1 2 3 4 5 8 | bottom
Quote# 97739

This is an interesting article, but I disagree with the beginning: “Over the last 50 years, America has witnessed the cultural ruin of its women. When women fall, an entire way of life and civilization itself are not far behind.” The reality is that the cultural ruin of America was caused by women. Specifically, women’s political, sexual and financial freedom is largely responsible for the decline of the West and not some abstract “culture.”

We harp a lot on liberalism, but what is liberalism but female thinking unbounded? I finally understand what that famous author meant when he said that civilizations die by suicide. Every civilization at the peak of its power, prosperity and wealth, and in a moment of decadence, emancipates women and, in a few short decades or centuries, it collapses. Babylon did it. Sparta did it. Rome did it. Now America will do it.

The basic problem with cultural discrimination is that it requires a theory or theories about how the world works. To have theories about how the world works requires making generalizations that are tested by, and adjusted to, reality. Women are diametrically opposed to generalizations. Why? To avoid having the analytical power of the generalization applied to womens’ physical appearance or other characteristics.

What all women implicitly understand, but are loathe to admit, is that 90% of a woman’s value is embedded in her physical appearance. Men choose women largely on looks based on a sliding scale of what men want and what they can get. The problem for women is that physical appearance is not only determined at birth, but it has a limited shelf-life. Whatever advantages women derive from looks do not last.

Now, when women were married at 20 and, a short time later, busy with their own children and families, the impact of this knowledge was limited. Family life occupies its own sphere and kids suck the narcissism out of women. With women competing in the world with men, this worry about appearances blooms to a neurotic high. Women are never certain if their success is the result of “who they are” or how they look. Consequently, this neurosis permeates every sphere of life within which women operate.

This is how you get a female police officer telling an investigator in the Berkowitz case that “Jews and Italians date, too.” Or, Maureen Dowd’s permanent screams on why society no longer finds her attractive. Or, the articles about the new standards of (chocolate) beauty established by Michelle Obama.

Women are at war with themselves and their short-term, pragmatic, narcissistic neuroses have swallowed the Western world.

Mark P, The Thinking Housewife 31 Comments [11/19/2013 4:10:46 AM]
Fundie Index: 37

Quote# 97737

I would call him a heretical Pope. (That is not to imply that Evangelical leaders of various stripe do not merit the same charge.)

“I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father but through me.” John 14:6.

Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, 20 and teaching them to obey everything I have commanded you.” Matthew 28:19-20.

“And there is salvation in no one else, for there is no other name under heaven given among men by which we must be saved.” Acts 4:12.

Any Pope or Church leader who asserts that all “religious” roads lead to heaven is sure to suffer the sentence set forth in Matthew 18:6, following:

”But whoever causes one of these little ones who believe in Me to sin, it would be better for him if a millstone were hung around his neck, and he were drowned in the depth of the sea.” Matthew 18:6.

And the greatest sin is the sin of unbelief: in denying that Jesus is God and that Jesus alone is the atoning sacrifice for our sins.

Essentially, the Pope is insinuating — as did President George W. Bush who said so explicitly in a video-taped interview with Charles Gibson — that Islam’s Allah is the same “God” that Christians worship.

May the Pope, the theologically liberal Evangelical “leaders,” and all other heretics of the true Church be brought to their knees in repentance and contrition for their blasphemy against the Holy Spirit; Lord have mercy on them.

Debra C, The Thinking Housewife 24 Comments [11/19/2013 3:50:12 AM]
Fundie Index: 28

Quote# 97729

A group of Arizona politicians — all Republicans, of course — have proposed a law (House Bill 2467) requiring public high school students to recite the following oath in order to graduate:

"I, _______, do solemnly swear that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic, that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge these duties; So help me God."

To quote Comedy Central’s Ilya Gerner: “Nothing says ‘I take this obligation freely’ quite like a state law that withholds your diploma unless you swear an oath.”

Kevin Bondelli adds:

"… graduating high school is not the same thing as voluntarily accepting the responsibility of a public office or admission to the legal bar. A high school diploma is, with extremely few exceptions, required to have a chance to live above the poverty level. It is the culmination of an education that up until that point was compulsory."

It’s bad enough the Republicans are demanding loyalty of the kind normally reserved for members of Congress and beyond — but there’s also no way I would say those last four words, and the current text of the legislation does not allow for any alternatives.

In other words, if this bill were to become a law, atheists would either not be allowed to graduate… or they would be forced to lie so they could graduate. Neither option is acceptable.

Mike Sunnucks of the Phoenix Business Journal points out another problem:

"The Arizona bill could also face legal challenges if it is approved."

"Jehovah’s witnesses, some Muslims and pacifist Quakers have in the past challenged loyalty oaths imposed by the federal government and other agencies, saying they conflict with their beliefs and religious professions. Similarly, some Arizona students could challenge the proposed high school oath as a violation of their religious liberties and freedom of expression."

This bill is the work of Representatives Bob Thorpe, Sonny Borrelli, Carl Seel, T.J. Shope, Jeff Dial, David Livingston, Chester Crandell, and Steve Smith.

Smith and Shope have also introduced legislation demanding that all students in grades 1-12 recite the Pledge of Allegiance (with “Under God”) every day. At least in that bill, students can get out of saying it with their parents’ permission.

No such exemption exists in the Loyalty Oath.

Keep in mind that in both cases, the bills do not help children get a better education. That’s the saddest thing about all this. The people who are in charge of fixing the education crisis are proposing solutions that would only waste more classroom time and exclude many students from graduating despite fulfilling their current requirements.

***Update***: While the bill still includes the God language, Think Progress reports that it may be revised:

"As written, the bill does not exempt atheist students or those of different faiths from the requirement, though Thorpe has pledged to amend the measure. “In that we had a tight deadline for dropping our bills, I was not able to update the language,” he wrote in an e-mail to the Arizona Republic. “Even though I want to encourage all of our students to understand and respect our Constitution and constitutional form of government, I do not want to create a requirement that students or parents may feel uncomfortable with.”

So it’s possible alternative language may solve the atheist problem, but *requiring* students to take the oath still poses a host of constitutional issues. Another option would be to make the oath optional, but that would make this bill completely irrelevant.

Which would be fine by me.

(Thanks to Brian for the link)

Bob Thorpe et al., Patheos 31 Comments [11/19/2013 3:39:43 AM]
Fundie Index: 27
Submitted By: aebars

Quote# 97717

Moonbats Make Ms. Marvel Muslim

You need a strong stomach to be a kid these days. The push to instill political correctness through comic books has created a female Muslim superhero:

Marvel Comics is bringing Ms. Marvel back as a 16-year-old daughter of Pakistani immigrants living in Jersey City named Kamala Khan.

Here’s what Ms. Marvel used to look like[...]

Not very politically correct, what with the white skin and even blonde hair. But that’s been fixed.

The reengineered Ms. Marvel isn’t the first attempt by the comics industry to promote Islam:

DC Comics last fall relaunched its “Green Lantern” series with Simon Baz, an Arab American and Muslim. … Marvel Comics has Dust, a young Afghan woman whose mutant ability to manipulate sand and dust has been part of the popular X-Men books. DC Comics in late 2010 introduced Nightrunner, a young Muslim hero of Algerian descent reared in Paris.

Jersey City is a suitable home for Kamala Khan, having a large Muslim population. That’s where the first World Trade Center attack originated. But Ms. Muslim Moonbat Marvel won’t have to worry about any unwelcome attention if she crosses the Hudson River into Lower Manhattan. New York’s incoming communist mayor has proclaimed, “I will ban all surveillance and profiling of Muslims.” The WTC is all forgotten now.

Give it another few years and the moonbats who create comic books will have Kamala Khan striking heroic blows against capitalism and Islamophobia by using her superpowers to steer airliners into office towers.

Dave Blount, Moonbattery 42 Comments [11/19/2013 3:32:19 AM]
Fundie Index: 42

Quote# 97715

Gonna say this....Creation occurred within six literal 24-hr. days.

God did not utilize any form of "evolution" in his creation of mankind.

The Earth is approximately (and the known Universe as well) 6,000 to 10,000years old.

"EVOLUTION"...and the empirically verifiable facts about it are indeed absolutely true.

"Evolution" does not prove that man came from monkeys...but, it does demonstrate, however, that pretty much all dogs came from a common ancestor in the canine family....

It doesn't demonstrate that reptiles miraculously evolved into birds....but it DOES demonstrate that the saltwater crocodile and the Florida Alligator have a common ancestor....
It makes the (absolutely problematic and horrifying) prospect that Bull-Sharks (who have now all but adapted perfectly to fresh water) are a truly "evolving" specie....and we have to account for them......and their ancestors were exclusively salt-water sharks, period.

There are certain facets of verifiable scientific fact, that help us to understand more fully the Scriptural teaching, and they are not to be ignored...but, don't read into the Scripture more than is there.

The Scriptures NEVER NEVER NEVER disagree with verifiable and provable "Science".....if they initially APPEAR to...then, either our understanding of Scripture, or our beliefs about the natural World are wrong, and need to be re-examined...


Phrases like: "The Bible is not a 'scientific' text"....are meaningless. superfluous and serve nothing but to obfuscate the real questions...That's a meaningless phrase. It is "historical" and it's also "scientific". It INSISTS that every statement it makes is to be taken as LITERALLY true....There's no such thing as "Theologically true, but Scientifically false" or, as some would have it on B.B...."Theologically meaningful, but not historically factual".

That's a load of meaningless crap.

For YEC's (like myself) we need to admit FULLY what facts of science serve to modify or alter our understanding of Biblical truth such that we more fully understand Scripture....But, is a "Young-Earth-Creationism" still a viable and intelligible option????.......Absolutetely it is............

But it ISN'T served by simply DENYING every scientific fact about the verifiable known Universe.

I am a Bible-Believing...Literalist...Young-Earth Creationist...who denies no KNOWN facts about "Science" that I am aware of...The Bible's account is to be taken literally...the days were 6 in toto...they were essentially 24 hrs. in duration, and EVERYTHING he stated that he created was done in that time-frame. The Bible squares PERFECTLY with "Science" neither is to be discarded. They are both (if properly understood) correct.


I also am intimately familiar with Hugh Ross's work...he also denies the Universality of the Noahcian flood...He's wrong. I like Ross, but he doesn't get it.

Inspector Javert, Baptist Board 37 Comments [11/19/2013 3:32:12 AM]
Fundie Index: 31
Submitted By: Meeeh

Quote# 97713

For upwards of 38 years I have warned that America is heading for a fiscal fall that will make the old crash of ‘29’ look mild by comparison. In the last ten years, I have written numerous articles and reports that give warning about America’s continuation of the abortion genocide and our wholesale entrance into the realms of prurient interests and gross perversion.

The message was appendaged with a warning about a dirge of poverty and scarcity. Today that message has seen its entrance with Obama’s healthcare spectacle looming against America’s wealth and posing the single greatest threat to our fiscal stability since the stock market crash and the days of the great dust bowl.

A reduction in the average income per household, shrinking jobs markets, shorter work weeks and now huge increases in healthcare costs are only the beginning.

The horror stories already coming out of the ObamaCare inauguration are being called ‘mis-information’ by the President, but the dullest minds can see that the facts don’t jibe with the Obama diatribe repeatedly offered to counter what we are all seeing unfurl before our very eyes.

What we know is that America has not been listening to the messages of warnings from her best voices. What we should know is that God is not so hard of hearing.

God hears the cries of the nearly sixty million slaughtered unborn human beings who were discarded like so much useless refuse. He hears the cries of those distraught with the breaking down of foundational principles like marriage between one man and one woman. He hears the outcry against the full acceptance and coddling of perversions and porn.

He has done today, what he did in the ancient times, he has measured out a three pronged appeal over a sufficient amount of time (a generation) and he is now entering into stage three. When the three appeals are finished, all that is left is judgment or a chance for us to repent and set the record straight once again. It is the last gas on this road before our little journey comes to an inglorious ending.

The three appeals call first to the head, secondly to the heart and finally to the wallet.

For years I have proclaimed that Americans are capable of justifying any trend that comes along, but when you touch the pocketbook you will get their attention. While it may be far too late to rectify this problem it may produce a new direction for many – quite long overdue.


Michael Bresciani, Christian Post 27 Comments [11/19/2013 3:31:36 AM]
Fundie Index: 23

Quote# 97709

All femisphere women are repulsed by decent men. Most femisphere women aren't really human beings but poorly behaved dogs. fschmidt, men around him and me know this. It is pathetic manginas like who deny this because they are immoral and oppose monogamy because they want a short term benefit of sleeping around with as many sluts as possible.

coconut, Why, God, Why? 43 Comments [11/18/2013 4:20:50 AM]
Fundie Index: 36

Quote# 97702

If you are shot, who do you blame, the bullet or the person who pulled the trigger? And which do you think these women are closer to? For me, the answer is unquestionably that they are like the bullet. Women are not capable of independent thought, so they cannot really be held responsible for their actions. All traditional societies have recognized this and have held the father or the husband responsible, while of course giving them the authority they needed to guide women’s behavior. Modern women can no more be blamed for their behavior than a spoiled toddler can be blamed for throwing a tantrum.

It is the men in modern culture who are fully responsible for the horrible culture that causes women to misbehave. If men came to their senses, they could instantly revoke women’s vote and enforce basic rules of decency including monogamy. It wouldn’t take long before women learned to behave in a civilized manner. So don’t blame the women.

Franklin, thatincelblogger 39 Comments [11/18/2013 4:20:36 AM]
Fundie Index: 50

Quote# 97675

[From a post titled, "Debunking some of the lies people say about me".]

You attacked your parents !

One thing you have to know about me is that my incel used to make me extremely depression and unmotivated at times. When people who not only don’t understand incel but don’t want to help you for 10 years come shouting at you, calling you a loser, lazy, telling you that your incel is all your fault and that you could find a girl anytime you wanted to, if you wanted to, all while trying to grab you by the head in order to “show you there’s nothing in it” you tend to get pretty mad. Anyway, they didn’t want to press charges against me, realizing they were assholes.

You wanted to rape your mother !

Actually, all I did was beg her for sex a couple of times I was very, very frustrated and sex starved. I did not want to have sex with her any other time than those few times nor do I want to now.

You blackmailed a woman for sex !

This lie is often repeated by a couple of extremely stupid feminist women. Some have even called it rape and, sadly, I know they weren’t kidding. This is how sick feminists are, and, as Eivind Berge can tell you, this would actually be rape in countries like Norway… If I had really blackmailed her.

In fact, what happened is that this woman offered sex than changed her mind when I said that it will be weird having sex using condoms because the previous girl I had sex with was on the pill. Not that I wouldn’t have sex with her with a condom, like they claim, only that it will be kinda weird in the start. She immediately said she changed her mind. I then tried to persuade her for 3 hours (which is normal male behavior, not coercion) and when she eventually agreed to do it again she changed her mind once more. You know why? Because I asked her to write “brb” during our Facebook chats. She just said she’s not gonna do it and that I should forget about her.

What many of you don’t understand is that she wasn’t doing this to Joe Average but to a guy who was incel for 10 years and whose only sexual experience prior to that was having sex with a girl twice for like 30 seconds. I called her on the phone and cried, begging her not to treat me the way she did but she didn’t care about the stress she just put me through at all. So I called her again and insulted her, being rightfully angry. After that I put just one of her pictures on this blog, without her name, location, anything, without calling her and telling her I will remove it if, just deciding to leave it up there out of sheer rage.

It was her who called me and offered sex to remove it. It was to be just one hour of sex, with no cuddling or kissing, and I was never to call her and contact her again. Of course I had to accept it. Only a person who doesn’t understand incel or a raging feminazi would say it wasn’t right to accept it. I would be insane not accept it.

Saying I was a creep to accept is brazen hate, not just against incel men or generally lonely men, AGAINST ALL MEN AND THEIR SEXUALITY.



thatincelblogger, thatincelblogger 119 Comments [11/18/2013 4:20:01 AM]
Fundie Index: 55

Quote# 97672

A girl I went on a date with yesterday just blocked me on Facebook without any explanation whatsoever. She never sent me a single message after we have seen each other but I predicted this would happen once I saw her disgusted face at the end of a date yesterday.

After my 20th rejection just this year I am instituting a new policy – a girl rejects me, I start a defamatory blog on her. These girls won’t know my real name so they’ll have to pay thousands of dollars to even establish who I am. Since I can’t afford to have criteria this will apply to absolutely any woman who rejects me. I’m starting with this girl.

I’ll let you know how the implementation goes. I have had enough rejections this year. 20 is more than enough. Now it is payback time.

Liberal monsters, known for confusing cause and effect to try and explain their lunacy, will say that this is the cause of women not wanting me. But it isn’t. I didn’t want to do this until now. This is an effect of female cruelty and sickness.

If you think I’m being unreasonable I’m imploring you to have no criteria at all and still be rejected over 50 times in your life, just 20 this year. It is painful. I have nowhere to “go on” to at all.

thatincelblogger, thatincelblogger 50 Comments [11/18/2013 4:19:54 AM]
Fundie Index: 41

Quote# 97658

(GGG/Coconut/Marjan Siklic abandons his idea where governments apparently assign women to incels)

Two things have recently happened that have opened my eyes

1.discussion on Cracked
2. I started sharing my ideas on domestic forums and basically got the same kind of obnoxious, retarded replies I get everywhere else

Franklin, a commentator on my blog, more widely known under a nickname fschmidt is right. A sick culture will never understand incel. It was stupid from me to believe in this cause. From now on I will no longer blog or post about the program anywhere else as it is a utopia. My pages on the program or even questions commentators here asked will be deleted (of course, those commentators will not be banned or censored in any other way). I have recently read all of Franklin’s material and I found out that he was right all along.

During my blogging and posting on other sites, mostly reddit I have encountered thousands of negative comments and barely a dozen positive ones. Common sense would dictate that it means that people would never implement this program. I could understand that much, but hoped that the mentality will change. Once I realized that it won’t and that the new generations will become even more and more irrational and idiotic I have decided to drop my previous cause.
But it really isn’t as easy as “some people disagreed with me and now I think basically everybody is scum”. I have thought about my life a lot and something snapped. All the events in my life found their true meaning. All the times I’ve been mistreated and abused now make sense.

The fact that a large majority of people are against my former idea isn’t the main reason why there is no point in even writing about it, let alone fighting for it. It is not so for this very strong argument could be countered by a notion that a growing number of incels might bring about the creation of such program one day. This is actually somewhat of a possibility but now I’ve become somebody who doesn’t think this would be a good idea.

A growing number of incels won’t be helped by my program for one basic reason- almost everybody in the modern culture is scum. So, while this scum can be incel and might even want this program for their own sake I don’t see anything good in letting scum breed. A counterargument to that might be that the modern culture makes a large number of decent men incel but I don’t see how they would get real help as decent men today are in very small numbers and will almost certainly not find a decent woman through the program, as the crux of the program isn’t about incel women joining but paying noncel women to join (which is necessitated by a huge disbalance between the number of male and female incels). Yes, decent women are somewhat likely to be incel but women who are scum aren’t. So there would be no substantial help.

One day, not that far from now, modern culture will collapse under the weight of its own evil and banality. Once a moral culture takes its place incel will no longer exist or only people who will be incels are those who deserve to be incel. It is currently the other way around. Most of those who deserve to be incel are very successful at finding partners and most decent people are incel.

My blog will now be about incel, love-shyness, anti-feminism, modern culture (which is an evil and psychopathic one), looking for women abroad and everything else that might be interesting to me and readers of this blog. Will my blog became just another MRA/manosphere blog? I don’t think so and will try to not make it so. I think I can offer some unique perspectives as somebody who had been 100 percent incel for most of his life and has experiences most people will never have. I have taken my own red pill but of a quite different nuance.

As for myself, upon realizing all this I had immediately decided to abandon most of my friends and no longer visit my shrink. All they did was feed me modernist bullshit. I will try to get to a country outside of femisphere but it’s probably not gonna happen as I am poor and have shitty major (history) so I’ll probably end up offing myself.

thatincelblogger, That Incel Blogger 67 Comments [11/18/2013 4:19:50 AM]
Fundie Index: 34

Quote# 97524

Whether a mother forces her daughter to be a whore for money, or whether a mother allows her daughter to whore for recreation, she's a whore either way. In this country, probably 1/3 of high-school age girls are whoring with parental consent. I don't approve of either type of parental pimp. We all understand that recreational murder is just as bad as murder for hire, but why don't we all realize that recreational prostitution is just as bad as prostitution for hire?

ibantam, WND 23 Comments [11/18/2013 4:19:40 AM]
Fundie Index: 27
Submitted By: JeanP

Quote# 97422

Overwhelmed, wearied and confused by years of attacks of all kinds a slim majority of Mainers grudgingly handed the sodomy movement the keys to Maine’s home. Tragically marriage, family, decency and common sense are all collapsing in the Pine Tree State. The truths of Genesis 19 and Romans 1 are becoming evident. I am encouraged by the efforts of Dave Smith and the Illinois Family Institute to avert this same disaster in the Midwest.

Fourteen states have fallen to the radical homosexual agenda. New Jersey is the latest state to pledge obeisance to this evil. And make no mistake, a society’s decision to turn it’s back on God’s definition of marriage can end only one way. Judgment and destruction. Now is the time for Christians everywhere to increase their commitment to groups like the Illinois Family Institute. No matter what happens this year with the marriage debate Christians must deepen their resolve to live as Christians in our modern world. We must choose to do this out of love for God and our fellow man.

Sexual sin is a destroyer. Jesus Christ is the creator. We are His creation, and we must defend and assert this proposition relentlessly in America. In God we Trust.

Mike Heath, Joe. My. God. 31 Comments [11/18/2013 4:19:20 AM]
Fundie Index: 25
Submitted By: Aspergus

Quote# 97132

We didn't outlaw the "natives", we outlawed their savage behavior. It seems to me the day is coming again for white men to don their collective cowboy hats and maybe learn to play a new game--cowboys and asians as well as cowboys and mestizos.

Sounds kind of fun, to me.

nolocontendre9, Taki's Magazine 19 Comments [11/18/2013 4:18:17 AM]
Fundie Index: 32

Quote# 96780

Is Allah in Hell for not believing in God?
Since the Christian God is obviously the real one, does that mean Allah is in Hell for not believing in him?

Best Answer - Chosen by Asker

Allah, buddha, the god of Jehovah Witnesses works, the mormon god, all the 300 million hindu gods and other gods are there. Every knee shall confess that Jesus is Lord.

Asker's Comment:
Yeah, God's going to send all those other imaginary Gods to Hell for sure.


Michael, Yahoo Answers 30 Comments [11/18/2013 4:17:36 AM]
Fundie Index: 36

Quote# 97708

In Norway a woman is never at fault for her actions, no matter how irresponsible. If a woman has any sexual regret at all, for any reason whatsoever, a man is always guilty of rape. Kudos to Dubai for standing up to this feminist ideal. While I am no fan of the sex-hostile moralism of Sharia law, their system is clearly superior to ours and admirably equitable. I don't agree with criminalizing fornication. But if we must have so repressive laws, it is much fairer to hold the woman responsible along with the man in cases of regretted sex (and in this case the man was sentenced to prison as well, just not for rape). Sharia law is the lesser of two evils. Rather than institutionalizing false victimhood like feminist law does, it holds both sexes accountable to rigid moral standards. I would take excessive moralism over excessive misandry any day. Thus, as an MRA, I applaud Dubai and I welcome Islamization of Europe too, over feminism at any rate.

Eivind Berge, Eivind Berge 50 Comments [11/17/2013 7:32:20 AM]
Fundie Index: 52

Quote# 97707

(Note: The linked article concerns the cancelled speech of NYPD Commissioner Ray Kelly at the Taubman Center at Brown University).

Somebody should have gone all Kent State on these morons. Shout us down, we shoot you down. Point. Counterpoint. Or should I say, hollow point. Now, as I was saying...

DepthTested, Brown Daily Herald 21 Comments [11/17/2013 7:31:26 AM]
Fundie Index: 32
Submitted By: Knight of Liberty

Quote# 97705

As our liberty is continually being crushed by the ‘abortion president,’ a Senator named Ted Cruz fights for Americans in Washington, DC.

Rafael Edward “Ted” Cruz was born December 22, 1970, 2 years and one month before baby killing was legalized in this country. The name Rafael in Hebrew means ‘God heals.’ Edward means ‘wealth guardian’ and Cruz means ‘cross.’

Interesting it is that this potential healthcare train wreck threatens the fiscal future of the United States and its people (wealth guardian?). The senator’s goal is to defund ‘obamacare,’ a plan that will result in denial of treatments for a generation known as ‘the baby boomers’ in the United States.

The very title of this legislation ‘obamacare’ is yet another lie: he obviously doesn’t care about the United States or its people. However, the ‘abortion president’ does care about jihadists and those who are sworn enemies of this country! He has proven this over and over; most recently by waiving a law that prohibits giving weapons to terrorist groups. His administration is now arming Al Qaeda and Al Nusra jihadists while Christians are relentlessly being slaughtered throughout the Middle East.

He is not stupid. This ‘president’ is succeeding beyond his wildest dreams. He has links to the muslim brotherhood, whose stated goal is to undermine and destroy the United States from within. If this horrendous ‘law’ isn’t derailed, every American will suffer and our country will continue its trajectory away from the God Who heals, His holy cross and any blessings of prosperity once connected with this weary land.

PS: Senator Mike Lee is speaking now against ‘obamacare.’ The name Michael means ‘who resembles God?’
The name Lee means ‘healer.’

We know Who heals and it’s not this ‘president.’

Anon, The Abortion Prophecy... 24 Comments [11/17/2013 7:30:48 AM]
Fundie Index: 33
Submitted By: Hasan Prishtina

Quote# 97704

OK. Let’s check out Barry Soetoro’s signature. The first item that should draw your attention is the large O which contains two other letters. Let’s pay special attention to that sectioned-off and isolated portion of his signature for a moment. In an article online, a blogger noted how the ‘O’ was shaped almost perfectly like an egg, not a round symmetrically shaped circle which obviously would be easier and more natural to write. Look at the ‘O.’ It’s almost painstakingly drawn to resemble an egg:




Did you know that the system of Islam views the world as egg-shaped?

Stay with me….

Next, let’s look at the ‘ba’ that’s isolated within the egg shaped ‘O.’ They are grouped, as if the three letters are separated for some strange reason. Well, I discovered the name ‘Oba’ is Egyptian and it means ‘scepter holder and king.’

So, quite literally, in a muslim/Arabic symbolic and literal way, that isolated portion of Barry’s signature means ‘Islamic world king and scepter holder.’

It has always been my belief that this ‘president’ makes a point, whether overtly or symbolically, to [b]extend a wink[/b[ and a nod to those who hold a special place in his heart…and it seems they’re never Americans.

Anon, The Abortion Prophecy... 43 Comments [11/17/2013 6:17:09 AM]
Fundie Index: 55
Submitted By: Hasan Prishtina

Quote# 97690

The disastrous effects of global warming are most certainly man-made, said Christian historian David Barton. No, not because we’ve been burning fossil fuels. It’s because God is mad at us. And no, he’s not mad us for burning fossil fuels. All this “climate stuff that we can’t explain,” Barton explained in a conversation with televangelist Kenneth Copeland, is God’s judgment wrought down on us for, among other things, abortion.

Together, the two worked out this basic sequence of events to explain their alternative theory of climate change:

1. America voted in politicians who support abortion rights.

2. In so doing, we “opened the door to the curse,” which includes floods, tornadoes, murder and pedophilia.

Back in the days of early America, Barton explained, if crazy weather was happening, the first thing leaders would do is “call for a national day of repentance, humiliation, fasting and prayer … and today we’re saying, ‘Oh no, it’s global warming.’”

In reality, he said, “We opened a door that lost God’s protection over our environment and that’s our choice.”

David Barton, Salon 44 Comments [11/17/2013 5:02:57 AM]
Fundie Index: 32
Submitted By: Kevin Klawitter

Quote# 97688

Night of the living ENDA

Just like the flesh-eating zombies in Romero's classic 1968 horror picture Night of the Living Dead, the sinister "Employment Non-Discrimination Act" (ENDA) won't stay in the grave. Although attempts to add "sexual orientation" to the list of federally protected people date back to the early 1970s, ENDA was first spawned in 1994 and repeatedly re-introduced and killed in subsequent Congresses. Back in April, it again became undead in the Senate, as S. 815, by pro-homosexual Democrat Senator Jeff Merkley of Oregon and 55 cosponsors, two of whom are Republican: Susan Collins (ME) and Mark Kirk (IL). In the House, we can "thank" openly homosexual Congressman Jared Polis (founder of ProFlowers) for its latest incarnation as H.R. 1755. A vote in the Senate is now imminent.

ENDA's requirements and prohibitions for employers are "justified" under the umbrella of previous civil rights legislation, creating a bogus equality between innate characteristics like race and sex and the perverse behavior of homosexuals and other sexual deviants. This proposed legislation equates homosexual behavior with skin color in an apples-and-oranges "civil rights" fiasco. Why a fiasco? Because this horrible legislation will strip fundamental, God-given, constitutionally-protected rights from many American citizens while it conflates unnatural, unhealthy, immoral homosexual behavior with "civil rights."

ENDA would be a devastating, unconstitutional blow to American liberty, essentially killing our God-given rights and freedoms of religion, speech and association. It is anti-business. It would require employers, under penalty of federal law for violations, to accept open homosexuals, cross-dressers, "transgenders" and whatever other sexual degeneracy they can come up with to "federally protect." ENDA prohibits discrimination "on the basis of actual or perceived sexual orientation or gender identity."

[...]

It is essential that we bombard our senators and representatives with demands to reject this evil legislation. I realize the battle for the soul of our Republic is fierce, and it seems we are facing an endless flood of wickedness coming from our elected and unelected "leaders," but we must not grow wearing in resisting their efforts to "fundamentally transform" our great nation. Let them hear from you on ENDA. It is critical.

Gina Miller, Renew America 24 Comments [11/17/2013 5:02:37 AM]
Fundie Index: 29

Quote# 97683

almost all of the tea party support Christianity, which is the basis for good sound gov't. these muslims in office now support allah and the anti-christ.people have got to research the candidates to see what is their stance on issues, before voting...

uncle teddy, Political Outcast 35 Comments [11/16/2013 8:50:07 AM]
Fundie Index: 27
Submitted By: Hasan Prishtina

Quote# 97682

but as you may know, Christ spend an eternity in hell for each person so they could avoid it.

[That doesn't make sense. If he spent an eternity in hell, then he is there now and he always will be. He cannot have spent an eternity for each person, since an eternity is basically forever.

The Bible tells us he was dead for three days and a half. That's not an eternity. And for an eternal being, that amount of time is not even the blink of an eye. And it's remarkably unfair for that same being to condemn others to an eternity of punishment.]


God evidently has access to a time plane (or something equivalent) which consist of an infinite number of timelines each of which can be expanded or contracted to control the time rate. He is not usher along the cosmic timeline, nor controlled in anyway by it including it's cause and effect one direction property since He is supra-dimensional to time and space.
'torment' is more correctly translated 'restraint'. the more one demonstrates earthly evil, the more restraint they will have in hell. this is to protect others from those that would unleash their most destructive capabilities. Why are they there? they have demonstrated their desires to want nothing to do with God, so He allows them their wishes but still provide them with protection from the most evil and vile. remember, God is true to his nature, and His nature doesn't allow torment. hell's inhabitants don't like there but they want independence from God even more so God accommodates them. Evidently, God creates spiritual being to live forever. there will be a new heaven and earth (Universe), and it will be sealed off from hell.

Think of an individual timeline for each individual eternity conpressed down to a few hours.

Snowtracks, AtheistForums.org 45 Comments [11/16/2013 8:43:57 AM]
Fundie Index: 34
Submitted By: Stimbo

Quote# 97681

[Comment on a Phyllis Schlafly column on The War Against Christians]

On a broad plain she is absolutely right. But what she fails to realize is that there is no such thing as "Religious Freedom" except in the minds of those who believe in democracy. These people worship themselves and not God.
There is only one God and he established only one Religion and one Church. All others are false religions and those who practice in those other faiths are on the broad road that leads to perdition-!!!

Ethan Clarke, WND 25 Comments [11/16/2013 8:35:47 AM]
Fundie Index: 31

Quote# 97680

Americans can no longer live with the vipers we have been nurturing. It is time for Christians and libertines to part ways for good. However, since the productive people will be scarce in your entitlement society, that's the last thing you want. So you will try to intimidate us as long as possible.

pearl87, WND 26 Comments [11/16/2013 8:34:45 AM]
Fundie Index: 20
1 2 3 4 5 8 | top