Quote# 88634

Should handicapped people be aborted and or euthanized?

The answer is, undeniably: Yes.

They should be.

Now, allow me to explain.

People, regardless of gender, who are born with either a mental disability or a physical disability, that is of such a degree it has been socially proven to hinder normal common functions, should not be allowed to suffer through a life of misery at the hands of care-takers and or sitters.

Not only is someone who is mentally handicapped or physically handicapped a drain to society, to tax-payers, and to their own family members and “friends” who are forced to care for them each day, but they, themselves, will suffer a lifetime of meaninglessness and agony.

This has to end.

The simple solutions for this would be to:

A) Test for hindering disabilities, and upon finding one, have the child aborted at the mother’s permission (which should be greatly encouraged or even lawfully mandated).
B) Have any child who manages to be born in a way that evades abortion euthanized as soon as possible, in order to keep them from straining not only society, but their own family as well.

Men should take no roll in this decision. And, they should have no interaction with the process of aborting or euthanizing the handicapped child; for multiple reasons:

A man performing an abortion of this sort, which slightly reflects a Spartan-esque ideology, would be doing nothing more than posturing and inflating their masculinity, as they are then, by extension, the official executioner of a life which they did not birth, and physically cannot birth.

Only women should be the official “executioners” or “doctors” who perform these ceremonial procedures, because, if a woman were to do it, it would be an act of kindness by the very inherent nature of that which is female. They would be, essentially, putting a life out of its misery so that it did not have to suffer. Unlike a man, who would only be asserting his dominance over said life, which he cannot ever even hope to produce; due to lacking the necessary genetic components for giving birth.

If a male or a female is found, in the womb, to be disabled, or are able to be born with a disability, which would, in the future of their life, cause an economic, mental and physical strain on their family, and even society as a whole, they should be aborted or euthanized.

That is my verdict on this important issue.

Thank you for your consideration!


Femitheist Divine,  The New Era of Feminism 97 Comments [7/29/2012 10:53:17 AM]
Fundie Index: 86
Submitted By: Ahmer

Quote# 88543

These are merely five of the many semi-unknown female heroes of the past few years. I listed them in the order in which I admired their courage and actions - meaning, that they are from greatest to least. But, that is not to say that I don’t admire them all. I respect all of these women for their courage, strength, resolve, and willingness to do what is just.

#1 – Sandra Crockett (1997)
In 1997, Sandra Crockett had her mentally handicapped son, who was 21 at the time, castrated in order to curb his sexual impulses and aggression. She feared that he would be taken away from her because of this, and she did not want him to be placed in a mental institution. Likewise, she said that he had been feeling some pain in his testicles. This one was originally number three on my list, but I loved this woman’s story so much, that I moved it up to number one. I greatly admire her, and I think she is a loving, kind hero. She did what she thought was best for her son, and it benefitted them both in the end. I believe that more women should, in terms of the practicality of the modern world, follow her example.

#2 – Anjana Maity (2009)
In 2009, forty-two year old Anjana Maity castrated her 13 year old son and then beheaded him. Interestingly enough, this act of release against the boy was committed after the woman’s husband, Ranjit Maity, left their family. He had had an affair, and he had threatened to set her and her son on fire if they did not leave him alone. The child was clearly suffering, as was she, and this should be considered an act of mercy on her behalf. So, regardless of whether she was arrested or not, she did the right thing.

#3 – Catherine Kieu Becker (2011)
In 2011, forty-eight year old Catherine Kieu Becker cut off her husband’s penis with a ten-inch kitchen knife. No act such as this is committed if the other party is undeserving. And, given that her husband was a man, who had attempted to abandon her, I would say that he did, indeed, deserve it. Mrs. Becker is a hero for seeking retribution for the misery she had been caused by her husband. Regardless of whether or not she was arrested, she is a champion, and I admire her courage.

#4 – Joyce Maxine Gregory (2012)
In 2012, thirty-five year old Joyce Maxine Gregory fought back against her boyfriend, or ex-boyfriend, after he went on a rampage through their home. During the struggle that followed afterwards, she grabbed his testicles, causing the scrotum to split open. And, while he may have recovered afterwards, meaning she didn’t quite finish the job, I still admire her for her bravery. It takes a lot to stand up against someone who is physically larger than you, especially when they have lost control of their senses. I salute her.

#5 – Chalie Simon (2009)
In 2009, nineteen year old Chalie Simon grabbed her boyfriend by the testicles and squeezed hard as he attempted to forcefully push her from his residence. Her actions came from his neglect for her feelings, and his neglect of providing the simple attention that she asked him for. It was justified, and regardless of whether or not she was arrested, I salute her for standing up against someone who mistreated her for loving them.

________________________________
That is my list for now - five of the greatest, semi-unknown female heroes of the past few years and or decades. I salute them all, I admire them all, and I hope that I, too, can be as brave when standing up against those who wish to do me harm.

Femitheist Divine, The New Era of Feminism 86 Comments [7/26/2012 3:40:05 AM]
Fundie Index: 122

Quote# 88542

The fact of the matter is, even then, and also now, women are still more important reproductively than men. In this world, it is not quite as necessary due to the immense numbers of the human species, but nevertheless, women are still the more important half.

For instance, if humanity were to undergo… say… a transformation of the short-term solutions sort. It would be sensible for 1-10% of the global population to remain male. For behavioral studies, and for reproductive purposes – a good example to remember is that it would require only one man to populate a city, while it would require an entire city of women for the same task. Women are more important because they bear the child, and thusly, they are needed in greater numbers.

If my short-term solutions were implemented, and men and boys were castrated in great numbers, it would make sense for some men to be able to be signed up through governmentally operated programs to become “Breeders” who would be exempted from castration until they were too old to continue producing viable sperm.

They would be used for sample collection based on supply-and-demand. This, along with the use of scientifically generated progeny, would be able to sustain a perfect population. Primarily female, and sufficiently - to the extent that it is necessary for sample collection - male.

Likewise, mothers or close female guardians would be advised to exempt their male children from castration if it were necessary on the basis of supply-and-demand. They could still go through with it, but they would be advised to not do so until the male grew older.

This practice of castration, Breeder usage, and sample collection would continue until it was scientifically possible to create female children entirely from the organic material of female adults. Then, the existence of men would no longer be necessary at all. Long-term solution implementation would follow.

Femitheist Divine, The New Era of Feminism 54 Comments [7/26/2012 3:39:34 AM]
Fundie Index: 61

Quote# 88394

It is a well-known fact that porn is a gateway for oppressive behavior, used to exploit women for the profit of others - women who are incapable of finding any other solution for gathering an income merely to survive. But, that is not the topic for this post. The topic for this post concerns male fantasies, young girls, and the potential for rape.

“Legal” pornography which involves women who are “of age”, or 18, is one of the most popular forms of pornography in regards to consumption. The attraction for men in this particular type of pornography is the youth of the girl, and to appease this attraction, the girl(s) in these movies and videos are forced to attempt to make themselves seem naively innocent, child-like, both externally and internally, in order to convey a sense of submissiveness to the male viewer.

[...]

It is my contention, because of this, that all men who desire this type of pornography are pedophiles and, inevitably, potentially dangerous rapists. They are drawn to the girl’s youth, and the fantasy that the girl is underage. It adds a sense of risk and taboo to the thrill. And, what is often cited, beyond sex, as the cause for rape? The desire for dominance and power. The difference between a girl at the age of 15 and a girl at the age of 18 is very minute, and men are capable of recognizing that.

I encourage any girl out there who is still dating a man to stop him from watching pornography, or, at the very least, if that is too daunting, find out what type of pornography he is often viewing. If it concerns young females and that sort of fantasy, I would suggest getting away from him as quickly as possible. Not only is he extremely depraved, sick and disgusting, but he is likely a pedophile, or has pedophilic desires, and he likely has a great potential for raping in the near future.

Femitheist Divine, The New Era of Feminism 50 Comments [7/17/2012 3:17:27 AM]
Fundie Index: 50