Quote# 109685

We began to pray against the spirit of a cat, and as we did the manifestations grew stronger. The frail woman began to crawl around our living room, pumping her back, clawing the carpet and literally pulling it up off the pad. Needless to say, it was a stunning thing to behold. This woman had literally turned into a cat right before our very eyes.

MICAH BELL, free in the lord 36 Comments [6/16/2015 2:50:33 AM]
Fundie Index: 25

Quote# 109684

Where do wind chimes come from? Clapperless bells were called “yongzhong” and were used to accompany religious rites and ceremonies. Skilled artists and workers of metal created these bells which were the forerunner of the wind chime. Buddhists hung thousands of these chimes and bells on the eaves of shrines, pagodas and temples. Many were highly decorated and carved or cast into many shapes and sizes. The purpose was to cause an awesome sound sensation and belief they would attract DEMON-SPIRITS.


Nehemiah Nowlen , free in the lord 27 Comments [6/16/2015 2:46:57 AM]
Fundie Index: 13

Quote# 109683

As Creator, the Potter has the authority to do with His pots whatever He chooses. As Sovereign, He has the right to do whatever He decides with His entire creation. In fact, He’s the only one with this right. As the Potter, all rights are exclusive to Him.

“Certainly, we have a right to life!”

Do we? Does man have a right to life? Or is even the right to life exclusive to God?

If man has a right to life, that right then dictates God was obligated to create us. If this is true, who’s really the prime cause: the Creator who was obliged to provide the right or the created who had the right to life?

Only Yahweh has a right to life. It’s inherent in who and what He is: I Am That I Am—the great and only self-existing I Am That I Am.

For us, life is not a right. It’s first a gift from the Life Giver and then a responsibility. We are obligated to use our lives as intended by the One who gave us life. To claim life as our right is to eliminate any requirement of responsibility to our Creator. In reality, it’s an attempt to usurp His exclusive claim to sovereignty.

The inherent problem in claiming even life as a right should be obvious. Is it any different with other rights—even those enshrined in the Bill of Rights, which are hallowed by most Americans, particularly Christians?

Most Americans view the first Ten Amendments to the Constitution as sacrosanct and inviolable. But this is the song of a siren.

The First Amendment’s guaranteed “rights”

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech or the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

Are these rights enumerated in the First Amendment biblical? If they’re biblical, they’re guaranteed by Yahweh. If guaranteed by Yahweh, they should be found in the Bible. If they’re not biblical, they’re “guaranteed” by someone else who can and has incrementally taken them away:

In Understanding the Constitution: Ten Things Every Christian Should Know About the Supreme Law of the Land, David Gibbs, Jr., and David Gibbs III argue for unalienable rights:

Our rights come from God, not from the state. Therefore, the state cannot take them away. What Uncle Sam gives, Uncle Sam can take away. But our nation’s birth certificate, the Declaration of Independence makes clear that our rights are unalienable because they come from God.

This sounds wonderful, but is it true? The State has certainly taken away an unwanted infant’s right to life. The State has incrementally taken away gun owners’ Second Amendment rights. The State has taken away the right to happiness, in particular the right to own property. Because rights come from the State, the State can take them away at its pleasure.

The right to religion

What about the First Amendment’s right to religion as provided in the Free Exercise Clause? Does man have a right to whatever religion and god he chooses? If so, how does this comport with the First Commandment?

I am Yahweh thy God…. Thou shalt have no other gods before me. (Exodus 20:2-3)

For thou shalt worship no other god: for Yahweh, whose name is Jealous, is a jealous God. (Exodus 34:14)

Man may choose to follow a god other than Yahweh, but he does not have the right to do so. It logically follows: Should government then provide such a right? If it does, what’s this say about such a government?

If it’s your right to choose any god you prefer, you cannot be judged for doing so. And if you can’t be judged for choosing another god, who’s really sovereign?

It’s not our sovereign right to choose our god but God’s sovereign right to choose us. Consequently, the alleged right to choose one’s god is itself a claim to divinity, tantamount to what was offered Adam and Eve in the Garden, “Ye shall be as gods!”

Christians need to rethink their love affair with First Amendment’s seditious “right” to religion. It was provided not by Yahweh, but by a group of Theistic Rationalists and Enlightenment Freemasons, whose ideological paradigm is polytheistic to its core.

The First Amendment’s Free Exercise Clause is responsible for transforming America from what was a predominantly monotheistic Christian nation (a united nation under one God) into one of the most polytheistic nations ever (a divided nation under many gods). It is arguably the most clever cover devised by man for sedition against Yahweh. It certainly has duped the majority of Christians into promoting the First Amendment as if some grand Christian ideal is found therein.

Only the Sovereign has a right to religion.


Ted Weiland, Constitution Mythbusters 28 Comments [6/16/2015 2:46:32 AM]
Fundie Index: 20
Submitted By: Skyknight

Quote# 109682

We prohibit_polygamy to protect women against religious and cultural abuse.

We prohibit_bestiality to protect animals against abuse, not to mention to just put a stop to perversion.

We prohibit_pederasty to protect children.

We prohibit_murder to protect people from killing each other.

We prohibit_incest to protect families against abuse and to avoid the chance of babies with genetic abnormalities.

We prohibit two people of the same gender from being called a marriage because kids have the right to be raised by their biological mother and father - same-gender marriages legally deny them this right 100% of the time, by design. So we protect kids from this by prohibiting any other form of "marriage" besides one man and one woman.

We prohibit two people of the same gender from being called a marriage because kids have the right to be raised by a mother and a father, not forced into setups that are dysfunctional 100% of the time and deny them this right: two or more fathers and no mother, or two or more mothers and no father. So we protect kids from being legally denied this right by prohibiting any other form of "marriage" besides one man and one woman.

We prohibit two people of same gender from being called a marriage (which it NEVER has in the history of the world) by the state as that's the state violating the constitution to establish their own state religion: Redefining religious institutions they never defined to begin with.

We prohibit two people of the same gender from being called a marriage because the government is violating the First Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America by REDEFINING religious institutions then passing laws to establish this new state religion where anyone who does not adhere to this new state religion is condemned as a criminal: sued and fined thousands of dollars.

We prohibit two people of the same gender from being called a marriage because in general marriage is for the possibility of procreation for the continuance of society - it's the bedrock of any healthy society. A same-gender marriage is, by design, never capable of such a thing and hence has one less basis of being called a "marriage".

We prohibit two people of the same gender from being called a marriage because any pro-creation should be within a marriage - same-gender 'marriages' are forced to go outside the 'marriage" 100% of the time by design. So we prohibit same-gender "marriage" to protect the foundation of a healthy nation.

We prohibit two people of the same gender from being called a marriage to protect Christians from being charged as a criminal if they do not violate their beliefs.

We prohibit two people of the same gender from being called a marriage because every single person alive has one biological mother and one biological father. Nature alone re-iterates what marriage is - that this is what a family is.

Reason2012, Christiannews.net  29 Comments [6/16/2015 2:46:25 AM]
Fundie Index: 16

Quote# 109681

Seeing a slut with her clothes off ought to make you mad. I love the beauty of the Hawaiian islands, but I loathe and hate the whorish hula dancers. They have bad character, thinking it is OK to get naked and entice men with their bodies. It is HEATHENDOM!!! If that is funny to you, you have a wicked heart!

That's why, even though I love to play Hawaiian songs on the steel guitar, I could never play steel guitar at such spiritually bankrupt events where sluts do the hula. Sexual immorality may seem normal for the unregenerate man, but as believers God expects us to be crucified with Jesus Christ. I AM CRUCIFIED WITH CHRIST, NEVERTHELESS I LIVE; YET NOT I, BUT CHRIST LIVETH IN ME (Galatians 2:20). I hate evil as God told me to in Psalms 97:10! I hate the lewd sluts and ungodly women who gyrate their hips for lustful men. The average person doesn't care or see any harm in such lewdness, but God condemns lust, filthy-mindedness, uncleanliness and sexual lasciviousness (Matthew 5:28; Colossians 3:5-6). Hawaii is a moral cesspool of iniquity!

David J. Stewart, JesusIsPrecious.org 35 Comments [6/16/2015 2:46:16 AM]
Fundie Index: 22
Submitted By: Chris

Quote# 109679

Re: Bruce Jenner Unveiled As Busty Woman In First Released Pic: "Call Me Caitlyn"

There was another episode of Savage where one transgender came on and it said it was the biggest mistake of it's life. Suicide and depression are EXTREMELY high in these creatures.

What is so disturbing is how delusional he is; that as I previously posted he said he must always have access to tampons! In Savage, he discusses how Bruce could not wait to be a 70-year-old grandmother. Savage even said, "what woman wants/can't wait to be 70?!"

People will ask me "why do you care? Let them live their life the way they want?" I respond, "This goes AGAINST my religious, psychological, and CONSTITUTIONAL BELIEFS". Some can understand the religious and psychological but not the Constitutional Beliefs. They do not understand, when we disagree/speak our mind..utilize our right to free speech, we are then deemed "a racist, transophobic, a hater, etc". We cannot even freely speak OUR VIEWS and the people AGAINST our Constitution are punishing us for exercising a right our forefathers fought for". Even homosexuals find Bruce to be an insult. The gay fashion guru, Tim Gunn, even said Kim Kardashian's book is vile and disgusting; but what do you expect from a man who has narcissistic, liberal, egotistic women in his life?! (Jenner) Then Jenner says he is "the new normal?!" Holy cow.

Savage also made an excellent point. Obama praises him for his courage and bravery. But Obama and liberal do not praise firefighters, police officers, those who served in war, would jump in front of a car or a gunshot to save someone. And yet, they said they would do it all again. But NONE of them are looking for praise; no less a 20-page layout in Vanity Fair.

Kitty0812, Stormfront.com 28 Comments [6/16/2015 2:46:04 AM]
Fundie Index: 11
Submitted By: HEIL SATAN

Quote# 109677

Homosexuals are using the Duggar incidents to try to somehow prove that conservatives are hypocritical.
Seems to me that the Duggars handled their situation - a 14 year old boy misbehaving - quite responsibly. They did the right things.
One must understand that LGBTQ groups are basically composed of super liberals and radical who hate any white family that has "too many" children and that is Christian. Minority families with many children are generally OK, you see.
Anything that smacks of healthiness or being "all-American" or too "white" or traditional makes liberals and LGBTQ groups nauseous.

Michex, BarbWire 26 Comments [6/16/2015 2:45:55 AM]
Fundie Index: 11
Submitted By: AJ Williams

Quote# 109674

Chiropractors have gotta love the cultural Left – I mean, an attentive observer could suffer whiplash tracking the whipsawing, confused, self-contradictory tenets of modern, libertine Liberalism.

Consider the purple-faced reaction to the revelation that twenty-seven-year-old Josh Duggar (of TLC’s 19 Kids and Counting) had inappropriately touched a number of young girls twelve years ago (his sisters and a babysitter among them).

Demands were seething: the now-married father of three should have been jailed for his malefaction. His openly Christian family — all of them, mom and dad, throng of offspring, their spouses, grandchildren — should be drummed out of enlightened company and lose their reality TV program permanently. Legal sanctions were even mentioned for the parents for what some observers consider an insufficient response to their son’s early-2000s’ actions.

Meanwhile, for decades society has been subjected to prurient progressives blowing out their cheeks and rolling their eyes at the mere suggestion of abstinence-based instruction for young people. “The kids,” we’re relentlessly, patronizingly tutored, ” are not going to listen. No matter what we say or do, they’re going to have sex!”

Take the the Daily Beast, which lately reported on a San Francisco “hero judge” who “rule[d] abstinence-only Sex Ed … illegal.” The same site exulted (“All Hail Scandinavia”) over a female doctor who demonstrated sex techniques for a classroomful of adolescents.

Best option? Train the panting lads to strap on a condom at some point during each tryst. Turn the young women – as many as possible, as early as possible – into fervid devotees of modern birth control technology. Sandra Fluke, anyone?

Humans, they imperturbably lecture anyone within earshot, are really just animals; “naked apes”, barely an evolutionary step above rutting canines. And kids? Especially TEENAGERS, for pity’s sake? Gland-driven little beasties. Incapable of keeping it in their pants.

Pubescent hormones uber alles!

Give the Duggar’s eldest man-child some credit for one thing — atrocious as was his misbehavior, reportedly no intercourse was involved — so no condom was needed at all! Doesn’t he get some props for that from the “do-it-but-just-don’t-contract-an-STD-or-get-anyone-preggers” set?

Admittedly, he didn’t keep his hands to himself — but, according to the kids-are-gonna-be-randy fatalism predominating trendy Left-Think, did he actually have any choice? Remember, teenage boys in particular are going to be teenage boys, right? Or so we’re unflaggingly informed.

On the other hand, if Josh Duggar’s baying denouncers insist he should have been expected to “Just say ‘No’” to those illegitimate, fourteen-year-old impulses in this one context, why is it assumed libidinal self-restraint can’t reach much beyond that among his peers? So he’s supposed to be ostentatiously scolded — his life practically ruined, in fact — for not curbing his youthful lusts in this notorious case?

Why then oughtn’t those exacting standards be expanded some to apply to all interaction between members of the opposite sex? If it’s being required he — and other boys like him — govern themselves when it comes to respecting a little sister or not copping a feel on a clueless neighbor, why is it so inconceivable that sexuo-relational boundaries be pushed a bit so that tempered, gentlemanly conduct is demanded from them across the board?

In sum: the Lothario Left’s attitude has been: Self-control for Josh Duggar? He** yeah! For the fumbling dork, however, in the backseat of Bob Seger’s “60 Chevy” (see “Night Moves“)? Or the frisky couple sneaking off for an alcohol-fueled, post-prom romp? Nothing much to be done to deter that. Those situations are inevitable. Where’s the prophylactics?

For a couple generations, at least, the tribunes of sexual revolution have been generating excuses for horny high-schoolers, even passionate pre-teens. We’ve been fed a gutless stream of surrendering, ruinously irresponsible malfeasance from those who are supposed to know better: adults’ recklessly facilitating young people’s – and not-so-young people’s – reckless behavior.

And any objections to same issuing from conservative/religious/traditional precincts have been met with agitated contempt. Recent headlines, for example, have included these flea-bitten sentiments: “Josh Duggar and the Purity Lie” and “The Duggars Dangerous Cult of Purity” (emphases mine).

Sounds to me like the young guy was merely operating according to secular Liberaldom’s bleak script. So why the shocked umbrage that he, if only passingly, comported himself as they predicted he — and all boys – eventually, inescapably will.

What’s that? Josh Duggar didn’t have to fondle those young innocents? Resistance to erotic temptation is, turns out, possible? Even by a hormone-addled kid?

Who knew?

It so happens, lots of us did — and have known, for ages. “Flee sexual immorality,” wrote one such centuries ago (1 Corinthians 6:18). “Among you there must not be even a hint of sexual immorality” (Ephesians 5:3).

The truth is, people — fourteen, forty-four or eighty-four years of age — are not slaves to their groins, powerless before their lusts and appetites. Regularly reminding others, including each new, maturing batch of human beings, of that rock-bottom, once widely acknowledge axiom is a healthy and desirable practice — for any society which wants to survive and flourish, that is.

Clearly, everyone won’t always abide by this sound, but admittedly challenging, counsel. Josh Duggar, regrettably, did not do so. His delinquencies do make plain, though, he should have; thus, he could have.

It’s gratifying to discover there are limits to the anything-goes abandon of the lifestyle Leftists. If this keeps up, who knows what’s next? Acknowledgment that physical intimacy on the second or third date isn’t necessarily a given? Admission that abortion isn’t the catch-all solution for the consequences of sexual carelessness? Grudging but whispered openness to the wait-until-marriage option?

Then, next thing you know, Liberals might end up shaking a finger or two at bad boys (and girls) beyond Josh Duggar.

Steve Pauwels, BarbWire 17 Comments [6/16/2015 2:24:57 AM]
Fundie Index: 11
Submitted By: AJ Williams

Quote# 109666

Another misconception many have about angels is when they refer to people as angels. This phrase is used especially when referring to infants and children. However, our infants and children are not little angels. All people are created in the image and likeness of God, not in the image and likeness of angels. Genesis 1:27: So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them. Calling a person an angel is underestimating their true of identity in the Lord.

unknown, shouting from the roof top 33 Comments [6/15/2015 3:21:10 AM]
Fundie Index: 8

Quote# 109665

Many Parents think it is good for their child to use their imagination so they think it is alright and even encourage their children to watch, read, or play with these things. However, their children are not using their own imaginations they are using the imaginations of other people that are inspired and led by evil spirits. The children are being introduced to an evil spiritual realm. Now they are seeing, thinking, and doing things they would have never thought of, or done, otherwise. Note: This evil deception also includes books and movies by so-called Christian authors who try to bring the aspect of science fiction and horror into their writing as a means of describing evil spirits. See my document on ‘Christian mythology’.


unknown, shouting from the roof top 29 Comments [6/15/2015 3:20:59 AM]
Fundie Index: 24
Submitted By: undie not fundie

Quote# 109664

Many people who practice ventriloquism will tell you they did not learn this dark art from any book; or even another person. They will tell you it just seemed they had a natural ability to do it. What they do not realize is they have spiritually received their ability under direction from evil spirits. The reason they have the ability to do it is because some members of their family, or their generations past, have practiced the abomination of black magic.

unknown, shouting from the roof top 35 Comments [6/15/2015 3:20:55 AM]
Fundie Index: 24

Quote# 109663

[I am Pro-Life.
I think abortion should be illegal, unless the mother's life is in danger.]




Life is life. Why kill a baby if the mother's life is in danger? Why not let the mother die and save the baby? Who are we to choose which life should be chosen over another? Why not leave it into God's hands to decide who should live or die. It is disturbing that some people claim to be pro life then put restrictions on life....

Justoneway, Christian forums 36 Comments [6/15/2015 3:18:32 AM]
Fundie Index: 28

Quote# 109657

couple had a one-eyed stuffed large frog named “Max”. After some period of time they began to talk about him as if he were a family member. Max sat on a bookcase and eventually the couple “noticed his eye” seemed to be looking at them. God revealed the demonic properties of Max, he was trashed and the curses broken that demons had put on the frog.

unknown, free in the lord 20 Comments [6/15/2015 3:12:13 AM]
Fundie Index: 23

Quote# 109656

3 year old had a “Raggedly Ann” doll and held on to the doll as if it were a brother or sister. The Lord spoke to an unrelated adult about this doll and said “None of My daughters are raggedly Anns”. Parents need to examine the toys, dolls, stuffed animals and games their children for these items attract demonic spirits and bring numerous curses on the child and into the child's home.

unknown, free in the lord 17 Comments [6/15/2015 3:11:58 AM]
Fundie Index: 24

Quote# 109655

Only 25 years ago America was ascendant (Reagan era). The Wall was down, truth was valued, a fictitious 'peace dividend" was spent (though not yet even earned; thanks, Bill Clinton!). "The Great Evil" had been defeated. A few years later G.H.W Bush led an eye-blink war slapping down Hussein. America still on top. So while this slide to demonic infatuation can be traced rightly back to Bolshevik days, the real growth spurt is recent - starting with the anti-morality decline of Bill Clinton.

Only twenty years.

And while I can understand full well the discouragement and fatalistic outlook many have - I have at times - this is silliness. Reagan was elected and pundits said there would never again be a Democrat President - their time was over. Clinton benefited from a booming economy and pundits said the same thing about Republicans. Obama and people said the GOP was toast. Real estate will never go down ... or never recover.

None of these ends up true. And I have little confidence our country is doomed, though it certainly looks bleak at the moment.

RCQ_92130, Barbwire 20 Comments [6/15/2015 3:11:42 AM]
Fundie Index: 14

Quote# 109651

There is a curse upon the Amish society, because they are teaching a false gospel of earning one's way to Heaven. Isaiah 64:6 says that even our best human efforts are complete filth in God's sight. Eternal life is based solely upon what Christ did for us to pay for our sins, not upon what we can do for Him. Look to Jesus!

Amish also practice the heresy of baptismal regeneration (that is, they require water baptism to be saved). Salvation is not guaranteed in the Amish religion. Amish believe that faithfully attending church increases their chances of going to Heaven. It is a strict salvation-by-works false religion based upon human effort. They do their best and hope they make it.

The truth is that you don't go to Heaven because you're good, and you don't go to Hell because you're bad. You go to Heaven because you have Christ's righteousness by faith. If you die in your sins without Christ's righteousness, then you will go to Hell to be punished and pay for your own sins forever (2nd Thessalonians 1:8-9). The sad truth is that there are many good people in Hell this moment.

David J. Stewart, Jesus is Savior 42 Comments [6/15/2015 3:10:10 AM]
Fundie Index: 22

Quote# 109650

if it's giving birth to the child and the mother is at risk of death, i honestly do believe the child means more than the mother.the mother has already lived quite a bit of her life if she's had sex at a proper age to end up with the fetus in the first place. whereas, the fetus / child hasn't even had the chance to begin their life.
besides, there are plenty of women who have been told they will not live through the birth, but have. you can't always rely on what the doctor says.
my grandmother was told it was not wise to give birth to her child, but she did so anyway. then came my mother. now here i am.
also, you would not be 'forcing' her to become an abusive parent. she herself decides her actions and if she decides to hit her child, that was not forced by someone that was her own doing no matter her condition.
furthermore, killing off children simply because the parents aren't seen fit to take care of them is just wrong if you ask me. if someone is truly unfit to take care of a child, then don't take care of it. give it up. there are plenty of people that are barren or are just not wanting a child of their own and would like to help another's. also, you can't really make the argument that people are telling mothers to put their child up for adoption when nobody is adopting and that they're all talk. over around 40,000 children / people are adopted internationally every year. people are indeed adopting.

might i add, by the way, that every time i argue against someone on the matter of whether or not a fetus is indeed a life, the person always changes the subject to something else having to do with abortion. i find that is because they realise they are very much in the wrong to have said that the fetus is not a life and that it shouldn't matter if we end that life in cold blooded murder.

skeptical, Deviantart 22 Comments [6/15/2015 3:09:07 AM]
Fundie Index: 13

Quote# 109649

This Pagan Police Association stinks of the Illuminati, whose whole goal in life is the destruction of Christianity, and when the Christians are finished off, then they may come for the heathens. Christianity and paganism are so linked as to be cousins of belief, once upon a time there were many Gods, and some people began to place one higher than the others. When the Hebrews were choosing El, we were choosing Woden, the only difference is they believed in a Messiah, and when the Messiah came, known as the Christ, some of their number refused him, and had the Romans kill him. To this day some people hate the notions that the Messiah has been and gone, and hold out that he is yet to arrive. These people loath Christianity, and will do anything to destroy it. Including the promotions of pre Christian worship, so be careful that the neo pagans do not have an ulterior motive.

I would like to think that we as the English people have advanced a little since the old days, and the worshiping of the stars the moon and the sun is like looking back to the seventies when people had flared trousers. Satanism is also linked with paganism, but there again Satanism is the worship of the anti Christ, so there is an ulterior motive there in. An old English pagan would have no idea of the "anti-Christ", he would understand good against evil and know to recognize one from the other.

Ceawlin, Anglo-Saxon Foundation 15 Comments [6/15/2015 3:08:51 AM]
Fundie Index: 10

Quote# 109647

Become a fucking savage. Do you hate this modern world and the disgusting women it has shat out of its unholy womb?

Make yourself harder, meaner, stronger and more fucking ruthless than any white knight faggot could ever imagine.

Do women owe you anything? Does this shit hole of a modern progressive world owe us anything? Nope. Then we fucking OWE THEM NOTHING!

So give them your fucking middle finger and the spit out of your mouth. Mock them, bruise them, fucking shit all over them. Find like minded men estranged from this rancid cuntocracy and help light the fuse that burns this fucking shit to the goddamn ground.

More men are waking up. More are seeing that everything has been stolen from them and now we have absolutely NOTHING. Well do you know what that means? Now we are truly free and we have nothing to lose. We are on death ground and now it's time to wreak some fucking havoc. When you have nothing to lose you are the most dangerous fucking thing in this entire goddamn world.

Let the anger and the rage flow through you like fuel cascading down onto a righteous fire in your belly.

Train yourselves up in violent disciplines. Take no shit from anyone and be prepared to exact furious retribution on all transgressors. If you don't make them pay no one will. Fucking remember that shit goddamnit.

Most of all stop doing whatever you can think of that helps keep this unholy beast chugging along. Grab some gasoline and let's light a cigar as this motherfucker burns to the ground!

CaptainObvious, Return of Kings 39 Comments [6/15/2015 3:07:59 AM]
Fundie Index: 22

Quote# 109646

[All links and formatting in original]

It's #yeguranistparade weekend in Edmonton, and as usual the media is all over themselves promoting a disgusting event that features naked men engaging in sodomy but without any of the critical coverage that, say an awareness campaign about murdered babies is given for featuring pictures of an aborted fetus.

In fact, you won't see a single WARNING: Global News has chosen to include a photo further down in the article. It may be offensive to some readers when the post-faggot parade coverage takes place.

The parade, by the way, is polluting Whyte Avenue this year, which is a shame since the #yegsodomitehike had for the longest time been downtown, leaving a glorious afternoon where Whyte Avenue was completely fudge packer free. That won't be possible this year, sadly, though you should be able to enjoy your day downtown without having any homely sapphists getting in your face. At least until the festivities wind down and all those cocksuckers cross the faggy High Level Bridge on their way to Buddy's Bathhouse. As a result, they polluted the city crosswalks by painting their disgusting epicene flag on the roadside.

Normally I'd say piss on the goddamned thing but with #yegsodomyfest running some uranist would try sucking you off. https://t.co/CHhyCRD4Wm
— FACLC (@FACLC) June 5, 2015

This year is going to be even worse, with sperm bumping MLAs courtesy of Alberta's ridiculously ill-advised Orange Wave, and Faggot-Familiar Alliances recently being implemented in your children's schools against your wishes. They'll be riding high, and while I certainly applaud anybody who shows up with a baseball bat and gives them a lesson in anal pain unrelated to their flamer lifestyle, it's far far better to just stay away.

There will be a day to defeat the poofters. We will do it, we will do it swiftly and with as much violence as we deem necessary, and when we are done the pillow biters will be yesterday's news in this beautiful province and cowardly pederasts like Kris Wells will be either run out of the province or buried six feet under it.

Feynman and Coulter's Love Child, The Third Edge of the Sword 22 Comments [6/15/2015 3:07:48 AM]
Fundie Index: 14
Submitted By: JeanP

Quote# 109644

Recently Bill Nye “the Science Guy” appeared in an interview in which he defended his participation in our evolution/creation debate last year. Many secularists were upset that Nye chose to debate me, claiming that debating creationists gives us some sense of credibility. Of course, most secularists ignore the fact that many of the greatest scientists of the past were creationists and many PhD scientists today are also biblical creationists (we have several PhD scientists on our full-time staff).

Actually, secularists these days don’t want public debates for a number of reasons, one being they don’t want the public to hear the information they have by and large successfully censored (in the public school system and much of the media). Evolutionists know that when creationists present the true nature of the creation/evolution debate (as I did during the debate with Bill Nye), many people will understand that molecules-to-man evolution is a belief—a religion. The secularists don’t want the public to understand that the religion of atheism is being forced on millions of school students and the culture as a whole.

Ken Ham, Answers in Genesis 36 Comments [6/14/2015 3:45:45 AM]
Fundie Index: 23
Submitted By: Chris

Quote# 109643

“He who sees the eyes of a child beaten and molested while his God watched is a seriously sick person for believing in a God.”

It is thoughtless to jump to the conclusion that nothing created everything, simply because God doesn’t immediately punish evil. If He intervened and had Judgment Day today, where would you stand under the light of moral perfection? God is holding back from punishing child molesters, rapists, adulterers, fornicators, homosexuals, those who lust, hate, lie, steal and covet, because He is rich in mercy and willing to forgive all who repent and trust in Jesus.

Ray Comfort, Ray Comfort's blog 39 Comments [6/14/2015 3:45:39 AM]
Fundie Index: 13
Submitted By: Chris

Quote# 109637

Okay. This is a VERY hard thing to think about. Now, are we talking abortion? If so, I view it like this:
It's the mom's fault she got knocked up, and she needs to take responsability. So, if the babey could kill her in the pregnancy, let it. ( i know, a bit harsh).

If it is a non-abortion situation:

I think that the wife should live. The wife can have another kid. The wife also may have a job, helping support the family. If she died, and the baby lived, the husband may not have enough money to keep the house ect. and keep the baby. If the wife lived, sure, the death of a child is devastating, but she could get over it. She could have another child( if it suits her). Besides, a baby should have BOTH a mother AND a father.

Kribensis12, Christian Teen Forums 24 Comments [6/14/2015 3:30:57 AM]
Fundie Index: 17

Quote# 109636

Has the whorish mainstream media finally taken notice of the endless crime spree in the White House? Thank you pathological big egos. It finally took the demands of the ego-monster to get their attention. One too many times being ignored and being denied information I reckon.

Middle finger president Obama has from the beginning done nothing but lie about all he is involved with. The only truth he has given us is regarding his intention to transform America, bankrupt the coal industry, and force his dangerously compromised Obamacare on the people.

He also from the start shared his shame for America. Apparently with this last declaration – the one of being ashamed, he couldn’t find a therapist to work it out so he just told the world about it and planned to punish us severely.

America has watched so many Obama – ‘transformation’ elephants fly through their living rooms with no action or response, that we can barely take in air anymore. Is it remotely possible that the media and politicians will recover their judgment, courage and brains now before they roll the body out?

[...]

“Just one small problem Obama…Americans has been waking up the last few years, Republican and Democrat, young and old, Black & White along with other flavors. We see you, your narcissism, your crimes and your communistic and radical Muslim core. We don’t like it, or your transformation agenda from hell. We will not put up with it, the hiding of your criminal toys in the closet, nor your plans to destroy and control America.”

House and Senate members and media everywhere, it is time for all of us to do more than wake up. Confronting and exposing Obama and his endless crimes is just the beginning but a good start. The exposure has to be loud, continuous and fierce.

Now, our leadership and media must demand as they are starting to do, that we see many arrests for these crimes.

Obama must be seen for what he really is all over the media, while our political leadership crushes his agenda, criminal staff and eventually him.

Obama thinks he is the great white shark who can eat us all alive. Nothing can stop him. Do I see a furrow in his brow as he glances around him?

I see a whole lot of ticked off American dolphins surrounding him. Last I checked…dolphins trump sharks.

Laurie Roth, BarbWire 26 Comments [6/14/2015 3:29:18 AM]
Fundie Index: 12

Quote# 109630

[Why is a woman's life worth less than a fetus'?]

It isn't. I think that someone who would prefer to exterminate their child in order to preserve their own life is a selfish coward. "Greater love hath no man than this, that a man lays down his life for his friend" --Matthew 15:13.I don't want EITHER the mother or child to die. If the decision of who dies is made by the mother, she should choose to die, that her child would live.

CliveStaples, Online Debate 36 Comments [6/14/2015 3:26:52 AM]
Fundie Index: 16