Quote# 121030

I bet you did not know 3 jews carried 2000 bodies with canes out of the gas champers to be feed into a 4 1man ovens. Not logical in the time frame they had. So many other things just did not add up if you used your brain. You're believing an american government and the jews. The holocaust was to obtain palestine. These same people started off in turkey where they massacred 2million albanians and displaced them from their homeland. Then they went to russia and had the royal family killed, got booted out of russia then made it to germany withe same intentions they had for every other place the went through. DESTRUCTION. Now those sa me jews are sitting here in the united states running the world and the information, and literally changing "rewriting" history as they see fit to. I really really suggest you do research on jewish people and their lies.

James F, Raw Story 16 Comments [8/10/2016 6:21:06 PM]
Fundie Index: 9
Submitted By: Ibuki Mioda

Quote# 121029


Conservatives have made this country great. Conservatives have moved mankind forward for thousands of years. Conservatives have created and nurtured families. People who have brain damage like you and other liberals are regressive.

You want to kill babies.
You want same sex marriage.
You want to chop off sexual organs because you don't identify with them.
You want handouts and no accountability.
You want Muslims from countries who kill gay people as a matter of law to be welcomed because you think it spites conservatives.
You abandon your women and leave them on welfare.

You are slowly driving yourself towards extinction. You are weak and worthless. You tell everyone you're intelligent, but your actions say otherwise.

Disappointed, The Atlantic 21 Comments [8/10/2016 6:20:56 PM]
Fundie Index: 10

Quote# 121023

The only thing Duke is "guilty" of is stating a desire to preserve the Anglo culture that America was built on and that made it great. When a Jew or black desires exactly the same thing, it is to be admired, encouraged and smiled about. When an Anglo-American does the same, it is labeled HATE, RACISM and is to be condemned. Duke has been demonized almost as much as Hitler for this. His detractors can only smear him with charges that he stole some funds some time or some such. What Duke has never done is kill anybody, shell and bomb hundreds of innocent people, shoot babies in the head, or bulldoze their homes and steal their land--something Israel does as a routine.

ClydeMullis, NPR 9 Comments [8/10/2016 4:08:13 PM]
Fundie Index: 5

Quote# 121022

The study left out the fact that under a patriarchal system parents invest in sons — not daughters. Maybe this explains why giving the family farm to the son was a rational thing to do.

The Chinese had a pretty harsh, yet explicit instruction in this regard:

" On the third day after the birth of a girl the ancients observed three customs: first to place the baby below the bed; second to give her a potsherd [a piece of broken pottery] with which to play; and third to announce her birth to her ancestors by an offering. Now to lay the baby below the bed plainly indicated that she is lowly and weak, and should regard it as her primary duty to humble herself before others. To give her potsherds with which to play indubitably signified that she should practice labor and consider it her primary duty to be industrious. To announce her birth before her ancestors clearly meant that she ought to esteem as her primary duty the continuation of the observance of worship in the home."

wfprice, Chateau Heartiste 18 Comments [8/10/2016 4:08:05 PM]
Fundie Index: 8

Quote# 121021

The problem with relying on literature for advice is that it has always been consumed mainly by women. The first novels in China and Japan were romance novels for women (Tale of Genji, Dream of the Red Chamber), and the Victorian novels repeated the pattern. To see what women really want through literature you need to be able to read and comprehend women’s thoughts, which doesn’t come naturally to men.

For most men this is a waste of time. They will never get it, and thank God for that! If all men devoted themselves to “understanding” women there would be no other accomplishments to speak of.

Just teach men to view society in a hierarchical manner, with women beneath them as their charges, and it will serve them far better than any amount of study of female psychology.

Come to think of it, that’s what the Bible, the Koran, the Analects and the Bhagavad Gita all do. This is the kind of literature men should read — the classics. Leave novels and “high culture” to the rare men who have the ability to read between the lines.

wfprice, Chateau Heartiste 31 Comments [8/10/2016 3:36:02 AM]
Fundie Index: 11

Quote# 121020

Funny, because it seems to me that the high-T males are having more kids than the others, despite being subject to extremely punitive measures for having said children. Within a couple generations, the children of masculine men will outnumber those of herbs by a factor of more than two to one (this trend started in the late 70s, after female sexual liberation, naturally).

I’d love to live long enough to see my “unevolved” grandkids kick the shit out of the remnants of the progressive white tribe. At this point, I think that might be possible. Dynastic succession is a beautiful thing.

Bill Price, Chateau Heartiste 24 Comments [8/9/2016 7:43:48 PM]
Fundie Index: 10

Quote# 121015

This article needs to be published. On the May 11th 2014 broadcast of The Alex Jones Show, Alex defended the satanic heavy-metal Rock band, “IRON MAIDEN,” but even worse, he blasphemed God by criticizing America's Bible-believing, God-fearing, faithful churches for opposing Iron Maiden's hellish Satan-worshipping concerts and music. Alex horribly stated:

“I like Iron Maiden, it's really great poetry. It's the opposite of satanism. The churches don't even know what they're listening to; don't even read the lyrics. Ah, and I would like to get the folks from Iron Maiden on.”

SOURCE: Alex Jones, quote from THE ALEX JONES SHOW (May 11th 2014 broadcast, time: 1:36 hours)

Ladies and gentlemen, carefully look at the IRON MAIDEN album cover image to the left. Notice the demonic BEAST with the devil's horns (Revelation 13:11) and the pitchfork. The pitchfork is being thrust through a young woman, which symbolizes a satanic offering. I heard Dave Mustaine of MEGADETH refer to his latest album in 2012 as “an offering.” Literally, today's youth are being offered up as a living sacrifice to Satan. It is fully understood by knowledgeable Christians as myself that the BEAST represents the coming Antichrist.

There is a preponderance of lyrics in today's worldly music that worships the Devil, whether it be the noise of KESHA, SHAKIRA, VAN HALEN or IRON MAIDEN.

The band Iron Maiden mocks the Word of God by blaspheming The Lord's Prayer by displaying the words, “HALLOWED BY THY NAME,” below the demon on the album cover to the above left. This is total demonic evil. Clearly, IRON MAIDEN and their fans are hallowing (worshipping) Satan, not the Lord Jesus Christ. There is no other way that this evil album cover can be interpreted. A common theme in the Rock music industry is to blaspheme, mock and dishonor the Lord Jesus Christ; while praising, honoring and worshipping the Beast, False Prophet and Dragon (the unholy trinity). Alex is involved in Satan-worship, but is in denial.

Alex Jones arrogantly downplays IRON MAIDEN as being mere poetry and art. My friend, IRON MAIDEN is 100% pure satanism!!! Alex professes to be a Christian who loves God with a pure heart, but Alex is very deceived if he also thinks that the band IRON MAIDEN is not of Satan. I'm not critiquing Alex Jones for listening to heavy-metal Rock music or his personal choices (although no Christian should listen to the Devil's music); but rather, I'm speaking out against The Alex Jones Show for publicly endorsing satanic music, defending it, promoting it, glorifying it, and slandering New Testament churches for exposing Rock music. Alex is wrong!

David J. Stewart, Jesus is Precious 37 Comments [8/9/2016 7:43:35 PM]
Fundie Index: 11

Quote# 121013

Crypto-Islamic news editors at CNN were in shock yesterday: ‘Qandeel Baloch: Pakistani social media star strangled by her brother.’

This was apparently front page news, nestled between stories about Donald Trump’s vice presidential pick, the assault-style truck attack in France, and the aborted coup attempt in Turkey. I doubted many of CNN’s readers knew or cared much about Pakistani social media stars, so I dove into the article to see what I could learn about the mass mind-control apparatus that is CNN. What did they want me to think because of this article?

The answer came quickly, in the vein of why we are all constantly force-fed praise about Malala Yousafzai: women are being oppressed in the Indian subcontinent, and you should feel bad about it. This time the oppression took the form of an angry Pakistani man who strangled his sister, who was making a name for herself posting half-naked selfies on Facebook and Instagram. He protested the “kind of pictures she had been posting online.”

CNN described Qandeel Baloch’s online exploits as “brazenly sassy, and increasingly political.” She was “curvaceous and self deprecating.” Here’s a money quote:

"In recent weeks, several of her posts encouraged her audience to challenge old practices of Pakistani society. In a July 14 post, Baloch referred to herself as a “modern day feminist.”"

Haha, oh man.

Qandeel Baloch’s brother didn’t murder her. Feminism murdered her.

I almost feel bad for Qandeel Baloch. Almost. This chubby female of middling looks, with the desperate need for attention common to her sex, somehow found a way to boost and buttress her own status and popularity. In a traditional Pakistani society, she found the Internet. She found Facebook and Instagram, doubtlessly shortly thereafter followed by Western ideas about “women’s visibility.” She found that, even though she was pretty average and unremarkable, she could do a simple thing to become famous and popular: post half-naked pictures of herself on social media with captions using words like “empowering.”

What happened next? The Cathedral found her, of course. Feminists found her. NGOs found her. Journalists found her. Did they tell her to stop posting such lewd and stupid stuff online? Did they tell her that Kim Kardashian is a warning, not a role model? Did they tell her she’d be better off doing something actually productive, like raising children? No, of course not!

...

That newspaper eagerly encouraged and fueled Qandeel Baloch’s narcissistic endeavours in order to further a political goal: the advancement of feminism and other progressive norms in Pakistan. Baloch made a reckless but predictable deal with the Devil. She would be the cudgel with which the Cathedral would beat traditional Muslim Pakistanis. In exchange, she got attention, fame, notoriety, and money. In theory.

In reality, the deal got messy very fast, and her own traditional Muslim Pakistani brother strangled her before she became a Kim Kardashian. He saw her become the Pakistani Lena Dunham, and he had enough.

Now CNN is eulogizing her as yet another martyr in the global and endless war of feminism and progressivism against human nature.

...

Tanqeed is not quite a fully-fledged Soros operation yet, but its donor list is suspiciously full of non-Pakistani names: Brady Calestro, David Dencker, Anna Waltman, and so on. Tanqeed, much like Dawn, provided cover and incentive for Qandeel Baloch. Do they reap any blame for her death? Are they at all ashamed or apologetic for pushing her into the role of a crowdfunded Lena Dunham in a country where honor killing is still common? No, of course not!

...

It’s clear she wasn’t rich, because if she was, she would have been writing a feminist column in The Harvard Crimson far away from Taliban and honor killers. She was a working class woman who took the high-risk job of being the Cathedral’s frontline feminist culture war shock trooper in a heavily Muslim country.

...

The Express Tribune, needless to say, is another major English-language Pakistani newspaper. It is Pakistan’s only newspaper affiliated with the International New York Times. Its editorial stance identifies with “social liberalism.”

What is the real story here? CNN wants to spin an epic tale of an average woman standing up to patriarchal oppressors against all odds. CNN wants to turn her into a martyr and a heroine. But she is neither of those things, and CNN’s tale is false on its face.

The real story is a sordid one. It is a story of a number of news organizations and NGOs following Anglo-Saxon ideologies of feminism and progressivism, funded and directed from abroad, working on a long-term project to undercut traditional Pakistani society and remake it in the images of Harvard and Oxford Utopia. It is a story of a lower-class Pakistani woman without a husband who got sucked into the pointless spiral of selfies, clicks, and likes that is Western social media, and was then selected and fueled down that path by those same news organizations and NGOs in order to further their political goals.

When she met her inevitable fate in Muslim Punjab, they eulogized her and blamed the patriarchy. And yet, before Qandeel Baloch was having phone calls with journalists at major left-of-center newspapers, she was not likely fearing for her life, nor twerking half-naked for millions to watch on YouTube. Qandeel Baloch was not empowered, she was a political pawn for organizations that did not care whether she lived or died.

Feminism killed the Pakistani Lena Dunham. It’ll kill the American one too, but that inevitable wound will be self-inflicted, unlike in Muslim Pakistan.

Mark Yuray, Social Matter 26 Comments [8/9/2016 7:43:29 PM]
Fundie Index: 14

Quote# 121012

When some evidence of creationism is scientifically presented, then I'm sure the body of science will be happy to review it. So far, this hasn't happened. Meanwhile, the primordial ooze is known to have existed. Not true for god.

Creation has nothing to do with evolutionism being a religion, it is only brought up by those who have nothing as some sort of pathetic straw man attempt.

Oboehner, Christian News Network 9 Comments [8/9/2016 7:43:24 PM]
Fundie Index: 10
Submitted By: Jocasta

Quote# 121010

The Mannerbund is also the source of sexual morality, which is actually a subset of property rights, since women are naturally the property of men – of either their fathers or husbands. Suppose you have a good friend. Suppose this friend has a girlfriend. Do you hit on your friend’s girlfriend in front of his face? No? Why not? Isn’t she a free individual enjoying all the rights afforded to her by a liberal democratic society, including the right to accept and decline sexual offers with consent? She doesn’t have to accept your advances, but why is it anathema to even make them? The reason is that your friend’s girlfriend is your friend’s property, and if the two of you are friends, you are members of a Mannerbund with (at least) two men. She is “his,” not yours, and hitting on her would be just as bad as reaching for your friend’s wallet.

This little example illustrating how women are naturally the property of men does not require formality or affirmation by the state to be accurate. In fact, this little example is an example of civilization and order on a relatively tiny three-person scale. With two men and a woman, the correct way to resolve the problem of competition for mates is the Mannerbund and the resulting instinctual respect for property rights and the specific subset of property rights governing mates. If you want civilization, you need order, and order – contrary to the pious proclamations of some – is often most stable when it is instinctual and unspoken.

Were it not for the Cathedral-State and the economic and legal privileges afforded to women over men in the West, this example of order could easily scale beyond three people to three hundred, three thousand or three billion. Over the transition from three to three billion, it would acquire some cultural or religious veneers, but the underlying biological/socio-political arrangement would remain the same. Politics is downstream from culture when the word refers to the kabuki theater of progressive-liberal democracy, but culture is downstream from politics when the word refers to the actual systems of biological and socio-political arrangements between humans. The most basic working socio-political arrangement between humans is the Mannerbund. The only unit smaller than the Mannerbund is the man – not the individual, but the man.

It could be argued that the family (specifically the nuclear family) is a more basic socio-political unit than the Mannerbund, but this approach is incorrect. To paraphrase Mencius Moldbug, hominids need government and politics because hominids are social and violent. To clarify Moldbug, hominids need government and politics because male hominids are social and violent. A man’s woman and children are extensions of the man and dependent on the man’s capacity for violence on their behalf, i.e. on their man’s capacity to defend them physically from other men. Women and children are social but their capacity for violence –- physical, but also psychological — is negligible compared to that of men’s, and for this reason they are de facto property, not political agents themselves. The Mannerbund, not the family, is the basic working socio-political unit.

A solid and dependable Mannerbund is a necessity for every man. No man is an island, they say, and a man without a local Mannerbund is going have deeply limited capacities when it comes to securing his property and legacy. Individualistic proponents of neomasculinity are missing the point already: no man is more “alpha” than a Mannerbund. Without a Mannerbund, a man cannot control his women, he cannot ensure his immobile property’s security in the case of state failure (deliberate or not), and without security of his women or property, he cannot secure the futures of his children.

Mark Yuray, Social Matter 44 Comments [8/9/2016 3:16:23 AM]
Fundie Index: 19

Quote# 121009

“What was true in the Wild West is even more true to-day. A woman with an Armalite and a computer can be as useful, or deadly, as any male. Here’s an idea – how about a partnership of equals? Works for me.”

Totally unbelievably wrong. I’m sorry you’ve swallowed the equalist dogma so deeply.

Women are psychologically and constitutionally incapable of possessing the killer instinct and leadership talent that men possess. This is not a muscular thing, nor an IQ thing. It is a psychological thing, a hormonal thing, it is a spiritual thing, a social thing — women can neither form nor lead Mannerbunds which are the basis of all action and civilization.

“and…..well… you can’t.”

Yes, you can.

“You can legislate until you’re blue in the face, but disenfranchising 50% of your population in one fell swoop will cause chaos.”

1. No, it won’t.

2. We’re going to be disenfranchising 99.99% of the population, not just females.

“OK, then. let’s ban education for all females.”

We don’t have to ban education for all females. We have to ban progressive education, progressive schools, progressivism, progressive preachers, etc. Then we have to sex-segregate and educate in a traditional, classical format.

“Almost overnight tens of thousands of underground schools will open up that will result, in a very short time, with a better educated female population than their male counterparts – you will make education cool for all girls.”

This is laughable. If I was King Mark, I would be presumably truly sovereign, in which case if I banned all female schools, I would order my army to shoot anyone who tried to set up a female school, and then order the army to wipe any settlements off the map if they tried to disobey my Kingly rule.

Of course, I don’t plan to do that, because I wouldn’t ban female schools, I would ban females from public life, and ban progressive schools.

“Fine. Let’s just fire all female government employees. This will be bad – your administration will collapse in a matter of weeks. Any more bright ideas?”

You’ve been commenting here for awhile, so I know you haven’t just escaped from Tumblr to comment here, but you sure sound like you have.

The government will collapse in a matter of weeks if you fire all female workers? To quote a cuck — are you kidding me?

And again, we’ll be firing ALL government employees, not just the women. How progressive of us!

Mark Yuray, Social Matter 34 Comments [8/9/2016 3:16:14 AM]
Fundie Index: 20

Quote# 121008

The entire feminist narrative from the beginning is rotten and a context deaf misreprisentation of social conditions plus outright lies. Although I disagree with many ways the men’s rights advocates frame issues, their information on the history of voting rights in the western democracies are very well researched and eye opening. Worthwhile reading.

Once voting became the activity of atomized individuals the rest of the rottenness of the 20th century bad decision making followed.

Rose, Counter currents 25 Comments [8/9/2016 3:16:09 AM]
Fundie Index: 8

Quote# 121007

Here’s what makes the prophetic calling possible to succeed in: you don’t have to please people, you just to have to please God. Very happily for us, God doesn’t hold His prophets responsible for how well their messages are received. If you blow us off, that’s all on you. And if we’re just another batch of delusional fruitcakes, then clearly no harm will come to you for blowing us off. In fact, you really should discount everything we say if we’re not accurately speaking for God, because He’s the only Source of truth. If our rendition of the end times is nothing more than a figment of our own demented imaginations, then you should run far and fast away from us. You really don’t want to be hanging out with folks who use the phrase “God says” as often we as do unless they’re using it correctly because when that lightning strikes us, you don’t want it nailing you as well. If we’re just putting words in God’s mouth that He never said, then it’s only a matter of time until He takes us down, and you should be cheering when He does. If we’re accurately predicting the end times, then just imagine all of the fun we won’t have when we’re getting interrogated up one side and down the other by really angry people who are looking for someone to blame their problems on. You see, there is no glory for prophets who are actually obeying God. He has a way of pinning His guys into no-win situations which prevent them from raking in any glory when He does what He says He’s going to do. And why should they? Glory is for God, not humans.

Anna Diehl, The Pursuit of God 12 Comments [8/9/2016 3:15:59 AM]
Fundie Index: 7

Quote# 121006

It was more than a year ago that I first wrote that women’s liberation is more properly called women’s prostitution. At the time, I was saying it with evidence culled from personal experience and from traditionalist intuition, but I am now both pleased and horrified to say that I can buttress the statement with some apt historical facts, too.

...

Suppose I hadn’t just showed my hand by telling you the following characteristics were all associated with 19th century frontier prostitutes, and try to think of what the following list would conjure in your mind:

Owns property.
Likes free health care.
Marries later in life.
Divorces frequently.
Travels extensively, often alone.
Avid and inventive social dancer.
Fixture in “saloons” (read: bars and night clubs).
Brazen and public.
Wears lipstick.
Overtly sexual makeup, clothing, and hairstyle.

Not so different from the average empowered feminist woman of today, no?

Granted, some things are notably different. The average liberated woman is usually not a fan of owning and using guns, but that’s because they’re even bigger fans of living in lily-white urban enclaves surrounded by effeminate men — not raucous cowboys. They’re also usually not successful gamblers or land owners, but they’ve more than made that up by being drug users and earning male salaries.

Aside from those two things, the average post-feminism woman of today has adopted every hallmark of the 19th century frontier prostitute. Decline alarmism is worth tempering, but it’s difficult to claim that a social shift like this is actually a good thing. I can hardly think of a way to more unambiguously demonstrate that social standards and cohesion have collapsed in the last two centuries, and especially in the last 50 years since the sexual revolution of 1969.

Of course, I am not the first one to make the argument that feminism turns decent women into prostitutes. I am not even the first one to notice this particular pattern at Social Matter. 19th century Americans had good reasons to look down on the behaviors and attitudes of prostitutes and I am certain they articulated them extremely well, extremely loudly, and decisively proved beyond a reasonable doubt that their arguments were superior to the defenders and supporters of powerful prostitutes and feminists. I am also sure that they lost anyway and that we are living in the aftermath.

The traditional view in the 19th century was that women should not own property, should be married early, should never divorce, should be modest, should remain near male relatives, should not hang out in or near bars or saloons, etc. This view was not born from arbitrary misogyny; it was born from a desire to keep ordinary women unassociated with prostitutes and the 19th century equivalents of strippers and camgirls.

That lipstick and the rest of the markers of prostitutes had such a bad reputation was not because of the arbitrary whims of The Patriarchy™, but because they facilitated prostitution. Women who owned property and used guns had more power than a lot of men, and therefore found it more difficult to find an appropriately dominant husband. Women who “painted” themselves with makeup and wore sexual clothing and hairstyles attracted all kinds of men, but didn’t make it easier to get married to any single one.

Women who got married later were at risk of never getting married at all, and in any case would limit their reproductive potential and therefore their mates — who wants to marry an aged woman, especially an aged prostitute, if they can marry a young, normal woman and have twice as many kids? Traveling alone and hanging around watering holes just tempts the loins and everyone knows it, and so on. All these basically anti-social and destructive behaviors used to be the domain of open prostitutes, but are now the domain of the high status “liberated” woman.

...

So in addition to pioneering nightlife, late marriage, divorce, traveling, dancing, makeup, sexual dress, and the planks of feminism, 19th century American prostitutes also pioneered abortion and birth control. The quoted author above mentions that abortion had even spread to “respectable women,” but it’s clear what the vector of transmission was.

Respectable women didn’t start aborting their kids and then unfairly discriminating against sex workers who did the same. Sex workers aborted their kids because of their promiscuous and unhealthy sexual habits, and then melded into the general population as they got older, perpetuating and spreading the habit as well as cheapening the reputation of actual respectable women, since nobody wanted to admit that prostitution was tacitly tolerated and that ex-prostitutes (or not even ex-, possibly) were allowed back into respectable society after plying a degenerate trade.

The other main difference is that in 1866 abortion, birth control, overt sexuality, “partying” as we think of it today, and the like were considered unambiguously bad, and were tolerated as an unfortunate fact of human nature at best and violently suppressed at worst. Today, between the decades of sophistic pronouncements of the Supreme Court and the allied assault on traditional culture by the Cathedral, the raft of bad behaviors associated in 1866 with unrepentant syphilitic whores have become enshrined as fundamental human rights in law and furthermore celebrated as expressions of piety towards the ostensibly humanistic religion of social progressivism.

That is not just a condemnation of the very concept of human rights, but of the entire formal and informal apparatus of government of the United States, as well as the ideals of progressivism.

Anyone who listens to Ryan Landry’s Weimerica Weekly podcast might even be convinced that contemporary empowered women are worse than 19th century prostitutes. Between the hellish trends of young female teachers having sex with their students and the media gearing up to normalize literal prostitution, they’ve got a good argument going. Tinder, Seeking Arrangement, and the rest of the click-swipe-bang(-pay) crowd have already put us a good part of the way there.

The only question is if in another 25 years people will still remember at all that prostitution used to be considered a bad thing. For the sake of the good and decent women left out there, I sure hope so.

Mark Yuray, Social Matter 21 Comments [8/9/2016 3:15:53 AM]
Fundie Index: 11

Quote# 121004

The Pokémon Go phenomenon is more proof the world is being readied for Satan's rule. The world is going crazy playing a game called Pokémon Go. The public saturation is so large the app downloads will soon surpass Twitter. There are some 20 million DAILY users of the game and large companies like Kellogg's, Kraft Foods and Burger King are heavily promoting it.

Few believers realize what the game actually is and apparently see no problem letting their children play it hours on end. In a nutshell, Pokémon Go is an occult-rooted and demon-oriented game of witchcraft originally created in god-less Japan. Believers’ children should have nothing to do with it!

If I were to suggest you should get out a Ouija Board and ask it a few questions, most grounded Believers would immediately point out the occult properties of Ouija that are obviously off-limits to Bible-believing Christians. And if you think using a Ouija Board is bad, Pokémon is 1000 times worse.

It’s like a three dimensional Ouija Board that is not played in one spot, but outside, all over the world as players chase and empower virtual demons. Yes, you read that correctly. Let's start with the word “Pokémon.” It’s a Japanese word that means “pocket monster.” And this comes from the same company (Wizards of the Coast) that originally developed the highly occultic and anti-Christian ‘Dungeons and Dragons” and “Magic” games.

Nintendo negotiated a license to distribute the game and its stock has since soared. The game is played by downloading an app to your smart phone which is used to find and capture Pokeballs. The Pokeballs are found all over town—appearing as images on the players' phones in parks, schools, hospitals, businesses, freeways, landmarks, etc.

They’re then used to throw at and capture virtual pocket monsters appearing all around in the mapped streetscape. Called “immersive play” or “augmented reality,” players use their smart phone's GPS and camera functions to blur reality with fantasy that, in essence, gives spirit and soul to digital objects.

Pokémon gives power to whomever catches them. When you capture your pocket monsters, you train them to have more and more “power” to use against other people’s Pokémon. The characters even mimic evolution as the Pokémon “evolve” from 1 to 100 as the game progresses.

are some 150 named Pokémon and they have special powers as they share the world with humans. For instance the Pokémon named “Haunter” can hypnotize, eat your dreams and drain your energy. “Abra” reads minds and “Kadabra” spews negative energy. Do note the names they use!

So the bottom line is that playing Pokémon Go is dealing with the devil’s demonic world. “Pocket monster” is just a ruse for “pocket demon.” The world has gone crazy searching out virtual demons! Most have no clue. Christian kids are being unsuspectingly sucked into the world of the occult by the millions.

“No wonder, for even Satan disguises himself as an angel of light. Therefore it is not surprising if his servants also disguise themselves as servants of righteousness, whose end will be according to their deeds.” (2 Cor.11:14).

Realize, especially regarding children, that this is a gateway to the occult and is strictly forbidden in the Bible. We certainly don’t want our children dealing with demons. But most see no harm in letting their kids play the game. As for the person who turns to mediums and to spiritists, to play the harlot after them, I will also set My face against that person and will cut him off from among his people (Lev. 20:6).

Nintendo’s stock has soared since acquiring the rights to distribute Pokemon Go Believe it or not, hundreds of churches, both liberal and conservative, are EMBRACING Pokémon Go by making their church a PokeStop or gym for the game. Really? REALLY? These churches actually think that by advertising “come catch ‘em all” that they can reach more un-churched people.

Unbelievable! They might as well advertise, “Come let your demons play with our demons.” The Bible is quite clear, even tying deceiving spirits into the latter days:

“But the Spirit explicitly says that in later times some will fall away from the faith, paying attention to deceitful spirits and doctrines of demons” (1 Tim. 4:1).

In the Old Testament the Lord was quite clear about steering clear of witchcraft as the penalty for practicing sorcery was death! “You shall not allow a sorceress to live” (Ex. 22:18). In multiple passages, we are warned. Yet somehow we missed the obvious. This game is quite evil!

Two months into playing Pokémon an eight-year-old boy asked his mother “What is channeling?” The boy explained that there were channelers, bad spirits and ghosts in his Pokemon game, calling out dead Pokémons' spirits.

“There shall not be found among you anyone who makes his son or his daughter pass through the fire, one who uses divination, one who practices witchcraft, or one who interprets omens, or a sorcerer, or one who casts a spell, or a medium, or a spiritist, or one who calls up the dead. For whoever does these things is detestable to the LORD; and because of these detestable things the LORD your God will drive them out before you” (Deuteronomy.18:10-12).

Paul the apostle pointedly warned us about the invisible war going on around us in verses we all can quote from memory but never really seem to find a reason to apply:

“Put on the full armor of God, so that you will be able to stand firm against the schemes of the devil. For our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the powers, against the world forces of this darkness, against the spiritual forces of wickedness in the heavenly places” (Ephesians 6:11-12).

We need to heed Paul's warning. If you have kids or grand-kids involved with this game, it’s time to get out the Bible and teach the inerrant truth in God's Word about the incredible dangers of the occult. Otherwise you risk losing them to the dark side.

Bill Perkins, Rapture Ready 41 Comments [8/8/2016 5:39:01 PM]
Fundie Index: 15

Quote# 121003

The daughter of an octogenarian whose ambulance was diverted during a Black Lives Matter protest last winter on I-93 said the defendants -- who today avoided jail time with guilty pleas -- treated people like her beloved father as “collateral damage.”

“The foolishness, when you hear about adult diapers and cement and people asking, 'Please get out of the way,' and you can hear the ambulances in the background, then I'm angry,”' said Pauline McDonough of Plainville, whose then 82-year-old father was diverted to a Brockton hospital instead of Boston Medical Center when protesters blocked the highway chaining themselves to cement blocks on Jan. 15, 2015.

Some of the protesters wore adult diapers expecting to snarl traffic for hours, authorities said.

“Once all of the risks that were presented to these individuals and they still chose to disregard that, almost like there was going to be collateral damage. … We believe that Black Lives Matter is certainly a noble cause. … But you know, it's a bigger picture than that. We have loved ones and all lives matter. And my dad's life mattered,” McDonough said.

McDonough's father, Richard McGrath, survived a serious accident that day in Easton but died in August from heart failure.

Ten protesters today pleaded guilty to willfully impending an emergency vehicle and were given six months unsupervised probation and 60 hours of community service even though prosecutors requested 90 days behind bars.
Afterward, the group said they had no remorse.

“We understood that there would be consequences of this action. But we are neither remorseful nor grateful,” said group spokesman Noah McKenna. He said the “real story” is the systemic violence against black bodies.

Along with McKenna, guilty pleas were entered by defendants James Billman of Brookline, Eli Cohen of Somerville, William Connolloy of Hanson, Emily Osmum of Somerville, Mark Schwaller of Jamaica Plain, Nicole Sullivan of Somerville, Brett West of Boston, Angela Davis of Somerville and Joshua Nickel of Roslindale. The defendants ranged in ages from 25 to 44 and six said they held bachelor's degrees.

Black Lives Matter, Boston Herald 35 Comments [8/8/2016 5:36:20 PM]
Fundie Index: 9

Quote# 120999

[I believe sexual agency means you are allowed to not sleep with whomever you want for whatever reason.]

Sexual agency means people are allowed to not sleep with people for bigoted reasons. It does not mean those reasons are not bigoted.

When people say they will not date members of (insert marginalized group), it is usually a red flag that the person is likely bigoted against that group.

[It does mean that you question someone's decision to not sleep with certain people, just because they belong to a marginalized group. I think doing so and preaching sexual agency at the same time hurts both causes. If someone is bigotted, then surely you will find another reason to call them out for. And if this is the only instance that could be interpreted as them being bigotted, and/or they have other reasons for it (e.g. if they were raped by a member of that marginalized group), then discounting them as "bigotted" seems like an awfully bad idea.]

That is like saying that believing in free speech and criticizing bigoted speech hurts both causes. That is bullshit.

Sexual preference is arbitrarily treated as sacred, and as such is often one of the only places where otherwise people who like to think of themselves as progressive are able to openly express bigotry. No one should have to wait until a less acceptable form of bigotry is expressed before they write off a toxic person for what they are.

And avoiding a marginalized group because one member committed a traumatizing crime is pretty much an embodiment of the definition of prejudice. If that is the case, it should be acknowledged as a problem and worked on.

shaedofblue, Reddit - r/SRSDiscussion 35 Comments [8/8/2016 3:25:11 AM]
Fundie Index: 14

Quote# 120993

Anything that you place as a higher priority in your daily life than personal time in prayer and Bible reading is idolatry. God created you and me because he needs our worship.

David J. Stewart, Jesus is Savior 46 Comments [8/8/2016 3:19:30 AM]
Fundie Index: 16

Quote# 120992

Yesterday, Wayne Allyn Root, a Donald Trump-worshiping sycophant and all-around conspiracy theorist, appeared on Jesse Lee Peterson's radio program to declare that Trump's presidential campaign is a message from God that "it's time for a war president."

"I think we need a war president and I think God sent us someone named Donald Trump," Root said. "I think he's perfect for this election. We needed someone who is a bit coarse and foul-mouthed and vicious and fights with a gun in a gunfight, not with a knife in a gun fight."

"I think he's the right guy at that right time," he continued, "and I get very mad when Christians try and tell me that they're not going to vote for him because he's just too coarse and too foul and too vicious and he says offensive things. When you read the Bible, I read tons of vengeful things, I read tons of war and death and people being punished by God. God is not always nice; this God takes vengeance when he's mad at you and he sends really vicious people when you need them."

"We're in a war to save America, I think from the devil, I think from the Antichrist, I think from a biblical prophecy that someone is going to take down this country and it's pretty clear to me it's happening right now," Root concluded.

Wayne Allyn Root, Right Wing Watch 27 Comments [8/8/2016 3:19:19 AM]
Fundie Index: 9
Submitted By: Ibuki Mioda

Quote# 120990

I started out talking about Razib Khan, who immigrated with his family from Bangladesh. Then I ranted about the folly of permitting mass Muslim immigration. So … should we have let Razib in? Now that he's in, should we expel him?

Here's where the particular collides with the general. It happens a lot.

It happens with blacks, for example. I talk and write a lot about the wrong-headedness, the scientific illiteracy of pretending that there are no statistical differences between the continental races in behavior, intelligence, and personality. Of course there are. If you deny that, you just end up with bad, dumb social policies and masses of wasted public money from trying to, for example, close racial gaps in academic achievement, or get more black policemen and firefighters by lowering entry standards to those professions.

So, people ask me, what about so-and-so (naming some smart, capable, socially useful black person)? Are you down on him, too?

Of course not. I'm not down on anybody. Of course I know there are smart, capable, decent blacks. Who doesn't know it? I had dinner with one a couple of weeks ago. I just think reality is better than fantasy and truth is better than lies; and if you base social policy on fantasy and lies, nothing good will come of it. That's all.

Same with immigration. It's about numbers. Would I care if we let 1,000 Mexicans settle in the U.S.A. every year, after being properly vetted? No, I wouldn't care at all. A thousand Nigerians? A thousand Muslims? A thousand Chinese? Same answer. With numbers at that level, we could do proper background checking before issuing visas, and in-country supervision once people got here, without compromising the freedom of our citizens. No problem.

But … One point six million Muslims? Three and a half million Chinese? Thirty-five million Mexicans? These numbers are beyond anything we can properly vet, manage, or supervise.

I say again: It's a question of how you salt your stew. It's numbers, numbers.

Do I want to expel Razib back to Bangladesh? No: but I do want to stop further Muslim immigration, and indeed mass immigration altogether. With sane policies and a bit of luck, we might be able to absorb the numbers we've already got, but to go on importing people at the current rate is lunacy. If we can't absorb any particular group, we can do what the Israelis do and bribe them to leave — buy out their citizenship if necessary.

John Derbyshire, VDARE 19 Comments [8/7/2016 3:13:06 PM]
Fundie Index: 12

Quote# 120989

If Trump doesn't win, then yeah, I'm going to change my affiliation to Independent. Not that it will matter, considering I don't look for the US to be around for long if the Hildabeast is elected. Or if the US still is around, we most likely won't be. Many of Hillary's enemies tend to drop dead, in various "accidents". In addition, if she wins, my guess is that soon it will be a crime to say "Jesus", will be considered treasonous to own a Bible, and just that people will be allowed to worship any god they want, can do the new age thing, the Muslim thing, the Buddhist thing, the Hindu thing, and any thing BUT worship the One True God, and His Son Jesus Christ.

If I were an atheist, that right there would give me pause. The reason there are no secular "issues" with all these religions, and we are forced to bend over backwards to accommodate them all... because they all have one thing in common.... they all worship SATAN. The only God (capital because I'm talking about the one and only God there is), we are not allowed to worship is GOD. Those who proclaim truth are persecuted for it, don't get the same "protection" that all the "religions" do. Hmmmm. I wonder, could that be because TPTB, elite, Democrats, and even many Republicans are threatened in that they know we worship the only One stronger than their master Satan? I'm POSITIVE that is why everyone gets rights but us, why we can't say Merry Christmas, why we can't refuse to sell a wedding cake to a gay couple, etc...

tiffanybw, Rapture Ready 29 Comments [8/7/2016 3:13:01 PM]
Fundie Index: 15
Submitted By: Kelpie

Quote# 120983

[Link and formatting in original]

Ali Hammuda, an Imam at a Cardiff mosque, seems intent on maintaining a position as one of the most hateful and extreme voices in the West when it comes to Islamic values. Hammuda first attracted international attention when three young men from his mosque who became extremists in ISIS in Syria. He is now back in the news after a secret recording shows him telling his followers that it is permissible and moral under the teachings of Mohammed to have sex slaves.

Hammuda influenced the three ‘Cardiff jihadis’ – Nasser Muthana and Reyaad Khan, then 20, and Muthana’s younger brother Aseel, then 17 – who became terrorists with ISIS in Syria. He is shown in the latest recording telling teenage Muslims that they can morally force women to be sex slaves under the teachings of the Koran (Quran). The recording from the Al-Manar mosque by an undercover reporter shows Hammuda, who (despite his extremist past) the English Islamic Programmes officer at the mosque, explains the Hadiths, or sayings of Mohammed.

Hammuda is recorded as saying:

“One of the interpretations as to what this means is that towards the end of time there will be many wars like what we are seeing today, and because of these wars women will be taken as captives, as slaves, yeah, women will be taken as slaves. . . . And then, er, her master has relations with her because this is permissible in Islam, it’s permissible to have relations with a woman who is your slave or your wife.”

[...]

While rape and slavery is perfectly moral under the teachings of Mohammad, Hammuda is disgusted . . . by music. Music turns out to be the “tool of Satan” so when you are raping your Yazidi sex slave, you should not listen to music. He also says that it is forbidden to engage in the “free mixing” with women . . . unless of course you are raping them as an Islamic right.

What is really frightening is that, until 2013, Hammuda was allowed to hold lunchtime sessions at Cathays High School in Cardiff. Many Muslims have condemned Hammuda and his hateful, disgusting teachings. After the release of the tape, Hammuda insisted that he has always condemned the “so-called Islamic State” and “this evil phenomena.” He insisted that “The undercover recording and quotations referred to seem to have been deliberately taken out of context to portray a religious perspective that I do not ascribe to.”

Ali Hammuda, Jonathan Turley 16 Comments [8/7/2016 10:49:17 AM]
Fundie Index: 11
Submitted By: JeanP

Quote# 120974

You know if moms could kill their children after they're born (besides post natal abortion, I'm talking older than a few minutes here) and we gave pro choicers' mothers the chance to "abort" them, you'd bet your ass pro choicers would be backpeddling because you know damn well most of their mothers didn't want them in the first place.

Anonymous, Tumblr 24 Comments [8/7/2016 10:44:08 AM]
Fundie Index: 9
Submitted By: Demon Duck of Doom

Quote# 120972

Continuing her smear campaign against Khizr and Ghazala Khan, Sandy Rios of the American Family Association told Alan Colmes yesterday that the Khans may have been disappointed that their son served in the U.S. Army, making him an apostate from Islam when he died.

Rios falsely claimed that Khizr Khan has called Sharia law superior to the U.S. Constitution, claiming that since he “adheres to Sharia,” he would then “absolutely” want to kill Americans. (She appears to be citing an article which, as the myth-busting group Snopes points out, “in no part suggested support for Sharia law or membership in the Muslim Brotherhood and appeared to be an academic piece, not an advocacy paper.”)

After citing the so-called Islamic State’s assertion that the Khans’ son was an “apostate,” Rios said that the Khans may agree with the terrorist group’s assertion: “I believe that they believe that anyone that adheres to Sharia believes their son is an apostate for serving in the American military.”

“He’s an apostate according to Islamic Sharia law,” she said.

Sandy Rios, Right Wing Watch 23 Comments [8/7/2016 5:55:23 AM]
Fundie Index: 15
Submitted By: Ibuki Mioda

Quote# 120971

If we were honest with ourselves, we put many gods before us to save us in our day to day lives. We use doctors and medication to save us. We use insurance to save us. We use mechanics to save us… The list goes on and on. Salvation in Greek means “all your needs supplied” like a baby is cared for. Jesus wants to be our Savior in all areas of our lives. Angels are just waiting for us to trust in God so that they can minister to our needs. It will take time for most of us to completely trust God, but in the mean time our underemployed angels are waiting.

mark, heavenshelpers.org 32 Comments [8/7/2016 5:54:30 AM]
Fundie Index: 18
Submitted By: PETF