyes and looked away and the other made a disgusted expression only to follow it with a slight groan and looked away as well.

Are you fucking kidding me? I can't even walk in the street without getting patronized by these cum dumpsters? Seriously, it pissed me the fuck off. It's not the first time I've gotten reaction like these -- and I thought the first time was bad...This is all because my subhuman face, nothing else. Fucking femoids are evil little creatures who can only laugh at peoples misfortunes. I fucking hate them all.

Lookismisreal, r/incels 12 Comments [9/24/2017 6:39:32 AM]
Fundie Index: 1
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 132017

When you see that every slut gets attention from hunks, while you are left to rot in loneliness, the only natural response is to be frustrated and angry. Don't let anyone tell you it's wrong to have violent hatred for women and society in general.

Incel4Life, r/incels 9 Comments [9/24/2017 6:39:12 AM]
Fundie Index: 1
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 132004

I got one all you stupid women who can't keep their legs closed and just say no to sex or give the baby up for adoption to a family who can't have kids who want kids. Abortion should be illegal and there should be a prison sentence for killing babies. You dumb people wouldn't be here if your parents decided to abort you. There are people in this world who can't have kids give them the joy of having yours if you're pregnant give your baby to someone who can't have kids don't kill it. You know when that sperm hits that egg it is a life you created life right then.

Life is a creative miracle people you are creating a living human being. Let that baby experience life let he or she take that first breath of air let a dad throw a ball to his son or daughter let a mom spend quality time braiding his or her hair or just spend time together with the baby as a family don't take away it's life before it has one don't take away the joy of a mom and dad watching the child grow up and the dad walking his daughter down the aisle to get married, don't take that away. So before you kill that living human being think about it, you may not want it but somebody does. Something to think about

Anna Swan, Facebook 9 Comments [9/24/2017 6:31:55 AM]
Fundie Index: 0
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 131990



humorlessbroad, r/Incels 7 Comments [9/23/2017 1:35:51 PM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Demon Duck of Doom

Quote# 131984

A Saudi cleric who said women should not drive because their brains shrink to a quarter the size of a man’s when they go shopping has been banned from preaching.

Saad al-Hijri, head of fatwas (legal opinions) in Saudi Arabia’s Assir governorate, was suspended from all religious activity after advising against allowing women to drive in a speech that contained comments “diminishing human value”, a spokesman for the governor of Asir province said.

Women remain banned from driving in Saudi Arabia despite ambitious government targets to increase their public role, especially in the workforce.

The ultra-conservative kingdom has some of the world’s tightest restrictions for women. They are also bound by law to wear long robes and a headscarf and require the consent of a male guardian for most legal actions, including study, travel and other activities.

In a video this week, Hijri asked what the traffic department would do it if it discovered a man with only half a brain. “Would it give him a licence or not? It would not. So how can it give it to a woman when she has only half?” he said.

“If she goes to the market she loses another half. What is left? A quarter ... We demand the traffic department check because she is not suitable to drive and she has only a quarter.”

The comments sparked outrage on social media, which is hugely popular in the kingdom.

Twitter users shared the video, many criticising it and making jokes about his remarks, under the Arabic hashtag “Al-Hijri-women-quarter-brain”.

The hashtag was used 119,000 times in just 24 hours.

Some users posted pictures of Saudi female scientists and academics in response and questioned Hijri’s own intellectual capacities.

But there were many others who supported the cleric, and the hashtag “Al-Hijri is with the woman, not against her” was used on 20,000 tweets in the same time period.

Hijri’s suspension, ordered by the provincial governor, was aimed at preventing the spread of views that spark controversy and do not serve the national interest, the provincial spokesman said.

Saad al-Hijri, The Guardian 13 Comments [9/23/2017 10:53:10 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Yossarian Lives

Quote# 131977

[From "What it really means when she says "I shouldn't do this" on the first date"]

Introduction
So you did something right and she wants to fuck you on the first date - congratulations - but at the last minute, her mouth orifice utters I shouldn't do this / I'm not that type of girl / Any other variation of the fact.

What?!
Don't worry, these are famous forms of last minute resistance that let's be honest, would probably only disarm a blue pill guy who wouldn't even manage to get the girl in the first place. Still, don't get cocky just yet. If you're getting I shouldn't do this then it probably means you're sending at the very least some provider vibe or, if you're "lucky", she's just playing it safe.

Just playing it safe?
Yes, this is what I call the slut powerplay. She gets to be a whore while giving off the unicorn vibe in case later you turn out to be provider material. It's the best of both worlds for her and the perfect move of a master manipulator.

So how do I check for this?
Well, is she fucking you on the first date? Actions, not words, gentlemen. That's why you should always "push" for the fuck - agree & amplify, push/pull, gauge, escalate - no matter what. She does her little tests; do your own as well.

If in the end she doesn't fuck you, one of the following occurred:
• She wasn't sexually attracted to you in the first place, which means you failed to apply the correct seduction techniques or don't have enough SMV.
You need to study more and apply them more often, or increase your SMV;
• She's gotten a provider vibe, which means she thinks she can extract value from you without spreading her legs. This falls back on point no. 1;
• She's actually not a slut (yet). Very rare. She may even never become one. I'm kidding. Enjoy while it lasts.

Conclusion
I shouldn't do this is a famous slut powerplay. She's playing it safe in case in the future she wants to lock you down, so that she has plausible deniability. Don't fall for this shit. As always: check her actions, not her words.

ForeverMaverick, Reddit - r/TheRedPill 4 Comments [9/23/2017 10:49:39 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: JeanP

Quote# 131970

What gets me is that this kind of hateful, violent rhetoric is seen by many as okay because it's somehow in self-defence, against the greater danger trans people face to their lives and safety.

And I don't deny that trans people have been and still are attacked and raped and murdered. But. Who's doing that? Who's threatening their safety in men's bathrooms and men's prisons? Who attacked and killed Brandon Teena? "Prostitutes in the most danger are PoC trans sex workers!" Okay, and who's killing them?
It's not radical feminists. It's men.

The system isn't radical feminism. It's patriarchy.

We're not 'excluding' you from feminism, trans people. Stand with us. Fight against destructive and violent patriarchy with us. Wear what you want, present how you like, accept that your personal feelings of "gender identity" don't actually override millennia of gender designed and maintained as repressive social structure, and stand with us. If you're targeting your fury at "TERFs" and not men and patriarchy, you're excluding yourselves.

icthyosaurosaurus, r/GenderCritical 3 Comments [9/23/2017 10:47:34 AM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 131916

[On a post about a TERF advocating genocide]

Several days ago an xy tranny punched an xx feminist in the face because she was gender critical. The whole savage attack was caught on video. Total silence from fstdt but you publish this shit?

Pathetic.

Anonymous, FSTDT 13 Comments [9/22/2017 11:08:02 AM]
Fundie Index: 0
Submitted By: Demon Duck of Doom

Quote# 131936

A feminist student who wished to become a police officer (presumably so she could wrongly jail hundreds or thousands of men on allegations of rape and child molestation) has thankfully been jailed before her career had even begun. She was found guilty of falsely accusing a taxi driver of rape and jailed for 16 months (unfortunately a light sentence considering the magnitude of her crime).

It’s unfortunate that her mindset clearly illustrates the kind of people who join our police force. No wonder the police are so rotten, though on this rare occasion it seems they did the correct thing. Hopefully it will serve as a deterrent to others.

holocaust21, Resisting the coming 21st century holocaust – Men's Rights, Youth Rights, Sexual Rights 4 Comments [9/22/2017 10:49:27 AM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: xavier

Quote# 131925

A 12-year-old girl who was pressured into sending a topless photo to a paedophile has reportedly been told she could face a child sex charge.

Child exploitation officers warned the schoolgirl she could end up with a criminal record after her mother learned she was being groomed online and contacted police.

The paedophile who coerced the girl into sending the picture has not yet been found, the The Sunday Mirror reported.

The culprit was said to have using an anonymous Instagram account to bombard the girl with explicit messages and requests for pictures.

She initially refused but later caved in to the pressure and sent an image from her iPad, before ending the conversation as the demands grew more obscene.

Her mother later discovered the messages and contacted the Child Exploitation and Online Protection (CEOP) Centre, part of the National Crime Agency (NCA), which advised her to report them to the police.

Police officers interviewed the girl, who lives in the south of England, and took the iPad for examination.

A CEOP officer later contacted the girl's mother and warned her daughter could face a criminal record.

Creating or sharing explicit images of a child is illegal, even if the person doing so is a young person sending a picture of themselves.

"I couldn’t believe it," she told the The Sunday Mirror. "How can the victim end up with a criminal record? She’s a young, innocent girl who has made a big, big mistake."

She added: "She’s the victim. She was coerced into sending it. There’s a paedophile out there yet they’re talking about criminalising a little girl. She’s scared, upset, worrying about what is going to happen and I’m questioning if I did the right thing in reporting it.

“My child is a victim of grooming but now she might be branded a criminal. If this is happening it could put other parents off reporting abuse. How many people actually knew this was the law?”

The girl is now waiting to learn if she will face charges as the police investigation goes on.

A spokesman for the NCA it always "puts victim care and safeguarding of children and young persons first and foremost."

They added: “In this instance we understand the child sent an image of herself to another person. If a young person is found creating or sharing images, the police must record a crime, in line with Home Office Counting Rules, and investigate.

“They have discretion not to take formal action if it isn’t in the public interest to do so. Police are encouraged to take a common sense approach that does not criminalise children unnecessarily.”

CEOP officers, The Independent 10 Comments [9/22/2017 10:46:14 AM]
Fundie Index: 7
Submitted By: Demon Duck of Doom

Quote# 131922

This is not going to turn into a game blog. Other men are much better at game than I am. I know, because I have seen them in action. On the other hand, I am not just an average f#@#!g chump. I clearly score more than the average f#@#!g chump, and fat and in my sixties I still score more than the average f#@#!g chump, though back when I was very fat, not so much.

I know a man half my age who was a male model and is a lot richer than I am. Girls stop and turn their heads when he walks through the mall. If he stands still, cute girls appear from nowhere and start conversations with him. But then nothing happens. Money and looks gets your foot in the door, but it does not get you laid. His problem is that he is far too nice.

Now a lot of readers of this blog seem to believe that nice, upper class girls, the girls that come from intact families, go to good universities and have supportive upper class fathers are not like that. Being a nice guy will, they think, get you a nice girl.

Bullshit.

The girl who started fucking at nine years old, jumped aboard more cocks than merry go round rides, mostly the cocks of criminals, and is still unmarried at thirty five because she is incapable of bonding with any man, is the girl who whose doting intact family spent a shitload of money getting her a good law degree from a good university. And this is precisely what evolutionary theory predicts. It is precisely the girl with the good family and a loving father who is disinclined to have sex with the nice guy. Nice guys have a way better shot with girls whose fathers have died or abandoned them. I have tried nice, and I have tried being an asshole, and nice gets mostly gold diggers and a few fatherless girls.

If you want a nice girl, be the bad man. The only society where nice guys get the girl is the society where the patriarch does not allow any non related males near his daughter except the man he has already decided will marry her. (And in such a society she will agree to marry him, because she wants to climb aboard the first plausibly high status cock that she meets, and her Dad treats him as high status and forces her to treat him as high status.) Ballroom dancing is pretty much a ritual to make the males look high status to the girls, so back in the day the system was a girl had a dance card filled out by her father, and was compelled to dance with everyone on the dance card, and be polite and respectful to him, and forbidden to dance with anyone not on the dance card.

But in a society where you can meet chicks without asking their dad to put you on their ballroom dance card, you need to treat chicks like dirt. And you especially need to treat them like trash if you want chicks from intact families who don’t have a number larger than your own.

One of my commenters told me that if I was dating much younger women, I was dating gold diggers. Yes, I have dated gold diggers, lots of gold diggers. But the trouble with gold diggers is that they want the gold, they don’t want to lay me. If I want to lay women, I get far better luck not giving them any gold, at least not until they have been having sex with me for a while without any indication of fidelity or financial support. I would be happy to date gold diggers if I got laid that way, but I don’t get laid that way – OK, I did get laid by one gold digger, but it was part of a plot to commit paternity fraud. Beta provider game just does not work. I know, because I have tried it extensively. You need a little bit of beta provider game, but it has to be part of asshole game, and you don’t turn on the beta provider game until after asshole game has succeeded. The chick needs to think that by laying you, serving you, and obeying you, then she reveals the soft nice guy inside your harsh exterior. Early niceness will lose the chick. Similarly, when you catch a fish, got to give it a hard jerk to set the hook. You let it run only after it is well and truly hooked. There comes a time in the relationship when you need to give her some beta provider game, or else you will lose her. But if you give her beta provider game too soon, too easily, or too much, you will also lose her, to someone who is a much bigger asshole than you are.

If you want a society where men act well, you need a society where men that act well get laid. Thus for civilization, must have patriarchy, and that patriarchy will be very forcefully resisted by women howling for their demon lover, and has to be very forcefully imposed on those women.

How forcefully? Well, England before 1810 or so was fairly successful at keeping women in line, and frequently deployed methods that would make the Taliban blush, methods that horrified the Victorians. We need to copy eighteenth century England, eighteenth century Virginia, and early nineteenth century Australia. The Old Testament gave women a legal status similar to that of modern day pets, and eighteenth century England was only marginally more progressive than Old Testament Israel. And to the extent that it was marginally more progressive than old Testament Israel, I would argue that this was a big mistake that led to the disaster we now suffer.

Giving women legal status similar to that of pets would have two effects: It would reward civilized behavior, and it would raise fertility to Timor Leste levels. Now some of my commenters are worried about white fertility. If whites were reproducing at Timor Leste levels, pretty soon we would need to conquer inferior races, take their land, and restrain them from reproducing. Oh the horror. Which reasoning seems scarcely different from the proposition that Europeans should restrain their reproduction so that we can benevolently rescue four billion African refugees over the next forty years.

Jim, Jim's Blog 14 Comments [9/22/2017 10:45:24 AM]
Fundie Index: 9

Quote# 131889

Ok I was a blind trans ally, then I was an agressive radfem who was just angry, then I became actually curious about them and tried not to be too harsh, to understand and to respect them as ideological opponents, and now I can definitely say FUCK THEM. There is no justification to disrespect, to selfishness, to them always insulting, dehumanising us and invalidating our experiences us with their language (cis, terf, afab) etc.

You're not bigoted to feel bad about their shit. They're not right in everything they do. They better learn it themselves. You have the right to have boundaries and to be respected just like them and everybody else. His problems are not your problems and no one owes him anything. Please listen to your own feelings and don't neglect them

krasnoobsk, r/GenderCritical 5 Comments [9/21/2017 11:30:45 AM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 131888

Yeah, that's what scares me the most about having a daughter. I would NEVER want to have a son (because they can poison you and they reduce your life expectancy if you have them, and I don't want to bring more of them in this world, they're already way too numerous) but I'd love to have and raise one (or several) daughter(s) if I find a woman to love and move with her.

Assisted reproductive technology for lesbians is going to be legalized in my country in 2018 (probably). But I'm scared as hell by what the internet and males in her school could teach her. I think I'd settle in a really remote area of my country, and I'd homeschool her so she wouldn't be in contact with porn-sick males. we wouldn't have a TV and only internet with parental control.

RadFHarva, r/GenderCritical 8 Comments [9/21/2017 11:30:39 AM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 131879

“If elected, I will do everything in my power to bring this evil to an end and take executive action to ensure that all Oklahomans are equally protected, including the preborn,” the former Oklahoma state representative said in a video posted to his campaign’s YouTube page last week. “I will disregard any unjust rulings or perversions of the U.S. Constitution that claim that there is a right to murder preborn human beings in the womb.”

Fisher said in the video that anti-choice laws passed by Republican lawmakers “really only spell out the requirements for killing a preborn baby,” suggesting that they don’t go far enough. “Every one of these pro-life laws affirm abortion as legal, treat it as an acceptable choice, and seek to regulate the practice. If you think about it, these laws are basically pro-choice.”

“I am not running for governor of Oklahoma as a pro-lifer,” he said. “I am not running to regulate abortion. I am running to abolish it.”

Dan Fisher, Friendly Atheist 7 Comments [9/21/2017 11:28:06 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Demon Duck of Doom
1 2 3 4 5 7 | top