Quote# 119035

Christians don't murder converts.

Sharia law Islamists do


Bush was NAIVE about Muslim Brotherhood and also allowed them in White House.

Obama is sold out to the terrorist org Muslim Brotherhood
Most Muslims are murdered BY Muslims


The Lord created all people in his image and likeness.

They choose to serve Him or the devil.

Those who reject The Son of God Jeuss the Christ as their Lord and savior are serving the default " god of this world" the devil antichrist spirit whom Jesus Christ came to deliver them from


And now Turkey won't need visas in EU.

OUR VISA POLICY IS HORRIBLE in allowing Islamists into the USA.

Ryan’s Strategy to ‘Keep the American People Safe’ Fails: U.S. to Issue Visas to 300,000 Muslim Migrants

http://www.breitbart.com/big-g...


ALSO ,....FRANCE IS REJECTING THEIR STUPID LEADERSHIP DECISIONS of importing jihad by swarming migration Hijra.

Poll: ‘Total Rejection’ Of Islam In France From All Across The Political Spectrum - See more at: http://pamelageller.com/2016/0...


Ax2root, The Hill 17 Comments [5/17/2016 1:49:20 PM]
Fundie Index: 8

Quote# 119032

Hitler wanted to kill Jews, why oh why throughout all his speeches and manuscripts and his book Mein Kampf did he not mention this? Did he just forget? No, he didn’t say or write it BECAUSE HE HAD NO INTENTION OF KILLING THE JEWS. No matter what amount of destruction he had observed done by the Jews to his people; he had enough self-discipline and ethical code not to take revenge. Being a strong character, he was able to rise above the darkness, the demonic standards of the judaic mindset and show self-restraint and humility. That is why he created ‘containment work camps’ for the Jews and certainly NOT death camps.

Because he was one of the good guys.

He cared about conditions for the Jews in the work camps. Unbeknown to billions of people the Nazi camps were not death camps, nor were they places to carry out human experiments. They were simply containment camps. Something had to be done with these destructive anti-social Jews who were strangling Germany. Thanks to the Jews, Germany had lost it’s moral code and had become debased and de-cultured ….does that ring a bell? Something had to be done! And Hitler did do something – he placed all the Jews in containment camps to allow Germany to breath again. But – this is the key point in this essay/piece. He did it in a way which was ethical. The camps had decent sufficient food (bearing in mind it was war time), they had theaters, swimming pools, football pitches, post offices where inmates could communicate to the outside world, kindergartens, art and music recreation and even prostitutes. Quality sanitation within the camps was paramount and that is why the inmates clothes were regularly de-loused with zyclon B gas. There were no human gas chambers……THAT IS A BIG FAT KOSHER LIE; to which the world has had to endure for over half a century. My theory is that if there had not have been a war effort, Hitler would not have even made the Jews work. AND I bet you the containment camps would have been luxury rehabilitation centers. In order to slowly de-programme the Jews from their mind control cult.


freedom, tightrope records 32 Comments [5/17/2016 1:48:42 PM]
Fundie Index: 23

Quote# 119029

I respect homosexuals as people, and I don't hate them at all, especially not because of their sexuality, but I do not support giving special legal rights to people just because they were born with an anomaly in the sphere of sexuality. Homosexuality is not a reason to hate anybody, because there is way more to each person than their sexual urges, and I'm really sad seeing people judging others solely on that basis, but homosexuality is also not a culture by itself, or religion, so what's the point of treating this subject under category of human rights?

I guess many would disagree that homosexuality is an anomaly in sexual behaviour, because homosexuals do not choose homosexuality [at least not the real ones] but just are homosexual. Yet, that's no argument at all. Shizophremic people also did not choose to suffer mental disease. Pedophiles do not choose to get aroused by children. [Note the difference between pedophilia and child molesting, first is just a sexual urge towards children or child related things, without acting on it, when in second case a person acts on that urge]
The fact that homosexuality is not one's fault, doesn't make it less of an anomaly. Just an anomaly that appears harmless enough for general society that people who choose to act on it actually try to present it as something normal, so... nobody will point out that something's not 'normal' with them? That might be it, but I do not dwell, there could be hundreds of motivations behind this.

There are therapies for people with sexual deviations percieved as harmful if acted upon, like pedophilia, but a deviation from basic sexual behaviors that isn't as plainly harmful is to be not considered a deviation because... it theorethically hurts nobody? Well, people with some lighter cases of aspergers also can lead a pretty normal life, yet it's still a mental anomaly, last time I checked. And no, there is no confirmation of something like homosexual gene.

Still, my point is not to hate these people. There are still people, like everybody else and hating them on basis of who they have sex with. If anything, they may be hurting themselves, among other reasons because some organs are not made to take part in sexual intercourse. And I agree that bullying and hating homosexuals because of their sexual urges is just as wrong, just as bullying and hating other coloured people or women is, but I'm not gonna let them convince me that what they're feeling is normal.


Also please take notice that I'm not telling people that loving someone of the same gender is not normal. Just having sex with them isn't normal. That's it. I really don't like when people use love as a synonym of sex. No, you don't have to feel sexually aroused by someone to love him/her

Hentala, deviantart 30 Comments [5/17/2016 3:47:25 AM]
Fundie Index: 9
Submitted By: Menomaru

Quote# 119027

Recently, Russia was in the spotlight because of a new trend where average citizens are killing dogs as a type of sport. Many of the participants are armed with various rifles while others are using easy to acquire poison from utilizing the death cap mushroom. I just want to briefly touch on a few points about this issue. Hopefully our Russian brothers will accept this critique.

First of all, I would like to congratulate the Russians for the courage to step forward and defend themselves from harm. Many people act in a cowardly manner when confronted with conflict and would rather hide indoors. It seems as though our Russian brothers are not cowards and they have chosen to protect humans from the violent attacks of stray dogs. This is the very essence of love for your fellow man: you want them to be safe so you take action and protect them. Bravo!

However, there are a few points that I would like to address:

Legality
In Russia, there are (rarely enforced) laws in place to protect dogs from such activities. I would like to advise our brothers to lobby for a repeal of these archaic and outdated laws. There is absolutely no reason that any human being should risk their freedom for a bag of fur. There are many legal ways to dispose of these mutts. Try to utilize all legal methods first. If you are genuinely under siege and totally encapsulated by stray dogs then by all means do anything within your ability to return your streets to a state of normalcy. There is no reason that anyone should live in fear because of stray animals.

Safety
While I admire the effort, I am a bit disturbed by the means. Poison is fine when used in a very controlled setting, but I am hearing reports of poisoned meat being tossed haphazardly in the city streets. Anyone who has children knows that kids will often innocently and trustingly take any object from the ground and place it into their mouths. If there is a gang of stray dogs and you want to throw poison to them from the safety of your car then, by all means, go ahead and do so. I don't mean to place a burden on anyone who wished to kill the dogs. There is a concern about the safety of innocents that needs to be addressed. Whenever you deploy poison you are morally and legally responsible for who or whatever it kills. Imagine if you intended to kill the dogs, but instead you inadvertently killed two kids who were walking home from school.
Bottom Line: If you must use poison, then do so responsibly. After the dogs eat their fill and disperse make sure that any remaining traces of the poisoned food are cleaned up afterwards.

I recommend that if anyone is in fear for their safety that they find a legal way or at least a way that cannot possibly hurt or kill innocent human beings. If anyone is looking to make this sport more popular, then maybe the best way would be to have weekly contests with death count stats. Larger and more vicious dogs could be worth more points per kill, etc.

Kill The Dogs

Humphrey Fipper, Kill The Dogs 42 Comments [5/17/2016 3:22:44 AM]
Fundie Index: 16

Quote# 119023

In its enabling legislation of 1958, NASA was given as its primary mission "fostering the expansion of human knowledge of space and the near Earth environment." Yet NASA has failed to implement that legislative mandate. Simultaneously, a secret space program has emerged not under NASA but the CIA. The President should sponsor a generalized end to the truth embargo surrounding all US activities in space. He should order NASA, the CIA, and other space agencies to release all of the data they have pertaining to secret space projects and declassify all treaties made with off-planet civilizations.

Andrew D. Basiago, Andrew D. Basiago for President 27 Comments [5/17/2016 3:20:58 AM]
Fundie Index: 13

Quote# 119020

There won't be any feminists in Heaven, because God won't tolerate that garbage up there. You'll be cleaning toilets and begging for crumbs under the Master's table. Only in the retarded U.S.A. are women put in charge of armies. It is unbiblical for women to lead men in any capacity. In the real world that doesn't work.

David J. Stewart, Jesus is Savior 41 Comments [5/17/2016 3:19:50 AM]
Fundie Index: 29

Quote# 119017

" ... Donald Trump and those around him think that Western liberal values are incompatible with mainstream Islam ... London has proved him wrong."

No. London just proved that it might have been infiltrated.

Excuse me. The Seven Dwarves did not knock down the WTC. And when your own Quran basically puts me on a hit list as an 'infidel', Your accusations of intolerance and bigotry ring a bit hollow.

In the context of current events, You need to prove to me that you are not a bigot. Not the other way around.

madhtr, The Washington Post 23 Comments [5/17/2016 3:18:30 AM]
Fundie Index: 7

Quote# 119016

The UK Labor Pary, which is (in a way) the equivalent of the Democrat party in the USA, has nominated a Muslim terrorist and ISIS supporter as their candidate for the London Mayor’s race.

In an investigation by the UK Daily Mail, it was uncovered that the Labor Candidate, Mr. Sadiq Khan, has regularly appeared at events and associated with groups sponsored by Muslim terrorist groups. Pictures from events he attends regularly show the black flag of ISIS being waved as well as include people with clear terrorist connections such as Moazzam Begg and Anwar Al-Awlaki.

Mr. Khan is no fool. As with any politician, he knows who these groups are and what they stand for. As we have mentioned before, per Islamic theology, silence in the face of a situation is consent to it. There is no doubt that Mr. Khan knows the terrorist affiliations of these groups. It is the fact that he is silent in speaking against them, which is his consent to their actions.

David J Slavik, The Washington Post 18 Comments [5/17/2016 3:18:21 AM]
Fundie Index: 7

Quote# 119015

Your ignorance is showing, since you don't consider Fox a legitimate source of news. A typical leftie response. It's not legitimate because it doesn't espouse your point of view. That would make the Wall St. Journal non-legit as well, I suppose. Oh wait. You don't read that rag because it's only about evil, capitalist business, which of course it is not. As regards white supremacists. People can support whomever they choose. Why no comment on black racists and Muslim anti-Zionists supporting Hillary? Who exactly are the "many sensible people" you mention? Roger Waters? Vanessa Redgrave? Stephen Hawking? Putting a little meat on your plate won't change the fact that you are wrong, but at least it could validate why you feel the way you do. When you hear news you don't like you ignore it.

Glenn88, The Washington Post 17 Comments [5/17/2016 3:18:11 AM]
Fundie Index: 5

Quote# 119014

Give me a break. When Rev. Louis Farrakhan, a well known hate preacher, was banned from entry into Britain, it was the illustrious Sadiq Khan who campaigned to have the ban overturned. Sadiq Khan has also gone out of his way to provide legal representation to various Islamist terrorists, including one imprisoned in Guantanamo. Note that Khan hasn't extended any similar support to British skinheads or IRA. So Mr Sadiq Khan is very selective on whose rights he'll campaign for - he gives preference to his own. With one out of every eight Londoners being Muslim and more than a third of Londoners being foreign-born, this election also showed how once again Muslims always vote for their own, and how whites are really the ones most likely to vote beyond their own ethnic group. Even I know that, and I'm a non-white Asian (my family actually comes from the same part of India that Sadiq Khan's family comes from.)

Trump showed magnanimity, and Sadiq Khan only showed his petty venal nature by shunning the hand extended to him. Oh, we know Khan cares about his family and his own - his entire political career is ample proof of that - but he can't seem to care more about the people who died in San Bernardino, or those who are going to die in the future as more extremists come into the West under carte-blanche open-border policies. I wish Khan would show the courage to campaign against the fundamentalists in his midst. Even the mosque he prays at in his home electoral district of Tooting has been mired in controversies, by discriminating against Muslims belonging to other sects. Islam can't even get along with its own, and they're trying to lecture the rest of us on tolerance??

Get out of town, man.

san-man, The Washington Post 11 Comments [5/17/2016 3:16:47 AM]
Fundie Index: 8

Quote# 119013

It's the Muslims that do not want to integrate into society. They want what they want when they want it! Then they cry and use our own freedoms and rights against us. Every place they move to turns into a 3rd world country with their "laws" and customs. They refuse to follow the laws of their host country.

Fredrico Alverez, The Washington Post 14 Comments [5/17/2016 3:02:49 AM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 119012

I know there’s no point but PLEASE READ THE WHOLE THING BEFORE HAVING A STROKE

So the real question here is, do I believe in biology, and to that end, do i believe the evidence that suggest man, just like every other living creature, has evolved over time by way of natural selection, and the answer to that is absolutely, yes.

I believe that homosexuality is a biological disorder, and that transgenderism, (excepting intersex people) is a mental/emotional disorder.

If we are to believe that man has evolved over eons by way of natural selection, then there is really no way someone can call a trait that leads to reduced reproduction or retards reproduction altogether as anything other than a disorder.

I think homosexuality is completely natural in occurrence (thought there are clearly people who ascribe it in a quest to be special) however that does not make it normal. People born with one foot arrive that way naturally, that by no means makes them normal.

To that end, I think homosexuals have no choice in their sexual attraction and as such should receive the same rights and have the same responsibilities as anyone else in society - that does not mean extra special rights, or the right to force people to labor for them, etc.

Transgenderism on the other hand, I find to be a mental or emotional disorder, as the person legitimately believes themselves to be something they aren’t.
I think most trans individuals need their family’s support, guidance, and help - not their enabling of a mental illness.
If after extensive counseling and therapy, a professional determines that the best way for a person to live through their disorder is to transition, then I see no issue with that. However, transitioning children, giving them hormones before they’re even in puberty yet, etc I see as child abuse and indicative of the parent’s own mental illness - a parent is there to raise the child, and that means sometimes you don’t give them what they want, because as it turns out, children are very poor longterm decision makers.

I don’t hate gays or trans people. I accept however that they are not what “normal” looks like, and for good reason - the species selects traits that make it stronger and better adapted to the world, and allow it to reproduce as much as possible, not traits the halt reproduction.

There would be, in my estimation, almost no anti-LGBT sentiment, if there wasn’t a practice of forced integration and acceptance by that movement.

The more a guy in a wig demands to be able to use the same restroom as a young girl, the more suspicious it becomes. The more gays try to force private businesses to serve them and use the law as their broad sword of forced tolerance, the more push back we will see.

bill-11b, Tumblr 17 Comments [5/17/2016 3:02:43 AM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: Menomaru

Quote# 119011


"....All these years with Presidents from both sides issuing such directives...." even though a president has no authority of doing so.

He does not have any more authority to make or change federal law than JT does. He is an executive. He is not a law maker. He doesn’t have legislative power. Not some, not now, not ever and the people have not given Congress the power to give it to him even if they wanted to.
But all of this is a game. Nothing more. But the gullible voters, in their muddled minds, THINK this is something real.
The republicans are nothing but the system “tacking right” like any boat does as it sails to a destination. In case with any government the destination is total control. When you’ve been tacking "left" for a while, you tack back to the "right". That’s all elections are. We’d gone right for a while with Bush, so then we switched and tacked left with Obamao. Just as we had tacked left with Clinton after tacking right with the first Bush.
The course has not changed. Tacking is not a change of course it is how you get where you’re going. The people just don’t see that they are in fact ON COURSE.
The republicans play and integral and essential part of getting to prison island. Without them we would go too far left and people would jump up and realize they were headed in a crazy direction. That’s the purpose the republicans serve. They give the semblance of a counter balance. When all they really are is the other side of the steering mechanism.
And as president Obamao only has the RIGHT to do, as the president, what the CONstitution says he can, nothing more.
Is there any doubt that Obama is in fact acting illegally? No. Well, Timmy, the phantastically informed, is Google now the supreme law of the land ?
Tell me why I need to "google" ?
I thought the CONstitution is THE ultimate Document......
Can I find this strange "permanent majority" in this Supreme Document ?

Croco Dile, Patheos - What Would JT Do 10 Comments [5/17/2016 3:01:36 AM]
Fundie Index: 3

Quote# 119009

Never before in the United States have we witnessed so much prejudiced criticism, malicious slander and hateful railings against Christian fundamentalism. I'll give you an excellent lengthy quote from Pastor Jack Hyles in a moment explaining what a fundamentalist is, but first let's hear what the Godless, wicked, sinful world defines fundamentalism as . . .

"What is Fundamentalism anyway? Fundamentalism is the attempt to impose a single truth on a plural world. What really lies behind fundamentalism is fear, a profound insecurity that makes you feel when you meet someone who doesn't like you or doesn't agree with you that that challenges and threatens your very being. Aggression is always a sign of insecurity, and insecurity is always at the bottom of a lack of faith, not the presence of it."Sir Jonathan Sacks

The preceding quote is by Jonathan Sacks, a reprobate Jewish rabbi in the satanic cult of Judaism (a group that openly denies that Jesus Christ is the Messiah). Mr. Sacks condemns fundamentalism for its attempt to impose a single truth on a plural world. My friend, it is called THE TRUTH!!! Fundamentalism is the genuine preservation, proclamation and defence of the Word of God!!! Without apology I can joyfully say that I am as narrow-minded as the Bible! Amen! Jesus proclaimed in John 14:6, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me. That is a single truth! The plurality (opposing views to the Scriptures) of the world is wickedness! 1 + 1 = 2, whether you like it or not! Now you can say and convince yourself and others that 1 + 1 = 3, but you'd be dead WRONG!

David J. Stewart, Jesus Is Precious 22 Comments [5/17/2016 2:40:42 AM]
Fundie Index: 9

Quote# 119008

So you travel to Asia and want to date white men? Hmm... White expats go to these more traditional parts of the world to escape women like you. Of course they'd rather spend their time with fine, pleasant, feminine women than a shrill, entitled, feminist typist like yourself. Maybe you should take a note or two from how these sweet Chinese girls act and treat the men you desire, and how men treat you instead of expecting the world around you to change to your liking.

Men don't care about your career, your college degree, how well traveled you are, how much of a "foodie" you are or how you can "pull off" a pixie cut. They like sweet, submissive, feminine, domesticated women who are pleasant and accommodating. Also, if you want to date white men who will put up with your personality, go back to Canada.

General Stalin, Global Times 21 Comments [5/16/2016 4:56:25 PM]
Fundie Index: 15

Quote# 119006

There is quite a bit of folk wisdom in women getting married by 27. Everyone has different genetics : some people age well, others poorly. I recently saw a 27 yr old woman I met many yrs ago, that I could not recognize. She looked 40, I was in disbelief. Some women become infertile earlier than the average age - I've met some those too. They thought that they had time , but the eggs were too old at early 40s.

Joy Chen, getting married at 38 , kids at 41 is pushing it and is a pretty shit example. Super late marriage is typical of MCGs. Once the cock carousel is done with them, they get collected by the old geezer divorcee scavengers.

Fakeslimshady, Reddit - r/aznidentity 15 Comments [5/16/2016 4:54:13 PM]
Fundie Index: 10

Quote# 119003

Robert E. Lee is supposed to have said, “It is well that war is so terrible, or we would grow too fond of it.” But when I look around at the wreckage of what now passes for Western culture, when I see the ongoing degradation and decline of Western civilization, I cannot help but think that perhaps peace is more terrible still.

Seventy years of relative peace and prosperity has made our young men hedonists and homosexuals, cravens and cowards who are more inclined to literally emasculate themselves than demonstrate even a modicum of courage. Seventy years of relative tranquility and safety has made our young women into shameless sluts and whores, barren harridans and harpies devoid of self-respect and self-control.

What has peace done for our morals, for our arts, for our sciences? What has peace done for our universities, for our churches, for our moribund civic and social institutions? What has peace done for our nations, invaded by pagans and barbarians and prostrated before them, too helpless to even complain, let alone resist? What has peace done for our minds, our souls, even our bodies, fat, bloated, soft, and weak?

Is it possible that too many generations of peace and pleasure have proven to be little more than an enervating cancer on our culture? Is it possible that peace is more terrible than war?

If these are the fruits of peace, then peace is a dreadful thing. If this is truly the best that peace has to offer, then for the sake of Man and Western civilization, let there be war.

[Adding some of the author's comments below to avoid unnecessary resubmissions]

"You are all forgetting the horror of actual war."

No, we're not. We're noting that DESPITE all the admittedly terrible horrors of war, they did not produce the degeneration and monstrosities that we are witnessing today. Bombs blew up paintings, to be sure, but they did not destroy the ability to paint beautiful paintings. Peace and prosperity did that.

War destroyed the body, but it did not destroy the spirit and the soul in the way peace and prosperity have. Did not the warlike Greeks warn of the danger of lotus-eating?

...

"I kind of understand what you mean but speaking from a Rwandese vantage point (Far from Western Civilization of course) who still fight tears back at each genocide commemoration, i wouldn't encourage a trading of peace for war."
First, don't bother with the emotional appeals. So you shed a few tears over some dead Africans, so fucking what? Go make a record with some pop stars or something.

Second, Rwanda remains Rwanda. Do you think you'll be able to say the same of London should it enjoy another 70 years of peace?

...

"For one thing, you can't remember or forget the horrors of actual war, since you have only read about them and not experienced them first hand. It's not a game of ASL."

And yet, war never led men to cut off their penises or gain 300 pounds. You petty pedants are completely missing the point in your rush to quibble over irrelevancies. Nearly every human society regularly survived periodic wars for thousands of years. 70 years of merely relative quasi-peace and ours is on the verge of collapse.

Vox Day, Vox Popoli 36 Comments [5/16/2016 4:53:28 PM]
Fundie Index: 17

Quote# 119001

Yes, GOD IS THE GREAT DICTATOR, THE SUPREME GOD OF EVERYTHING! What are you or I able to do anything about it? To be sensible, the only thing we can do about it is to obey whatever HE says before Judgment Day, before we stand before HIM!1

[...]

The evil dictator of this world, the Antichrist, shall be judged by the REAL DICTATOR of the universe very soon.5

“In the beginning was the WORD, and the WORD was with GOD, and the WORD was GOD. All things were made by HIM; and without HIM was not anything made that was made” (John 1:1, 3). It is easy to see that our GOD is a dictator, and HE said we will do what HE says, or we will spend eternity in Hell, then the Lake of Fire.6 Hell and the Lake of Fire are the places of many perpetual torments and miseries, and they never end!7 They are eternal!

Don’t believe what the false preachers say, that we are all sinners! If we are saved, we can say that we were once sinners, but now we are the Sons of GOD.8 Sons of GOD are not sinners.9 Christ is in us, and we are the fullness of GOD; we do not sin, and we dare not sin again!10 People who say they are sinners and claim to be Christians are not Christians. They want you to believe that this is possible. Friend, you are either of GOD or Satan. You can’t be both at the same time.11 Choose you this day whom ye will serve (Joshua 24:15). Will you serve GOD and proclaim that you are a Christian, or will you say you’re a Christian and at the same time say that you’re a sinner, a satanic sinner? Whose team are you on, anyway? Would you listen to the Apostle Paul if he told you, “I’m a sinner”? Or could you follow JESUS if HE said, “I’m a sinner”? JESUS said, “Be ye HOLY, for I am HOLY” (1 Peter 1:16). And John stated, “He that sins is of the devil” (1 John 3:8). And how can you be a Christian and be of the devil? You can’t!

In the book of Joshua, one man (Achan) sinned, and because of it, the entire nation was cursed.12 If you sin, you’re cursed; and if one person in your church sins, the whole church is cursed if that is not taken care of; and if one person in government sins, the entire nation is cursed. Just look at the nations of the world! “If a ruler hearken to lies, all his servants are wicked” (Proverbs 29:12). And if a person who says he’s a Christian says also that he is a sinner, then like his father the devil, he is a liar and the truth is not in him. You’re either a Christian or a sinner. Again, you cannot be both. Sinners of any nation are the cause of the nation’s troubles. Put away the sinners, and you’ll put away the troubles. This is why I preach the Gospel, in an attempt to cause all people to repent, so the troubles of our nation will be dissolved (Joshua 7:25-26).

[...]

GOD, the JUST and HOLY DICTATOR, decreed that the soul that sins shall die (Ezekiel 18:4, 20)! Not even one nano-speck of sin shall enter the KINGDOM of HEAVEN.

Tony Alamo, Tony Alamo Christian Ministries 20 Comments [5/16/2016 4:52:04 PM]
Fundie Index: 9
Submitted By: Chris

Quote# 119000

Republican frontrunner and presumptive nominee for president Donald Trump once said that “smart women” act “feminine and needy” but that on the inside, they’re “real killers.” It is, he advised men, “one of the great acts of all time.”

On Friday, CNN pointed out that the description comes from Trump’s chapter on women from his 1997 book, The Art of the Comeback.

“The smart ones act very feminine and needy, but inside they are real killers,” wrote the erstwhile reality TV star. “The person who came up with the expression ‘the weaker sex’ was either very naïve or had to be kidding. I have seen women manipulate men with just a twitch of their eye — or perhaps another body part.”

Donald Trump, Raw Story 15 Comments [5/16/2016 4:51:59 PM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: Demon Duck of Doom

Quote# 118999

A Texas superintendent issued a scenery-chewing response to a letter from the Obama administration warning schools to comply with federal law and allow transgender students to use the restroom that matches their gender identity.

The letter doesn’t carry the force of law but contains an implied threat that schools could face lawsuits or lose federal aid — and many of President Barack Obama’s conservative critics recoiled from the directive.

Rodney Cavness, the superintendent of Port Neches-Groves Schools in southeast Texas, said he would willfully disobey the president’s order, reported KBMT-TV.

“I got news for President Barack Obama,” Cavness said. “He ain’t my president and he can’t tell me what to do. That letter is going straight to the paper shredder.”

The superintendent said he had five daughters and was entrusted by parents to protect another 2,500 girls in the school system — although he conceded that few sex offenders were transgender.

“I would say about molesters — 99.9 percent certainly aren’t,” Cavness said.

He said the president’s order went too far, saying that his school system could handle transgender students without any assistance from the White House.

“Now I don’t want them bullied, but there are accommodations that can be made short of this,” Cavness said, without offering specifics. “He is destroying the very fiber of this country. He is not a leader. He is a failure.”

Rodney Cavness, Raw Story 25 Comments [5/16/2016 4:51:50 PM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Demon Duck of Doom

Quote# 118994

To me a feminist, as the term is used today, is simply a woman who doesn`t understand herself or her nature and fails to find joy in life because she is trying to be something she is not, something she cannot be, and, if she understood herself, wouldn`t want to be.

In short, feminism, as the traditional use of the word would bring us to understand feminism, is everything it claims it is not.

At its root, it is both matriarchy and patriarchy treating women as second-class citizens through non-traditional expressions of very traditional gender role restrictions and expectations.

The mode of implementation is different, but the aim is the same.

Instead of female circumcision as practiced by African mothers and grandmothers to ensure their daughters and granddaughters land Mr. Right, American feminists use abortion to keep women unattached and available for Mr. Right with uncompromised vaginas, firm breasts and abs free of stretch marks.

Traditional **** shaming, used in the past by not-so-hot women to dry up the sex market with the intent of driving un-laid men their way, used to take the form of malicious gossip and rumor mongering concerning the sexual exploits of prettier women.

Today it takes the form of ever clearer and ever more awkward and uncomfortable verbal consent to each and every level of intimacy paired with an implied threat of rape charges in the absence of this specific spoken permission leading to a sexual buzz-kill that couldn`t be any more penis shriveling if your parents were in the room.

The ages-old you break it, you buy it rule still applies to men, but there is no need for shotgun weddings today since the courts simply throw men who never wanted children in what is effectively men`s only debtor`s prison if they fail to pay what is demanded.

Bottom line: feminists treat women as children incapable of managing their own affairs while men are held to a very high standard of accountability.

Traditional feminism is both matriarchy and patriarchy on steroids, cross-dressed as progressive intellectualism and self-identified as somehow genuine.

momonkey, City Data 22 Comments [5/16/2016 3:21:51 AM]
Fundie Index: 17

Quote# 118989

When I suggested to Samantha Stephenson (presumably an atheist) that she couldn’t prove that Charles Darwin existed, she replied:

“Never tell me I can't do something. Prove you're real. Documented evidence proves Darwin's existence, historians are still unsure if there was a guy who even matched the whole Jesus description. Yet they're good on Darwin. And to be fair, where's the lock of Jesus hair?” Samantha Stephenson

In answering her, I would say that if someone provided what was said to be Charles Darwin's birth certificate, how would we prove it was his? Any “documented evidence” has to eventually be "believed." That's what it comes to. Do we believe it or don't we?

Old pictures of Charles? How do we know that was really him in the picture? How do we know books were really written by him? We simply “trust” that they were. His historical existence for us rests on “faith” -- do you believe or don’t you? I believe he did…but I know that there’s no absolute proof.

The faith that I have in Jesus has nothing to do with His existence. The trust I have in Him is for my eternal salvation.

Ray Comfort, Atheist Central 36 Comments [5/16/2016 3:05:04 AM]
Fundie Index: 16
Submitted By: Chris

Quote# 118986

[ I've never understood how water board is torture or unendurable... It's the desire to breathe an adequate amount of air right? When they can't get enough air they have reflex and try to avoid the feeling of "drowning" or "choking"..? Can you explain water boarding? ]

You basically described it. It simulates the panic of drowning, and of course, if you’re in the custody of people who’s intent you don’t know, it works even better.
All torture is mental, the physical injury with most torture is just a means to an end.
With that in mind, waterboarding starts right in with psychology without the need to injure the subject.

I was whiskey boarded as a cherry in the barracks. Same concept, except a handle of jack instead of water. And trust me, it sucks massive dick, and it does induce panic, as I said, I can only imagine it’s even worse if you’re bagged and shuffled around and find yourself in a dimly lit connex with a couple of pissed off meat eaters who “soften you up” first before strapping you to a board and simulate-drown you.

I would say waterboarding probably does meet muster for “torture” - that said, I don’t rightly give a rats dick if we torture non-uniformed, non-state combatants who engage uniformed forces and civilians as an insurgency or terror force.

IMO, any captured EPW should be soft interrogated, and those determined to potentially posses useful intelligence should have the shit tortured out of them until they let it slip. Many will tell complete falsehoods to make the torture end, those people should be tortured further, until dead, in front of the next schmuck in line. Some one will eventually give us something we can use.

If we save one civilian or Soldier’s life, I couldn’t rightly give a fuck if tortured every EPW to death and then shot his dog to get the AI.

bill-11b, tumblr 13 Comments [5/16/2016 3:03:38 AM]
Fundie Index: 9

Quote# 118985

The rise of homosexuality, promiscuity, gang violence, fatherlessness, lesbianism and single motherhood within the African-American community is directly attributed to GODDESS WORSHIP.

When you watch porn, you're unwittingly engaging in goddess worship. You're subjecting yourself to the worship of Cerces: Mama Wata: Yemonja. (I will use these names interchangeably throughout this article).

This is why in all porn movies (gay porn being the exception), the woman is always the starring attraction. Everything centers around her. This is because Mama Wata operates through goddess sensuality. The porn industry itself is highly occult in nature: and its purpose is to make money off people while opening them up for demonic visitation and infiltration through sex.

Here's something else to consider: Notice how whenever people - particularly women - get near a beach or some other body of water, they tend to want to get almost naked? Why the desire to show one's body so openly to others, specifically around water?

My contention is that the spirit of Yemonja is behind it. This demon is also behind the whole strong-independent-single mother phenomenon among many black women in the United States today. Most single black mothers and their children are under the powerful control of this marine spirit.

Yemonja is also behind the rise of homosexuality and lesbianism among so many black Americans. This is the goddess of single mothers, fatherless kids, female sensuality and weak effeminate men.

When a person enters into a covenant with this spirit, the children of the single mother becomes the property of Mama Wata.

To secure worship from them, this spirit leads the children into becoming emotionally-driven or effeminate males (if they're sons), and sexually promiscuous and domineering females (if they're daughters).

Mama Wata has specific colors that are worn by her more open followers. Those colors are aquamarine blue and sea green. Have you noticed a proliferation of women (and effeminate guys) dyeing their hair those exact same colors lately?

Sea shells worn as jewelry and hair adornments are another tell-tale sign of this spirit's direct influence within society today. This is because Mama Wata/Yemonja is known as the water spirit, meaning it is believed to dwell in or has its base of operation within bodies of water.

Mama Wata is personified as a mermaid spirit.

How does one enter into a covenant with this demonic creature? It mainly happens through sex! Particularly through engaging in fornication, adultery, masturbation, watching porn, visiting strip clubs, watching strippers and homosexual acts. Sex is the initiation ritual that brings one into covenant agreement with Mama Wata.

I've been warning you for some time that sexual sin is nothing to play around with! It's never just harmless pleasure. That's what this demon wants you to think, to make it easier to gain control over your life. When you have sex outside of wedlock, you are forming a covenant with demons.

This is the one big secret that witches and those given over to the occult do NOT want you to understand. They initiate others into the occult through having sex with them: including CHRISTIANS!

Many of you don't realize it: but this demonic spirit is the very reason why so many of you struggle to get into a relationship that's worth having.

It's also one of the main demonic principalities behind the high crime, incarceration and murder rates among African-American males. It's behind the gang confederacy in Chicago known as Folk Nation, which includes the GD, Black Gangster Disciples and the Latin Disciples. They use those colors because those are Mama Watas colors! These gangs are responsible for a large portion of the violent murders that has plagued Chicago's black and Latino communities in recent times.

Yemonja will always seek to claim her children back: even if it's by death. And it's the reason behind so many men being unable to find financial security or to maintain gainful employment.

All these are negative side effects of making covenants with demons.

Sidenote: All attempts at black unity and upliftment will fail miserably unless this demon principality is dealt with first. We cannot solve our physical problems until we first conquer our spiritual nemesis.

Many of you are yoked to Mama Wata, whether intentionally or not. And now you must get unyoked. Only the mighty power of Jesus Christ can set you free.

To combat this notorious demon, a person needs to give their full heart and allegiance to Jesus Christ. The sinful lifestyle needs to be completely abandoned without reservation. One needs to be baptized in water. And they need to seek God for the baptism and in filling of the Holy Ghost.

Mack Major, Eden Decoded 18 Comments [5/16/2016 3:03:11 AM]
Fundie Index: 15

Quote# 118984

"Anyone who can't handle prayer so much that they have to stomp it out has no scruples.
Anyone who wants the heavy hand of government to push their religion on other people's children has no respect for anyone's religious rights. This evil generation is the epitome of loss of self control."
The ones without self-control are the ones trying to misuse the government to promote their religion.

Yes those atheists are crafty little devils, aren't they!

Smarter than you, I'd say.

Yes, you're probably right.
In the beginning there was nothing.
And then... IT EXPLODED!!??
And from NOTHING......came EVERYTHING!! Yeah, yeah. Just because!
Hee, hee! Yeah, bonafide intellectuals these atheists!
They believe in MAGIC!
Good luck with that.

Thanks for showing your total ignorance of science. I see why "magic man done it" appeals to simple minds like yours.

Oh, no magic man?
Oh, that's right. Just MAGIC! :)
Enlighten us professor.
We'll wait.

I'm not your tutor; trying to teach a superstitious fool like yourself is a waste of time. But your pig-ignorance is slightly amusing.

Yeah, that's what all the other believers in magic had to say too.
Big on boasting. Short on any details or evidence whatsoever.
Shocker.
I'll stick with Intelligent Design. You keep MAGIC.

The Last Trump, Christian News Network 22 Comments [5/16/2016 3:01:44 AM]
Fundie Index: 11
Submitted By: Jocasta McFucken