1 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 | bottom
Quote# 117430

In the Hindu Revolution every anti-national Media person and judge and politician will be beheaded first. Let their blood run like a river!

Janamejayan, Twitter 25 Comments [3/13/2016 4:17:40 PM]
Fundie Index: 16
Submitted By: arcanephoenix

Quote# 117429

Stop Promoting Satanism in South Africa

Christianity is the dominant religion in South Africa, with almost 80% of the population in 2001 professing to be Christian. No single denomination predominates, with mainstream Protestant churches, Pentecostal churches, African initiated churches, and the Catholic Church all having significant numbers of adherents. Importantly, there is significant and sustained syncretism with African Traditional Religion among most of the self-professed Christians in South Africa.

Of the total national population of 44.8 million, 35.8 million or 79.8% identified as members of a Christian denomination. According to Wikipedia the 2001 Census (2011 Census did not ask about religion) there are currently 35,765,251 Christians in The Rainbow Nation, making SA one of the leading nations still following Jesus Christ.

However - There are certain Blasphemous Media/Music/Event Organisations and venues corrupting the minds of individuals by letting Blatant Satanic International Artists/Bands come to our Beautiful country and perform, spreading their filthy message to their following and glorifying Devils/Demons. This "right" which they label as "Freedom of Speech" and "Constitutional Law" and the uprising in Record Labels/Event Companies completely undermines the majority and ethical values our "fair" nation stands for and abolishes the Christian values our forefathers and leaders took generations to build to create Freedom in SA.

By Venues allowing these organisations to book events on their premises and blaspheme God openly, promotes pure evil Hate Speech. If we can't shut these companies down completely, then let's stand together to slow them down at least and urge the venues to cancel booked Satanic events and discourage more Sacrilegious artist from arriving on our shores to pollute the minds of our youth. Not to spoil their "fun", but to protect them! Below are some examples of upcoming shows in 2016 with Band Names and Venues included (feel free to google them and see for yourself):

Promoter: Witchdoctor Productions (follow link provided)

Events Booked:
BEHEMOTH & VOLTUMNA SA Tour 2016
26th March 2016 – Bassline – Johannesburg
27th March 2016 – The Assembly – Cape Town
ROTTING CHRIST SA Tour 2016
Friday 01 July 2016 – Bassline – Johannesburg
Saturday 02 July 2016 – The Assembly – Cape Town

Please Share this Petition on Facebook, Twitter and other Social Media wherever possible - Let's spread the word like Wildfire!

Psalms 33:12-22 - Blessed [is] the nation whose God [is] the LORD; [and] the people [whom] he hath chosen for his own inheritance.

Let's stand together for Jesus Christ our Lord and Saviour and prove that South Africa still supports Christianity as the facts proclaim! If we as Christians just stand back and do nothing, Evil will prevail...

James 4:17 (NIV)
"If anyone, then, knows the good they ought to do and doesn't do it, it is sin for them."

Petition:
We, the undersigned, call on Venues, Consumers and Artists to Boycott Satanic Influenced Organisations in South Africa and Avoid any related Business dealings with them.

We also call on Christian Artists to not partake in events that are sponsored by Satanic Influenced Companies/Agencies or perform at venues that support the Anti-Christ Movement of these Establishments.

Christians SA, GoPetition 20 Comments [3/13/2016 4:16:45 PM]
Fundie Index: 11
Submitted By: TimeToTurn

Quote# 117428

I have been asked: How could I be comfortable with Trump's proposal to temporarily ban any new Muslim immigrants, while policy is reviewed? The Christian ideals of love and charity in no way mandate that the safety of U.S. citizens be compromised. God’s word gives to nations the right to self defense. The mainstreaming of Islam is undermining national security and may undermine the preservation of the U.S. Constitution and the Judeo-Christian foundation on which our freedoms have been based. As for Trump’s threat to kill the families of terrorists, I abhor the unnecessary harming of innocent lives. But I am convinced that the United States has the moral justification to use every means to fight terrorism.

Alex McFarland, New York Times 24 Comments [3/13/2016 4:16:35 PM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: AJ Williams

Quote# 117426

[ "Noah wouldn’t have had the adequate tools" [to build his ark]]

Besides the fact that we don’t know what tools Noah had, we point out that many people wittingly or unwittingly have an evolutionary view (or evolutionary-influenced view) of history. Many think Noah must have been some primitive person maybe using primitive stone tools. When God made man, man was obviously highly intelligent. Genesis 4:21 tell us that within a few generations people were making musical instruments. By the time of Noah, and with people living for hundreds of years before the Flood, who knows what sort of knowledge was accumulated and the kind of sophisticated technology that was developed? Noah may have had tools and other impressive technology that we would be jealous of! And remember, we don’t know how ancient people built many of the stone structures in South America or even the remarkably constructed Egyptian pyramids. The ancients obviously had a technology we just aren’t aware of, as it seems no record was kept or the records were destroyed. In this area of ancient technologies, we need to think in terms of a Christian worldview based on the history in the Bible.

[Emphasis added]

Ken Ham, Ken Ham Blog 30 Comments [3/13/2016 4:15:58 PM]
Fundie Index: 14
Submitted By: Night Jaguar

Quote# 117425

A Zion Christian Church prophet named Alec Ndiwane had a brush with death recently when his ability to see the future and fend off wild animals with the power of the Lord failed him at a wildlife park in Ghana. Ndiwane, while visiting Kruger National Park with fellow church members, went into a “trance” and began “speaking in tongues.”

The prophet threw caution to the wind and charged at a pack of lions who were happily chomping on an impala they had taken down. Ndiwane ran towards them, believing the dominion over animals granted by God to man would keep him safe. As he ran screaming towards the pack, several of the animals decided he looked rather tasty, charging towards him instead of running away. When Ndiwane realized there was some serious tonnage worth of teeth and claws headed his way, he miraculously snapped out of his trance and turned tail towards safety.

Not only did God not give Ndiwane power over the lions, he also failed to give him the speed to get away clean. A female lion got in a good swipe and ruined the rest of the trip, sending Ndiwane to the hospital with major damage to his glutes. While doctors assured him his left cheek would be intact, the right cheek apparently didn’t fare as well. Ndiwane was stitched up and spent the night in the hospital.


Alec Ndiwane, Addicting Info 22 Comments [3/13/2016 4:15:51 PM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: Mister Spak

Quote# 117422

(So cruelly torturing families of terrorists, even if they had nothing to do with the attacks, is how to fight a war?)

LOL!

The only reason Trump feels so extreme is cause you've forgotten how to actually a fight a war. Allied military leaders in WW2 did far worse (arguably) BUT they won the war, the Nazis are out of power, Japan is pacified and in fact now thrives, the world was saved. They weren't fully clean either but they did what they had to do. A politically correct fought WW2 would have dragged on for a very very long time.

ISIS could have been defeated in a matter of months, they're not even close to the strength of the Third Reich, but you chose to fight a PC war with no American boots on the ground.

It's time to get serious.

#1922469, FSTDT 116 Comments [3/13/2016 10:37:20 AM]
Fundie Index: 21
Submitted By: Arceus

Quote# 117414

Donald Trump: 'Islam Hates Us'

Donald Trump on Wednesday gave some more provocative comments about Islam.

"I think Islam hates us," Trump said when CNN anchor Anderson Cooper asked him whether the US was at war with Islam.

"There's a tremendous hatred," the Republican presidential frontrunner continued. "We have to get to the bottom of it. There is an unbelievable hatred of us."

Trump sparked a national firestorm in December when he proposed that the US bar all Muslims tourists and immigrants from entering the US until the "hatred" in the religion is figured out. Trump announced his plan after the terrorist attacks in Paris and San Bernardino, California.

Trump also appeared open in November to some kind of database for Muslim Americans, but he later distanced himself from the idea.

"There's a tremendous hatred. And we have to be very vigilant," Trump told Cooper on Wednesday.

"We have to be very careful," he added. "And we can't allow people coming into this country who have this hatred of the United States and of people that are not Muslim."

Donald Trump, Business Insider 38 Comments [3/12/2016 5:55:22 PM]
Fundie Index: 9
Submitted By: Arceus

Quote# 117412

Oregon man smashes Buddhist monk’s head into a car while screaming about Muslims

A Buddhist monk was assaulted in Oregon by a man who mistook him for a Muslim, KATU reports.

Kozen Sampson, 66, told the station he was visiting Hood River on Monday when he heard a man yelling at him.

“I pulled over, someone ran up and yelled. I turned around, they kicked the door, hit me in the side of the face and knocked my head into the frame of the car,” Sampson told KATU. “I do remember [him yelling] an F bomb [about] Muslims, and that was it.”

But Sampson said he is trying to spread a message of tolerance and love — and it seems to be working.

“I don’t know the Islamic faith well, but I do know that Muslims are our brothers and sisters and I would encourage everyone to just take a hard look at how supportive are you of all God’s children,” Sampson told the station.

He said he pitied the man.

“I was thinking, ‘That poor man.’ Can you imagine living your life in fear and anger? Can you imagine wanting to do something that you had to hurt somebody?” he told KATU.

Oregon man, RawStory 35 Comments [3/12/2016 5:54:07 PM]
Fundie Index: 19
Submitted By: Night Jaguar

Quote# 117411

What is hilarious about this is that Donald Trump actually kinda has a point here. Most military servicemen are right-wing fanatics who love Trump and would follow his orders without question, even if they were blatantly illegal. I could see the majority of them gladly torturing innocents if he told them too.

And that's what makes Trump so scary.

(Later Post)

You think that they'd care? Right-wingers and Christians never really cared about the Constitution, despite how much they blabber on about it. It's a scrap of paper to be discarded when it becomes inconvenient.

Do you seriously think that a right-wing US serviceman would think twice if he got the chance to murder an innocent Hispanic or Muslim person? Of course not. He would be drooling at the chance to shoot dem libruhls and sand niggas.

NeoMatrix, FSTDT 42 Comments [3/12/2016 5:53:50 PM]
Fundie Index: 1
Submitted By: Skybison

Quote# 117401

I am opposed to anyone voting, except perhaps married men of property and wealth who are raising or have raised their biological children with their wives, but the worst voters are single women.

Sweden is now the rape capital of the west, due to importation of masses of North Africans to maintain the vote for failed welfare statism. When Swedish men say “Hands off our women”, Swedish women say “We are not your women”, and vote for more mass nonwhite immigration and ridiculously light slap-on-the-wrist penalties for rape.

Women do not really want the kind of society where sex happens by consent. (Check the xhamster porn videos preferred by women) Thus single women subconsciously, and sometimes consciously, want our society to be conquered, the men killed, and they themselves sexually enslaved.

In the ancestral environment, if you were a man and your in group was conquered, you were likely to be killed or enslaved, and thus be no ones ancestor. If you were a woman and your in group was conquered, you were indeed likely to be enslaved – to a successful man in the victorious group who would have children by you, and, knowing his children were his own, raise them well.

So we are in large part descended from men who conquered, and who resisted conquest with absolute determination, and descended from women who took to conquest, abduction, and slavery like a duck to water.

The strong independent woman, the woman living the lifestyle that feminism and school teaches her she should have, has few or no children, for children take two, and the commitment to stick it out when things go bad. In the ancestral environment, if you were a strong independent woman you were surrounded by weak contemptible men, in which case abduction, rape, and slavery was a good way to meet manly men.

Suppose the Taliban was to somehow do a Boko Haram and abduct a bunch of baristas with post graduate degrees in victim studies and a hundred thousand dollars of student debt. They would probably wind up having six children and umpteen grandchildren each, so we would expect women to have evolved to rather like this sort of thing.

Or, alternatively, you can believe that women was created to be a helpmeet to man, and in the fall was condemned to desire this sort of thing.

Lots of existing societies have arranged marriages or marriage by abduction. It seems to work just fine. When parents, society, or respectable authority tell women to fuck someone, they fuck him, and are happy to do so.

Large numbers of well educated and wealthy English gentlewomen in eighteenth century England married whom they were damned well told to, and I don’t see any memoirs or books from any of them complaining about it.

We hear a lot about women being involuntarily trafficked to brothels, and sometimes it happens, though less than advertised, but when white nights go forth to rescue these poor oppressed and victimized damsels in distress, they are invariably disappointed.

Commanding a woman to clean some man’s floor and cook his meals is like commanding children to eat their broccoli, whereas commanding a woman to warm some man’s bed is like commanding children to eat their icecream.

In eighteenth century Australia there was a fair bit of lighthearted and unserious female resistance to shotgun marriages, they were far from entirely compliant, but looking at these incidents, those resisting shotgun marriage do not seem like poor pitiful victims of male sexual desire, but lustful bawds who were worried that the party was going to end.

Since Victorian times, historians have sought to depict eighteenth century Australian women as sexually exploited and sexually hyper oppressed, but they just cannot seem to find any examples of women seriously resenting, complaining about or resisting this supposedly horrid extreme sexual oppression. We see lots of disciplinary issues where women were punished for talking back to the husband that they were assigned to, or punished for failing to work as directed by their husband, or being absent without leave for short periods. We just don’t see any disciplinary issues, zero, despite vigorous and alarmingly imaginative search by historians, that seem plausibly related to disinclination to go to bed with the man to whom she was assigned.

Consent is useful and valuable to the extent that a women voluntarily swears to honor and obey her husband, and to stick it out till parted by death, and eighteenth century Australian authorities were pretty keen on obtaining more or less voluntary consent for that purpose. If she is not credibly swearing that before God and man, consent serves no useful purpose to husband, family and society, women don’t really like it all that much, and the eighteenth century British and Australian authorities were untroubled by the lack of it.

Jim, Jim's Blog 23 Comments [3/12/2016 4:54:05 AM]
Fundie Index: 31

Quote# 117400

In 1985, when cutting first appeared, girls cutting themselves was something astonishing, something no one had heard of, that psychiatric interns had never heard of.

Now a significant minority of women cut themselves. Hard to say how many, but probably a few percent. Not a substantial minority, but not a tiny minority either. Hot fertile age women. Women with strong sexual needs and completely screwed up sex lives, usually sex lives screwed up by their own self destructive bad choices. “Strong independent women” who are not in the least strong, and greatly fear independence. White women. Women totally raised in feminism.

As the epidemic grows, only now is the psychiatric industry coming up with a diagnostic category “Non suicidal self harm” We did not have a word for cutting until recently, and psychiatrists are only now coming up with a word for it, and not a very apt word yet, for the category self harm is deliberately over inclusive, in order to avoid being exclusively female, including a great deal of what would be more aptly called “stupidity”, so that some males can be put in the same category. (The obvious difference being that after doing something very stupid once or twice, males usually stop doing that particular stupid thing.) It is politically disturbing to have a psychiatric category that is near one hundred percent female, so calling it what everyone calls it, “cutting”, is politically incorrect. Yes. Males sometimes, rarely, cut themselves. Discover it hurts like the blazes, then do not do it again.

If you google for “self harm”, the PC term, you don’t get information on cutting, but deceptive and malicious misinformation on cutting, misinformation intended to cause harm and suffering, and if you google “cutting” any page that comes up with words “self harm” in it is overwhelmingly likely to be malicious misinformation.

[Picture of a woman will many self-inflicted cut marks]

As it says in the Book of Genesis, women are psychologically maladapted to equality.

Think how much more comfortable she would be, how much more at peace she would be, how much saner she would be, how much happier she would be, if those were her owner’s whip marks.

Reading between the lines of girls making videos and posts about cutting themselves, they are saying to the numerous boys that pumped them and dumped them “Punish me, don’t ignore me.”

Jim, Jim's Blog 23 Comments [3/12/2016 4:53:54 AM]
Fundie Index: 29

Quote# 117399

Some time ago, I and a bunch of other reactionaries had a debate on whether women commonly fuck dogs.

I have no evidence that women of commonly fuck dogs, but I have lots of personal evidence that women very commonly do lots of horrifying stuff that many of my commenters find very hard to believe. These personal observations are perhaps statistically insignificant and may be from an unrepresentative sample of females, but is consistent with the rather small subset of women who watch porn, who generally watch disturbingly deviant stuff, while most males watch fairly vanilla stuff.

Most women read romance, rather than watch porn. Romance male leads are generally demon lovers, rather than the nice boy next door – one notable exception being when the female lead is sold, enslaved, kidnapped, abducted, or subject to an arranged marriage without her consent at a very young age by the otherwise nice boy next door. In the very common genre of supernatural romance, the male lead is often a literal demon. How is a real life male going to compete?

Male and female sexual impulses are the product of natural selection. In the ancestral environment there is biological and evolutionary conflict of interest between dads and daughters, in that daughters prefer cad type demon lovers, and dads prefer dad type sons in law. Daughter prefers the best sperm, but dad does not want to be stuck with support. Similarly a conflict between husbands and wives, in that wives prefer demon lovers, and husbands are seldom demon lovers – the best semen is unlikely to belong to the best protection and support.

For civilization to exist, fathers and husbands have to be able to coercively overrule the sexual preferences of women.

For it to be politically possible for fathers and husbands to coercively overrule the sexual preferences of women, we have to have it generally accepted that women are the dangerously lustful sex, whose dangerously powerful sexual impulses have to be overruled for their own good, for the good of their children, and the good of society – that women’s dangerously powerful lusts and self destructive lusts are the big problem that has to be solved, not immoral males.

Whether or not women commonly fuck dogs, for civilization to survive, men need to be inclined to suspect that they might. For civilization to survive, men need to control women’s sexual choices. For men to control women’s sexual choices, it needs to be politically incorrect to have excessive confidence in the purity and chastity of women. That women are dangerously and self destructively lustful needs to be taught by authority, presented in the media, and the sort of thing you need to believe if you want to get on with the important people you need to get on with if you hope to get ahead.

Jim, Jim's Blog 30 Comments [3/12/2016 4:53:44 AM]
Fundie Index: 27

Quote# 117398

[Someone hears noises in his house. Advice follows:]

These noises and actions may come from the jinn. The jinn are part of the creation of Allah whose existence we must believe in, because Allah mentions them in many verses of the Quran,

All nations believe in the jinn and they have had many encounters with them, which it would take too long to describe. No one denies the existence of the jinn except for a very few ignorant philosophers and doctors and the like. [Majmoo’ al-Fatawa]

Allah has enabled the jinn to change shape and to fly, etc, but despite their great powers they have no control over the righteous slaves of Allah. Allah says (interpretation of the meaning):

You should also purify your house of everything in which there is disobedience towards Allah, such as keeping images and dogs. Abu Talhah (may Allah be pleased with him) narrated that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) said: “The angels do not enter a house in which there is a dog or an image.” [al-Bukhari, Muslim].

startingarabic, ummah.com 21 Comments [3/12/2016 4:53:26 AM]
Fundie Index: 14

Quote# 117395

(A review of James Earl Jones reads the Bible)

James Earl Jones should stick with Darth Vader

I was excited to get this CD set, since I know James Earl Jones has a great set of pipes, and I have listened so much to Alexander Scourby's reading of the Bible that I was ready for a new reading. I was disappointed the first time I listened. Jones does not use inflection while he reads; the result is that the words sound lifeless. As a Christian believer, that abhors me.

But more than his lifeless reading, I am apalled at Jones' changing of the text. He is reading the King James Version, but he changes the words at will. For example, the text will read "Christ Jesus" and Jones will read "Jesus Christ." I counted 21 errors in his reading of the Book of Ephesians alone. If you believe, as I do, in the divine inspiration of the Word of God, you will not be able to stand how Jones imposes his own changes to the text without any textual or scriptural justification. Jones should stick with Darth Vader.

Vance Bicknell, Amazon.com 34 Comments [3/12/2016 4:52:29 AM]
Fundie Index: 10

Quote# 117394

The most high profile case in recent times was that of Herbert and Catherine Schaible. The Pennsylvanian were jailed in 2014 for allowing their 8-month-old son Brandon to die a slow and painful death from diarrhea, rather than seek medical attention. They argued their religious beliefs stipulate that illness is a sign of ‘spiritual lack’, and only prayer can cure it.

The father, Herbert Schaible, defending their decision, said:

“We believe in divine healing, the Jesus shed blood for our healing and that he died on the cross to break the devil’s power,”

What makes the case all the more shocking, is that the couple were already on probation for the involuntary manslaughter of another child. Their two-year-old child died of pneumonia in 2009 after they refused to seek medical help.

The couple were found guilty of involuntary manslaughter for the 2009 death, and sentenced to 10 years probation. A condition of their probation was that they sought medical attention if any of their surviving children became sick. Yet, within that probationary period, the couple allowed another child to die from a treatable illness. This time, their eight-month-old son Brandon.

Herbert and Catherine Schaible, Addicting Info 23 Comments [3/12/2016 4:52:11 AM]
Fundie Index: 16
Submitted By: Mister Spak

Quote# 117393

(In response to story about a Pennsylvania pastor and their mayor cooking for the homeless)

And in other news, atheists and evolutionary believers in "magic" perpetually complain about merely having to LOOK at the homeless and call continually for their removal...

The Last Trump, Christian News Network 25 Comments [3/12/2016 4:51:28 AM]
Fundie Index: 14
Submitted By: Jocasta McFucken

Quote# 117392

[bolding mine]

Lincoln County state Sen. David Curtis is among 10 members appointed Tuesday by Senate Leader Phil Berger to work with the N.C. House of Representatives in overturning a Charlotte City Council ordinance before it can go into effect April 1.

The committee, headed by Wilkes Republican Sen. Shirley Randleman, will meet for the first time Thursday afternoon.

“I just appreciated (Berger) doing it, having enough confidence in me to be in the committee,” Curtis said. “It is a very big issue we need to deal with before April 1. If we don’t overturn it before April 1 it is going to set a precedent we don’t want to set in North Carolina.”

The ordinance, a revision to Charlotte’s existing nondiscrimination ordinance, allows transgender people to use either men’s or women’s restrooms, depending on the sex with which they identify. It also means businesses like restaurants, taxis, bars and stores can’t discriminate against a customer on the basis of being gay, lesbian or transgender.

Curtis said Charlotte’s decision presents a “business issue,” in addition to a bathroom one.

“The gays would go into a business, make some outrageous demand that they know the owner cannot comply with and file a lawsuit against that business owner and put him out of business,” Curtis said.

Curtis cited wedding-based services as ones that could be attacked under the ordinance.

N.C. State Sen. David Curtis, Lincoln Times-News 13 Comments [3/12/2016 4:42:18 AM]
Fundie Index: 10
Submitted By: Aspergus

Quote# 117391





NOW BEFORE YOU DISMISS THIS EVIDENCE AS IMPOSSIBLE AND CLOSE YOUR MIND, READ EVERYTHING FIRST.

THERE IS A VERSE IN THE BIBLE THAT IS FOUNDATIONAL TO ANYONES SEARCH FOR TRUTH. IT STATES; "ON THE EVIDENCE OF TWO OR THREE WITNESSES A MATTER (OR EVERY FACT) SHALL BE CONFIRMED."

THE OMNIOLOGICAL SOCIETY USES HISTORICAL RECORDS, EYEWITNESS ACCOUNTS AND EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE IN THE SEARCH FOR TRUTH.

THE HARD PART IS NOT FINDING THE TRUTH. THE HARD PART IS IN ACCEPTING IT, ESPECIALLY WHEN IT MEANS YOUR PRESENTLY HELD VIEWS ARE PROVEN WRONG.

THE EVIDENCE PRESENTED HERE IS BASED ON THREE WITNESSES.

1. AN EYE WITNESS ACCOUNT
2. BIBLICAL & SECULAR HISTORICAL RECORDS
3. EMPIRICALLY VERIFIED 21.5" MAN TRACKS IN TEXAS & 24" MAN TRACKS IN AUSTRALIA.

THIS EVIDENCE FALSIFIES THE MACRO-EVOLUTIONARY WORLD VIEW THAT MAN EVOLVED FROM LITTLE TINY MONKEYS.

THE PRESENT EVOLUTIONARY ESTABLISHMENT REFUSES TO BE OPEN-MINDED AND INVESTIGATE THE EVIDENCE PRESENTED ON WEB SITES LIKE THIS.
THEY, IN FACT, AGGRESSIVELY ATTACK INDIVIDUALS, SCIENTISTS AND ORGANIZATIONS THAT CHOSE TO FREELY INVESTIGATE AND CHALLENGE THEIR BIASED WORLD VIEWS.

"FREE SPEECH & ACADEMIC FREEDOM" HAVE BEEN REPLACED IN OUR NATIONAL SCHOOL SYSTEMS WITH "SUPPRESSED SPEECH & ACADEMIC INDOCTRINATION."

REMEMBER THE WORDS OF JUSTICE WILLIAM O. DOUGLAS "RESTRICTION OF FREE THOUGHT AND FREE SPEECH IS THE MOST DANGEROUS OF ALL SUBVERSIONS. IT IS THE ONE UN-AMERICAN ACT THAT COULD MOST EASILY DEFEAT US."

THE CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF OMNIOLOGY IS DEDICATED TO RE-ESTABLISHING
"FREE SPEECH & ACADEMIC FREEDOM" FOR EVERYONE. IF YOU AGREE WITH US, WE HOPE YOU WILL E-MAIL OUR WEB SITE TO YOUR FAMILY & FRIENDS.




Henry & Joe Taylor, omniology.com 33 Comments [3/12/2016 4:25:35 AM]
Fundie Index: 16
Submitted By: Arceus

Quote# 117390

You people are fucking pathetic. Are you even listening to yourselves? “Oh, he’s so self centered, he’s not getting tested for ME”. Seriously? Grow the fuck up and wear a condom. Accept that if you’re screwing strangers, some of them aren’t going to be the most savory people. Refusing to get tested for YOUR convenience is hardly the worst thing someone’s trick could do.

Let me get this straight: the average queerty reader is apparently engaging in sex with strangers. Rather than admit that strangers sometimes don’t behave as we’d like and respond accordingly, we’ve constructed an ideal in our heads that these people have an obligation to get tested and disclose for OUR protection. Then, when we’re presented with the reality that not everyone does this, it is somehow THEY who are selfish, stupid and mean? Wow. I mean, wow. All ideals aside, you people are fucking idiots. Would you also leave your doors unlocked and wallet out only to be horrified that someone took your stuff? As for selfish: I don’t think you even know the meaning of the phrase. To be offended that someone isn’t risking a legally subordinate position just so you can have the sex you want kinda takes the cake, doesn’t it? Wow. What part of Bizarro World do you people live on?
All these fucking girls sit here whining about how its a “deadly weapon”. We’re not talking about fucking rape here. If they’re so fucking terrified, they need to sit at home and jack off.

[ Assholes like you are the ones who spread the disease just cause you’re horny. Fuck that; if you have the balls to fuck another guy, have the balls to say whether you carry HIV, and let him decide for himself if some stranger fucktard like you is worth risking infection? ]

Oh grow the fuck up you sanctimonious asshat. I haven’t spread it to anyone. Between condoms and undetectable status, the people I sleep with are more likely to be crushed by blue ice falling from an airplane than infected by me.
For the record, I *do* disclose to everyone, mostly because I don’t want some crazed nutjob like the losers on this website to come after me when they inevitably test positive. And yes, many of them will inevitably test positive. Anyone who thinks that disclosure is an effective way to protect agains the virus is setting himself up for a rude awakening. Just because I disclose doesn’t mean I agree with these laws, and just because someone disagrees with these laws (or doesn’t disclose) doesn’t mean they spread the disease. They’re separate issues. It is only because people like you keep reinforcing the idea that they’re one and the same that people continue to operate under the delusion that disagreement=nondisclosure=infection=murder..

...

.
Disclosure isn’t about “someone else’s right”. We don’t disclose when we have any other STD, including HCV and HPV which each kill more people than HIV. We don’t disclose to everyone we walk near if we have TB, despite the fact that you’re more likely to get TB from a casual acquaintance than HIV from a condomed, undetectable trick. We don’t disclose our driving records to our passengers or our credit scores to our lovers. All of these things are “relevant risks”, but we don’t demand people talk about them. Why? Because in every other area, we concede that there is some small amount of risk, and we admit that sometimes people have to take responsibility for their own decisions. HIV and “disclosure” are special areas, detached from the actual complications of the virus or the liklihood of infection.
HIV Disclosure hasn’t been about anything noble since it became apparent that condoms were an effective way to stop the disease. Its about forcing people to wear a scarlet letter, ghettoizing those who are infected and covering the whole thing up with a cheap veneer of “personal harm reduction” or whatever the discrimination-disguised-as-prevention crowd wants to whitewash it as.
No one has trumpeted this horn as loudly, or as uncle-tomishly as you, and for that, I’m rightfully calling you out on the carpet as a jerk and a bigot of the highest order. You’re not “saving anyone”, you’re validating discrimination, and you should be ashamed of yourself.

Todd, Queerty 7 Comments [3/12/2016 4:25:04 AM]
Fundie Index: 8

Quote# 117389

How about a disclosure law about herpes. A disclosure law before kissing someone. Yes, let’s throw someone in jail for 25 years for a kiss.

[ AIDS IS NOT like herpes you fucking idiot!
And, fucking moron, most of the comments are ridiculing Joseph not embracing his sociopathic lunacy; of course, then you pose contrary opinions: take responsibility VS decriminalize irresponsible behavior.
]

It’s not irresponsible behavior to not tell someone you have hiv if you are having protected sex.
There, I said it. It’s not irresponsible to have sex with somebody without telling them. It is irresponsible to have sex with somebody without knowing your status and being protected.
I’d venture 90% of you don’t know your status here… and hook up… regularly. Why is my hiv status criminal but yours is just dandy?

bailey, Queerty 7 Comments [3/12/2016 4:24:56 AM]
Fundie Index: 7

Quote# 117388

[ in response to commenters calling a guy that deliberatly refuses to get tested for HIV and potentially endanges his sex partners, selfish ]

Bailey:
I am rather shocked at these attitudes here.
People are fine having unprotected sex or protected sex with virtual strangers and then get upset when they find out that person was HIV positive… even if it was wholly protected sex.
HIV isn’t a death sentence anymore. It’s like herpes.
The bigger issue is that you people take no responsibility for your own actions… so you slutted around last week and meet a new guy this week and have sex… you could be HIV+ even if you don’t know. At least hiv+ people who know their status can take and ensure precautions.
Most of you would rather bury your heads in the sand and believe they are negative because they ‘look’ healthy or told you they are negative from their last test (and whether true or not, unless they haven’t had sex for 3 months prior to that test and none after, they don’t know.
Accept responsibility for YOUR OWN actions and stop blaming someone else.
It’s time to decriminalize this. Hey, you fucking idiot. You must assume that every person you have sex with has hiv.
If you don’t, you will get hiv.
Don’t blame them. Blame your damn self.



Todd:Fucking ditto. This “they need to disclose” bullshit ignores the reality of the epidemic in favor of people’s fantasy. Its fucking insulting to those of us who took control of our health, it usurps any rational model of prevention and it makes things much, much worse for everyone. The ten ton elephant in the living room is that these queens are freaking out because the OP just popped their balloons, not because he’s doing anything unusual.

Bailey , Todd, Queerty 8 Comments [3/12/2016 4:24:42 AM]
Fundie Index: 3

Quote# 117386

Tammy Duckworth has a sad record of not standing up for our veterans.
[Duckworth is a double amputee due to combat injuries in Iraq]

National Republican Senatorial Committee, Twitter  16 Comments [3/11/2016 5:37:54 PM]
Fundie Index: 11

Quote# 117385

As all honest people who do not lie to make those who are inferior feel better, we know women and girls are useless, primitive creatures. They cannot do anything alone, they would always require some sort of assistance from a male. Women always claim to be independent, however, that is false and it is just another way for females to get attention. Little immature girls always need attention, because they get lonely and cry. They never stop whining because they never seem to grow up and act their age. Will they ever have anything in their boring pathetic shameful lives than to be playing with their doll houses and touching that shameful untidy bean like clitoris on top of that ugly smelly mouth like thing (A.K.A vagina)? I do not care whether they flunk like some girls I have known because they don’t pay attention in class or because they fall asleep, but I just wish they would stop complaining just because they are jealous of males. I know girls get really jealous easily, and they become angry when their labium is getting too uncomfortable in their pants or their tampons and sanitary napkins get disgusting. Oh well, girls will be girls. Girls know (Or should know) that people lie to them to make themselves feel better becasue there is nothing good about them.

Here are SOME of the things boys and men are better at than primitive pathetic women and girls. I could not post all, as there is way too much:
1) Proven by insurance companies, girls are horrible drivers; in fact, the top worst 5 drivers are women
2) Girls die from many more diseases involving their untidy vagina’s and breasts.
3) We mature faster, we don't act like giggling dimwitts.
4) Girls are less creative, and from what I have seen, they lack skill in anything which takes imagination and creativity.
5) We are proud about ourselves, unlike girls who don’t like talking about themselves because they are ashamed.
6) Our statements are not based on opinion, unlike girls.
7) We can get away with speaking however we want on the internet.
8) We always get the upper hand in contests.
9) In some countries, girls are disposed of due to their uselessness.
10) They cannot carry on the family name.
11) Being a man is a compliment, being womanish isn’t.
12) Boys have way more useful skills than girls.
13) We can throw.
14) Bratty little girls are always scolded by their parents.
15) We are the dominant group.
16) We have better social skills
17) We are not lazy
18) The man of the house = the boss of the house
19) We don’t stuff tampons up bleeding holes.
20) We don’t have smelly vaginas that are always getting infected
21) We don’t need to use sanitary napkins
22) We are more successful at work and school, instead of flunk all the time
23) We don’t have gross habits
24) We don’t have labia that annoyingly changes color
25) We are not disgusting and smelly creatures that need to put on perfume.
26) We have merits
27) We never have to feel the pain of giving birth
28) We don’t need makeup to make ourselves look better. Girls NEED them.
29) We don’t get cheated on easily and lose our money
30) We don’t need to sit down whenever we go to the bathroom.
31) Our wives do all they can to make us happy.
32) We never have to make sandwiches ourselves.
33) Our private areas are not untidy and messy.
34) Every hero is a male
35) We aren’t the helpless girls who always need help from boys.
36) We get to boss you around.
37) We can style our hair more than one different way.
38) We don’t all look the same
39) We are funny when we try to be, unlike girls and women who are least funny when they try.
40) We are able to think and talk with the “head” on our shoulders.
41) ^We don’t talk with our vaginas when looking for a relation
42) Always being right.
43) We aren’t affected by rejection.
44) We don’t cry or get upset as easy as a baby.
45) We complete tasks without assistance.
46) We have greater pride.
47) We think before we do.
48) We don’t get in the way when trying to help.
49) We don’t have any flaws.
50) One man can have as many women as we want.
51) More fun being me.
52) We do not hide from people we have crushes on.
53) We don’t faint so easily.
54) We get to drive without crashing.
55) We don’t have panic attacks.
56) We are stronger against alcohol.
57) We are braver.
58) We are taken seriously.
59) We don’t hate each other.
60) We can draw better.
61) We are better at all classes, even in P.E.
62) We are so perfect that we need to make the women feel better about themselves.
63) We rule the world.
64) We create everything important in life.
65) We get to hang out with our friends without being jealous of each other.
66) We have a great time in life.
67) We have a purpose in life, people remember great men much more than women.
68) We take part in the government.
69) We never have to worry about dishes.
70) We don’t have a hard time getting along with anyone around us.
71) We don’t need to worry about broken nails.
72) It is impossible to offend us.
73) Are not afraid to say our birthdays.
74) The ability to drive.
75) The ability to remain calm in difficult situations.
76) Never having to worry about a **** punt in the clitoris.
77) Never have to hide a stretched out labia.
78) We have a good image.
79) We can surpass girls and women even in jobs considered feminine.
80) We have confidence in ourselves, and a positive self-concept.
81) We can adapt to any environment.
82) We have always been superior in the history of man.
83) ^History on MAN
84) Mankind, not womenkind
85) We value loyalty over inanimate objects.
86) We are not greedy and selfish.
87) We don’t stuff ourselves with food and get fat.
88) Women and girls love us.
89) We are not secretly being kept as low-class family members.
90) We are smarter.
91) We can do jobs that require brainwork.
92) We don’t get love crazy.
93) We have better things to do in life than play with dollhouses
94) We don’t need to worry about how we look, because we always look great.
95) We don’t spend hours combing our already perfect hair.
96) Girls have to give chocolates on Valentine ’s Day.
97) We don’t need to wait for a nice handsome strong boy to comfort us.
98) We don’t look at our private parts and go “eww, how can anyone be attractive to this?”
99) We don’t have an annoying labia that gets uncomfortable in out pants.
100) We don’t have to put makeup every morning.
101) You are limited to seating posture.
102) Our jealousy never gets the better of us. Girls get jealous of their friends and boys, start an immature fight.
103) A short urethra leads to waking up wet in bed.
104) When you’re turned on you don’t get wet and disgusting.
105) We don’t have to trip over high heels.
106) We will never get breast cancer.
107) We will never get vaginal yeast infection.
108) Your voices sound the same and dull.
109) We will never break our bones from failing at P.E class.
110) Our body structure is made stronger.
111) We can run.
112) We will never know the feeling of being kicked in the vagina, and the foot going into that second mouth between a girls legs.
113) We don’t have a shameful bean like clitoris.
114) Our hair doesn't get in the way.
115) We dont have to piss blood every month.
116) During puberty the whole world doesn't know!
117) We don't leave used tampons in the toilet, or drop them on the hallway of the school.
118) We don't need to pretend our clothes and shoes are comfortable when they are not.
119) We don't need to pretend to think we are the best, we already are.
120) Our "We are better" reasons are not outdated and false.
121) We cook better. Image of a chef or cook is a man.
122) Did I mention the time two girls in my class could not make it to 10th grade? There were only like 12 people in the class and two girls flunked. I guess it was expected, girls are always in the danger of FLUNKING.
123) We don’t need to worry about stretch marks.
124) We have logic skills.
125) We can go to the bathroom alone.
126) Our formal clothing isn’t just a simple piece of cloth.

broew, PinoyEXchange  49 Comments [3/11/2016 5:37:46 PM]
Fundie Index: 33
Submitted By:

Quote# 117368

For professing Christians that are fooled into believing fish to mankind evolution is science, yet alone true, and pretend fish to mankind evolutionists are really just reporting science, take note of the hate they have of any reference to God having anything to do with anything. Fish to mankind is nothing less than an anti-science attack on the truth of God, and their behavior here shows it yet again.

Reason2012, Christian News Network 21 Comments [3/11/2016 4:36:10 AM]
Fundie Index: 13
Submitted By: Jocasta McFucken

Quote# 117364

Scarlet Overkill's Ableist Portrayal in Minions.

I'm a huge fan of Scarlet Overkill, but like many characters she has her own set of problematic elements. It's important to discuss them.

I'm not referring to scenes where she's angry/has poor impulse control. She's a villain, & those can be a skill set.

Scenes where Scarlet appears like she has a dissociative d/o are played for laughs, but they make me uncomfortable.

One example is when she appears on TV. I couldn't find a pic, but her waist is unusually elongated and she's swaying. Why go there? I don't recall anything about the appearances/behavior of Gru, Vector, or El Macho that would imply a mental disorder. At least, one implying a dissociation from reality. So seeing Scarlet, the franchise's 1st female supervillain, appear as though she might be delusional/psychotic, dismays me to no end. It also makes me angry.

Not only is Scarlet Overkill's portrayal abelist at times, it's sexist as well because of her gender. She's a woman so ergo she has to appear mentally disabled? Really? That's the best the creative team could dream up? Why insult female audiences with an abelist portrayal of a female character, especially one who's otherwise powerful? Are they implying women can fantasize about power but should never actually have it?

Why send such a harmful message to people with disabilities? Implying Scarlet Overkill has a mental disorder undermines all her scenes where she's powerful, confident, etc. So while Scarlet can be angry like Gru & other villains, the ultimate & harmful message sent is she's inferior.

Question: Why couldn't the creators have just kept playing her outrageous anger for laughs?

Answer: Entrenched sexism and ableism are difficult to shake.

I took my daughter to see Minions. You can bet I warned her about Scarlet's mentalist portrayal and how it's not appropriate. Or funny.

Anonymous., storify.com 29 Comments [3/11/2016 4:35:18 AM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: solomongrundy
1 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 | top