Quote# 133829

Actually most of the Muslim immigration has been part of a plan to invade Europe, the Kalergi Plan. The dominantly young men invading Europe were directed by their Imams to go and rape Europe, impregnate the women, and take over Europe. Climate has nothing to do with this plan and never will.

higley7, Watt's Up With That 1 Comments [11/4/2017 2:14:06 PM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 133824

The British, with the "Modern" Germans, were the originators of revisionist history. It was they who first began to write Blacks out of history after the “Race/Religious Wars" of the late medieval. Now look, the British will soon start teaching their children the truth: that Blacks were the original people of Britain. But please know, this is not the result of truth seeking, those truths were always known.

Rather, this is them succumbing to the pressure of sources like Realhistoryww, and others, who publish the truth. The truth causes people to ask uncomfortable questions of authority. Accordingly, we call upon students and truth seekers everywhere to keep the pressure up, demand the truth - it works!

Mike111, Realhistoryww 4 Comments [11/4/2017 12:37:46 PM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 133753

I've done extensive research into this subject because I appreciate facts. I was not alive during the moon race and I never just accept someone's word for something although when I was young I did because everyone else said we went to the moon. I know what our government is capable of and we all know there are secrets that remain for years even while hundreds sometimes thousands of people work on these projects. I spent weeks investigating film footage, photography, and many other aspects of the moon race.

It takes time, but the information is available. I don't rely on just 1, 2, or even 3 things for my opinion. All I know for a fact is that what people saw on TV, the photos,and have been taught by a government-run school system is a slight of hand magic trick.I believe that the Apollo program was a cheaply done fabrication so as to divert huge amounts of money to another top secret or several top secret programs. I am not a conspiracy person. I simply believe facts that I am able to judge for myself. Research, research, research is the key to knowing any fact. Have we gone to the moon? Yes, we have scientific equipment on the moon. Was it placed there by actual people?

I find no evidence that any person has ever stepped on the surface of the moon? Have we tried to send someone to the moon? I don't know but I do not believe we have. Since all experiments are always carried out by animals before people I find it amazing that after some successful and some unsuccessful attempts to send animals into low space (although the furthest animals in space, 2 monkeys, was not very far at all only reaching 360 miles I believe, someone correct me if I'm wrong) we decided to just start shooting multiple men at a time to the moon with great success. I know it's hard for people to believe that something they have believed there whole life could be untrue, especially when everyone they love, respect, and admire has been telling them it is true.

I ask you to simply put yourself in the position of someone a long time ago when the smartest people in the world, including governments, where teaching that the earth was flat and you would fall off if you went to far. How the idea that the earth was round was blasphemy. Just keep an open mind. Man is deceptive. Magic is slight of hand. We all know that you can't saw anyone in half, yet we sit in an audience and with our own eyes see it happen. If only the magician would tell us how he did it. He never will. He loses his power over us if he does. The magician is the government and we will never know how they performed the trick. Please forgive any spelling mistakes. I love you all.

A great magician never reveals his secrets, Debate 3 Comments [11/3/2017 7:18:59 AM]
Fundie Index: 1
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 133792

Unlike all other water treatment processes, fluoridation does not treat the water itself, but the person consuming it. The Food & Drug Administration accepts that fluoride is a drug, not a nutrient, when used to prevent disease. By definition, therefore, fluoridating water is a form of mass medication. This is why most western European nations have rejected the practice — because, in their view, the public water supply is not an appropriate place to be adding drugs.

Fluoridation – or any practice that uses the public water supply as a vehicle to deliver medicine – violates medical ethics in several important ways:

It deprives the individual of his or her right to informed consent to medication.
It is approved and delivered by people without medical qualifications.
It is delivered to everyone regardless of age, health or nutritional status, without individual oversight by a doctor and without control of dose.
The safety and effectiveness of fluoridated water has never been demonstrated by randomized controlled trials–the gold standard study that is now generally required before a drug can enter the market.

No doctor can force a patient to take a particular medicine. As explained by the American Medical Association, the doctor must inform the patient of the medicine’s benefits, side effects, and alternatives and then allow the patient to decide whether to take the medicine or not. With water fluoridation, health boards, city councils, and state legislatures simply tell the individual that fluoridated water is good for them and then proceed to add it to their drinking water, irrespective of their consent. Fluoridation us allows government bodies the right to do to everyone what an individual doctor is prohibited from doing doing to anyone.

In modern pharmacology, it is well known that individuals respond very differently to the same dose of a given drug. Thus, the dose of a drug that is safe for person A, may be toxic for person B. This same pattern applies to fluoride as well, as some people in society are known to be particularly vulnerable to fluoride’s toxic effects. Nevertheless, water fluoridation is based on the premise that the same dose of a medicine can be good for everybody, irrespective of their age, health, and nutritional status. Adding fluoride to water thus forces it on everyone in the community, including:

bottle-fed babies (despite recommendations by many dental researchers that infants should not consume fluoridated water);
individuals with poor kidney function (despite their impaired ability to excrete fluoride and their heightened risk for fluoride-induced bone damage);
individuals with iodine deficiency (despite compelling research showing that they can suffer amplified neurological damage from low levels of fluoride exposure)
individuals with deficiencies of calcium, vitamin C, and/or vitamin D (despite the well-documented fact that fluoride’s toxic effects on bone tissue are amplified in these individuals);
individuals who drink large quantities of water, including athletes, manual laborers, and those with polydipsia.
There is no other drug on the market that is applied so recklessly.

There is a reason that society requires prescription drugs to be dispensed by a doctor or dentist: if there are unexpected side effects or the patient is particularly sensitive to the drug in question, the doctor overseeing the patient can intervene and correct the problem. There is no such oversight with water fluoridation. There is no systematic or comprehensive program to track the level of fluoride building up in people’s tissues, or to monitor for side effects that may be occurring (e.g., routine urine and blood tests do not measure fluoride). Doctors are not trained at medical school to recognize the side effects of fluoride (if anything they are taught there are none). Even when people are suffering from overt crippling forms of skeletal fluorosis (fluoride poisoning of the bone), it can take years of incorrect diagnoses and failed therapies to receive a correct diagnosis.

Although water departments can generally control the concentration of fluoride being added to water, they cannot control the dose that individuals receive. This is because the dose depends on two factors beyond the water department’s control: (a) the water drinker’s weight and (b) the water drinker’s thirst. The less an individual weighs, the greater the dose (by body weight) they will receive for each glass of water consumed, and the more an individual drinks (and some people, including athletes and manual laborers, drink a lot), the more fluoride they will receive.

The uncontrolled dose that water fluoridation delivers stands in stark contrast to prescription drugs. When a doctor prescribes a drug he or she always specifies the daily dose very carefully. Even in the same patient, the dose is subject to revision, depending on the patient’s response. No such individual tailoring occurs with water fluoridation.

Randomized controlled trials (RCT) are the gold standard for proving whether a drug is truly safe and effective and are thus typically require before a government licensing body will allow the drug to enter the market. Although fluoridation has been going on for over 60 years, and although fluoridated water is now consumed by over 180 million Americans on a daily basis, there has never been a single randomized controlled trial to determine the safety and effectiveness of either fluoridated water or fluoride supplements.

This may explain why the Food & Drug Administration still considers fluoride supplements as an unapproved new drug, despite over 50 years of dentists and pediatricians prescribing them to their patients. Keep this in mind the next time you hear a dentist or city councilor state that “thousands of studies” prove fluoridation is “safe and effective.”

Flouride Action Network, Fluoride Alert 3 Comments [11/4/2017 2:56:03 AM]
Fundie Index: 1
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 133807

You may ask: what Shakespeare problem? He was one of the most successful screenwriters of the 1990's and he never has to be paid. He gets away with crude jokes that would be called tasteless anywhere else. Shakespeare's just fine the way he is! Shakespeare is high and low. Shakespeare is gay and straight. The Bard, whose personal story is unknown and unquestioned, has been reduced to an icon or symbol of rarefied intelligence, of impenetrable, unreachable genius.
All things to all readers, the author has conveniently disappeared in favor of his words.

The problem has emerged because the few biographical facts that exist about Mr. Shaksper of Stratford-on-Avon don't tally with what we would expect from the brilliant author of the plays and poems. The content, attitude, life experience, interests, and deep classical education evident in the plays surpass what is on record for William Shaksper of Stratford-on-Avon. Nothing in his life suggests that he was the author of the Shakespeare Canon, or had a reputation in his own lifetime to that effect.

The man commonly accepted to be the author Shakespeare was born in the village of Stratford-on-Avon in April of 1564. There is no record of his actual birthday, but the boy was christened on April 26, 1564, and his name, as given, was Gulielmus Shaksper. No, he wasn't Italian, … "Gulielmus" was the scribe's Latin spelling of William. The Shaksper family's name is spelled dozens of different ways, but the most frequent, in his own time, was Shaxper, or Shaksper. The boy's father, John Shaksper, was a glove maker. William Shaksper himself was essentially a grocer, grain trader and landlord by profession. No one in the village of Stratford thought of him as learned, bookish, poetical or theatrical, nor are there any legends, let alone records, of him producing any local entertainment.

The local records only confirm that William Shaksper was a merchant, not a lyricist or genius of letters. Shaksper's will mentions no books or manuscripts. There is no remnant of any evidence that he was even literate himself. His parents and his children could not read. (What writer would not teach his own children to read ?) Nor did his children benefit, or show they had any knowledge of his alleged celebrity as a playwright. The few historical connections which would place Shaksper as an actor or investor in the Globe Theater, or any other theatrical enterprise were all created after the "fact". There is no contemporaneous evidence that Shaksper, the grain dealer of Stratford, was the author of the Shakespeare Plays and Poems. In short, there is a rather big Shakespeare Problem, and it is one of the greatest historical and literary mysteries of all time. The modern image of Shakespeare the Author, in his quaint country cottage, writing for a living while suing his neighbors in small claims court, is a myth. The facts concerning William Shaksper of Stratford-on-Avon tell a different story.

(..)

Because of the peculiar facts stated above and more, critical doubt about the prevailing myth of the Shakespeare phenomenon has been raised over the past several centuries by some of the greatest minds in Literature, Philosophy, and Science.

(..)

The earliest speculation about a hidden hand behind the Shakespeare plays was in 1785, when the Reverend James Wilmot, D.D. attributed the authorship to Sir Francis Bacon. In 1848, an American consulate named Joseph C. Hart speculated in his book, The Romance of Yachting, that the Stratford man could not have written the plays. Hart proposed Ben Jonson as the author.

The issue became popular knowledge in 1857 with the appearance of The Philosophy of the Plays of Shakespeare Unfolded, by Delia Bacon. Nathaniel Hawthorne wrote the preface, and helped with both the publication and promotion. This can be considered to be the first Anti-Stratfordian book. Although this work is ponderous, pretentious, and thin on facts, the author launched a whole genre of thought and criticism with her idea that the Shakespeare plays were a vehicle for a new philosophy, that looked beyond religious minutiae, and was based on a higher love and reason. Because of her name, (though she was not related to Francis Bacon), people have assumed that Delia Bacon was the first Baconian. She was not. Delia believed in a group theory of authorship, though she offered that Francis Bacon supplied the philosophy that infuses the plays. In her book, she named Sir Walter Raleigh as the mastermind who created the Shakespeare Plays, using the talents of a circle of men. In Delia's view this is how it went with Raleigh and Company:

"He became at once the centre of that little circle of high born wits and poets, the elder wits and poets of the Elizabethan age, that were then in their meridian there. Sir Philip Sidney, Thomas Lord Buckhurst, Henry Lord Paget, Edward Earl of Oxford, and some other, are included in the contemporary list of this courtly company, whose doings are somewhat mysteriously adverted to by a critic, who refers to the condition of the Art of Poesy at that time ."

(..)

In the World War I era, research into the authorship problem took a different turn. Robert Fraser's The Silent Shakespeare, 1915, offered William Stanley, the 6th Earl of Derby as the W.S. behind the Shakespeare name. In 1919 Abel Lefranc published Sous le Masque de "William Shakespeare". LeFranc also zeroed in on William Stanley, who was the son-in-law of the 17th Earl of Oxford. The watershed year in this field was 1920, when John Thomas Looney, a British schoolteacher proposed the theory that Edward de Vere, 17th Earl of Oxford, a Courtier to Queen Elizabeth I, was the author of the Shakespeare plays and poems. He outlined his hypothesis and discoveries in his book, "Shakespeare" Identified. This book had a wide reaching impact among intellectuals. It was reviewed favorably in the London press by John Galsworthy. Both Sigmund Freud and James Joyce read "Shakespeare" Identified and wrote about their impressions. Freud actually revised his interpretation of Hamlet in the light of his new understanding.

The "Status Quo" opinion seems to be that "Shakespeare is just fine the way he is." This is essentially the Stratfordian Paradigm. Shakespeare is seen as a miraculous freak of nature: a self educated country merchant who somehow learned the theater inside and out and wrote the plays for money, and nothing more. Within the Stratfordian position there are a thousand mythical biographies of Shakespeare, based on each modern author's deconstruction of the plays and poems, with the few flimsy facts about Shaksper thrown in for color.

The next paradigm or world-view is based on the variation: "Shakespeare had a little secret." This we may term the Radical Stratfordian position. Within this umbrella are theories based on the idea that Shaksper-of-Stratford was indeed the author, but he had a secret life that shamed him, or was dangerous, and has thus never been verified. The most popular is the "Shakespeare was Gay" theory. Runners up are: "Shakespeare was a secret Catholic", "Shakespeare was a Spy", or "Shakespeare was a member of a Secret Society".

Venturing into un-orthodoxy completely we encounter the idea that "Shakespeare was really somebody else, but who knows who?" This is the classic Anti-Stratfordian paradigm. The 33 arguments against Shaksper's authorship of Shakespeare that I listed above have all been fleshed out into full explanations in countless books published in the last 100 years. There are many Anti-Stratfordians, and a good number of them are content to have the whole thing be a fine mystery, without yearning for a definitive answer.

The final stage is called Heresy or Truth, depending on your opinion. It is when one begins to make the claim, that "Shakespeare was __________ " (fill in the blank). If you fill in the blank with Francis Bacon, you are a termed a Baconian; if you complete the equation with the Earl of Oxford, you are an Oxfordian.

Robert Brazil, ElizabethanAuthors 4 Comments [11/4/2017 5:31:46 AM]
Fundie Index: 1
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 133787

I think at this point most people have their mind made up either way, the evidence is out there and the holes in the official theory are absurd to the point of laughable.

The thing that always gets me is who was the number one person in charge of the whole thing?, anyone who has done any Government work will tell you these idiots could not be trusted to run a bath let alone coordinate what went down with the months and months of planning..

I personally believe that the key to the whole thing is undeniable proof of thermite and WTC building 7, someone had to have put the charges and or installed the Thermite, who are they where are they???.. Floating with the fishes not doubt.

slider1982, AboveTopSecret 1 Comments [11/4/2017 2:55:21 AM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 133752

THE Moon landings between 1969 and 1972 never took place and were staged by the US intelligence community, a controversial filmmaker has claimed.

Bart Sibrel claims he has proof the CIA orchestrated the famous Apollo 11 moon landing – and believes no one has ever stepped on the lunar surface because it is too dangerous. Speaking exclusively to Daily Star Online, Sibrel reckons mankind would have set up bases by now if it was possible to travel to the moon.

And he believes the historic event took place in a film set and the crew were actors given instructions by the CIA through ear pieces. Rockets designed in the 1960s, according to Sibrel, were unable to exit the Earth's orbit and would never be able to resist a deadly radiation belt en route to the Moon.

Yet the manned Apollo 11 lunar landing on July 20, 1969, is regarded as one of humanity's greatest achievements. And today marks the historic event's 48th anniversary. Millions worldwide remember where they were the moment Neil Armstrong declared: "It's one small step for a man, one giant leap for mankind."

But Sibrel claims it is all a sham. The filmmaker has been on a mission since the age of 24 to prove the landings were a major cover-up.

Sibrel said he has obtained raw, unedited footage from NASA – that was never released to the public – that features radio conversation between crew and a third confidential party that prompts the astronauts with what to say and when to speak. Sibrel, who directed the film A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon, says: "I consider it not a theory, I consider it a fact.

"For the first three years making the movie, I was under the idea it might not be true. "Then I obtained an outtakes reel." In the footage, a voice says "talk" before Armstrong relays back to Mission Control in Houston – Nasa's headquarters. Sibrel believes this is a third-party voice – he assumes from a CIA agent – prompting Armstrong to speak and what to say.

The 51-year-old said the idea of man setting foot on The Moon is "absurd" and said they were used to force the public's gaze away from the Vietnam War. "If it was so easy in 1969, there would be bases on the moon by now", he added. "(Christopher) Columbus sailed to the new world and it is absurd to say they could do something that cannot be completed today. "They (the public) cannot see it clearly because it's a religious event to them.

"I once spoke to a college professor and asked him if it was revealed Neil Armstrong didn't step foot on the moon, would they believe it? He said he would still think it was real."

Sibrel cites the studies of aerospace engineer Wernher von Braun as another reason why humanity has yet to make it to the Moon successfully.He said the Van Allen Belt – 272 miles from Earth – is impenetrable due to its high levels of radiation and a space rocket capable of reaching the Moon would need to be the size of the Empire State Building and weigh the same as the Queen Mary cruise liner.

Sibrel also claims the Moon is hit by mega micro meteorite storms every 48 hours capable of killing astronauts instantly and damaging space craft. While Sibrel is adamant he has proof the landings are a hoax, he said his family has endured death threats and he took no enjoyment from researching the topic.

He added: "George Orwell said 'who controls the past controls the future'. "Woodrow Wilson was the US president in the 1920s and he said there was a shadow government above him pulling the strings. "I am going to put it all behind me. I've not enjoyed this process in the slightest. "I got kicked out of church, I got unfriended by many people because of what I believe, that the Moon landings are fake. "It's been an interesting experience but so be it.

Bart Sibrel, Daily Star Online 6 Comments [11/3/2017 7:16:28 AM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 133750

Honestly, sadly etc. They will reveal/disclose extraterrestrial existence as a threat once we begin to invest serious economy in space. Think about it: they are going to have to lower wages of the intrepid space traveling labor pool, or shit will get too expensive, far too quickly for their quota. Therefore, we will need a universal common enemy and thru the conduit of politic, we will have lower cost for space labor. Cheap labor is almost always the reason, for... well, everything.

The extraterrestrials must be following a very intense 5th dimensional rule and playbook, because otherwise - as every group has them - some jackass ETs would have "landed" on the White House lawn shitfaced on gas alcohol already. Perhaps the grandfather paradox is legit, or the many-worlds idea allows them to just skip over slices that they fuck up? Despite how intelligent they have to be, they definitely still have a reminiscent soft spot of an Achilles' heel for tomfoolery. With all that power, what left is there to do but amuse yourself?

I have seen UFOs and I "know" they exist, but I do not think that we will ever see definitive proof, i.e., a picture or video. To me, they very well could be "God-like" and be our future lineage that has managed to travel back in time for kicks. I do believe that their presence affects our minds and it wouldn't surprise me at all if our cameras literally cannot capture them as they truly are. Like a true unknown - something potentially hyperdimensional - all we have is our interpretation of what we saw and how our minds perceived them.

Oppenheisenberg, r/UFOs 2 Comments [11/3/2017 7:12:22 AM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 133751

OWEN SHROYER (GUEST HOST): Welcome in to The Alex Jones Show folks. It’s amazing, here we are, so much news and the news is so big and the news is so frequent that the biggest news every day becomes a back-page story the next day. The Las Vegas massacre cover-up, nothing. The JFK files being declassified, Hitler still alive. All the history textbooks lied to us. I was lied to my entire life about JFK, knowingly, by my government. I was lied to my entire life about Hitler, knowingly, by my government. And that’s just a nonstory now because you’ve got another radical truck running people down in the streets.

Owen Shroyer of Infowars, Media Matters For America 3 Comments [11/3/2017 7:13:04 AM]
Fundie Index: 3

Quote# 133767

One of the things not brought up is radar has spewed its death among americans for years,it makes one have less self discipline and more base urges.lower level thought processes. Once it went to nexrad,the gov could now fine tune it to a more average dose and more specific base urges. As a member once said,dems want to take all your money, Repukes want to take away all your fun.

Both are plagues upon the nation.a true anarchist just wants freedom.both parties have defiled the true definition of anarchy. The churches have also joined in this defilement. To heal the nation,freemasonry and eastern stars and tribes like gangs need to be purged.peacefully is preferrable! Revenge begets revenge.show the populace the error of their ways and if they dont change then show them the bars.always peace first! The two political parties use police as weapons.this has lead to police mafias answering to the highest bidder.

Which is the party in control. Two sides of same coin of destruction. Anarchy doesnt sound so bad when you see the other gangs true colors. Currently in my town the freemasons finance the winner of an election and the chosen loser. The loser gets paid to be the fall guy.both are traitors to peace and freedom.

Anonymous Coward, Godlike Productions 1 Comments [11/3/2017 7:38:49 AM]
Fundie Index: 1
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 133749

Very insightful observation. I think you're correct.

It's because the government bureaucracy is a control system. The system can't be shown to not be in control, because that obviates its reason for existence.

Government Spokesdude: "Folks, there are these things flying around the atmosphere, they kinda look technological, and they can and do violate our airspace even over our most sensitive nuclear and military installations. We don't know what they are or where they come from and we can't do anything to stop them. Any questions?"

Public: "Yes. Why are we paying you?"

Commence societal upheaval and bureaucrats losing their phony baloney jobs.

At least, that is the fear from the bureaucratic mind, I think.

It is essential that the government maintains the tacit transactional agreement with the populace that they remain in control and can protect them. UFOs represent a negation of this. I'm unsure as to whether this existential threat is explicit or implicit in government, but it does explain the behaviour toward UFOs over the last 70 years; they want to get ahead of the situation.

My conclusion from this is therefore that they haven't, and UFOs remain a mystery. I guess they have some pretty good gun camera footage and radar tapes secreted away, but that is about it. This is also one of the reasons I don't believe the Black Triangles are secret government craft, btw.

CaerBannog, r/UFOs 1 Comments [11/3/2017 7:10:51 AM]
Fundie Index: 1
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 133707

No! Denying the existence of nuclear weapons is more like not believing that six million Jews were killed in gas chambers by the Germans. Or not believing that the Apollo Moon landings happened. There are lots of examples of things which seem impossible or were once called "denial" of "long established facts". Most Normies without special knowledge, will tell you that "there are tens of thousands of witnesses of the alleged gaschamber killings in "Nazi extermination camps". They don't know, that in fact there are only a handful of people who have been called as witnesses, and most of them are/were unbelievable for many reasons.

Most of the photo and film "evidence" of "nuclear explosions" has actually been analyzed and are in many cases very obvious fakery. Do yourself a favor, and just read the very short explanation as to why nuclear explosions don't exist - the physical science aspect. Just as with the holohoax and the moon landings, and 9/11 most of the believers' claims have been rebutted. It's just that the bigger and older the lie the harder it is to escape from the effects of any gigantic brainwashing operation.

I am a cautious person. Even with the holohoax I will say, that I don't know if they eventually will find evidence for millions being gassed, I can only look at the present evidence and explanations.There is a lot of serious material debunking the existance of Atomic bombs. It was basically a propaganda stunt, or they really tried, but could not make it work, and decided that the propaganda was as good as long as they could convince most of the world.

No I'm not a 100% on this, but that the film and photo evidence is fake, that's for sure. Certainly these arguments and explanations deserve attention. Björkman says he will give a million US dollars to anyone who can prove him wrong, or can present a realistic plan for making an A-Bomb.By the way, why would this be unthinkable, after all the other gigantic scams throughout history. Why be surprised about this one. That is the perfect mind control - no one thinks it is even remotely possible. Just like the way Jews rule us. Most people are unable to see it, even if you give them the stats and figures. I don't ask anybody to believe, but just to take a look at the arguments and the facts.

Amadeu, Stormfront 10 Comments [11/1/2017 2:53:17 PM]
Fundie Index: 8
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 133726

Liz Crokin is a right-wing “reporter” and rabid conspiracy theorist who has dedicated her career to exposing the supposed fact that leading government, entertainment and business leaders are involved in a massive satanic pedophile cult. Recently, she appeared on a program hosted by a former “Survivor” contestant to discuss the various Hollywood sexual abuse scandals, where she declared that Bill and Hillary Clinton are satanists and pedophiles and urged the government to investigate critics of President Trump like Alec Baldwin, Stephen Colbert and Michael Moore to uncover their ties to pedophilia.

Crokin said that the sexual abuse scandals in Hollywood “completely coincide with the occult” because this abuse “is directly related [to] satanism … It is part of an occult ritual that these celebrities, politicians, powerful people are engaged in because they believe in Lucifer, they believe in Satan and they believe that sexually abusing children literally gives them spiritual power.”

Crokin asserted that she “knew that Kevin Spacey is a pedophile” because he “is very tight with the Clintons,” whom she asserted “are both sexual predators and are pedophiles and that will be proven to be true very soon.”

Reiterating her belief that those who criticize Trump are likely involved in pedophilia, Crokin declared that “the people that are involved in child sex trafficking, that are involved in pedophilia—or maybe not pedophilia but have some major criminal activity to hide—they’re the ones screaming the loudest against Trump.”

“I would say Robert DeNiro needs to be looked at very closely,” Crokin said. “I would say Alec Baldwin needs to be looked at very closely, I would say Stephen Colbert needs to be looked at very closely, I would say Michael Moore needs to be looked at very closely. You’ll find that these elite pedophiles, they’re very close friends and they all hang out and they’re all marked members of the same club an they’re all doing the same stuff.”

Liz Crokin, Right Wing Watch 3 Comments [11/2/2017 5:26:43 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: kuyohashi

Quote# 133668

That's why I don't do Disney. I read that McDonald and Disney were added to the number of Olympian families...interesting if true because that means these two companies support Olympian (a.k.a. Illuminati) goals.

Sharon Rojas, Facebook 3 Comments [11/1/2017 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 133558

Eisenhower’s presidency had coincided with a long period of peace and prosperity. Indeed, the title of the popular 1970’s TV show, Happy Days, refers to its setting in the 1950’s. The Eisenhower years mark the peak years of “the baby boom” and upward mobility of all classes and ethnic / racial groups. Apart from a minor and short-lived recession in 1958, the 50’s truly were “the good old days.”

One would therefore think that the Republican Party (aka GOP for Grand Old Party), with its popular and superficially likable “war hero” presiding over these “happy days,” would have greatly expanded, or at least maintained the Congressional majorities which Ike inherited upon winning the 1952 election in a massive landslide. This was not the case. To the contrary, in spite of two massive Eisenhower landslides, the 1950’s turned out to be a history-altering bloodbath for House and Senate Republicans, and it was not by accident.

1952 & 1956: Eisenhower won two historic landslides and remained popular for the full eight years of his presidency. Meanwhile, conservative Republicans in Congress were picked off by the dozens. Why?

There were two elements driving this extremely odd paradox of such a popular president not having any election “coat tails” for his fellow Republicans to grab onto. First, the Globalist media, while constantly exalting Eisenhower on one hand, trashed what was then a mostly conservative, anti-communist, constitutionalist Republican Congress with the other. But the real death blow of the one-two punch knockout of the GOP Congress came from Eisenhower himself.

During the 1954, 1956, 1958 and 1960 election seasons, Eisenhower -- with the exception of a few liberal “modern Republicans” -- refused to lift a finger in defense of his beleaguered colleagues. He was the one man in America who could have protected the patriotic anti-communist Republican Congress from the daily whipping it was taking from the Globalist press, but he refused. Robert Welch describes Ike’s silent treachery of 1954, which only grew worse in subsequent Congressional elections, and peaked during the 1958 mid-term elections in which the GOP lost an additional 49 seats in the House, and 14 in the Senate. Welch:

“Nor can there be any slightest question about the disruption of, and damage to, the party being intentional. Eisenhower not only refused to do any campaigning for, or to give any White House moral support to, the Republican Senatorial and Congressional candidates – he left their campaigns permanently disorganized through his deliberate delaying tactics with regard to his expected support, which was never forthcoming. Then, at the very last minute, he went through face-saving motions, of which a high-school politician would have been ashamed, with his fantastically childish scheme of chain telephone calls.” (6)

“Delaying tactics,” eh? Just like the World War II delays which got so many Americans killed while preserving Eastern Europe for Stalin! The final paradoxical results of Eisenhower's sabotage were truly astonishing -- all the more so when we consider how popular Ike had remained from start to finish of his 8 year reign of ruin. Here are the final "before and after" numbers:

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

1952: 221 Republicans and 213 Democrats = R +8

1958: 153 Republicans and 283 Democrats = D +130

SENATE

1952: 49 Republicans and 47 Democrats = R +2

1958: 35 Republicans and 65 Democrats = D +30

As shocking as those statistics are, there is more to the numbers than meets the eye. You see, many of the Senate and House Republicans who did manage to survive the Eisenhower purge were "modern Republicans" -- today known as "RINO's" (Republican in Name Only). And most of the incoming Democrats who replaced them were of the extremist Marxist variety. Their dominance would shape the course of America's political, economic and cultural decline for decades to come.

There can be no doubt. Eight years of Ike killed the Republican Party, just as it had the conservative majority of the Supreme Court... by design. No bloody wonder Democrat Sulzberger's New York Slimes and Democrat Meyer's Washington Compost endorsed him, twice.

The Democrat Party, which had been on the brink of destruction just six years earlier, knocked out the Republican Party in an epic rout. Yet “Republican” Eisenhower always remained popular. The result pleased Eisenhower and Democrat Senate Leader Lyndon B. Johnson very much.

Mike King, Tomato Bubble 6 Comments [10/30/2017 7:45:49 AM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: Yossarian Lives

Quote# 133660

Oh god. Another Pro & Against vaccine , GMO & organic vegan debate debacle. Can't we all see, on both sides, that this is what they want ?? They incite confusion in the 'science' so that we have no idea what to fucking believe.

All the quibbling over what is best just adds to their cause to bring down Veganism and adds to the reputation of the meat , dairy , egg & pharmaceutical industries. We're all pawns, fighting each other and benefiting their cause. Keep arguing - keep losing.

djpetebrooks2, r/vegan 2 Comments [10/31/2017 1:32:28 PM]
Fundie Index: 1
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 133663

I went to the same indoctrination box that we call public education that you did. I choose to think for myself. What makes you think vaccine manufacturers wouldn't have an agenda to spread misinformation so they can continue to fill their pockets with billions of dollars of profit per year? I choose not to inject a toxic concoction into my body and it's MY right to choose what goes into it.

It's not my fault if your technology doesn't save you from the boogie man ancient diseases that have mostly disappeared in modern society due to slowly improving our immune systems through healthier diets and better hygiene over the past century. Disease rates were already steadily decreasing over 50 years before vaccines were created. Inject all the aborted fetuses into yourself that you please but don't accuse ME of endangering YOU.

xjakes, r/vegan 3 Comments [10/31/2017 1:32:47 PM]
Fundie Index: 1
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 133588

Gods are immortal men and men are mortal Gods. Still ,the justice of the Gods is different than the justice of men many people believe in the world that Romanians do not work and are only stealing and many people believe in Romania that I have no right to be in the Stellar age because of the crimes of my father commited in the year 1995

I was told that Simona Halep will never reach number 1 in the world of tennis because of her Romanian flag Andrei Tataru Cristian Dracula told me back on 1st of january 2016 that she will exit top 10 because Romania does not deserve to be there and he is an American spy a traitor for us

Still the justice of the Gods is different because the Gods of Atlantia are Immortal light beings who make more than 50% ethical deeds and have a broader Vision of things I also have this broader vision

I know that Artemis humiliated Athena Simona Halep yesterday she shall be number 1 in the world for another 11 weeks with no Shining still the Shining can be great but it is Nothing in the eyes of the Supreme Unmanifested Gods Artemis does not understand this simple fact of life

people here may say that I live in the medieval age while they have teeth and are roaming the stars and I did nothing compared to them but the justice of the Supreme God is much higher than those who seek to destroy me now Lemuria is humiliated and the Red Race has still 3days to rule just like Atlantia was humiliated on 7th of october 2017 now a second version of me is roaming the halls of the Atlantean city Ramad Nilan in the Bucegi mountains now our fleets are destroyed and twisted dovahkins are controlling this planet

but... I shall give the Divine Mandate to Artemis my beloved twin sister in the 2-3 days Because this is the Constitution of Atlantia. Apollo

Lucian Apollo Zalmoxe Aeli, Godlike Productions 6 Comments [10/29/2017 3:50:00 PM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 133576

I am fully convinced that now transgenderism is a psy-op meant to infiltrate and undermine the feminist movement. Now a male can do anything he wants. He can not only incite horrific crimes against women, he can also steal the label woman from us and force us to accept his delusions that he is a woman, against all evidence of biology and science.

Whatever delusions that males create with regards to women is taken as the truth, while the truth of women's lives and what we truly are is taken to be lies and just paranoid imaginings on our part. Is it any coincidence that transgenderism is all the rage in countries where women are more privileged? No one would want to be a woman in the Middle East, or many Asian and African and even Latin American countries.

They only want to be what the male fantasy of what a woman is. It's also no surprise that countries that are persecuting homosexual people are also forcibly offering sex reassignment surgery to them because they would rather not have two people of the same sex in love with each other.

Misanthropia, Feminist Current 8 Comments [10/29/2017 12:55:21 PM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 115839

12 Methods America Is Using To Turn France Into A Globalist Nightmare

Uncle Sam eats your children and you pass him the salt

Recently, Roosh shared with me an article in three parts on a conference that took place in Paris in 2010, initiated by the US ambasador to France, Charles Rivkin and aimed at many influencal figures of the state. The goal of this confidential conference was to deconstruct the French identity and sovereignty through different actions.

The document was released on Wikileaks and can be found here. It is a written proof of the will of the American government and investors to interfere in the domestic affairs of our sovereign state, something that we see in our daily lives. Here are the fields on which the multicuturalist and globalist decisions maker focus:

1. School

Being a former teacher, I noticed the introduction of constant changes since my youth and the education I received. An even stronger cultural masochism is taught to our kids at school. Racist and racism are the almighty go-to words that instantly discredit the hour-long argumentation of anyone, even when backed with research and scientific proof.

Educational lobbies are changing the school programs to teach the glory of African kingdoms and the expansion of Islam, instead of French history and civilization. Leftists call anyone who wants to focus on native history and its figures a “neo-colonialist.” As French polemicist Eric Zemmour puts it, destroying “the French National epic” and its heroes is the goal. The Rivkin program also includes redefining French history in the school curricula to give attention to the role of non-French minorities in French history.

The decision of teaching more about Arab kingdoms than French kings belongs to the current Minister of education, formerly Minister of Women’s rights, Najat Vallaud-Belkacem, a short-haired Arab woman born in Morocco who became French because her dad worked in France. She is fighting against sexism and inequality, is pro-abortion and stumps for the rights of the gay and transsexual lobby. I am obviously expecting an unbiased decision.

Rivkin states in the report of the conference, that the 1,000 American English language teachers employed at French schools will be provided with the propaganda materials necessary to inculcate the desired ideals into their French pupils.

2. Kids shows

The earlier the better. Back when I was a child, the cartoons I watched depicted mighty heroes crushing the enemy, often bloodily. There was a conflict between good and evil and a lesson taught. The story had a beginning, a chain of events, and an end. Now every episode has too many characters (all diversity-approved) who are often weak, but that’s ok because everyone is nice and worrying about the unknown is intolerant. The creators teach children that being a weakling is not a problem and that working on your looks is not important because true beauty is in the heart.

As the son of an ambassador, Rivkin had no experience in foreign policy and diplomacy. He was appointed because he had experience in including multiculturalist propaganda in kids’ shows and being the CEO of the Wildbrain company, which created Yo Gabba Gabba! among other things. Watch an extract of the show if you don’t know it, you will understand what I mean.

[...]

4. Food

The phenomenon of “malbouffe” (junk food) is smearing our rich culinary culture and became an essential part of our young people’s social life and diet. Coca Cola, McDonald’s, and other giants advertise everywhere and fast food “restaurants” just pop out of nowhere, even in the remote countryside. So does liquid sugar merchant Starbucks and its open support to homosexuals.

Our national agrarian system is now invaded by pesticides and automated agriculture. The opponents of it are quickly silenced. With the GMOed Frankenstein turnips and corn created in American labs, the plants mutate and the people will soon pay the price.

Small local producers disappear and the large companies put what they want in the food. We are still slightly protected by our national laws on food quality and protected labels. But for how long?

5. Influence on native youth

The Hipster-loving, tattoo-sporting, slut-celebrating culture as reached them and they love it. It makes them feel so special. So did lesbian and pansexual attention whoring of the girls, taught by pornography and the Hollywood crowd.

Promiscuity is on the rise, thanks to apps such as Tinder, the fashion of selfies, likes, attention-whoring, nudes sent on smartphones, Sex In The City, Instagram and the promotion of the hook-up culture, even if the young girls become more feminists. It goes only one way: against men.

The destruction of the nuclear family model and healthy relationships between men and women is the objective. The global culture turns our girls into unfuckable modern art masterpieces and our lads into fragile chicken-legged boys in skinny jeans and snapbacks for the urban predator to rob and attack.

6. Hollywood culture

The Hollywood sphere keeps unloading its filth in France. Open homosexuality, metrosexuality, narcotic abuse, along with Pitt-Jolie and their adopted African kids, brought around like a new handbag are everywhere in our tabloids. Everything they do is cool—changing religion like you change underwear, becoming a woman because you are bored, mudsharking, being gay as a three pound note. The words they say are followed by the mass like the bloody Gospel.

7. Destruction of nationalism

The civil rights and feminist movements that trampled the ideas of freedom of association and patriarchy inspired the plague that are the anti-whites of SOS Racisme (oh, the irony) and the anti-heterosexual male feminists of Ni putes, Ni soumises (“Neither Whore nor Submissive”).

Regionalists and nationalist movements and their sympathizers are filed by the police and intelligence services like they supposedly do with the potential jihadis.

Observe what happened in Corsica lately. The police services are moving heaven and earth to find the handful of men that broke into the Mosque and smashed the kebab place, but leave the youths that attacked the two firemen and the police officer that sparked the gatherings of the patriots in the first place. When a handful of Corsicans show more patriotic balls than millions of hand-holding JE SUIS CHARLIEs, there is an issue.

The objective detailed in Rivkin’s report is to monitor and counter any party that does not satisfy their agenda, namely nationalists and traditionalists, dubbing them “racist” and “xenophobic.” The words verbatim: “focusing on the decrease in popular support for xenophobic political parties and platforms.” This is to ensure that the program is working as it should to block the success of any “extreme” or “xenophobic” party that might challenge globalization.

8. Consumption

The consumerism brilliantly orchestrated since the end of World War II started with GIs distributing cigarettes and chocolate to French children after four years of rationing during the Occupation, and continues with the giant American corporations pushing us to purchase things we don’t need. Inside every French, there is an American trying to get out.

The explosion of advertising budgets of the likes of Pepsi, Kellogg’s, or McDonald’s shows it. Some courageous peasants lead by Jose Bové, seeing the threat, tried to take McDonald’s influence apart physically, by crushing one of their joints with their tractors. They failed, as they had limited means compared to the gigantic reserves of cash the corporation had.

Before, the French were champions of recycling and inventiveness. Now they throw away without repairing. There is an obsession with novelty and the newest gadgets. This also helps them collect your data and know your taste so they can propose more things to buy. “Oh you bought X Item, you will also like Y and Z item! Buy, buy, buy!”

9. Influence on non-native youth

The Quick burger chain in France now wants to have the cool halal image and will only serve halal meat in a few years. McDonalds France already serves halal meat but does not advertise it and admits serving it without explicitly warning their clients. So do KFC France and Flunch.

The halal market is a gigantic and lucrative one, as the client that buys it pays a tax directly to the mosques and their private funds on the pretext that they are the authorities that validate every kilogram of halal meat produced. Some large chains of supermarkets focus more and more on their halal clientele. In addition to the sanitary risks of halal slaughtering, the problem is that the natives have to adapt to the non-natives’ diet in the name of equality.

There is also a strong phenomenon of “thugization” of the black and Arab youths in the housing estates of the big cities. All of that thanks to the rap and gang culture, brought by American television shows and the gangsta clips on MTV.

10. Communication tools

The tablets and smart phones reach us younger and younger each year. Every schoolkid that can barely read already has a smartphone, an open door to porn, and the rest. Every family has one, and they replaced the baby-sitters.

Your position is always known thanks to your phone and they will listen to what you say if they want to. They know how many of you are in the house, what is your daily routine, what you buy, and what you read. The algorithms and data are kept.

The policy of “état d’urgence,” initiated following the Paris attacks, allows the government to bypass all the laws about digital privacy on the internet and is directly inspired by the Patriot Act that followed 9/11.

With the development of smartphone video games, more entertainment online, more immersive and time-consuming games where the mind is put on pause, you have fewer people thinking and questioning whoever is in charge.

11. Celebrations

Ah, Halloween. Another hardly disguised consumerist celebration. Occulting the autumn equinox and All Saints’ Day, trampling the tradition of family meals and flowering the graves of our loved ones, one pack of cheap lollies at a time. Overpriced costumes and diabetes for the kids, slutty behaviour and bad decisions for the grownups. Well, at least the pumpkin farmers thank you.

Santa Claus, invented by Coca Cola, pulverized Saint Nicolas that my father used to sing about and greet as a child. The cries of ungrateful brats under the Christmas tree because Barbie’s caravan does not include the picnic table replaced the Christmas carols. My grandfather used to say “When I was a child, we got an orange and a candy stick for Christmas. If we did not behave, we got a bag of coal. So don’t complain.”

[...]

Don’t be fooled—you are next on their list. Their end game is to submerge us into one big melting pot of global consumerism, to uproot every individual from an identity and heritage and replace that with the global shopping mall, and the “global village.”

Jean-Batave Poqueliche, Return of Kings 15 Comments [1/6/2016 4:12:33 AM]
Fundie Index: 3

Quote# 133555

Egypt knew no Pharaohs nor Israelites

What if the whole story of the Exodus from Egypt was a fake story, and what if we could prove that it is?
Whenever we say ‘the Exodus’ everybody unconsciously and instantly recognizes the story as the fleeing of the Israelites headed by Moses from the grip of Egypt’s ruthless Pharaoh. Thanks to the Church, the Synagogue, the Mosque and of course Hollywood films this Exodus story has sunk deep in the collective subconscious of the masses, so deep that the story of Moses and Pharaoh has turned into an almost unshakable historical truth that once took place in Ancient Egypt.
But actually nothing in the ‘milieu of that story’ indicates that it happened in Egypt, except maybe the mistaken association between ‘Pharaoh’ and ‘King’ of Egypt.
Likewise, nothing in ancient Egyptian records or its oral tradition say or even allude to the fact that this tale of Moses really happened in Egypt. Even more shocking is the fact that the ancient Egyptian records do not refer to the Kings of Egypt as Pharaohs. Yes, Pharaoh was never a title for Egypt’s king. Linking Pharaoh to Ancient Egypt is merely a myth propagated by centuries of falsehood brought about by misleading interpretation of Biblical history.
The only reason we know the story of the Exodus happened in Egypt is because the Bible says so. We keep on believing that is the case because mainstream Egyptologists just went along with the Biblical narrative and absentmindedly designated Egypt’s Kings as Pharaohs. But if we examined the Hebrew text the Bible (currently in our hands) used as a reference we will strangely not find Egypt mentioned in it as the site/land of the Exodus story. The whole mess/deception took place during translating the Hebrew/Aramaic stories into Greek back in the third century BC. This is when Egypt was first hijacked and forcibly placed in the Hebrew Bible as the theater of the Israelite landmark stories. Ironically this whole act of duplicity took place on Egyptian soil and specifically at its legendary library of Alexandria.
But what if the Bible as we know it has long been tampered with?
•What if the first western translation of the so-called Israelite stories, that came to be known as the Septuagint Bible, was a distorted translation?
•What if the Israelite stories we all have been made to believe took place in Egypt simply did not?
•What if Egypt was fraudulently introduced in the Bible as the theater of the Israelite stories?
•What if the homeland of Judaism and the early Israelites is not Palestine?
•What if ancient Egypt never knew any so called Pharaohs?
•What if Abraham, Joseph and Moses never set foot in Egypt nor even dreamed about it?
What if the whole story of the Exodus from Egypt was a fake story, and what if we could prove that it is?

(Bolding mine)

Ashraf Ezzat, Amazon 5 Comments [10/29/2017 1:10:25 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 133522

John Edmonds is selling his 9.67-acre horse ranch because he can’t stand the constant paranormal activity he says he deals with.

The Stardust Ranch in Rainbow Valley, Ariz. has been featured multiple times in television shows and international media for its purported alien activity. Edmonds and his wife Joyce say they’re fed up with interstellar interference.

Edmonds claims he has slain 19 aliens with samurai swords and he and his wife have endured abduction attempts.

“They actually levitated her out of the bed in the master chamber and carried her into the parking lot and tried to draw her up into the craft,” he told NBC-affiliate KPNX.

The couple purchased the ranch in 1995 with the hopes of leading a peaceful life operating their horse rescue organization.

“Almost immediately from the day we moved in, we began to have strange experiences,” he said.

On his Facebook page, Edmonds regularly updates his friends and fans of the day-to-day experiences of living on the so-called Alien Ranch.

Under one image of what appears to be dried blood and a katana, he described the method of destroying the “greys.”

“Unless you cut the head off and disconnect the antennae, so to speak, they instantly ‘phone home.’ Even with a razor-sharp sword, it is nearly impossible to decapitate them with one swing,” he wrote.

“Some are very intrigued and have no issues with the history of the property, while others are absolutely scared to death about what may or may not happen to them if they should buy it,” she said.

In addition to its paranormal features, the property boasts a ranch house with five bedrooms, four bathrooms, and a large diving pool.

Edmonds warns prospective buyers to be prepared to live on the ranch.

“It’s not something for a traditional family, but it holds a lot of secrets and what I believe are future opportunities to understand forces that are in the universe,” he said. “Please be very well grounded because the energy here has the tendency to manifest with whatever is going on with you.”

John Edmonds, Global News 7 Comments [10/28/2017 9:38:12 AM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: dxdydz

Quote# 133514

Following Monday's rebuttal piece about China's "authoritarian" leader, Xi Jinping, and the rapid progress of China, a long-time reader and English ex-pat living in China wrote in to confirm and expand upon what we had published about the success of what is essentially a Chinese version of market-oriented fascism. His letters, coming from first person experience, were extremely enlightening and uplifting -- yet a bit heart-breaking at the same time.

We say "uplifting" because of our admiration for China's positive energy, self-confidence, economic development and cultural advancement. As lovers of humanity, we wish all the peoples / races of the world the best (well, maybe not so much for some of badly behaving elements we refer to as "the usual suspects"). But we also describe the letter as "heart-breaking" because it makes the painful sense of loss for us westerners all the more stark and acute. We Europeans once had that very same "mojo" which China is now rediscovering. But a certain "they" (cough cough) took it away from us, and it doesn't look like we'll be getting it back anytime soon, if ever.

We read and appreciate all comments / letters which come in -- even though we can't respond to them all -- but we generally don't publish the feedback. But this was too good not to share with "youse guys" (New Jerseyese for the plural of "you"). We don't know if our English reader would have wanted his name published or not, so we'll just refer to him as "The Englishman in China." The following comments / letters constitute his full testimonial about the dynamic "communist" fascist nation which has wisely banished the New York Slimes, the Soros groups, Fakebook and various other Globalist NGO's from its land.

BANNED IN CHINA!

Soros (cough cough) -- Zuckerberg (cough cough) -- Sulzberger (cough cough)

Original Comments from Englishman in China: Damn right! I've lived in China for many years. The people here (including myself) have a far better quality of life and are much freer than people living in DEMONcratic England where the people are physically and mentally abused on a daily basis.

ANYT: You do? Where? What else can you share with me? Would love to get a western / ex-pat's perspective.

Englishman in China: I have always felt much freer here in China than in England. The police act as civil servants and have little if no public presence out of the foreign tourist spots (which is all mainly for show). The police in normal areas sit around wearing gym shoes smoking and generally relaxing. They also help cut trees and do road maintenance etc. No high viz meat-head glorified thugs here. The police don’t usually get involved in people’s affairs, and prefer to watch from the side lines, monitoring situations, more than interfering and controlling. I have many examples of this if you want. Another thing I love about China is their non-use of sirens. Police don’t use high pitched ear bleeding sirens (like you hear 24/7 in England, even in small villages) which upset and distress people on a conscience and subconscious level. You very rarely hear sirens, only very occasionally a low pitched and much quieter warning from an ambulance.

The Chinese people are far happier than the people in England. This is because they are not physically and mentally abused by an onslaught of highly disturbing and negative fear based tripe on an hourly to daily basis. I love watching the Chinese news. The people are kept in control here, not by fear based tactics, but instead by a constant relaying of positivity, that China is a wonderful country, and that it’s economy is strong and secure. Honest opinions are heard about North Korea, that it is the Americans who started it in 2006 (?) and that lil Kim is only reacting to protect his people. Very little time is spent on Globalist NWO fake news, preferring to report on all the positive things that are happening in China. There is a huge optimism here for the future which is refreshing. England has a feeling of decay and degeneration.

Old people here are respected and they enjoy a much better and healthier quality of life. They are the elders, they are cherished. They are always seen sitting outside together, playing board games, doing QiGong and spending time in the community, unlike the helpless, terrified, caged and mostly ignored elderly of the UK.

"It was the stupid people in their 60’s and over who voted out of Europe!" Instead of, "the elders have spoken. They have more wisdom than others, and their views are to be respected." The elderly are active members of the community and work in the public gardens and volunteer for things like road safety assistance.

I could continue for ever. I love China, it’s people, it’s strong and protected cultural traditions and its ‘for the people’ government. Okay, Falun Dafa persecution, corruption etc., they are not perfect, but compared to the corrupt demon infested ‘democratic’ governments of England, who are actively setting out to perverse and destroy their own people and culture, China is wonderful in comparison.

If you want more I am more than happy to continue.

ANYT: Sure...very interesting. How did you end up there? is that your permanent home now? What city / region?

Englishman in China: Notes to Mike 2 -- I have lived in and around Nanjing for six years. I am now travelling and currently in DaLi. It’s wonderful.
China has a very strong sense of nationalism. They know who they are and are very proud. The Chinese flag is hung everywhere, and why shouldn’t it be? I remember in England after "Brexit" when people who hung the British flag outside their homes were called racist (palm over face, groaning deeply). The general consensus is that "we are the best country in the world", again, is a refreshing optimism that holds energy and vigour.

The country has very strong reemerging religious movements. Yesterday I went to a Christian church here in DaLi. China is covered with Buddhist, Daoist and Confucius temples. People practice QiGong openly in public areas and spirituality is strong.

Patriotism and religion --- considered "old fashioned" in the oh-so-enlightened West, are important elements of China's Renaissance.

I have never felt so free as I have felt these past six years in China. The Chinese people pretty much do whatever they want. The way they see it is, China is "theirs", all of theirs, and not the governments. When the smoking ban came in, it was totally ignored, and still is to this day. People sell fruit, vegetables etc. on the street. The government tried to clear it up, they moved the sellers on, but the next day, the sellers came back. This continued on a daily basis, sellers being moved on, sellers coming back, until the police stopped moving them on. Fantastic haha. For six years I never paid income tax, and many businesses don’t. Just because there is a law, it does not mean that it is followed or enforced. This is the opposite to England where laws are completely followed and glorified like the words have come down from God himself. The enforced smoking ban was imposed here without a vote, in a "democratic" country.

Bills are very low and affordable, water, gas and electric bills are barely noticeable. Public transport is incredibly good and incredibly cheap! English railways are the biggest scam in comparison. For me to travel on a brand new bullet train going 300 km an hour from Nanjing to Shanghai it costs me 14 pounds. That’s the expensive rate. I can also take a "slow train" (the same as the fastest trains we have in England) if I can’t afford 14 pounds, and travel for 4 pounds. That’s 346 km. I can take a 20 hour slow sleeper train from ChongQing to KunMing (650 km) for 14 pounds. If you miss your train, you just go to the desk to change your ticket or get a refund. If you miss the extortionate and highly crappy train in England you have to buy another ticket. It costs me 8 pounds to do a 10 mile train journey from my home to the nearest city in England. It’s 80 pounds to go from Norwich to London (150 km). In China, everyone can afford to travel, there’s a rate for all income brackets. Brand new subways and buses are pennies to use. Trains are efficient, modern and affordable.

China’s got talent! You know, I absolutely detest the manufactured drivel on the X factor and Britain’s got talent. I have always hated watching that debauched filth. But you know what? I love watching the Chinese version. It’s really beautiful and the contestants have real talent. The clothes and dance routines are highly respectful. They play traditional Chinese instruments and sing wonderfully soft and compassionate Chinese songs.

The hospitals here are amazing. All appointments are same day, no three month waits like at home. You just turn up, pay about 30 pence to see a doctor, and wait your turn. Simple and effective. The pharmacy’s are industrial scale natural herbal medicine outlets and are within the hospitals. They prescribe herbs for your condition which you can have boiled up for you into daily servings at the hospital and then posted to your house in a two week supply for an extremely cheap price. It’s very good indeed. When I had a server skin condition here, the doctors refused to give me antibiotics as they are damaging and only used as a last resort. ALL the doctors have prescribed for the same condition in England IS antibiotics! In China they asked me, what am I eating, they looked at my tongue, they asked me what my stool looked like. They actually try to cure you naturally and to get to the root of the problem. In England, they ONLY prescribe big pharma drugs without asking and recommending anything else for diet or lifestyle. As you know these drugs only make you even more ill.

China has incredibly low immigration, about 0.06% of their population. "Racist" bastards! Everything is done by Chinese people. When I get to the airport in England I am always amazed to see that about 95% of the staff are non white native British people. "Oh, we don’t want to do those types of jobs anymore so we need to give them all to immigrants." Bullshit! We are becoming so mixed now it’s incredible! When I fly to China, of course, there are only Chinese workers.

NO FOREIGNERS ARE ALLOWED TO WORK IN CHINA DOING A JOB THAT A CHINESE PERSON CAN DO!

Foreigners are not allowed to work in bars, restaurants, sweep the streets, work in airports, factories etc. because it would take the jobs from the Chinese people. Wow! Imagine if we had that level of common sense in our countries! Foreigners are ONLY allowed to do things the Chinese CAN’T do as well, for example, teach English. And that’s the law here. Bravo!

Funnily enough, the Chinese actually are openly racist. "Black people are lazy, we don’t like black people." "White people are very intelligent and we admire their work ethic and achievements." I hear this sort of thing all the time! But no, it’s the Whites that are racist, never the Chinese.

China isn’t overrun with advertisements from corporations mind controlling you to buy things that you don’t need. On their buses and subways, instead of countless adverts, the government shows videos about how to keep healthy, how to practice QiGong, how to cook healthily, why you should quit smoking, why taking natural herbs and medicines are good for health and the over use of mobile phones etc.

And finally, counter to what people in the West think, China looks after the families it buys the land from for development much much better than the west. It actually makes the land owners mega rich. They want more people to be rich to fund the economy because the government own the corporations whereas at home, the corporations own the government. Big difference! I have a friend and the government took her house to build a sky scraper on. They gave everyone of her family members an apartment each (8 people). The apartments are worth a lot of money. They all live in two and rent the rest. On top of that they gave an extra 8 apartments which they sold and are now millionaires! The whole family doesn’t need to work ever again! This is happening EVERYWHERE in China.

We once had that optimistic "swag" in the White West --- that healthy sense of belonging, solidarity, community, purpose, justice and culture which China has rediscovered. May we find it again.

Boobus Americanus 1: I read a Letter-to-the-Editor in The Anti-New York Times today from a British ex-pat living there. The letter writer really seemed to admire what China is doing.

Boobus Americanus 2: Like Xi's China, The Anti-New York Times is so fascist.

Sugar: Damn sstraight, Boobuss! You got a frickin' problem with that?

Editor: One billion Chinese, and one Englishman, don't seem to.

Mike King and the Englishman in China, Tomato Bubble 3 Comments [10/28/2017 11:17:41 PM]
Fundie Index: 0
Submitted By: Yossarian Lives

Quote# 133454

How stupid does one have to be to think a cancer cure doesn't exist?
Edit
Scientists have the ability to make salmon with 6 pack abs, animal human hybrids called chimeras, and the ability to send satellites across galaxies and send pictures back through some form of mystical space wifi, yet there's no cure for cancer. Get the f out of here, of course there's a cure. Too much money involved for the powers that be that want you to know about it.

CRISPR technology itself should prove that there's a cure for cancer, just by how advanced it is.

Jeffery, Yahoo! Answers 11 Comments [10/27/2017 5:04:53 AM]
Fundie Index: 1
Submitted By: zipperback

Quote# 133556

[From "Dr. Gerberding or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love Vaccines"]

Welcome my fellow goyim; my name is Dr. Frank Einstein and I am here to calm your uneasiness on the question of vaccines. Many of you may or may not know that here recently a lady was jailed due to the fact that she refused to follow the court order to vaccinate her child. The child thankfully has since been vaccinated. Nothing like a little government intervention to give Progress the boost it needs from time to time. Just imagine where the South would be if there had been no forced integration back in the sixties.

Now lets start off with the most ludicrous claim: vaccines cause Autism. As many of you know these claims have been around for quite sometime now and there have been countless studies debunking this fraudulent accusation. The fact that they refuse to do Double Blind Placebo test for most vaccinations is totally irrelevant. I mean how negligent and uncaring would our government have to be to mass-produce vaccines for the public without actually testing them for side affects, if they were potentially that harmful. If you want an example of the wrong way for a government to handle it look at Japan. They just simply banned the MMR vaccine after noticing a large part of the population started developing adverse affects (only including a few instances of Autism, blindness, and death). But what would you expect from a country that allows its schools to use Mein Kampf as “teaching material”. Another argument these delusional people will make, is that the minuscule amounts of heavy metals somehow cause it.

It’s not like the stuff is being injected directly into your child’s bloodstream. If anything this abrupt rise in Autism is a genetic defect due to homogeneous societies. Diversity, our greatest strength, will undoubtedly solve this within a few generations.

Of course there are a few other concerns like how the vaccine industry is set to make $61 billion dollars in profit by 2020. So what if international corporations make a lucrative profit off what you’re injecting into your children, just think of all the refugees they’ve saved by allowing them to acclimate to our society through the miracle of vaccines. Or how we have the highest rate of SIDS in the industrialized world and we are also the most heavily vaccinated. It’s just another freak coincidence my fellow goy, giving these coincidences too much attention can be dangerous. Before too long you’ll be buying into all these conspiracies about globalism and our greatest ally Israel. Speaking of this blessed race the American Jewish Committee gave Julie Gerberding their first ever Woman’s Global Leadership Award. She earned this from not only her tenure as the director of the CDC, but also her current career at Merck where she is the head of their vaccine division. She is truly a champion of global industry and health.

In closing I know there are a few things still not covered such as the infamous “vaccine court” among other things. Yes, there will still be naysayers, people not convinced by the facts so conveniently placed before them. This short essay will in no way placate all the emotional soccer moms enraged at the fact that their precious child may never become potty trained much less start a family of their own. They will have to search a little longer before they can so easily lay the blame elsewhere. I’m just here to remind those of you who aren’t yet too far gone that vaccines are 100% absolutely never ever going to be dangerous.

Don’t look into it. There’s no need. After all you can trust me, I’m a doctor.

Frank Einstein, MD, Identity Dixie 2 Comments [10/30/2017 7:45:39 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: JeanP