Quote# 102153

Atheists: Name a successful Atheist society that isn't a Communist dictatorship and hasn't collapsed.?

There has never been a prosperous Atheist civilization. Even Pagans built great civilizations that lasted a long time. Atheists would be running through the woods naked if it weren't for religious people.

LIST OF ATHEIST NATIONS

Soviet Union: Oppressive Communist dictatorship. Collapsed in 1991.
North Korea: Oppressive dictatorship with a high death rate. Most citizens are poor as dirt and sometimes resort to cannibalism.
Cuba: Dying nation. Will fall apart eventually
Eastern bloc: Same with the USSR.
China: Led to Mao's great revolution that took millions of lives.
Cambodia: Khmer Rouge.
Sweden: Currently being invaded by Muslims. Will become Swedenstan in about twenty-five years. Many Swedes and Swedish Muslims violently hate Jews and Israel. It's not safe for Jews to live in some Swedish cities anymore. This is due to Socialist EU politicians who support Muslim terrorists and accept Muslims immigrants and hate Jews and Israel because they were bribed with oil.

As you can see,Atheism does not do any good for countries. Atheist nations are more likely to accept Muslim terrorists into their country. I challenge you Atheists to name an Atheist society that hasn't collapsed, isn't a Commie dictatorship or isn't being taken over by Muslims hordes.

Kaykay, Yahoo! Answers 42 Comments [7/18/2014 3:37:53 AM]
Fundie Index: 20
Submitted By: Juicifur

Quote# 102150

That is RUBBISH. Homophobia is an invented word. It is about personal choice and belief and to disagree without any dislike, hatred or even bias is not homophobia.
You could say atheist are christianphobics. Do you hate Christians because you disagree with their beliefs?
So STOP making excuses and making Christians to be different to others who disagree with someone elses beliefs.

Russian and other countries like Uganda are against homosexuality full stop.
Today people can move if the country they live in does not allow the the freedom to partake in homosexual acts.

What if you had to sleep with another man to prove you were not homophobic?>
You see it isn't natural to some they have no sexual feelings or emotional feelings towards the same sex as they do the opposite sex. Does that make them homophobic? You will support homosexiality as long as you are not made to participate.
The same for many people but why try and make someone who does not feel it is natural say it is.
Because basically there is a difference between accepting homosexcuality for others and accepting it to be right for yourself.

I am sick of the argument and finger pointing when people are seen as homophobic to the limitation of what they accept.
You do not accept it is right for you. You would hate to be forced or co-hersed into doing homosexual sex.
Do not confuse natural rejection of choice to be homosexual and feel it right with those who are just blatant bigots and would harm someone who is homosexual. Do not include all Christian groups in such outright and deliberate bias.


Sassy, Religion and Ethics 38 Comments [7/18/2014 3:36:42 AM]
Fundie Index: 15
Submitted By: NearlySane

Quote# 102148

Almost always when I talk about how things “should” be I am describing a kind of ideal model of how society should work and I am furthermore trying to recreate how society actually did work in the past. My proposed model of how “things should be done” is always based on the assumption of how a society that is already healthy and high functioning would work.

So I am not saying that women should not have the right to vote today right now; I am saying that in the distant future when things are “good” women not having the right to vote would help to maintain a positive social order and good relations between the sexes.

As far as Afghanistan? I don’t know about Afghanistan. I live in the United States and more broadly the Western World. I am advocating for what would work and what would be good in reference to the environment that I actually live in and know something about.

As far as punishing women. I am saying that in principle it is legitimate for a husband to “punish” his wife to enforce his rules regarding the wife’s relationship with him or the wife’s responsibilities and behavior regarding the family. Likewise it is legitimate for the male community to punish the husband for the husband’s misdeeds regarding his wife or his family.

As for how exactly a husband should punish his wife? I would say how he chooses to or according to what the husband thinks is the best approach assuming the husband is following community standards of what types of “punishment” are preferred and what types of “punishment” are considered too dangerous or too prone to abuse or too damaging to be acceptable.

I would say the basic rule should be that a punishment against the wife should be minimally harmful to the relationship in itself while still accomplishing the goal of correcting the woman’s harmful behavior. In addition punishment based on the withdrawal of a reward is better than punishment based on the infliction of a harm as punishing through the withdrawal of a reward is less prone to abuse and requires that a man be providing a benefit to the woman before he would be in a position to punish the woman. In this way the woman’s obedience would be motivated by her desire to continue to benefit from the man rather than her fear of being harmed by the man. Obedience motivated by continued access to rewards is clearly more ethical than obedience motivated by avoiding harm.

Jesse Powell, Secular Patriarchy 50 Comments [7/17/2014 3:56:07 AM]
Fundie Index: 29

Quote# 102146

...Overwhelming evidence supports the belief that homosexuality is a sexual deviancy often accompanied by disorders that have dire consequences for our culture....Research confirms that homosexuals molest children at a rate vastly higher than heterosexuals, and the mainstream homosexual culture commonly promotes sex with children.1 Homosexual leaders repeatedly argue for the freedom to engage in consensual sex with children, and blind surveys reveal a shockingly high number of homosexuals admit to sexual contact with minors.2 Indeed, the homosexual community is driving the worldwide campaign to lower the legal age of consent.

Steven Baldwin, Knights of Banjo Hollow 49 Comments [7/17/2014 3:37:39 AM]
Fundie Index: 19

Quote# 102144

Some Questions Atheist Cannot Truly and Honestly REALLY Answer! Which leads to some interesting conclusions…

1. How Did You Become an Atheist?

2. What happens when we die?

3. What if you’re wrong? And there is a Heaven? And there is a HELL!

4. Without God, where do you get your morality from?

5. If there is no God, can we do what we want? Are we free to murder and rape? While good deeds are unrewarded?

6. If there is no god, how does your life have any meaning?

7. Where did the universe come from?

8. What about miracles? What all the people who claim to have a connection with Jesus? What about those who claim to have seen saints or angels?

9. What’s your view of Dawkins, Hitchens and Harris?

10. If there is no God, then why does every society have a religion?

Today Christian, Today Christian 91 Comments [7/17/2014 3:36:06 AM]
Fundie Index: 29
Submitted By: Night Jaguar

Quote# 102141

Atheists unveiled a monument next to a Ten Commandments monument in Florida. The group that built it plans to put up 50 more nationwide.

1. A quote on it says: “An atheist believes that a hospital should be built instead of a church.” Which is awkward, because we really haven’t seen all those hospitals the atheists were going to build …

2. The hospital quote is also awkward because it clearly should have said: “An atheist believes that 50 monuments to atheism should be built nationwide instead of a hospital.”*

3. A quote on the monument says atheists “Want war eliminated.” Which is awkward because warriors like Stalin and Lenin and Mao and Hoxha and Ceau?escu – were all atheists.

4. The monument also mocks the punishments threatened in the Old Testament. Awkward: Far worse brutality was actually committed by the atheist warriors listed above – in our lifetime.

5. The “We want war eliminated” quote is also awkward because all of the other quotes on the monument are from Founding Fathers known for starting a war with England.

6. It’s awkward that at the dedication, a preacher used the monument to preach Christ, and the free thinkers got mad at his free thinking.

7. It’s awkward that the monument has what looks like a biohazard symbol on it.

8. But the symbol actually shows an atom. J.J. Thomson won the 1906 Nobel Prize in Physics for discovering the electron. He was a churchgoer who read the Bible every night. Which is awkward for atheists.

9. A quote on the monument says “An atheist strives for involvement in life and not escape into death.” Awkward: atheists Jack Kevorkian (Dr. Death) and Derek Humphry (founder of the Hemlock Society) would disagree.

10. A New Jersey-based group went to Florida to build an atheist monument. That sounds kind of … missionary and proselytizing. Which is awkward for people who are against that kind of thing …

Tom Hoopes, Catholic Vote 33 Comments [7/17/2014 3:33:25 AM]
Fundie Index: 19
Submitted By: michael3ov

Quote# 102140

[cultureshift explains his views on why he was shadow-banned by Tumblr staff. A shadow-banned user cannot send private messages, have their posts appear in tags, or show up in reblogs or comments unless someone chooses to go to their page.]

There are several reasons why I am shadow banned and 'pro-choice' bloggers are not:

1. I spread the inconvenient truth about the reality of human abortion, a reality which many are desperate to keep hidden away.

2. I confront mothers who post the sick and gruesome details of how they poisoned or slaughtered their children while living in their wombs. Tumblr will allow them to post these details without any qualms, but the second I respond to them on behalf of the child they killed, I get shadow banned. And I can assure you I never harass anyone, I simply respond to posts that are tagged for the world to see. After all, that is what Tumblr is about - public discourse.

3. I routinely expose Planned Parenthood, who runs a blog here on Tumblr, and who has a vested business interest in keeping images of their work off of their tag.

4. The vast majority of the Tumblr demographic is in favor of killing the unborn and have the power of numbers to generate coordinated 'abuse' and 'spam' reports to the Tumblr staff, giving the impression that random users are reporting me.

5. The people who created and continue to operate Tumblr are extremely liberal and therefore very likely in favor of human abortion. In other words, they are not sympathetic to my cause.

cultureshift, In Defense of the Defenseless 41 Comments [7/17/2014 3:33:03 AM]
Fundie Index: 17
Submitted By: Wykked Wytch

Quote# 102139

GULBARGA: A cleric [, part of a group from Bihar looking for a hidden treasure in the 14th century Firozabad fort,] allegedly participated in the gory murder of his 18-month-old daughter in Firozabad, near here.

[...]

Five months ago, the group brought an imam from Delhi, said to be an expert in finding hidden treasures. He said there was no such treasure in the fort, and went back.

Not satisfied, they brought another imam, Mohammad Ashqua, from Bihar, in the second week of May. He claimed he could divine a treasure, and told the group it could be unearthed with the ritual sacrifice of a baby girl. The group then started looking around for a girl to sacrifice, but couldn’t find one. On May 21, they found Sadiya Ayat, a little girl playing outside her house near the Firozabad mosque.

It turned out she was the daughter of Shamshad Alam, imam of the Firozabad mosque. The group took the girl and kept her sedated in a house in Hasanapaur for three days. Alam lodged a police complaint on May 21 saying his daughter had gone missing.

[Superintendent of Police Amit] Singh said Alam was party to the conspiracy, but had not been told his daughter would be killed until the day of the sacrifice, May 24. The group allegedly told Alam he would get a big share of the treasure if he allowed his daughter to be sacrificed. Alam agreed, and was present during the killing, Singh said. Two men in the group, Mashaqua—who died in police custody on Friday—and Mohammad Ashaqua allegedly chopped Sadiya’s ears, neck and hands on the fateful day.

[...]

[Bolding mine]

Mohammad Ashqua, Shamshad Alam, Mashaqua, Mohammad Ashaqua and other Biharis, The New Indian Express 30 Comments [7/17/2014 3:32:48 AM]
Fundie Index: 36
Submitted By: JeanP

Quote# 102137

The thuggish pastor of a small Southern California church and two of his parishioners tortured a 13-year-old boy who lived at a church-run group home, savagely beating him, grinding salt into his raw wounds and forcing him to dig his own grave. The pastor, Lonny Remmers, 56, and his two goons even tortured the teen during a group Bible study session, forcing him to sit in front of the others while they twisted his nipples with pliers, court documents show, according to the Los Angeles Times.

The assaults were part of a brutal campaign to "scare" the boy straight after he was moved from one home, where his mother and sister lived, to another allegedly for acting out, the Times reported.

Remmers, Nicholas Craig, 24, and Darryll Jeter Jr., 30, pleaded guilty Monday to charges including inflicting corporal injury on a child, assault with a deadly weapon and making criminal threats. Remmers, who runs the Hart of Worship Community Church in Corona, was expected to be sentenced to two years in prison. The other two were given a year in home confinement, plus three years of probation.

[...]

After getting orders from Remmers to "scare" the boy, Craig and Jeter drove him to a remote area, where they lashed him with a belt and forced him to dig his own grave. The twisted pair then forced the boy to get in the hole as they tossed dirt on him from above, as though they were burying him alive, the documents said.

Later, they returned to the home and the boy took a shower, while Craig and Jeter rubbed salt into the cuts on his back, authorities said. They also tied him down and sprayed mace in his face, causing his nose to bleed, the documents said.

The boy later told police he thrashed so violently, he left the shower spattered with blood, the Times reported. Other members of the home reported seeing the blood the next day.

The torment continued later that night at the Bible study session at Remmers' home, where the men clamped his nipples with pliers in front of about a dozen other men.

Authorities said the sicko pastor claimed the boy needed to be disciplined for "not accepting responsibility for his actions."

The boy's mother had brought him to Remmers' church, which has 15 to 20 members. Corona is in Riverside County, about an hour east of Los Angeles.

The teen hasn't been identified.

By pleading guilty, the men avoided a kidnapping charge, which would have been the most serious against them.

Remmers is scheduled to be sentenced Sept. 26.

Lonny Remmers, Nicholas Craig, Darryll Jeter , NY Daily News 44 Comments [7/17/2014 3:23:48 AM]
Fundie Index: 35
Submitted By: SZD

Quote# 102136

[On Ian Thrope coming out as gay]

The only ones who place any importance on these periodic public outings seem to be gays. It has become tiresome and almost passé to people not involved in your personal affairs and lifestyle. If your truly proud of being gay and feel it's perfectly normal why do you feel you have to convince everyone else? Since when does pride in oneself have to be proven or approved by others? Like it or not it seems that your the intolerant ones. Your agenda is to force the majority of your fellow citizens to think just like you and to just put up with your insolence and bullying. Do you really think that by mocking straight people and traditional institutions such as marriage, the military and competitive sports that you'll be more accepted? You may want to rethink your strategy as it appears to have many similarities and tactics of another group of bullies who without question do not accept you. That group being Muslim extremists.

A, Yahoo Sports 25 Comments [7/17/2014 3:22:42 AM]
Fundie Index: 16
Submitted By: TheReasonator

Quote# 102135

(In response to a Christian who mentions why American Christian Zionists never seem to mind about the Christian Palestinian minority)

Spoken like a true atheist troll. Actually all Christians know that Israel is repsonsible for the existence of the Holy Bible, We also know they were God's chosen people long before we came about then of course favortism and legalism were no more because of Christ's sacrifice. Still those who curse Israel will be cursed and those who bless Israel will be blessed and there is no denying that. So your lack of knowledge has atheist troll written all over it.

Speaking to Israel's forefather Abraham God says, "I will bless those who bless you, and whoever curses you I will curse; and all peoples on earth will be blessed through you." - Genesis 12:3 and what is for Abraham is for Israel.

Now for your claim that Palestinians are Christians too:

After the second Jewish revolt under Bar Cochba (A.D. 132-135) it is said the Roman Emperor Hadrian renamed the land of Israel and Judea as Palastina (Palestine) after the ancient enemies of the Jews - the Philistines. Because of his hatred of the Jews, it was meant to be an insult to dishonor them and remove their Jewish rights and history.

Until so called Palestinians can define their Nation's capitol, their borders, their party politics, their financial institutions, their laws, their origins, their government's protocol on every level, their healthcare system, their emergency response system, their social services, their infrastructure, their foreign and domestic policies and any and all other institutions and ethics that would afford them the right to nationhood among the world's nations why should they even be recognized?

So what Christian in their right mind would become terroristic or part of an insult against the nation (Israel) that helped us Gentiles understand God and God's will?

You sir are an imposter at best.

EDIT: Thumbs down - of course all you socialist atheist liberals would come running to the defense of your atheist troll friend........ rotfl...........
Source(s):
Every American Christian prays, "Lord watch over and protect Israel, secure your land and give it peace."

Every American Christian will always be for Israel and support Israel even in their prayers.


William, Yahoo Answers 33 Comments [7/16/2014 3:27:34 AM]
Fundie Index: 22

Quote# 102134

We live in a world where OUR side is attacked relentlessly and their side starts screaming in agony and frothing at the mouth if we direct ANY words back in the direction of the libtards. Let me spell it out for you: ATTACKING CHRISTIANITY IS A STANDARD LIBERAL TACTIC THAT I CAN FIND VIRTUALLY ANYWHERE IN THIS DAY AND AGE. Do we really need a miniature RevLeft on Stormfront to please people who just can't get enough of it from television, movies, "news" stations, academia, comedians, public schools, politicians, billboards, bumper stickers, and every other site on the web except Stormfront? Seriously?

It's not like slamming Christianity hasn't been done before. It's not like these "religion=bad" ideas aren't pounded into children's heads from the time they emerge from the womb. It's not like it doesn't happen all the time everywhere we go. Exactly what does this discussion contribute to our movement that we can't hear from EVERYONE else all the time?

Yeah, attacking the Christian church: Way to break new ground.

Fading Light, Stormfront.com 35 Comments [7/16/2014 3:26:42 AM]
Fundie Index: 12
Submitted By: HEIL SATAN

Quote# 102131

Immediately after my conversion to patriarchy around 1995 I became aware that feminists, meaning the culture at large and almost all women in general, would resist my effort to recreate the 1950s ideal of family life for myself as an individual. This filled me with a great rage against feminists. The feminists were bent on destroying me completely; first they messed up my parents so that they would be selfishly oriented and not focused on my developmental needs as a child and as a future man. This is why I was particularly weak in my social skills and why I didn’t see what my positive purpose in relation to women was. Then the feminist culture in general tried to suppress my strength as a man telling me I was an “oppressor” if I showed strength in relation to women. So my particular weakness due to my parents neglecting my social needs combined with the globally imposed feminist culture telling me I should be weak as a man and I was obligated to make myself weak as a man in order to avoid “oppressing” women led to my strength level being so low that it was pretty much impossible for me to get women to be romantically interested in me. This was entirely feminism’s fault because feminism is what led my parents to be selfishly oriented and to neglect my needs as a child and a future man and feminism was responsible for the general cultural message that men were the oppressors of women and so men should weaken themselves in order to avoid oppressing women.

Finally as a young adult I figured out a way to escape from the universal rejection by women feminism imposed upon me; that being 1950s style male breadwinner patriarchy. The problem however was that me embracing 1950s style patriarchy I knew would lead to hostility and push back and that the whole culture and legal system was designed to make traditional family life fail and be unworkable for the purpose of promoting and elevating the feminist version of family life; the feminist version of family life and its associated cultural messages being what plunged me into my failure with women in the first place. So before my conversion to patriarchy I was too weak for women to be interested in me; after my conversion to patriarchy my goal was to be stronger than what the feminists wanted me to be with all sorts of roadblocks and danger and discrimination against me as a man being set up by the feminists for the purpose of weakening me and undermining me because the feminists deemed me to be “too strong” and therefore an oppressor of women with me not going along with their “gender equality” script; “gender equality” being simply female supremacy in practice.

So immediately after my conversion to patriarchy a great rage in me developed against feminists because I could see feminists were bent on destroying me as a newly emerging patriarchal man just like they had already dedicated themselves to destroying me as a child and a young adult by making me too weak to appeal to women before hand. There was no escape from feminist tyranny and feminism’s goal was to destroy my capacity to form relationships with women no matter what I did. So the first 2 years after my conversion to patriarchy I focused my energies on figuring out all the different ways feminism messed up society and developing a general plan in my mind about how patriarchy could be reintroduced and how feminism could be eventually destroyed and overcome.

One might ask themselves; after seeing that patriarchy would get a lot of resistance from the culture and that it might prove unworkable and impractical for myself as an individual why didn’t I try to pursue the middle level of strength feminists and the women around me wanted from me and that would produce a reasonable level of success with women consistent with the average level of success with women among men in general? Why did I start out being too weak as a man and then go to the opposite extreme of being “too strong” trying to be like a man from the 1950s and then refuse to “go to the middle” like the society and the women around me wanted me to do?

The answer to this question is that once I saw that patriarchy would work as a way of attracting women and would be good for children I saw the 1950s man as being a good man, a morally good man, and that the 1990s man others wanted me to become was a bad man by comparison because he did not care for women like the 1950s man did and he did not provide to his children a mother to look after their needs full time like the 1950s man did. The 1950s man was objectively better than the 1990s man so of course I was going to choose to be like the 1950s man regardless of the fact that the culture around me and the women around me wanted me to be a 1990s man rather than a 1950s man at that time. Since the 1950s man was objectively superior to the 1990s man if the women around me wanted me to be a 1990s man that meant the women around me were bad, that they wanted me to be a bad man because they were bad themselves. If the culture around me wanted me to be a 1990s man and not a 1950s man that meant the culture around me was bad. Of course it was already clearly established that the culture around me was bad because the culture is what made my parents what they were and the culture is what told me to weaken myself as a man so that no woman would ever want me.

Jesse Powell, Secular Patriarchy 45 Comments [7/16/2014 3:26:10 AM]
Fundie Index: 30

Quote# 102124

If you believe there is no God, you have faith.

No human can absolutely disprove the existence of any God.
That's because no human can be in all places at all times.

Christians believe in the one true God of the Bible.
The God of the Bible, who can be at all places at all times, tells us in His word that He is the one true God.
Any other "gods" are simply devils.

Atheists, on the other hand, don't have a witness to refer to who can be at all places and all times.
Therefore, they take it on faith that no God exists.
They can't actually prove it.

To sum up:

*If you believe there is no God, you have faith.
*If you simply say that no one can know if there is a God, you don't necessarily have faith.

2 Samuel 7:22
"Wherefore thou art great, O Lord God: for there is none like thee, neither is there any God beside thee, according to all that we have heard with our ears."

ExaltGod, deviantArt 42 Comments [7/16/2014 3:21:42 AM]
Fundie Index: 17

Quote# 102121

L.G.B.T. Let God be true.

Romans 3:4
"...let God be true, but every man a liar..."

Titus 1:2
"...God, that cannot lie..."

Hebrews 6:18
"...it was impossible for God to lie..."


Seriously, this is what "LGBT" should stand for.
As in, sodomites need to stop twisting God's word to support perversion.
They need to just accept the Bible for what it says: homosexuality is a sin.

Don't try and make the Bible defend your sexuality.
Don't try and make God approve of your sin.

Let. God. Be. True.

----------------------------------------------------------

How to get saved: exaltgod.deviantart.com/art/Sa…

----------------------------------------------------------

NOTE: I hate homosexuality, not homosexuals.
If you want to keep your freedom of speech, don't try to take mine away.

ExaltGod, deviantArt 47 Comments [7/16/2014 3:11:11 AM]
Fundie Index: 21
Submitted By: katrinahood

Quote# 102120

[if you believe slavery to be immoral you are a moral relativist, so then let me ask you does God approve of slavery, is it morally acceptable]

The ironic thing about your claim Tony is that it makes no sense on your worldview. Moral absolutes just do not comport with a chance universe, where people are just chemical accidents. Your question is only meaningful in the Christian worldview, which shows that in your heart-of-hearts you really do know God. Yes, the type of slavery advocated in Scripture (helping an irresponsible person get out of debt by paying all his debt and training him to become financially responsible) is morally right. But apart from the Christian worldview, the phrase "morally acceptable" is fundamentally meaningless. You again demonstrate the truth of Christianity by the very questions you ask.

Jason Lisle, Jason Lisle's blog 34 Comments [7/16/2014 3:10:44 AM]
Fundie Index: 18
Submitted By: Tony

Quote# 102112

[On a pool in the town of Galion not giving a Family Pass to a family with same sex parents.]

Galion is in my backyard. I posted this article because the gay agenda is now so saturated into our culture that it is hitting small towns. Galion is so small you can blink and miss it as you drive through. The constant pushing of their lifestyle has brought me more against them then before. Before they began pushing the acceptance of their lifestyle, I had no problem with gays because they minded their own business. But now... being plastered all over the news and through society is making me hate their cause. (The sin not the person) The things people are saying about this small town around here, because they can't change the rules in the blink of an eye, makes me wants me to slap them so hard they go back in time to witness the crucifixion. Eh.... I'm just so annoyed by this. Someone pray for the north east... the US as a whole actually would be better.

ksnyder, Rapture Ready 43 Comments [7/15/2014 3:37:39 AM]
Fundie Index: 25
Submitted By: documentingtehcrazy

Quote# 102111

[Discussing Exoplanets]
Erin....you are just making words up now to sound intelligent. subjugate...officiousness? Perhaps studying the bible would serve you well and give you a true sense of intelligence.

Lauren Smith, The Weather Network 50 Comments [7/15/2014 3:37:24 AM]
Fundie Index: 39
Submitted By: Jam526

Quote# 102110

[Discussing Exoplanets]
What you call "facts" are actually myths brought about by ***** to test your beliefs. When judgement day comes, our Lord and Saviour will see you people for what you really are, sinners.

Lauren Smith, The Weather Network 30 Comments [7/15/2014 3:37:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 20
Submitted By: Jam526

Quote# 102109

[On Burger King releasing the Proud Whopper.]

Only indirectly related, but I read today (RR News I think) that HIV is increasing in homosexual men again. They only think they are winning. God will not be mocked.

Maranatha!

carol1948, Rapture Ready 39 Comments [7/15/2014 3:36:24 AM]
Fundie Index: 20
Submitted By: documentingtehcrazy

Quote# 102106

This should make it clear to everyone who is not a sexual deviant that the position of the English Common Law was correct, and that all of the various deviancies that have been legalized and normalized and declared no longer indicative of psychological sickness since the 1950s should promptly be returned to their former status.

There is no middle ground. What devotees of one particular immorality or another believe is a reasonable stopping point - here, and no further - is nothing more than a waystation on the road to total depravity of the worst imaginable sort.

We libertarians were wrong. Societal liberty simply cannot be maximized through sexual anarchy any more than it can be maximized though unrestricted immigration, unrestricted government, or unrestricted voting. In retrospect, this should always have been obvious: if everything goes, then literally everything will go. This is no longer a hypothetical objection on the part of traditional conservatives, it is an undeniable reality. It is human nature to push at the boundaries; there will always be those who cross the line. Therefore, the line needs to be set firmly along boundaries that are undeniably eucivic and proven by centuries of tradition to be sustainable in the long term.

There will be those who disingenuously insist that the clock cannot be turned back, that humanity is doomed to an endless future of sodomy, incest, rape, necrophilia, and bestiality. This is provably false; the current period of sexual anarchy in the West is hardly the first in human history and it is very short by historical standards. And this particular clock most certainly will be turned back, one way or another, because everything from birth rates to the transmission rates of sexually transmitted diseases indicate that the current state of near-sexual anarchy has already reached the point of unsustainability.

Technology can never trump Creator-imposed morality any more than science can surmount the physical laws of Nature. It may appear to do so, for a short time, but that is nothing more than an illusion based on incomplete understanding.

Vox Day, Vox Popoli 44 Comments [7/15/2014 3:35:51 AM]
Fundie Index: 22

Quote# 102105

Taylor Swift is a detrimental influence upon America's teens. She is imprudent, lewd and immoral.

On the DeGeneres show, Swift spoke of her good “character.” What character? Women with good character don't lie down on the floor, roll around while wearing a negligee for some pervert's camera to film, and then put it on MTV for the world to see. That is exactly what her video, FEARLESS, is, and that's exactly what MTV is known for. Where are all the preachers in America? Am I the only one who gets mad over this stuff? Am I the only one who loves God?

David J. Stewart, Jesus is Savior 39 Comments [7/15/2014 3:35:40 AM]
Fundie Index: 18

Quote# 102097

Speaking from a legal standpoint, there is plenty of evidence to impeach Soetoro (birth certificate, Benghazi, Fast & Furious, capitulation towards UN wrt. Libya, ISIS crisis, Berghdal incident, fleeing from Iraq, Osamacare, border crisis, expansion of all government bureaucracies, absolutely anything to do wrt. Eric Holder, Marxism, Islam, Black Liberation Theology, atheism, abortion, gay agenda, promotion of the global warming fraud, refusal to wear flag pin, refusal to put hand over heart during Pledge of Allegiance, opposition to the flag burning amendment, and there’s probably a lot more). Sensible people can find the relative provisions in the Constitution which would impeach him.

Speaking from a political standpoint, keep in mind that the Dementocrats completely disprove of the Republican Party, so there is no political capital to be lost by legitimately pushing for impeachment. Moderates can be won over if they are exposed to the truths of the Hussein Administration. His disapproval rating is higher than his approval rating, meaning that impeachment can only be a success.

Speaking from a moral standpoint, Osama and the rest of the Dementocrats deserve to meet the same fate as the Rosenbergs did. We used to execute traitors, now we give them the Presidential office. If we don’t want to look like international laughingstocks, then that is our only option.

Objective Scrutator, Free Republic 40 Comments [7/15/2014 3:26:44 AM]
Fundie Index: 19

Quote# 102096

Your right...as in the days of Noah and Lot, so too will the second coming of our Lord. This homosexual explosion is a sign....

SwordofGeddo, Rapture Ready 38 Comments [7/14/2014 3:20:32 AM]
Fundie Index: 23

Quote# 102093

Then there’s Carver County’s house district 47A, where Waconia Mayor Jim Nash is facing off against Norwood Young America businessman Bob Frey, a race in which “sodomy” has become one of the campaign issues.
...
[W]hen questioned about his position on social issues, Frey added that it “does certainly need to be addressed for what it is. It’s not about the gay agenda but about the science and the financial impact of that agenda. It’s more about sodomy than about pigeonholing a lifestyle.”

Frey then explained his view: “When you have egg and sperm that meet in conception, there’s an enzyme in the front that burns through the egg. The enzyme burns through so the DNA can enter the egg. If the sperm is deposited anally, it's the enzyme that causes the immune system to fail. That’s why the term is AIDS – acquired immunodeficiency syndrome.”

Bob Frey, MinnPost 40 Comments [7/14/2014 3:19:47 AM]
Fundie Index: 42
Submitted By: Zagen30