Quote# 110634

Ahh yes. Can you feel that, folks? The winds of change sweeping over us as the tide of public opinion turns against us. As a growing number of "churches" become apostate and worldly, true Christianity becomes increasingly marginalized with a small group of fanatical fundamentalist "hold outs" still vainly clinging to the NOW rejected position that the Bible is or ever was the inerrant Word of God. As one pastor put it, "the supreme court ruling was a clear shot over the bow for Christians in America". And now the flood gates for Christian persecution in America are beginning to open.

Stand firm in the faith and stand apart from all the posers, remembering that God has already told us that this would happen. And that He calls for patience and endurance from His church throughout the coming persecution and imprisonment, EVEN UNTO DEATH, should it come to that. And show this depraved and immoral, hedonistic, self-indulgent, spineless and ever fearful world what real courage looks like as we take our place in the history books and at the altar of Almighty God next to the brave men and women who "did not love their own lives even unto death" but went instead BOLDLY to their deaths, before they would ever even consider renouncing their faithfulness to the One who did the very same for them :(

And remember, Jesus could never return as long as there was a Christian, God fearing and God loving United States of America in the world, continuing to export Christianity
across the globe as she has done. No, He returns to a world that has rejected Him, a world of depravity and debauchery, one of sexual anarchy, lawlessness and financial collapse. He returns, not to a joyous welcoming committee, but instead TO BATTLE.
To a world with an Israel reborn after thousands of years without a homeland, yet surrounded by enemies committed to her destruction, while the nations of the world attempt to divide her land and even her very capital, Jerusalem itself.

Any of this sound familiar? : )
Yes, praise God, we're almost home! Take heart, folks! Let not your hearts be troubled!
Not long now.

The Last Trump, Christian News Network 16 Comments [7/10/2015 3:14:31 AM]
Fundie Index: 6

doing

Quote# 110633

not just a gays are doing problems but many peoples doing problems but i dont like gays what they doing with iniquity and they say what they are doing positive thing which is not just making them souls darken with blasphemes agains GOD'S law .And many not gay people they even doing same mistakes. God bless you all people amen

Welle Blue, Christian News Network 20 Comments [7/10/2015 3:14:13 AM]
Fundie Index: 11

Quote# 110630

[Look, pool. You're trying to say that theists don't exist just because what they worship isn't well defined. But they do exists, just as football exists, even though football players play an imperfect game. Catch my drift?]


And now i'm just sitting here sobbing like a 2 year old because nobody has ever been that understanding with me,even my dad - i'd probably save you if i had to choose between you and 5 random people.

*That's exactly what i'm saying.
How can someone believe in something with no physical or theoretical evidence(But probability can say that the existence is probable because:aliens(long story))but when it is also something that is ill defined?Then it's a whole another thing..

*It's like believing in fldsmdfrism which is a ism that says that fldsmdfr exists and fldsmdfrists doesn't even know what fldsmdfr is.Therefore i can discredit fldsmdfrism and therefore fldsmdfrists cannot exist because the reason why they existed in the first place is itself flawed!

*I can't seem to connect god with football because football has a physical evidence also it has a consistent definition.("Any of various forms of team game involving kicking (and in some cases also handling) a ball, in particular (in the UK) soccer or (in the US) American football.")

*So if god doesn't exist theism shouldn't exist either because the most basic element that was used to build theism is "God".So theists do not also exists.But theists that "think" they know the definition of God exists,but they aren't truly theists because they only "think" they know it there can never be "theists".Don't you agree?
If you do,then why should atheism exist?Which is a ism that rejects the claim of theism(which cannot make a claim because what they are claiming to exist doesn't have any theoretical evidence nor does it have any physical evidence and then they say they don't even have a consistent definition of it!What the fuck theists??)

pool, AtheistForums.org 15 Comments [7/10/2015 3:11:33 AM]
Fundie Index: 14
Submitted By: Stimbo

Quote# 110627

There’s a ridiculous rumor in the Church today that Jesus is humble. What a laugh. Jesus is anything but humble, and He is clearly demonstrating His love of glory by the way He basks in Self-exaltation. The Holy One, the True One—these fancy titles are lofty compliments that Jesus is paying to Himself. He keeps reminding everyone that He is Mr. Awesome. Well, of course He is—He’s God Almighty, and our Gods have no use for downplaying Their own magnificence. They have extremely high opinions of Themselves and They broadcast those opinions without hesitation.

Anna Diehl, The Pursuit of God 12 Comments [7/10/2015 3:09:28 AM]
Fundie Index: 9

Quote# 110626

(on homosexuality being a choice)

It is a choice moron, every bit as much a choice as any other sexual perversion. Science? That's a joke, it is learned behavior - period, don't run away from it with your head firmly planted up your boyfriends poop-chute. Name one time I gave "straights" a pass on that, until you do don't bother me with your fabricated crap.

Oboehner, Christian News Network 13 Comments [7/10/2015 3:03:51 AM]
Fundie Index: 9

Quote# 110624

Well, I always told my kids in lieu of pulling the plug on the cable that watching all the paranormal shows on tv was a form of studying demon activity. By demon activity I mean those Atlantian creatures who were advanced enough to avoid the preAdamic chaotic earth scene, much like the rich and famous could do so now with their prebooked flights to the outer limits. Anyway, said child now has encounters that I think stem from that, but she doesn't realize that she gave an opening. Anymore than she was almost 'naturally' gay after a traumatic event that if it had not been for a "malebonding" experience where she was beatup when being mistaken for a boy sent her back to a more feminine perspective, would have not realized it as anything but a natural occurance.
Not to say that you were seeking the experience but I think that things we may not realize (oiji board as extreme example) do bring on events.

Cassia, Christian Forums 14 Comments [7/10/2015 3:03:40 AM]
Fundie Index: 13

Quote# 110621

I've noticed it for decades, the liberals and/or democrats divide everyone by race, gender, skin color, etc... where they create a box with a label on it. Everyone 'this' or 'that' gets identified, categorized, stigmatized, and stereotyped, and goes into their box.

OICU812, City Data 16 Comments [7/10/2015 3:01:28 AM]
Fundie Index: 0
Submitted By: ScrappyB

Quote# 110620

If the last space on a lifeboat can be given to either a 97 year old granny or a 17 year old high school girl, then all other things being equal 99.999% of the population would acknowledge the last seat goes to the 17-year-old. Similarly, any baby in or out of the womb is "more valuable" than the mother (or father) because the baby has more years of life available. For that reason, if some sort of surgical intervention is required and the honest choice is having to sacrifice exclusively either the mother or the child, the lesser evil is to sacrifice the mother in the interests of the greater number of years available to the child's lifetime. The only exception to the foregoing would be if the baby had some serious developmental defect that condemned the baby to a shorter lifetime than the mother.

As to rape and incest, the pro-abortion argument is selfish and clearly false. We all have one mother, two grandmothers, four great-grandmothers, and 1,024 great-9x-grandmothers. At a rape rate of 1% (and crime statistics indicate the rape rate is much higher), we all have on average at least 10 female ancestors resulting from rape a few generations ago, plus more ancestors born earlier and perhaps more ancestors more recently. Adding in male children, the number of rape-resultants in anyone's ancestry is double. If it were legitimate to kill the baby for his or her mother being raped, the extermination of the corresponding ancestors would have made sure that practically everyone would never have had a mother and/or a father born, and therefore practically everyone would have had zero chance to be born. When pro-abortionists chant devotion to their idol of killing babies to make the innocents pay for rapes they didn't commit, they are denying the validity of their own existence and therefore their own line of argumentation. Of course, like abortion hypocrites always do, they wouldn't follow their own advice and vivisect and dismember themselves simply because they resulted from a mother or grandmother or great-grandmother being raped. Their whole argument is one of selfish convenience, as with any mafia-style system of using crude pretexts so as to conceal the truth with elaborate lies. Even more hypocritically, Live Action's videos clearly prove Planned Parenthood doesn't care about rape at all, and they actively and elaborately cover up rapes that are reported to them. So the "abort for rape" lie falls apart at all of its twists and turn. And "rape resultants" like Rebecca Kiessling are happy to testify, along with their mothers, that after being raped the right decision was proven to be KEEP THE BABY to make mother happy she did the right thing.

Whether rape is involved or not, we all have El Derecho de Nacer (The Right to Be Born). This was the title of a Mexican movie made in 1952, set in Cuba, and it is available on Netflix with English subtitles.

randy crawford, Live Action Blog 18 Comments [7/10/2015 2:59:30 AM]
Fundie Index: 12

Quote# 110619

You are here: Home › Featured › General › The Homosexual Movement Is The Most Hateful And Most Vile Group In All Of The Western World



The Homosexual Movement Is The Most Hateful And Most Vile Group In All Of The Western World

by Ted on July 7, 2015 in Featured, General
By Theodore Shoebat

Sodomite activist, no different than Nazis
Sodomite activist, no different than Nazis
The homosexual movement is the most hateful and most vile group in all of the Western world. The sodomites are supremacists; they believe that they have the superior lifestyle, a disposition and constitution more superior than the “others,” who they consider as inferior breeders. This is the ideology of sodomism.

Sodomism is the ideology of homosexual superiority, in which the homosexuals desire to usher in — through propaganda, violence and state coercion — a utopia in which homosexuality is seen as a supreme ideal, and those who believe in the conjugal union as is affirmed and established by the Christian Faith, are viewed and treated as enemies.

Many empires have advanced sodomism, with each attaching it to a particular religion. The Roman Empire advanced sodomism as it was associated with their own religion; the Seleucids advanced sodomism as it was associated with their hybrid religion of Syrian and Greek mythologies; the Greeks did the same, as did the Samurai and the Muslims.

St Paul was a witness to this supremacist way of thinking. He described the homosexuals as “proud, boasters,” (Romans 1:30) and as “leaving the natural use of the woman” (Romans 1:26). They are proud because they reject the woman, and this can only be described as someone esteeming himself as superior because of his homosexuality. While the modernist heretics of today want to accuse us of sexism, they praise the greatest form of sexism, and that is homosexuality, where gender is seen as insignificant, the role of the woman is seen as nothing, and where a child having the chance to be raised by a woman, is viewed as frivolous, and any objection to this is viewed as dangerous.

Its quite interesting that the Bible describes the sodomites as proud, and today they flood the streets and call their assemblies a “pride rally.” They are proud of their sodomism, and lift their heads above humanity. We see this in the story of Lot in Sodom and Gomorrah. The homosexuals surround the house and cry out, “Where are the men who came to you tonight? Bring them out to us that we may know them carnally.” (Genesis 19:5) They immediately wanted men, seeing the conjugal union as inferior.

This dark sentiment fully manifested itself once Lot cowardly offered his daughters to satisfy their violent lusts, and they said: “Stand back!” (Genesis 19:9) They wanted nothing to do with women, because at that point, they had totally plunged themselves into the prison of the demonic and fled away from the higher humanity; but not only this, it was because they saw the woman as inferior, and homosexual sodomy as superior.

There is no other reason as to why the sodomites wanted to abolish marriage between a man and a woman, than that they view the conjugal union as inferior to their sexual anarchy. They see sexual anarchy as superior to orthodox monogamy, and this is why they demanded the redefining of marriage. It was purely a supremacist push.

The problem is that the Christians of the West kept insisting that they “loved” sodomites, and that sodomites needed to be treated as equals. Instead, what we should have been doing from the beginning, and what we should continue to do, is declare the Christian Faith as superior to the diabolical ideology of sodomism; we should always be exclaiming the Christian religion to be supreme, as opposed to continuously apologizing and pre-qualifying our affirmations against the homosexuals. We should not be referring to modern thinking, but to St. Peter when he described the homosexuals as “natural brute beasts made to be caught and destroyed” (2 Peter 2:12).

Theodore Shoebat, Shoebat.com 16 Comments [7/10/2015 2:58:48 AM]
Fundie Index: 12
Submitted By: Rabbi Realm

Quote# 110618

“After a big decision like this, people scream and holler, ‘This is bad for the country,’ and then we just acquiesce,” Clarke said. “I believe one of these decisions might just be a catalyst to not just say we don’t like it but to actually do something, to defy this stuff.

“And that’s what churches are supposed to do is resist. And if the court comes back and says you don’t have a right to exercise your religion, then they’re going to have to decide what to do next. … But who would have thought that in the 21 century homosexuality would come out of the closet and churches would be forced to go into the closet?”



The Constitution is being “obliterated,” and “our democratic way of life is being transformed into a socialist agenda, and I don’t know what it’s going to take short of a Lexington-Concord type moment,” Clarke said.

“We had a Civil War. We see a great divide forming again. That’s a part of the landscape that has come from Obama; he’s an Alinskyite, and he knows you have to create a critical mass. So they’ve created all this division, stirring up racial animosity in our cities, rich against poor in the Occupy movement, and now it’s this religious divide. That’s why I keep telling people gay marriage is not the issue; you’re missing it. You have to peel back the layers and look at this transformation. It happens subtly right before your eyes, and you’ll miss it.”

Clarke said division in the conservative movement also aids the left.

“They will have to band together and decide what they’re going to do, but I think the first act is defiance,” he said. “Justices Alito, Scalia, Roberts, Thomas said this is unconstitutional. I’m going with that, and what these four justices said went against the language of these five oligarchs. Amend the Constitution if we don’t like it because we’ve done it, what, 27 times?"

Sherrif David Clarke, Right Wing Watch 7 Comments [7/10/2015 2:58:36 AM]
Fundie Index: 8
Submitted By: Yuu

Quote# 110617

http://www.saintgianna.org/

The woman in the story posted by the OP is an example of what it ultimately means to be a mother. To be willing to give up your life for your child. To protect and defend that life.

To those who would kill their baby to save their life, what would your children and husband think of you? Could you really tell your children that you killed their sibling just so you could have a few more years (comparatively speaking; life on earth is so brief compared to our eternal life) here on Earth?

It takes a lot of courage to do what that woman did. We have to look beyond our own wants and needs and do what is right.

HappyMamaJ, babycenter 12 Comments [7/10/2015 2:58:27 AM]
Fundie Index: 7

Quote# 110612

Immediately after a white gunman killed nine worshippers at a black church in Charleston, South Carolina, last month, Larry Pratt of Gun Owners of America started laying blame on the church’s slain pastor, who was also a state senator, for supporting gun control and not allowing concealed weapons in his church.

In an interview with Armed America Radio that was posted online last week, Pratt doubled down, claiming that the shooter, Dylann Roof, targeted a church “populated by liberals” and pastored by “Mr. Anti-Gun” because he knew his victims would be unarmed.

“Since this particular church was pastored by a state senator who was Mr. Anti-Gun,” he said, “then it became pretty obvious that yep, that was a gun-free zone, a bunch of liberal Democrats in there, and the dirtbag that struck, I think knew exactly what he was doing. There’d be plenty of black churches that he could have gone into, and he probably could have met effective resistance, but he went to one where it would be known to be populated by liberals, and then he had open season.”

Pratt made a similar argument about the 2011 mass shooting in Tucson that critically injured Rep. Gabrielle Giffords, claiming that the shooter “didn’t find any resistance” because Giffords is a Democrat.

Larry Pratt, Right Wing Watch 38 Comments [7/9/2015 3:52:25 AM]
Fundie Index: 25
Submitted By: Ibuki Mioda

Quote# 110610

Pealeontologists are now even doubting if dinosaurs ever existed !!
THE DINOSAURS NEVER EXISTED"
and stone henge is fake as it was built entirely from scratch in 1953!

Ha suckers so much for your attemots to deny Gods truth
And invent your pagan stone lol temples!
Down with the papal antichrist!
Jesus is lord of all creation Forever

Anonymous Gossiper, Give Me Gossip 35 Comments [7/9/2015 3:36:20 AM]
Fundie Index: 31

Quote# 110604

It is my personal opinion that this whole cross-dressing ordeal with Bruce (now Caitlyn) Jenner was planned long ago. The reason is because of the way it is progressing in social media, and the timing of it all. What are the chances of Bruce Jenner coming out as a woman right before the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on June 26, 2015 that same-sex marriages are now legal? And now Bruce (I'll never call him Caitlyn) is doing interviews nationwide, and even has his own upcoming TV show promoting his new deathstyle, which will debut on July 26. It is shameful. Jenner (a male) blasphemes God by claiming that God chuckled and made him a male with a female soul, to cause him internal struggle in life as a test...

[Snip news article]

As you just read, Mr. Jenner thinks that God chuckles over his cross-dressing. Jenner believes that God created him for the purpose of dealing with gender identity. My friend, that is hogwash! The truth is that Bruce Jenner is confused about sin. God in His infinite wisdom did not make a mistake when He made Bruce Jenner. God does not make mistakes. If God ever created a homosexual man, who desires to have sexual relations with other men, then He messed-up by giving that poor man male genitals incapable of mating with other males. Kindly, God did NOT intend for men to sodomize each other in the anus!!! Two men cannot naturally reproduce to conceive children. If a man believes that he is a homosexual, then God is calling him to a life of celibacy, because homosexuality is a vile sin (Romans 1:24-32).

David J. Stewart, Jesus is Precious 30 Comments [7/9/2015 3:28:24 AM]
Fundie Index: 15

Quote# 110603

I was not too long ago called “old school” by a “new school” Baptist pastor, who preaches on women being modest about twice a year, but his definition of morality for ladies permits them to wear pants, slacks and other men's attire. May I say, I am proud to be called “old school” concerning morality. I am not a perfect man, but I want to be by God's grace. Biblically, women ought not wear pants. That's what our text verse says. Women ought not wear men's clothing. Many prostitutes wear pants, which is the attire (clothing) of a harlot, exposing her shapely thighs. Proverbs 7:9-10, “In the twilight, in the evening, in the black and dark night: And, behold, there met him a woman with the attire of an harlot, and subtil of heart.”

In the early 20th century, only whorish women in brothels (whore houses) wore pants. You couldn't find a woman wearing pants in public in 1900. Those were the good old days. Look at that awesome photo above! Women wore long beautiful dresses. In the swinging 1950's, women started wearing slacks and miniskirts, which escalated into the nudity of the 1960's, resulting in millions of unwanted pregnancies and the murderous abortion industry of the 1970's. So many women wear pants these days that the shame of immodesty is gone. After decades of declining shame over sin, now even homosexuals are legally permitted to marry in all 50 states. Evil companies like Walt Disney encourage young girls to dress like prostitutes, wearing high-heels, lip gloss and negligees at 11-years-old. Unbelievably, there are numerous clothing companies that fabricate and sell whorish attire for children. They ought to be in prison!

The Word of God is very clear that a woman is prohibited from wearing pants. It is a wicked thing that clothing designers today make dress pants for women. Pants have always been men's clothing. It is shameful that most Bible colleges and evangelical churches (even Independent Baptist Churches) don't discourage women from wearing pants. Get mad at me if you want, I believe the Holy Bible. A woman that wears pants is disobeying God. She is not right with God. If she is an older woman, she is encouraging younger women to wear pants by wearing them herself. Pants on a woman draws men's attention to her hips, curves and bodily shape, which is a precursor to sexual immorality. At a minimum, a woman wearing pants blurs and diminishes the distinction between femininity and masculinity. God deliver our culture from masculine females!!!

In our predominantly lewd, nude and crude American culture, preaching like this is scorned and laughed at, but God is on my side because I am on His side. What do you think God prefers, that which discourages lust or that which encourages it?

David J. Stewart, Jesus is Precious 37 Comments [7/9/2015 3:28:07 AM]
Fundie Index: 12

Quote# 110600

I came across a review from prison planet, about the new Alexus car commercial, and how it was filled with illuminati symbolism.

I sensed that it may not be the best thing for me to be viewing at that time, but I went ahead and looked at it anyways.

As I read the article, I scrolled down the page, and as soon as I seen one of the Illuminati symbols, that looked like a line of black and while ghostly figures, I FELT a demon come through the computer screen. (It went right through me; definitely a creepy feeling.)

I immediately cast out the demon, and shut down the computer, but I was still too late.

One of my kids came rushing into my bedroom, his eyes still full of sleep, and asked me what it was that I had just encountered on the web.

There was no question from this child that I had just been surfing the web; he KNEW that the demon waking him up from his sleep and attacking him had come from my room and through the internet.

“Why?” I asked him. “What happened?”

He then described to me, the demon who had just come into his bedroom to try and attack him.

It sounded just like the black and white ghostly picture that I had just seen on that web page just moments before. The symbols were the same, so I knew it had to have come from that site.

As I apologized to my child, I realized that I may have to stop surfing the web late at night, for I did not want to disturb my kids sleep like this any more.

Dreams of Dunamis, Dreams of Dunamis 24 Comments [7/9/2015 3:27:03 AM]
Fundie Index: 18

Quote# 110599

Being a Guy i don't like gay men, but lesbians could be useful with our breeding program as long as they are not butch type.

Lesbians of the White Race could use Sperm Donation from White Men which will help repopulate our Planet.

Aryanalien, Aryan (Nordic Alpine) Aliens 26 Comments [7/9/2015 3:26:08 AM]
Fundie Index: 21

Quote# 110598

July 15, 2006 HEAT WAVE linked to July 15 JADE HELM?

On July 14/15 I had many awake visons from God

July 14 I saw Visions of a brick road in heaven leading to an Asian looking temple with angels in armor with a scroll.

On July 15, I saw, in real life, no vision, the sun rise dark red with a Bright yellow blindfold on it. The blindfold fell of and I saw a face in the dark red sun looking at the earth in anger.

That day marked the beginning of the 2006 north American Heat wave, that killed hundreds.


I knew the heat wave was a sign of God's wrath and the tribulation to come, Could July 15 date also be a sign of the beginning of the tribulation?

Look at the maps too!

[link to upload.wikimedia.org]

[link to img.youtube.com]

"By July 25, California authorities documented at least 38 deaths related to the heat in 11 counties. Temperatures reached 110–115 °F (43–46 °C) in the central valley of California July 23–24.[24] State officials said it was the worst heat wave to hit Northern and Southern California simultaneously in 57 years.[25] Front page newspaper coverage described some individual deaths.[26] By July 29, the mounting death toll left the coroner's office in Fresno overwhelmed[27][28] — double-stacking bodies.[29][30]"

If you compare the maps, it's strange the greatest heat was seen in the jade Helm states.


Also, interesting that people didn't start to die until later in July.

Jul5 15 Tribulation starts, Godlike Productions 28 Comments [7/9/2015 3:25:51 AM]
Fundie Index: 8

Quote# 110596

THIS IS THE SHOCKING TRUTH ABOUT "GAYS", the politically incorrect truth

For several decades now we have all been inundated with social engineering concerning tolerance of homosexuals. Most of us were willing to go that far, to look the other way as long as they were discrete and did not influence our children. I don't know how many times I've heard (and said) "I don't care what two consenting people do in the privacy of their own home", and I don't.

Before that, gays were beaten and ostracized, and if you were a homosexual in a public school you were seen as a pariah, and rightly so I believe. Kids knew it was wrong, and were allowed to have that opinion. And this is how it all got started. People felt sorry for kids that were picked on. Most people myself included don't like to see a weaker person bullied by a stronger one, even if he is a fag. Two wrongs doesn't add up to a right.

The first step to getting where we are now is TOLERANCE. We were forced by extreme pressures and threats of prosecutions, expulsion of our children from public schools, and lawsuits to TOLERATE AND ACCEPT something that we see morally unconscionable. It isn't limited to just leaving hem alone, it is now having to tolerate their intentional systematic grooming of children, and the messages are barraging them from all fronts, from the television programs they watch, to the lessons that they are learning in school to the music they listen to. Nowhere is anyone telling them the other side, because we are constrianed by our own disgust and decency not to tell our children what it means to be a "fag".

WELL, IT"S TIME TO TAKE THE GLOVES OFF< POLITICAL CORRECTNESS BE DAMN, WE HAVE THE RIGHT TO TEACH OUR KIDS WHAT WE BELIEVE IS MORALLY RIGHT AND WRONG, AND WE HAVE THE RIGHT TO TELL THEM THE TRUTH!

here are a few of those truths you won't see being taught about homosexuals

1)The average lifespan of a homosexual male is more than 20 years less than a heterosexual male. The average lifespan of a male in the united states is 78 years. The average lifespan of a homosexual male is somewhere between 49-53 years, depending on whose statistics you use.

Statistically, homosexuality is much worst health-wise than smoking or even heroin addiction.

2)The incidence of deadly diseases like hepatitis and aids are much much higher in the homosexual population. Sexually transmitted diseases are common

3)Even when in a "monogamous" relationship, almost all gays have multiple sex partners. Homosexuals are promiscuous and tend to have multiple partners that they have no emotional attachment to.

4)Almost all "gay" men claimed to have engaged in sexual relations with adult men while still children. The logical conclusion is that the grooming and seduction of males at a specific age right around puberty probably results in a boy becoming a homosexual, it is not a genetic trait, it is a learned behavior!

5) If one believes the statistics, around 2% of males in the United States are homosexual or 3% are homosexual+bisexual. 4 out of 10 reports of sexual assaults and molestation of children in the United states are male on male, and 99% or more of pedophiles show an exclusive preference for one sex or another. Most psychologists studying the problem agree that most boys do not report their molestation or assault, which means that 4 out of 10 is probablymore like 7 out of 10. I don't know about you, but I absolutely refuse to label a man who prefers sex with male children as anything other than a homosexual. If he has had sex with women, he is still a homosexual > heterosexual is not an aberration of nature, but homosexual is, so you can call him a "bisexual" if you want, he is a homosexual pervert engaging in homosexual acts. By the nature of their preference, these homosexuals do not admit they are homosexuals, but they are by definition.
So what could logically conclude from this is that homosexuals are many more times likely to be a molester of children. It could be 25 times a likely, but it is no less.

5) Children who are groomed and seduced by homosexuals typically do not report the abuse. Placing children by adoption in a homosexual environments greatly endangers their health ,both mental and physical. there is no way to know for sure if a homosexual "couple" are really pedophiles molesting their charges. The possibilities are endless, but the consensus among the sensible with common sense seems to be that homosexuals who want children will influence them to become homosexuals.

6)Children learn by example, and they adopt the mores and morals of their parents. The influence of homosexual parents on children has been proved in advanced studies to result in poor performance in all social aspects , from education to their ability to care for themselves. Children raised in homosexual environments do worst in school, are more likely to end up on drugs, and are much more likely to be jailed. They are also not surprisingly many times more likely to be sexual deviants themselves.

7)The main agenda behind the normalization of homosexual marriage is to allow homosexuals to adopt and raise children without the possibility of any legal resistance. I cannot understand how the people behind it could not possibly see that pedophile homosexuals are going to adopt children and molest them in great numbers because of this decision. It has doomed tens of thousands of children to be sexually abused and demoralized.
one studies carefully the statistics involved with state mandated adoptions and fostering of children, it becomes obvious the children in this country would be far and away safer and better off if the state did not intervene in family affairs by removing children form their parents care. While some cases do warrant it, the vast majority result in the children being much worst off that they were with their natural parents, and the people behind this are aware of these statistics. What this seems to indicate logically is that the intent is to harm children and destoy families.

8) If a person is truly concerned about the health and happiness of a child, he would teach that child that homosexuality is one of the most dangerous and filthy perversions there is.He would tell them No one is telling children about bleeding anuses, fecal matter leaking from their anuses, and prolapsed rectums. No one is telling them about the disease and the longevity studies, no one is telling them the truth because most of us are too modest to discuss things like this with kids. I feel we have no choice, because the fags are teaching them it's all about rainbows and ponies and having a gay ole time. They are counting on us to be too disgusted to teach our children the truth!

If you have anything to add to what I have said, question what I have said , or disagree with any part of it, feel free to voice your opinion, but be aware I intend to expose either your stupidity or your dishonesty. There is not a single word I have written here that cannot be proved empirically, scientifically.

IDW, Godlike Productions 23 Comments [7/9/2015 3:25:30 AM]
Fundie Index: 11

Quote# 110595

NONE of you Motherfuckers seem to understand what the Rainbow Fag Flag means do you? America is FUCKED

After God destroyed the world with the great flood, he promised the few survivors, the chosen few, that he would never again unleash the world wide flood. It was a covenant with his children...

What are the Satanic NWO pupeteers doing? They're encouraging homosexuals marching under rainbow flags, co-opting a Biblical symbol, a symbol literally of God and waving it in God's face as if to say "Haha! you said you'd never do that again, you promised! you can't touch us! Here's the rainbow so you don't forget!"

These sick piglike fucks don't know the anger they are provoking in God... Obama doesn't realize that you DO NOT FUCK with God. Mark my words -the devasation will be nothing short of biblical, the kind of doom that no one will be excited about. I'm talking the kind of shit Johnny Cash wrote songs about, the songs that haunt the deepest remnants of faith in those who have given into SIN. America better prepare for the ASSFUCK OF THE CENTURY...

On the other hand, Russia, its people, its leaders honor and respect God and they have been blessed and will be safe. God has demonstrated it. The Satanic Babylonian whore of the world (America) rallied nearly the entire world against Russia, with every lie, every dirty trick, it turned nations against Russia to ruin and collapse Russia - And they failed! the sanctions didn't fucking work and Russia's economy is growing, their ruble has gained value! They now have the strongest allies in the world, both politically and Militarily! They're about to give europe the middle finger by pulling the carpet right out from under their asses with the new alliances with greece and italy soon! Those who follow and honor God are protected and rewarded! Look at what the Syrians have been able to withstand from the Satanic NWO forces for almost five years.... few nations could truthfully say the could today withstand all that and still fight strong! Syria has because God has not abandoned them!

Repent you disbelieving Motherfucks! Apologize to God! Keep the faith! Vayan con dios, hijos de puta!!!

Epiphany time Motherfucks!, Godlike Productions 23 Comments [7/9/2015 3:25:21 AM]
Fundie Index: 18

Quote# 110592

HETEROSEXUALS AND THEIR GOALS
Heterosexuals are individuals who are sexually attracted to individuals of the opposite sex. Because of this attraction their long-term goals tend toward marriage and family. There are exceptions but generally speaking this is what they’re after. It comes about because men want sex while women want love and security. Women offer sex in exchange for love and security; men offer love and security in exchange for sex. There are endless variations to this arrangement but essentially it’s an exchange of these basic desires to mutual advantage. This arrangement leads to children which are the natural result of sex between men and women.

Michael V. Wilson, Preaching Politics 23 Comments [7/9/2015 3:24:13 AM]
Fundie Index: 8
Submitted By: Dominic McPherson

Quote# 110591

There's no such thing as an atheist, according to one of the stars of the reality TV show "Duck Dynasty."

Si Robertson, known to fans of the show as “Uncle Si,” told the Christian Post that anyone who uses the date is acknowledging Jesus.

"There's no such thing as an atheist," Robertson told the website. "I'm serious, because there's too much documentation. Our calendars are based on Jesus Christ. Whether you believe in him or not, every time you sign your calendar, you add down the day's date, you're saying he's here, OK? That's documented."

While the widely used Gregorian calendar introduced by Pope Gregory XIII in 1582 uses years based on the approximate birth of Jesus Christ, the names of many of the months and days of the week retain their pagan origins. March, for example, is named for Mars, the Roman god of war. Tuesday is based on Tiu or Tiw, the Germanic god of war (who shares origins with the Norse god Thor).

Robertson, a Vietnam War veteran, also cited a variation of the maxim, "there are no atheists in foxholes," claiming that people turn to faith when they are in trouble.

"If you get in a serious bind, the first thing you'll do is say [God], please help me," Robertson told the website.

Robertson is promoting the film "Faith Of Our Fathers," which is about two men who served in the Vietnam War, one of whom is devout while the other is a skeptic.

Skeptics, apparently, do exist.

"There's a lot of skeptics," Robertson said.

The movie focuses on the two men as well as their sons, who meet years later. According to IMDb, Robertson has a role in the film as a gas station clerk.

"Faith Of Our Fathers" currently has an 11 percent rating on Rotten Tomatoes based on nine reviews, and a score of 20 on Metacritic based on five reviews.

Si Robertson, Huffington Post 28 Comments [7/9/2015 3:23:49 AM]
Fundie Index: 17
Submitted By: Yossarian Lives

Quote# 110590

Canada ceased being a free nation in 2005. Free speech was tossed aside. Scripture was criminalized. Discussions about marriage and sexuality must be sanitized in Canada, lest the human rights tribunals and the courts come down hard on anyone not towing the government line.

Mr. Profound, Alliance Defending Freedom 14 Comments [7/9/2015 3:23:43 AM]
Fundie Index: 9
Submitted By: Nemo

Quote# 110589

Perhaps one cannot prove that gays caused Rome to fall, but like so many others it did fall and many Romans were "gay". This scenario has repeated itself many times with many nations/civilizations, even including modern France and Germany (WWII).

Charles Spickard, Alliance Defending Freedom 21 Comments [7/9/2015 3:21:56 AM]
Fundie Index: 7
Submitted By: Nemo

Quote# 110588

[Hyperlinks in original]

The big news this week is that two Islamist gunmen killed twelve people at the French "satirical" weekly newspaper Charlie Hebdo. The world is almost universally outraged by this attack. But not me.

What exactly is Charlie Hebdo? It's in French and I don't read French, but I think a google image search conveys the basic idea.

http://www.google.com/search?q=Charlie+Hebdo&tbm=isch

From this, we see that "satire" is really just a polite way of saying ridicule. This is a liberal newspaper that ridicules religion and whatever else liberals don't approve of. We can see a similar style of cartoon by googling "nazi jewish cartoons".

http://www.google.com/search?q=nazi+jewish+cartoons&tbm=isch

There isn't much difference except that the Nazis had somewhat better taste than Liberals do. Of course the targets are different, but that doesn't matter, the concept is the same.

Should this kind of thing be tolerated? Whatever the answer, the answer should be consistent. If you are going to tolerate Charlie Hebdo then you should also tolerate Nazi anti-Jewish cartoons. Is France consistent? Please read about Hate speech laws in France. According to these laws, this kind of thing is "hate speech" and should not be tolerated. And in fact Muslims took Charlie Hebdo to court based on this law and lost. This is liberal hypocrisy at its finest. For a liberal, hate speech is only speech against something liberals like. Hate speech against what liberals hate isn't hate speech at all, according to liberals, it is free speech.

So let us summarize what a liberal is. A liberal is a hypocrite who ridicules opposing viewpoints, who is intolerant and legally censors opposing viewpoints, who is totally closed-minded and is unwilling to even listen to opposing viewpoints, and who come out in mass protest when their hypocrisy is threatened. In short, liberals are scum. But does this justify killing them?

On an intellectual level, this is a difficult question. But on an emotional, it is easy. I am filled with joy whenever I hear that liberals have been killed. How could I possibly feel any other way? I have an opposing view to liberals, just as these Muslims do, so the liberals have relentlessly ridiculed and censored me. They are totally incapable of respecting or tolerating opposing viewpoints like mine. Every interaction I have with liberals causes me to hate them more. How could I wish for anything other than their death?

On an intellectual level, I believe in free speech and live and let live. So in theory, liberals should be allowed to be scum and should be left in peace. But this only applies as long as liberals follow the same rules. When the liberal West interferes in the internal affairs of Muslim countries, Muslims have every right to attack back. The argument that these are innocent citizens of the West is absurd. It is precisely propaganda like Charlie Hebdo that causes the public to choose governments that attack Islam. So Charlie Hebdo is a justified target. My only criticism is that while France is quite intolerant internally to Muslims, it is not particularly active against Muslim countries. So Muslims who don't like France should just leave. The same cannot be said for America which relentlessly sticks its nose into the affairs of other nations. So attacks against America are entirely justified.

I am not Muslim, so this is not my problem. So while violence against liberals appeals to me emotionally, I have no intellectual reason to do this and I won't. I will just live my life in peace, and take pleasure in any news of violence against the liberals who I hate.

fschmidt,  CoAlpha Reactionary Forum 44 Comments [7/9/2015 3:21:42 AM]
Fundie Index: 13
Submitted By: JeanP