Quote# 99808

A non-fundie asks another poster about similarities between hominid fossils and modern humans, fundie denies the similarities come from common descent.

Dear PS, It's because they share a common CREATOR. Prehistoric people looked exactly like Humans since they were made after His kind. That is, the kind of person Jesus made with His own Hands. While prehistoric people LOOKED like Humans, they did NOT have the Human intelligence of Adam, the first Human, until they produced children with Adams descendants. Genesis 6:4

The misguided ToE cannot explan How or When Humans inherited their Human intelligence from Mindless Nature, since Nature has NO intelligence. God shows us HOW and WHEN the prehistoric people changed from animal to Human intelligence. It was when Noah's grandsons married and produced children with the prehistoric people who were already here when Noah arrived. That's God's Truth and it also refutes the False idea that Humans are Apes. That is a Satanic Lie because Humans were made long BEFORE our Planet was formed. Genesis 2:4-7 Haven't you noticed that NO one can refute this Fact? God Bless you.

If you're curious about how humans could have existed before the Earth, according to another post the world before Noah's flood was actually another Earth made entirely of flat dirt that washed away in the flood water. The Ark was raptured to our Earth during the flood. Really.

Aman777, Christian Forums 29 Comments [3/6/2014 4:12:24 AM]
Fundie Index: 30

Quote# 99805

[Re Arizona Governor vetoing discriminatory anti-gay bill.]

I don't have any first hand knowledge of the bill, but I don't think there was any reference to homosexuals in it. I do believe the "anti-homosexual" aspect was created by the leftist machinations in our country.

I grew up reading signs on the doors of businesses that said, "No shirt, No shoes, No service", and other signs that said, "We have the right to refuse service". I'm wondering, in this day and age, if a business owner dare refuse service to anyone for any reason?

The governor of Arizona probably made the right choice with the bill that was reported to be written in a very broad way that could lead to all sorts of difficulty. But I do think a business owner should have the right to refuse service as they choose, without any regard to religious beliefs, just as I think I have the right to avoid restaurants where smoking is still allowed. It's about personal liberty.

Tall Timbers, Rapture Ready 29 Comments [3/6/2014 4:09:53 AM]
Fundie Index: 8
Submitted By: documentingtehcrazy

Quote# 99803

[On the governor of Arizona vetoing Arizona's version of the "Turn Away the Gays" bill.]

Bad feeling about this......
......I have a gut-feeling Arizona will soon experience some type of judgment from the Lord for caving to this; though I have much respect for Jan Brewer, IMHO, she just sold her soul to Satan on this one.

She's pretty much stating that AZ's economy is more important than people's consciences; the bill should have been called the Anti-Conscience-Searing Bill b/c that is precisely what it amounts to.

Folks, I think the wheat is going to be separated from the chaff w/ this one; I pray we're on our last lap; I cannot take this evil anymore.

XMaryX, Rapture Ready 40 Comments [3/6/2014 4:06:46 AM]
Fundie Index: 13
Submitted By: documentingtehcrazy

Quote# 99795

When we give deviant sexual conduct preferred status in law, Christian morality becomes illegal. If you think government-recognized “gay marriage” is harmless to society, you’re playing the fool. It places the Christian sexual ethic and free exercise of religion in direct conflict with law. It’s my sense that many liberty-minded people are finally coming awake to this disturbing reality.

Although we all sin, Christians are commanded to neither support nor engage in evil. Hence, Christians – true Christians – cannot engage in nor condone the unrepentant practice of homosexual behavior. Neither can we support sin-centric “gay marriage.”

This rudimentary equation is built upon the natural laws of moral physics. Christianity is magnetically charged truth. Homosexual behavior is a magnetically charged lie – a spiritual and biological falsehood. Christianity and homosexual sin are as north to south. Polar opposites cannot occupy the same position in time and space. They repel one another. It’s physically, spiritually and legally impossible for religious freedom and preferred legal status for sexual sin to coexist in harmony.



Matt Barber, Barbwire 33 Comments [3/6/2014 4:00:25 AM]
Fundie Index: 22
Submitted By: Aspergus

Quote# 99794

I like tv music and photography too. It's cool that you like to sew. It shows you're a submissive Asian women. That's one good thing Asian women have that white women have forgotten, how to be submissive and do nice things and serve a man. The Bible says women are there to serve, and be second to, men. I agree so much with the Bible and don't like how far people have strayed from it. I can't believe anybody is even supporting letting faggots play football and get married. But Asian women are still submissive and kind like women described in the Bible. I think God put them on this Earth so they can marry white men, and live a righteous, Godly life. Please let me know if you would like to meet a kind, generous, strong and good hearted man like me.

Nathan

Nathan, Creepy White Guys 59 Comments [3/5/2014 4:37:09 AM]
Fundie Index: 55

Quote# 99793

The Transcendental Argument for God (TAG) is a philosophical argument, mainly developed by the late Gregory Bahnsen, and developed for the layperson in Dr. Jason Lisle's recent book The Ultimate Proof of Creation. Dr. Lisle promotes the argument as being philosophically impregnable--irrefutable. This argument is by no means successful in all situations. It will not work on opponents who are especially stubborn or ignorant. An opponent must be intelligent enough to understand that he has been defeated, and honest enough to admit that he has no refutation to the transcendental argument. That noted, against open-minded intellectuals, this argument is a devastating counter to any claim of morality, logic, or uniformity coming from a critic.

Anonymous, Creationwiki 35 Comments [3/5/2014 4:36:05 AM]
Fundie Index: 28

Quote# 99791

"Nope, you people are actively lobbying and legislating to stay in your ever-smaller little circle of like-minded simpletons. The AZ [anti-gay] bill is proof of that – you can’t just shut up and be what you want to be, you have to legislate that you get to be “special” and be allowed to actively discriminate against anyone who isn’t in the Stupid Bubble.

This is why people laugh at you."

Not true jackhole. Many of us are preparing for all out total war against you totalitarian Marxist scum.

We know that you filth cannot be bargained with or reasoned with so further conversation is pointless. Ridding the Earth of turds like you will be a public service. Laugh all you want, no one but RINO’s care what you think of them.

Assholes like you just can’t stand it when you cannot dictate the every day details of American life. If gays want to get married go for but you will NEVER force us to accept you. Going to another store that WILL bake you a wedding cake never occurred to you in the libtard Stupid Bubble. It’s called the free market but cultural Marxists like you don’t believe in that.

I will not comply with your laws or fund your agenda, or recognize your authority and I will never surrender. That is why your leadership, like Bill Ayers, has planned for 30 years to force those of us you cannot intimidate into extermination camps in the south west. When you get around to coming for me come early and wear armor, it’s going to be a long day. Not that a coward like would come personally which is why you have been militarizing the police and arming non-law enforcement agencies like the National Weather Service, Comrade Obama’s private army of Progressive brown shirts.

I have no interest in compromising with you or even hearing what you have to say. I’ll see you on the battlefield, but you won’t see me.

762x51, Moonbattery 50 Comments [3/5/2014 4:35:22 AM]
Fundie Index: 40
Submitted By: Rabbit of Caerbannog

Quote# 99790

" The terms "left wing" and "right wing" came from the French Revolution. The politicians who sat on the left wanted to reject the existing government, while the politicians on the right wanted to preserve the existing government. That's why the right wing is commonly called "conservative." The left wing was characterized by more liberal policies, so the left wing is commonly called "liberal."

During the Civil War, the southern states were so determined to reject the government that they seceded from the Union. So clearly they were definitively left wing.

Lincoln and the Republicans were devoted to preserving the Union by preventing the militant radical left wing states from seceding. So clearly they were definitively right wing.

Lincoln sought to cause change within the established framework of the constitutional process of lawmaking and executive authority. The southern states sought to depart from this established framework by rejecting it completely. This illustrates the conservative constitutional stance of Lincoln, as opposed to the militant radical stance of the left wing southern states, which used radical violence to pursue an agenda that was based on a revolt against the existing government. The southern states fired the first actual cannon shots of the Civil War at Fort Sumter, which illustrates their militant radicalism.

After the south lost the Civil War, they continued their militant radicalism by forming the KKK to use intimidation tactics in pursuit of their political agenda, which continued to be based on rebelling against the existing and established government.

Anyone who says otherwise is just spouting left wing propaganda.

This is so clear and obvious, how can anyone disagree? "

Lincoln Was A Conservative , Yahoo Answers 38 Comments [3/5/2014 4:34:59 AM]
Fundie Index: 22
Submitted By: michael3ov

Quote# 99788

[A federal judge struck down Texas's ban on gay marriage.]

I live in Texas. And I predict that Texas will ignore any queer marriage rulings. Our Attorney General - soon to be Governor Gregg Abott has made traditional marriage a main plank of his carreer. And the new elected A/G (Paxton or Branch) have already made campaign promises to keep Texas straight.

Sure, we have liberal politicians like the Castro brothers and Abortion Barbie. But they are useless and actually provide amusement for us with their stupid antics.

Responsibility2nd, Free Republic 30 Comments [3/5/2014 4:34:37 AM]
Fundie Index: 21

Quote# 99787

An American wife, mother, and heterosexual recounts the sacrifices she made to win a medal at the Olympics. Needless to say, dessert scarfing, obese lesbians didn't win a lot of medals at the Olympics this year. See: Lesbianism and obesity

Conservapedia, Conservapedia 23 Comments [3/5/2014 4:33:43 AM]
Fundie Index: 32
Submitted By: Andrey

Quote# 99781

By way of a voice vote, the House Education Policy Committee passed a bill that would require teachers to recite Christian prayers in public schools every day, even though the majority of members did not vote for it.

The bill, sponsored by Rep. Steve Hurst, R-Munford, would require teachers to spend no more than 15 minutes in the first class of each day to read, verbatim, opening prayers said before a meeting of the U.S. House of Representatives or the U.S. Senate.

Rep. Mary Sue McClurkin, R-Indian Springs, chairwoman of the committee, said she heard more votes in favor of the bill.

“It’s what I heard as chairman,” she said.

Reps. Terri Collins, R-Decatur, Elaine Beech, D-Chatom, and Phil Williams, R-Huntsville, all voted against the bill. Reps. Marcel Black, D-Tuscumbia, Mac Buttram, R-Cullman, and Kerry Rich, R-Albertville, did not vote at all.

The only two to vote in favor of the bill were McClurkin and Rep. Lesley Vance, R-Phenix City.

House Clerk Jeff Woodard said the chairman of each committee has the discretion to decide the outcome of a voice vote. Committee members can request roll call votes if there’s a dispute, but none of the Education Policy committee members did.

Woodard said the majority of bills coming out of committees are passed by voice vote.

The committee also passed a religious expression bill, sponsored by Rep. Mack Butler, R-Rainbow City, that would allow students to initiate prayer in school and express their religious views in their schoolwork. The bill would also require schools to adopt a policy to reinforce those rights.

Butler, who served on a school board for 10 years, said the purpose of the bill is to communicate to school administrators and teachers what’s legal. He said he knows teachers who are scared to death because they don’t know where to draw the line.

“Every bit of this bill is already legal,” Butler said. “It’s just that no one knows it’s legal.”

Beech said she didn’t understand why a bill legalizing actions that are already legal under the U.S. Constitution was needed.

State education officials at the public hearings on the bill last week said the bill isn’t needed because students already have those rights and that developing individual policies might open schools to lawsuits if they don’t get the wording correct.

Susan Watson, executive director of the Alabama Civil Liberties Union Alabama, said at last week’s public hearing that the Congressional prayer bill is unconstitutional and will put school boards at risk of lawsuits.

Mary Sue McClurkin and others, Montgomery Advertiser 28 Comments [3/5/2014 4:29:40 AM]
Fundie Index: 30

Quote# 99780

I have not found any reason from your posts in this thread to make me suppose that inter-sex states are not caused by original sin.

Spud, Religion and Ethics 26 Comments [3/5/2014 4:21:25 AM]
Fundie Index: 26
Submitted By: NearlySane

Quote# 99779

I finally got around to watching the Bill Nye The Science Guy? vs. Ken Ham debate. As many have said, it was an instance of Ham acknowledging his assumptions while Nye refused to admit that he was assuming anything. I appreciated Ham's commitment to discussing presuppositions, instead of getting bogged down with how to properly understand a rock we dug up.

But my biggest takeaway? There are a lot of sophisticated, educated Christians with letters attached to their name, and most of them look down their nose at Ken Ham, using monikers like "fundamentalist" to dismiss and deride him.

These are the same types who insist that Holy Scripture is the result of an extended Telephone Game, rather than being breathed out by God. They have very sophisticated explanations like Q Theory and J.E.D.P. Theory to explain how we got the Bible, rather than simply affirming that men wrote as they were carried along by the Holy Spirit.

Me? I'll take Ken Ham's simple faith and trust in God's word. You can keep your diplomas, doctorates, and high-brow vocabulary. He doesn't get it all right, but his theology is orthodox and his views on everything are founded on Scripture. How many of us can honestly say that? Is Jesus going to congratulate us: "Well done, good and faithful scholar"?

Before anyone says it, I am certainly not saying that we should embrace anti-intellectualism. I'm only saying that if your intellectualism doesn't start with the Bible, you're doing it wrong. And I see a lot of the university types starting with science, logic, reason, or even tradition. None of those things are Scripture. Start with Scripture. The rest of it will take care of itself.

Ken Ham humbly submits to God's Word and has spent his life encouraging others to believe Christ's words: "Your Word is truth." I pray that my life will be spent doing that very same thing. And if there are dinosaurs involved, all the better.

Tim Dukeman, Deeper than Sound-Bites 38 Comments [3/5/2014 4:21:15 AM]
Fundie Index: 22

Quote# 99778

Are there any bigger bullies than Leftists?? If they don't get their way on EVERYTHING, they mobilize the ignorant and cause trouble. Then they get their sycophant Media to use Alinsky tactics on the ‘evil ones’. I am sick to death of these manipulators and bullies!

originalbuckeye, Free Republic 19 Comments [3/5/2014 4:20:59 AM]
Fundie Index: 13

Quote# 99777

[Neopagan fundie reviews a children's comedy novel about the Norse gods visiting London]

Not a Suitable Subject for a Novel

What authors like Francesca Simon fail to understand is that Wodenism is a living and growing religion in England. It is the original and natural religion of the ethnic English people. The Gods of the English are in many[but not all] cases the same deities honoured by the other modern day descendants of the pre-xtian Germanic peoples, whether they be of English, German, Dutch or Scandinavian descent.

Making fun of our deities in a novel dishonours our Gods and causes offense to those of us who follow the ancestral Gods.
I would ask therefore that all potential purchasers of this book take that into account.
On a different note I would recommend that if anyone were to author a book about our Gods to at least be consistent with the names of our deities and not mix Anglo-Saxon and Norse names! I notice from browsing the book via Amazon book search facility that whilst Woden is referred to by his correct English name, Thunor is called by his Norse name Thor. Likewise Tiw is referred to as Tyr.

Lastly I would like to point out that as London is no longer a city inhabited by a majority ethnically English population it would be the last place in England that the Gods would choose to "return" to. They are ANCESTRAL Gods after all! Unlike the middle-eastern god our Gods do not consider themselves to be universal or require the whole world to worship them. They exist in the DNA of their people, their folc.

Wulf V, Amazon UK 40 Comments [3/5/2014 4:20:34 AM]
Fundie Index: 15

Quote# 99772

Under the Communist 'democrats' the ONLY Sin is HAVING MORALS! Everyone is now "required" to ACCEPT, under penalty of law and/or Media HARASSMENT (Paula Dean), every Perversion the democrats come up with...Pro death (abortion), Poverty, out of wedlock births, atheism (preferred by democrats), homosexuality, same sex marriage, destruction of the core Black Family, generational welfare! What do democrats find offensive: the U.S. Constitution, Bill of Rights, Capitalism, People WITH Morals and/or Christian values, and ANYBODY who DISAGREES with them!

JMcCarthy, Townhall.com 35 Comments [3/4/2014 4:12:24 AM]
Fundie Index: 29
Submitted By: Rabbit of Caerbannog

Quote# 99771

[RE. the Arizona bill that would allow businesses to refuse service to LGBT people.]

I wonder how many of these people who believe that the government should force people to work for homosexuals realize that they are supporting slavery? After all, they are supporting involuntary servitude.

Corbett, Townhall.com 46 Comments [3/4/2014 4:11:55 AM]
Fundie Index: 34
Submitted By: Rabbit of Caerbannog

Quote# 99769

[This man is responding to some gay Jews in the comments section.]

I am so ashamed of the self centered position of so many people born as Jews. If Jewishness is simply who your mother or Father were, then Esau is as Jewish as some of you will ever be. The law is not about what pleases you, but what pleases G-d. Esau counted the birthright as nothing, until he lost the blessing, some of you will be in the same position in the end. Endless discussion whether G-d meant this or that, is foolishness and does nothing but promote what pleases you, Especially when we know what G-d actually said. Who wants to please G-d? This G-d who shows his intricate demands in the ceremony and instruments of the Temple Worship, and we feel free to discuss what he really meant when he says what he says? The Torah declares beastiality is sin, is there one of you who will nuance that one and question what G-d really meant? Or will you accept that one as an absolute? We know the answer, we just don't like it. Did G-d really say that? I think I heard a little snake whisper!

Billy Price, Chabad 19 Comments [3/4/2014 4:11:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 19

Quote# 99768

[The NFL is reacting against Arizona's proposed anti-gay bill]

The idiots in the league office are making the same mistake that the gatekeepers in SF/F made about 20 years ago. They wrongly assume that they are in a position to dictate to the public, when in fact it is their position that relies upon the good will of the public.

Tolerance is an evil joke. It is nothing but a stalking horse to impose anti-Christian, anti-Islamic secular values on an unwilling public. It is now eminently clear that the First Amendment was a mistake, considering the way it is being used to attack religion rather than protect it, as was the original intention. Somehow, "Congress shall make no law" has metastasized into "no one anywhere shall be permitted to make a law."

Arizona should respond by telling the NFL that if it pulls the Super Bowl, it will be taxed 100 percent of its revenues in the state, including revenues derived from television income.

Vox Day, Vox Popoli 36 Comments [3/4/2014 4:09:49 AM]
Fundie Index: 30

Quote# 99762

Non/Anti-Catholics please skip this thread. I have no interest in debating the Catholic faith with those who despise or reject it.

As long time members/lurkers know, I am a TRADITIONALIST PRE-VATICAN II Catholic. Or, what was until the 1960's known as a regular Catholic.

I've long described myself as 99.999% Sedevacantist, because while it has been clear for almost five decades that the 'new' Catholic church celebrating the 'new mass' has strayed mightily from the TRUE teachings and the TRUE Mass set down for all time at the Council of Trent, I always held out hope that God had somehow managed to maintain the succession of the throne of St. Peter even through the tumult of the latter half of the 20th century.

Of course, mystics and visionaries through the centuries have written about a time when a false and evil 'church' would occupy the Vatican and that the 'true' Pope would be concealed, I've always hoped that they were NOT speaking of the present Novus Ordo/nervous disorder (ahem) 'Catholic' church...

Well, today that very last little speck of hope in me died.

'Pope' Francis today directly contradicted Pope Pius XI's DIVINI REDEMPTORIS with his Marxist attack on the greatest engine of wealth the world has ever seen - the free market! Since PREVIOUS Popes have declared Marxism incompatible with true Catholicism (and it IS!), it is a settled matter, and yet Mr. Bergoglio (the pretender to the throne of St. Peter who styles himself Pope Francis) presumes to advocate for Marxism!

Clearly Mr. Bergoglio did not pay attention to what has been done to his native Argentina by the Marxist/Feminist (sorry for the unnecessary double labeling there) President Kirchner, and the condition of the poor in his home town of Buenos Aires, much less the total elimination of the middle class and wealthy by the vile machinations of this sadistic statist ****.

Anyway, there is no point to this rant other than to say that it is now clear to me that the throne of St. Peter has been vacant since the (ahem) selection of (ahem) 'Pope' John XXIII, since a heretic cannot be Pope according to long standing Catholic law, and every man who's presumed to use the title of 'Pope' since then has been a manifest ****ing heretic (with the possible exception of the conveniently murdered John Paul I.)

</rant>

womanhater, Men Going Their Own Way 27 Comments [3/4/2014 4:05:49 AM]
Fundie Index: 28

Quote# 99760

A lot of pro-abortionists will hold a woman who has had an abortion's hand and tell them how proud they are and how strong they are and how they should be respected.

The same pro-abortionists will tell you that pro-lifers are the most unkind and insensitive people there are.

When someone posts a picture of themselves, smiling, after an abortion, and pro-lifers respond by calling them selfish and disgusting, it's because they are literally commenting on a picture of a person who is proud of themselves for tearing their child to pieces because their existence was inconvenient to their parent. They are proud of murder.

An abortion ends in the purposeful death of someone who had no choice in the matter. Like hell we'll pat the hand and sympathize with someone who is proud of themselves for killing their child.

Pro-lifers don't give a shit about "controlling women" or what you do with your junk. We care about you not dismembering helpless human beings. There is nothing about such an act to be prideful about.

If a woman dies in "back-alley" abortions, we will mourn the loss of the woman and the child. We WILL NOT say that it should be safer for a woman to kill her child. In any scenario, if a murderer got killed while trying to end someone else's life, there would be celebration from media outlets and individual people. But, when a woman wants to kill her undeveloped child? No we're supposed to celebrate that, instead.

Know why pro-lifers want abortion to be illegal? It's because we're anti-death and don't think it should be legal to fucking murder someone because you're their family.

I personally don't give a shit if you think we're mean. If you have willingly ended someone's life and you have the gall to smile about it, I will never respect you.

themoofster, I'm not a retard in this universe, am I? 46 Comments [3/4/2014 4:05:01 AM]
Fundie Index: 25
Submitted By: Wykked Wytch

Quote# 99754

[You are the same people who tried to justify slavery “because the bible”… you don’t get to be bigots just because you happen to be superstitious bigots.

Turns out that institutionalized douchebaggery is not a winner in the marketplace of ideas, and anti-gay Jim Crow laws are not remotely going to make it past the SCOTUS even if an individual state manages to ram it through. But you will manage to wawste a bunch of taxpayer money trying (because “party of fiscal responsibility”?)”]

My GOD, do you eat with those hands that are more full of hate than I have seen in a long time??? The Bible does NOT call for slavery, idiot.. “Ante-Gay?” Jim Crow was action against the Negros, who never wanted to be here anyway.. They were forced here by their own neighbors in the next country in Africa.. What you don’t read history??? Should try it! And a “individual state” has rights the same as you, except you have done nothing to earn that right.. At 75 I can call you a fool, I have seen many in my life and you fit right in..

Dennis, Moonbattery 29 Comments [3/4/2014 4:03:28 AM]
Fundie Index: 26
Submitted By: documentingtehcrazy

Quote# 99749

Arizona Legislature Defends Christian Businesses From Gay Militants

The Arizona State Senate has once again placed itself in the liberal establishment’s crosshairs, this time by affirming our right not to be compelled to do business with overt homosexuals in situations that violate religious principles.

Media liberals preposterously but predictably screeched like scalded cats that the rights of homosexuals are violated if private citizens are not compelled by the government to enter into relations with them that violate their consciences. Their attempt to equate this with civil rights struggles of the past is an insult that should enrage blacks.

Senate Bill 1062 was explicitly inspired by an outrageous case from neighboring New Mexico, where a Christian photographer was sued for refusing to photograph a ceremony that according to her Christian beliefs was a blasphemous travesty.

The New Mexico case created a new sport for militant homosexuals, who can seek out Christian businesses, demand they participate in activities that are clear violations of their religious beliefs, then crush them with a lawsuit if they refuse to betray their faith. A particularly appalling example is the bullying of Jack Phillips, a principled baker in suburban Denver.

These thuggish tactics, backed up by a relentless establishment media propaganda barrage and conservative cowardice, have allowed the Left to achieve astonishing success in advancing the corrosive gay agenda.

Three Republicans who voted for it, intimidated by the inevitable backlash from the Left, are egging on Governor Brewer to veto the bill. Whether she has the spine to uphold the religious freedom guaranteed in the First Amendment, as well as the comparably fundamental right of freedom of association, remains to be seen.

[Picture of a rainbow flag with a swastika.]

Finally some resistance to the marriage of coercion and perversion.

Dave Blount, Moonbattery 21 Comments [3/4/2014 3:58:43 AM]
Fundie Index: 22
Submitted By: Rabbit of Caerbannog

Quote# 99745

As I have shown in the book "Ultimate Proof of Creation" only Christian theism can account for the preconditions of intelligibility. For example, no polytheistic religion can account for objective morality because which god's decrees should we follow? The gods of other faith systems cannot account for uniformity in nature for a number of reasons. For example, it is the biblical God who transcends time (2 Peter 3:8), has all power (Genesis 17:1, Genesis 18:14), who knows all things including the future (Isaiah 46:9-10), has revealed Himself (Romans 1:18-20), and has promised to uphold the future like the past (Genesis 8:22). All these things are necessary in order to have justification for uniformity in nature, and no other god fulfills all these

Jason Lisle, Jason Lisle's blog 48 Comments [3/3/2014 4:33:11 AM]
Fundie Index: 42
Submitted By: Tony

Quote# 99744

The Gay Media are asking all of North America to allow them the equivalent of passing final judgment on Phil Robertson for his comments. I for one can not do that and I would never pass judgment on a gay person for espousing his or her rights. Why do some people feel the overarching need to do this. Every community has it's nut jobs but c'mon people. Let the man have his job back. Hasn't he apologized enough yet???? The unofficial poll on this site is almost 10 to 1 against his removal. A&E, please remember how you make your money! I feel almost safe in calling this reverse discrimination.

Elwoodathome, Toronto Sun 26 Comments [3/3/2014 4:32:44 AM]
Fundie Index: 16
Submitted By: RodlenJack