1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 | bottom
Quote# 121613



The godless progressive liberals are calling the U.S. Constitution a living document. This means you can interpret the meaning of it any way that fits the present progressive mob thinking of the day by wicked judges. That's why we need and addendum that puts
God Almighty and His Son Jesus the Lord of all, in an updated U.S. Constitution.

This should be a new preamble to the U.S. Constitution:

WE THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES recognizing the being and
attributes of almighty God, the divine Authority of the Holy Scriptures, the
law of God as the paramount rule, and Jesus the Messiah, the Savior and Lord of
all, in order to form a more perfect union do ordain and establish this Constitution
of the United States of America.

---------------------------------------------

If our founding fathers knew what would happen to America today they would have added the God of the Bible and His Son, the Lord of all, Jesus the Christ. It should be updated Article [I] (Amendment 1 - Freedom of expression and religion)

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of a National Christian Church, or prohibiting the free exercise of all Christian Churches and Christians thereof. Any Christian has the right to share his faith anywhere and anyplace including any government agency and military post or unit; and there shall be the freedom to place Christian scripture anywhere and on any government document; there cannot be any abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press or any media; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.


BobbyHead, Christian News Network 19 Comments [9/16/2016 4:26:08 PM]
Fundie Index: 11
Submitted By: KingOfRhye

Quote# 121608

[In response to the question How long did the anti-Nazi consensus take in post-ww2 Germany?]

Nazism wasn't a mistake. Look at how the world is today and imagine how much better it could be if the Nazis won. The Western world is a cesspool of degenerate behavior, just as bad as the third world.

Nathan, Yahoo Answers! 11 Comments [9/16/2016 4:25:38 PM]
Fundie Index: 10
Submitted By: TheReasonator

Quote# 121607

(Yesterday Greta Van Susteren asked people on Twitter if she should make a segment on Hillary's health. Today she abruptly left FOX after 14 years. What the fuck?)

Because the murdochs are radical leftist and no real conservative would work for them. Today is the day fox became the new CNN

Purpletricycle, r/The Donald 12 Comments [9/16/2016 4:25:31 PM]
Fundie Index: 11
Submitted By: Ivurm

Quote# 121605

I completely agree that there's rampant discrimination against Asians, but which came first? I This is not what "forces" the parents to do x, y, and z. The behavior came first. The discrimination came later, for many reasons, but a good deal of which is caused by the fact that the Asian parent pressure produces kids whose abilities simply make a lie of their resumes. I've taught enrichment English at an Asian academy for many years. I run into kids all the time who got the highest level, Advanced, on their end of year state tests who simply don't have anything approaching the vocabulary or writing skills to back these scores up--and this is simply not the case for whites, blacks, and Hispanics with similar scores (or later generation Asians). I know lots Asian immigrants with 2400 SAT scores, and I know a few whites with same, as well as Americans of all races with over 2100 totals. Again and again, the Asian immigrants are simply ordinary swots, often having forgotten the information they crammed for. The others with equivalent scores are not.

As for "pure merit", while I'm definitely in favor of rewarding brains, the fact is that Asian immigrants have "broken" our test system, particularly the College Board side of things. I have no idea if it's just a gaming method of decoding the test, or if the cheating is so substantial it turns up in the scores. Certainly the AP Calc tests are too easy or too formulaic--the Bio test was just changed a couple years ago and scores dropped. Similar changes need to be made to the Calc tests. But the SAT scores---Asian scores have increased dramatically in the past 15 years, while every other race average has stayed roughly constant. That suggests something other than just hard work.

The situation with the Asian students is far more complicated than discussed in the article and a very serious problem. Many of the Asian students in our school are the children of foreign high tech parents and in other cases the parents have sent the children here to rent a room alone in the district just to attend the school. There children completely self segregate themselves for the rest of the school, rarely play sports, and help each other cheat at a very high rate. Yes they are high achieving but many of them take the math or science class the summer before the local college and then try to get the teachers to skip the information they already know. Quite honestly the local teachers mostly despise the Asians because of their singular goal of getting an A.

EducationRealist, Althouse 4 Comments [9/16/2016 4:25:01 PM]
Fundie Index: 5

Quote# 121601

Sex is not like driving, it is a natural instinct that has been around for millions of years and is necessary for survival of all species.

It is a bad lie to say age of consent means age when adolescents are ready to have sex.

Age of consent means:
Sex under the age of consent is terrible, in each and every case, with no exception, and so much that government MUST interfere with draconian long prison terms.

Age of consent does NOT mean:
it would be wiser if most kids under that age did not have sex. Human-Stupidity’s opinion to abolish age of consent does not mean that everyone should have sex at low age. It means, sex is not very damaging, and it is the business of parents and care takers to lead and supervise their children.

And, strangely, government need not interfere when pregnant alcoholics give birth to permanently damaged babies with fetal alcohol syndrome. Or government does not prevent parents from creating obese diabetic children by instilling wrong eating and exercise habits in them.

Government is not concerned with health of children, government is concerned with repression of sex.


Human-Stupidity.com , Emma the Emo's Emo Musings  25 Comments [9/16/2016 3:27:55 AM]
Fundie Index: 9
Submitted By: Xavier

Quote# 121600

Saudi Arabia's top cleric has declared that Iran's leaders are not Muslims and regard Sunni Muslims as their enemy.

Grand Mufti Sheikh Abdul-Aziz ibn Abdullah Al ash-Sheikh was responding to Iran's supreme leader, who denounced Saudi Arabia's handling of the annual Hajj pilgrimage to Mecca.

The Grand Mufti said the claims of the Iranian Ayatollah were "not surprising" and accused Iran's leaders of being Zoroastrians, an ancient pre-Islamic Iranian religion.

Saudi Arabia's population is nearly 90 per cent Sunni and has long been at odds with the 95 per cent Shia Iran - two denominations that have been in conflict since the 7th century.

In remarks published on Wednesday, Sheikh Abdul-Aziz Al ash-Sheikh said: "We must understand these are not Muslims.

"They are the son of the Magi and their hostility towards Muslims is an old one, especially with the People of the Tradition [Sunnis]."

Grand Mufti Sheikh Abdul-Aziz ibn Abdullah Al ash-Sheikh, The Independent 24 Comments [9/16/2016 3:27:52 AM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Yossarian Lives

Quote# 121598

The United British Emirates is a concept for how Britain could be governed, that is, for Britain to be governed along the lines of the United Arab Emirates. The United Arab made up of seven self-governing principalities, and the national government is elected by the rulers of these principalities. Similarly, Britain could be divided into 96 principalities following the traditional county boundaries, and each of these counties could be governed by hereditary Christian rulers.

In theory, once a country becomes democratic, it cannot revert back to its feudal origins, as the public will not give up their power. That's a theory, but it's wrong, because the public do not have any effective power. Democracy is like the element sodium, and does not exist in nature. It instantly turns into oligarchy or monarchy. Britain is effectively ruled not by the British public, but by Catholic clerics.

When for example did the British public decide to allow in millions of Africans and Asians? This was decided by politicians who were selected by entryist Labour Party members, who in turn were acting in obedience to Catholic clerics, who decreed that Britain should become a multicultural society. Britain already is an oligarchy, and the only question is whether it should be an oligarchy of Catholic priests, or an oligarchy of the Windsor family and other popular families that serves the interests of ordinary people.

In the United British Emirates, there would still be a House of Commons and a House of Lords. The House of Lords would be made up of principality rulers and their heirs. An heir would not necessarily be the eldest son, but the son whom the House of Lords considers the most worthy. A government would need to retain the confidence of the Lords, and the Commons would be there for consultative purposes.

It has been suggested that being a lottery winner would be preferable to being the Duke of Westminster. But how about being the ruler of a Christian principality? Or how about being the ruler of Dubai? Can anyone imagine a better job than being the ruler of an English county?

A formal oligarchy is historically the most stable form of government. The oligarchy in Venice lasted 1100 years without any regime changes. Throughout this period of 1100 years, Venice was the most desirable place in the world for ordinary people to live. In contrast, the current regime in Britain has only existed for about 50 years, and has not delivered good government.

Jeff, The Spectator  26 Comments [9/16/2016 3:26:17 AM]
Fundie Index: 14

Quote# 121594

The culture of honesty does not exist much outside Judeo-Christian societies. That's difficult for Westerners to understand. Basic dishonesty-- graft, bribery, cheating, etc.-- affects everything. We've all experienced it, but most of us in the West have not seen how it operates when everything depends on dishonesty.

Bob Ellison, Althouse 13 Comments [9/16/2016 3:25:15 AM]
Fundie Index: 11

Quote# 121589

It's easy to get caught off guard by the gays. You're walking uprightly and doing good; but their mind is in the gutter continually. So when gays approach a God-fearing Christian, that believer may not know what to say to them at the moment. I've learned to just tell them kindly that God says homosexuality is a sin. You don't have to be negative. Be honest and tell them that you don't swing that way. If they become upset or belligerent, just say “I really have to go” and leave. Sometimes homosexuals will box you into a corner and force you to either accept their gay lifestyle or tell them that it's a sin in God's eyes. I am proud to say that I am 100%, bonafied, nonrefundable, HOMOPHOBIC!!!

Admittedly I feel awkward, nervous, uncomfortable and strange when a person announces to me, or even hints that they are, HOMOSEXUAL. I don't hate you if you are queer, but I am glad that I feel VERY uncomfortable around gays. That's how God wants us to feel. Something is very wrong with a person who feels comfortable around God-haters, rebels, perverts and wicked heathens. Homosexuality is the lowest you can go in life morally. I know that people think murder or adultery is worse, but they're really not. Homosexuality requires a total rejection of God's will for your life, a complete subversion of the human soul, a direction that is almost impossible to break free from once you start down that path of sexual degeneracy.

David J. Stewart, Jesus is Savior 33 Comments [9/16/2016 3:24:20 AM]
Fundie Index: 13

Quote# 121588

When women get past their teens, they grow armpit hair, leg hair, pubic hair, body odor. Men don't like this... it's natural for men not to like it. It also means she may not bear as many children in the long run. Men are natural hebephiles. In modern society men forget how necessary it is for post-pubescent women to alter their bodies to be attractive. No man would accept a post-pubescent woman in her natural skin. She must remove her post-pubescent traits and mimic adolescent traits to be attractive again. Men in modern society think this is normal.. but it's not.. It's very unnatural. It's very fake and manipulated

Marshall Hare, disqus 31 Comments [9/16/2016 3:23:19 AM]
Fundie Index: 15
Submitted By: Xavier

Quote# 121586

Barack Obama has cancelled a meeting with the president of the Philippines after Rodrigo Duterte appeared to call him a “son of a whore”.

The move followed a warning from Duterte to the US president to keep off the subject of extrajudicial killings in his country’s brutal drug war when they were due to meet on Tuesday at a regional summit in Laos. Duterte told a press conference that Obama “must be respectful”.

The firebrand president was answering a reporter’s question about how he intended to explain the extrajudicial killings to Obama, before boarding a plane to Laos for the Association of South-east Asian Nations summit.

“You must be respectful. Do not just throw away questions and statements. Son of a whore, I will curse you in that forum,” Duterte was quoted by as saying by Agence-France Presse. “We will be wallowing in the mud like pigs if you do that to me.”

When his comments reached the Obama camp, the US president initially said he was asking his staff to find out whether holding the meeting as scheduled would be useful.

“What I’ve instructed my team to do is to talk to their Philippine counterparts to find out, is if this in fact a time where we can have some constructive, productive conversations,” Obama said at a news conference at the end of a G20 summit in the eastern Chinese city of Hangzhou.

“Obviously the Filipino people are some of our closest friends and allies and the Philippines is a treaty ally of ours. But I always want to make sure that if I’m having a meeting that it’s actually productive and we’re getting something done.”

But hours later the decision was made to cancel, a White House spokesman said. Instead, Obama will meet with South Korean president Park Geun-hye.

Duterte has faced condemnation from human rights campaigners, diplomats and the UN for inciting a war on drugs that, according to official figures published on Sunday, has led to 2,400 deaths in just two months.

The defiant Philippine leader has responded to critics with a string of outbursts, including labelling the US ambassador to Manila a “gay son of a whore”, telling the Catholic church “don’t fuck with me”, and accusing the UN of issuing “shitting” statements about his anti-drugs policies.

Obama joins a long list of people whose mothers’ purity have been called into question by Duterte, including Pope Francis, Philippine bishops and a murdered journalist, as well as the drugs traffickers who are the main targets of his domestic law and order policies.

He took office in June after winning a landslide on promises to sort out drug crime in the country, and told crowds on the day of his inauguration: “If you know of any addicts, go ahead and kill them yourself as getting their parents to do it would be too painful.”

During his campaign, he said 100,000 people would die in his crackdown, with so many dead bodies dumped in Manila Bay that fish there would grow fat from feeding on them.

The call has led to what critics say amounts to open season on suspected drug criminals on the streets of Manila and other major cities, with thousands killed by vigilantes and police, who invariably claim to have fired back in self-defence.

In June, the UN secretary general, Ban Ki-moon, condemned Duterte’s apparent support for extrajudicial killings, saying they were “illegal and a breach of fundamental rights and freedoms”. Duterte replied by calling the UN “stupid” and threatening to withdraw the Philippines from the supranational body.

Asked about the possible consequences of his comments, he said: “What is ... repercussions? I don’t give a shit to them.”

Pres. Rodrigo Duterte, The Guardian 22 Comments [9/16/2016 3:23:05 AM]
Fundie Index: 7
Submitted By: SpukiKitty

Quote# 121583

"Is the DNC leadership really this inept, or is something really scary about to happen?"

Of course something scary is going to happen. We are going to get screwed like the Russians did when the USSR fell apart. Hillary Clinton is the oligarch candidate, and her supporters are going to loot us like we’ve never been looted in our lifetimes.

When someone as obviously sick and incapable as Hillary is being full-on supported by the elite, what it means is that the elite doesn’t want that person to govern. They want to install their people in all key positions of influence and have their way with the country while Hillary is out of commission.

Bill P, Unz 29 Comments [9/15/2016 2:28:06 AM]
Fundie Index: 11

Quote# 121582

1830 is not all that long after the French Revolution, in which the very French idea of chivalry died a quick death. Prior to the revolution, French men were sometimes murdered for as little as questioning the honor of ladies.

De Tocqueville seems to have had sentimental feelings about chivalry, as a lot of French did in his day. Perhaps he saw how some of the old honor codes remained in America, in the South in particular, and found this favorable in comparison to his much changed homeland.

Women’s security and liberty may be a reasonable goal, but when it is enforced with such ferocity men eventually rebel, and for good reason: they often find themselves subjects of the women being “protected,” and a woman in authority can be a terrible tyrant to men (not to mention her children).

By the way, chivalry – including the female-worshipping part – was partly borrowed from Muslims during the Crusades. Even today Muslims honestly think they honor Muslim women much more than we do our own.

Bill P, Unz 19 Comments [9/14/2016 4:25:01 PM]
Fundie Index: 9

Quote# 121579

When the bible said that there's nothing new under the sun, it wasn't playing around. This is a *5000* year old condom! And you thought condoms were something they came out with during your lifetime to cut down on AIDS, unwanted pregnancies and STD's.

Nope: they were originally used in fertility sex rituals to capture a man's semen, later to be used in ritual offerings to the gods and to make love potions with.

They were also used to prevent evil spirits inside of one person from transferring into the other person during sex. What we call viruses today were known as evil spirits back then. And do you honestly think the purpose for them has changed in all these years? I think those ancients may have been onto something.

Evil spirits easily get transferred through sex. It's one of the most effective ways to not only transfer demons and other wicked spirits: it's also one of the most effective ways of initiating someone into the occult.

Sex is a binding agreement, just like entering into a covenant with someone. And when you 'cut covenant' with someone, you also enter into covenant with whatever has entered them prior to you meeting them.

Wearing a condom won't protect you. It can't even adequately protect you from herpes! Arm yourself with the right knowledge - before you find yourself entering covenant with a demonic spirit that was hiding inside of the person you just slept with.

And if you've already done so, learn how to break those soul ties: not just with the person who you slept with; but with the demons too that they brought into your life. *More info in comment section*

https://www.pinterest.com/pin/517280707183481886/

Mack Major, Facebook 34 Comments [9/14/2016 3:34:54 AM]
Fundie Index: 18

Quote# 121578

Indubatibly and definitively, Phyllis was a great lady who quite reasonably may have been put forward as Queen of the United states in a just world where the Catholic Church took its rightful place as center of all government. Indeed many solypsystic actions are taken against women who commit thoughtcrimes against the new progressive order. By feminist logic, we conservative men must defend them against discrimination.

Thomas Bechett, We Hunted The Mammoth 23 Comments [9/14/2016 2:57:42 AM]
Fundie Index: 19
Submitted By: Skybison

Quote# 121577

As of this writing, it appears that ~4,000 people lost their lives in the attack on the World Trade Center. While this sounds like a large number of people (and it is the largest loss of life due to single terrorist attack), it represents only a small percentage of the people who could have died in those towers. A total of 50,000 people worked in the World Trade Center towers at the time of the attack. In addition, it was reported that 100,000 people visited the towers every day. This means that at least 90% of everybody in the towers at the time of the attack escaped alive! This sounds like a miracle to me. There are some other remarkable facts to consider. The first tower that was hit stood standing 45 minutes longer than the second tower, allowing more time for those who had no warning to escape. After the attack on the first tower, people in the second tower immediately began to leave, despite the announcement by management that everything was safe and under control. People interviewed later reported that they "felt" that they should leave. Did God communicate to tens of thousands of people to warn them to escape? It seems likely, since people usually listen to and follow the advice of authorities. In watching the crash of the second airliner into the second tower, it seems remarkable that the tower did not collapse immediately. There was a huge explosion that engulfed several floors of the tower at once. Did God miraculously sustain the tower for an additional 30 minutes to allow people to escape? Given these circumstances, it seems likely that God miraculously intervened to limit the death toll in the attack on the World Trade Center towers.

Rich Deem, God And Science.org 27 Comments [9/14/2016 2:57:36 AM]
Fundie Index: 8
Submitted By: Chris

Quote# 121576

Where was God During the World Trade Center Attack?
The goodness of the work of God in this atrocity


Where was God during the terrorist attack on the World Trade Center towers on September 11, 2001? The Christian God is supposed to be both loving and all-powerful. Despite these characteristics, God seems to be unable or unwilling to have prevented this and other evil acts that have been committed in the world. The atheist concludes that either God is not loving or not all-powerful or that God does not exist, because if He did exist, He could stop all the suffering. Although God obviously did not prevent this atrocity, who is to say that He has not prevented others. Believe it or not, there are worse things that terrorists could have done, including exploding a nuclear device in Manhattan. In addition, atheists have not considered all the things God might have done to prevent an even greater loss of life than what occurred during the attack on the World Trade Center. This page will examine some of the more obvious ways that God was working during and following the attacks.

[...]

The third airliner crashed into the Pentagon. However, the side of the building hit was under renovation, limiting the loss of life. If the terrorists had crashed directly into the Pentagon from the original direction of flight (the plane had passed the Pentagon and made a 270 degree turn prior to impact), the loss of life would have been ten times greater. Was God involved in this?

The fourth airliner did not even reach its intended destination (probably the Capitol Building in Washington D.C.). Although God did not bring down this airliner directly, His people were involved in thwarting the attempt at mass destruction. Todd Beamer, a graduate of Wheaton College, a dedicated Christian who taught Sunday School, led a charge against the hijackers who had commandeered flight 93, resulting in the plane crashing into an unpopulated field outside of Pittsburgh. As it turned out, the plane crashed just 2 miles from an elementary school. Was God involved in steering the airliner away from the school?

Has God been involved with the events subsequent to September 11? The attack has turned people from their selfishness to seek God and get involved in helping the victims of the families. The following Sunday, we had standing room only attendance at Sierra Madre Congregational Church, as did nearly every church in the nation. People lined up for hours to donate blood at the Red Cross. The Red Cross had been requesting for more donors for months before this with no success. People, organizations, movie stars, and even websites have banded together to raise funds for relief agencies and the families of the victims. God has been working in the hearts of people to get more involved with each other and helping those who are less fortunate. The shock of this evil atrocity has made people realize that their own petty problems are minor in comparison to the plight of others, and helped people to see how really fortunate they are.

A member of our church choir related a minor miracle that resulted from this attack. Heather and her family were living temporarily in an apartment complex, which, being in Southern California, consisted of many different races and ethnic backgrounds. After the attack, all the Middle eastern children stopped playing outside, and their parents were nowhere to be seen. The Saturday after the attack, Heather and her children knocked on all the doors of the complex and invited the people to a time of prayer near the swimming pool. Many dozens of people showed up, including families with Middle Eastern background. They admitted that they were afraid of reprisals and were staying out of site. They all prayed and shared together - something that would have never happened if the attack had never taken place. The people of that apartment complex are now acting as a family of God, united to help and care about each other.

Where was God in the attack on the World Trade Center? He was there all along!

You intended to harm me, but God intended it for good to accomplish what is now being done, the saving of many lives. (Genesis 50:20)

Rich Deem, God And Science.org 18 Comments [9/14/2016 2:57:34 AM]
Fundie Index: 7
Submitted By: Chris

Quote# 121575

multiculturalism is a euphemism for media induced zeitgeist that whites are evil so they need to give away their land and destroy their own race to atone for the sins of their ancestors. It's incredibly racist to allow everyone BUT whites to organize based on their race. Race is real, it is not a social construct at all. You can get a dna test and with just 12 markers find out exactly what region of the world your ancestors came from. All non-blacks are part neanderthal, which was actually an advantage for non-blacks, It increased their cranial capacity and they learned inherited an amazing culture that survived for tens of thousands of years which included art, music(the first musical instruments were neanderthal flutes) knowledge of cold weather survival, weaponry, tools, ect. Neanderthal had light skin and hair which is a trait that still exists only in their hybrid descendants. The point is race is real and each race has the right to its territory and the right to keep their territory homogeneous. Multiculturalism is white suicide, it only exists in white countries. We are in a recession, we have record high unemployment. We still let in immigrants and debate on whether the tax payer should pay for the houses, healthcare, education, ect of ILLEGAL aliens who are often criminals and drug mules. The birthrate among whites is 1.1 per family. meaning when to people have sex they on average only have one child to replace them for the next generation while Arabs have a birthrate of 8.2. China, even with the one child policy, still manages to have an average birth rate of 12.31. It's genocide by media control of information and opinion, marxist style infiltration of the education system to teach everyone that whites are evil and they killed millions of natives(when they only killed thousands, small pox and other pathogens killed millions without any help from the white devil) and they were the only slavers in history and no whites slaves ever existed or exist today...

If you think there isn't a system discrimination against whites called "affirmative action, multiculturalism, political correctness, Diversity," then you should ask yourself, Is there a white history month? White student Union? White Scholarship programs? A League of White Nations? national council of la blanca raza(there's the national council of la raza or the race if you don't speak any spanish because you're too far north to be forced to learn spanish because of the open borders.) Well there isn't any of those and if anyone tried to create any one of those organizations or even suggest that whites exist and have their own interests like every other race then it automatically activates years of media and education indoctrination that usually just creates rage in the mind of the individual who will then use verbal slander or physical violence to suppress any sentiment from ever being said in the future for fear of more backlashes. In some countries(germany, Austria, france) you can be arrested for hate speech if you advocate white existence or european ethnic identity(meanwhile muslims riot throughout Europe every other year or any times someone draws a cartoon of their prophet, or writes a book exposing their barbaric religion. Don't believe the lies. You have a right to exist, we all do, but the only way to do that is to have limited contact with other cultures. Trade and nothing else.

Charlie Craig, The Washington Post 18 Comments [9/14/2016 2:57:30 AM]
Fundie Index: 10

Quote# 121574

Christians are God's children. We are two steps highter than any other living creature and one step higher than Angels. Teaching children that we are the SAME as the creatures we are destined to rule is NOT teaching the Truth. Thats WHY I call godless evolution the biggest Satanic Lie ever told in the history of Human civilization.

Ben West, Amazon Evolution Forum 21 Comments [9/14/2016 2:55:20 AM]
Fundie Index: 13
Submitted By: Rachel

Quote# 121572

If there were reasons and evidence, there would not be atheists. Not so?

The evidence is the universe and everything in it. The reasoning is that something cannot come from nothing, and the cause must be greater than the effect.

If there are atheists, it is because some are incompetent, e.g., infants, toddlers, severely retarded adults and possibly some mentally deficient autistics or others. Others are competent, but rebellious.


Faith Reasoner, Disqus - Religion 30 Comments [9/13/2016 5:59:02 PM]
Fundie Index: 12
Submitted By: Jocasta

Quote# 121565

Children need Bible clubs in schools. Public schools were created so that all children can learn the Word of God firsthand. Americans have no freedom if they don't have the Holy Bible. Man was not born into immorality's slavery but to be free to glorify God. Secular West enslaves mankind with abnormal immorality if it doe not follow the Holy Bible. Slavery to sin or freedom by God's truth. It's one or the other; there is no middle ground.

Grace Kim Kwon, Christian News Network  32 Comments [9/13/2016 2:03:14 PM]
Fundie Index: 11

Quote# 121564

(Responding to story "‘Increasingly Aggressive’ Atheists Target Children in New Evolution-Promoting Book"):

It's like a children's Bible, just full of lies! What a wonderful way of killing the innocent joy and hope in little children! Consider what a great advantage it gives to little boys and girls to learn that African boys are animals at such a young age, so that they can get a head start into evolutionary racism, which is a true truth! I hope the authors enjoy the millstone and the lake of fire.

Martin Smit, Christian News Network 39 Comments [9/13/2016 1:51:51 AM]
Fundie Index: 16
Submitted By: Jocasta

Quote# 121562

(In response to an article claiming a communion wafer that developed a red spot tested positive for DNA.)

Pax Christi. hm, how to interpret such....miracles(?)? From God or Devil? What the Word of God says-and not Pope, or undeducated theologians? In Mat,Lk, Mk and St.Paul (1 Cor 11) one reads "body"/soma (Greek) and in John 6- "flesh"/sarx (Greek); therefore, if we see such tricks with matter/flesh then...2Thess 2:9 comes to mind! To remind, except Legnica case of recent "miracle" more famous is Sokolka Podlaska in Bialystok Diocese. It seems matter can be controlled in some way by Devil (UFOs!) but never soul (or spirit). Jahve@me are checking the knowledge of Word's God;ps. since 1991 I have been attacked by Devil's agent in the Church starting with Fr.prof A.Guindon O.M.I at Stt.paul.s University in Ottawa, Canada; later in Warsaw: the riots at Holy Mass on Jan 27 I 2001 after my Words (Echo of Word in Neocatechumenat) and the criminal case , art.195.1 Polish Criminal Code; RC celebrant fell at the altar and ended up at Emergency UNit after refusing to give me a Communion! Theological and philsophical idiots(not knowing st.Aristotle, K.Godel and A.Tarski) of World Univ@Church are blocking my divine Words.....very often for the last and eternal time (in Hell).Have you read on my coming in Bible and Jesus teaching on Son of Man?

Krzysztof, http://www.churchmilitant.com/ 30 Comments [9/12/2016 2:30:02 AM]
Fundie Index: 11
Submitted By: nazani

Quote# 121559

[On being accused of lacking empathy]

Unlike the imbeciles here who say that being permanently denied relationships and sex because you are not a rapist and a murderer is a-ok and no problem, but getting a dick in a place where it is designed to go into is the biggest trauma ever lol? Women are biologically designed to love rape. That they didn't in some societies was only because men instilled the desire to mate with their husbands in certain patriarchal societies by mating them with coalphas. Aversion to rape is a result of patriarchies.

caamib, FSTDT 47 Comments [9/12/2016 1:59:02 AM]
Fundie Index: 39
Submitted By: Demon Duck of Doom

Quote# 121554

Morality itself tends to fluctuate in time, and who is to say that generations from now, our highest ideals won't be viewed as obscene? Afterall, at one point the KKK, slavery, genocide and torture were all viewed as acceptable. They still are in parts of the world. So by what morals and during what time period would one hold an immortal being to?

Another argument against holding God to human morals is that It isn't human. We don't hold animals to human ethical standards. If we did, we would have to arrest them for murder, public indecency, rape, incest and a whole gamut of other immmoral crimes. Since God isn't a human being, holding him to our standards is likewise pointless.

So I suppose in retrospect, if God ordered me to commit genocide, I probably would. I would have to be reasonably assured that is was actually God. But if so convinced, I would have no moral problem with it. Like my Mother says :\"Son, I brought you into this world, don't think I won't take you out.\"

Cerebulon, FSTDT 28 Comments [9/12/2016 1:58:38 AM]
Fundie Index: 27
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 | top