1 5 6 7 | bottom
Quote# 2315

I cannot believe that you could close your eyes to the scientists from EVERY discipline who submit their substantiated findings on a ~daily~ basis through numerous, and various, media outlets that (1)Disprove evolutionary theory and establish the fossil record as evidence of Creation, (2)wonder aloud why the debunked and erroneous carbon dating is still being utilized, and (3)state that the very existence and quandary of the "missing link" disqualifies evolution as a "theory" in the first place. You are calling our greatest scientific minds (Newton, Einstein, etc.) liars, and proposing that you are "more enlightened" than they. ....Oh, how interesting....this VERY situation - your exact thought processes were prophesied in the bible over 3,000 years ago!

BeachBeliever, Rapture Ready 8 Comments [2/1/2003 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 8

Quote# 2316

[On miscarriage]Well, if you think about it, that's probably the BEST thing, as far as the baby goes, because he/she goes straight from the womb to heaven for eternity.

fourgivn1, Rapture Ready 9 Comments [2/1/2003 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 2317

Here's an example of a prediction based on information from the Bible. The lifespan of people before the flood was up to and above 900 years. Even if you eliminate cavities, our teeth tend to wear down, rot, or break over a period of about 100 years. If God designed us to live up to 900 years or more, one would expect that God would have either designed our teeth to be stronger or designed us to get new teeth. As it turns out, people who live well past the age of 100 DO actually get a new set of teeth. Some people even get them as young as their 80s. So the prediction is confirmed by the evidence.

npetreley, Christian Forums 16 Comments [2/1/2003 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 5

Quote# 2318

[Repeating the <a href="http://www.snopes.com/science/stats/10percnt.htm" target="_blank">10% brain use myth</a>]If we were designed to live 900 years, one would expect to find unexplainable anomalies in our understanding of the human body, becase we're only seeing a small snapshot of what the body was designed to do or handle. And that is exactly the case. As it turns out, we only use a fraction of the memory capabilities of our brains. If we lived to 900 years or more, we would use most of the remainder. Obviously our brains were designed for longer lives.

npetreley, Christian Forums 10 Comments [2/1/2003 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 1

Quote# 2319

In addition, if you extrapolate the accumulation of certain minerals in the human body over 100 years to a longer lifespan, the body would become poisoned by these minerals at age 300. Our body has no known means of eliminating these minerals. However, it is my hypothesis that the appendix is an organ that is designed to 'wake up' every 300 years and eliminate these toxic minerals.

npetreley, Christian Forums 15 Comments [2/1/2003 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 2320

Why should natural selection choose one organism to survive and reproduce and not another?

William A. Dembski, ISCID Forums 12 Comments [2/1/2003 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 5

Quote# 2321

Those Christians who do not accept creation have been brainwashed by the school system to believe a bunch of lies. There is no evidence for evolution, however there is very much evidence for creation.

Guest, YouDebate.com 10 Comments [2/1/2003 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 8

Quote# 2322

There are no contradictions in the Bible, different people simply wrote them different ways.

Guest, YouDebate.com 14 Comments [2/1/2003 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 3

Quote# 2323

As i've read through all these forums, all you evolutionists seem to have different stories, or different "proven!" theories, and ya'll all just basically prove eachother wrong by going on about what you think you know. atleast all us creationists have our facts down right and know what we believe and don't help prove our beliefs wrong.

Laboo, EvC Forum 5 Comments [2/1/2003 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 2

Quote# 2324

to bad I'm not talking about tuberculosis, do some reading (Im not talking about websites) on the subject and you'll understand that becoming immune [to antibiotics] isn't evolution. Sort of how we become immune to the chicken pox after getting it, or gaining the same immunity from your mother after you are born.

hobbst3r, EvC Forum 8 Comments [2/1/2003 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 3

Quote# 2325

I'm just using this as a clear example of the kind of deception that is happening in the Roman Catholic Church. We can't fight this kind of deception with logic or reason. Arguments are of no avail. While we do need people out there speaking the truth so that when their eyes are opened they will see it, I don't think there is anything to be gained with constant arguments back and forth with people who are so deceived. It just doesn't work.

Don, Rapture Ready 3 Comments [2/1/2003 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 3

Quote# 2326

There is much scientific evidence of a world-wide flood. You can't ignore the evidence.

Becky, Rapture Ready 21 Comments [2/1/2003 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 5

Quote# 2327

[Replying to 'Can he make a square circle?']If God is omnipotent, then the answer to these questions is yes. God, the inventer of logic, is not bound by what He created (just as I, an artist, am not bound to create my artwork the same way every time - I am the creater, not bound the the constructs of my artwork).

edgtheo, Rapture Ready 10 Comments [2/1/2003 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 0

Quote# 2328

[Replying to 'Can God make a rock so heavy he cannot lift it?']Not only can God create the unliftable rock, but He could also lift it. Again, why could He not? If your answer is simply because it does not make sense, then you are right in the effect that it seems to not make sense. However, by doing so you are trying to restrict God to the level of your intellect (and I grant your intellect is quite impressive, but not equal to God's).

edgtheo, Rapture Ready 26 Comments [2/1/2003 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 0

Quote# 2329

No human being was there when the earth was created. There are no 'first hand accounts'. The only first hand account that we have to go by is the Bible.

Sojourner, Rapture Ready 18 Comments [2/1/2003 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 2330

Carbon dating has a circular logic that tries to prove archeology with geology then geology with archeology. It is unreliable considering +or- 1 million years to be good. If carbon dating is what you are basing your agnostic beliefs on then you should reconsider

rwluke, Rapture Ready 6 Comments [2/1/2003 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 3

Quote# 2331

[After someone explains carbon dating doesn't work on things over 50,000 years old]Well, When I was in high school, back in the 80s, the carbon dating method was used to destroy my faith in Jesus Christ. Whether or not it is used today for dating 50000 years out. So now its known not to work so well on those ~5 million year old fossils.

rwluke, Rapture Ready 7 Comments [2/1/2003 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 5

Quote# 2332

The problem with psychology is that it looks to man for the solution rather than God, and reduces behavior and human problems to functions of chemicals in the body. It is inherantly anti-supernatural and skeptical.

Halden_Doerge, Rapture Ready 16 Comments [2/1/2003 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 6

Quote# 2333

Medicine was doing fine before Darwin. What great advances occurred because of the evolutionary thinking? Aren't humans beyond the reach of natural selection anyway?

joelazcr, Christian Forums 17 Comments [2/1/2003 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 8

Quote# 2334

We know that an atom is composed of protons and electrons. If the protons are positive and the electrons are negative, then what keeps the electrons from crashing into the positively charged nucleus. If the nucleus is completely made of positive material, what holds it together? Wouldn't it fly apart because of the like charges. We know that gluons don't because they have never been observed or measured. How would they hold the atoms together anyway, no force is really strong enough to keep electrons away from the nucleus or to keep the nucleus together. That is, except the power of god. Check out this verse...Colossians 1:17

tacoman528, Christian Forums 17 Comments [2/1/2003 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 5

Quote# 2335

[After someone explains the Strong Nuclear Force]Seems like a pretty good arguement to me. Like I said, gluons have never been observed, measured, or proven to exist. They were made up by Athiests to try to explain the phenomina of why the nuclei stay together. Gluons do not exist.

tacoman528, Christian Forums 8 Comments [2/1/2003 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 2

Quote# 2336

And why, may I ask, do you think the atom does not collapse or the nucleus doesn't fly apart

tacoman528, Christian Forums 13 Comments [2/1/2003 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 2337

None of you seem to know the answer. So I will have to properly inform you. If anyone here thinks they know the answer, then say it. In Colossians 1:17, it says that Jesus holds all things together. Its the only thing that makes sense. Think about it. You don't know the answer, yet the answer is before you. It is Jesus that holds everything together. I've given you my answer which is completely logical.

tacoman528, Christian Forums 12 Comments [2/1/2003 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 6

Quote# 2338

Bush's proposal is justified, even if it is first strike, as Iraq jeopardizes world peace. However biblically the government should be of a monarchy.

GTX, Christian Forums 3 Comments [2/1/2003 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 2339

All of you 'former Christians' turned Atheist are weak minded, and weak souled. You won't find real Christians turning away from God because some Message Board dork tells them to.

Billdemart, Christian Forums 13 Comments [2/1/2003 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 5
1 5 6 7 | top