Quote# 134146

Sermon 14: Not of the World
By The Rev. William H. Grimes
Romans 12:2 says "And be not conformed to this world: but be ye transformed by the renewing of your mind, that ye may prove what is that good, and acceptable, and perfect, will of God." I am taking a break from the "Debunked" series in order to provide a clear and necessary message.
Last Friday, sinful seductress Taylor Swift released her sixth wicked studio album called reputation. Liberal transvestite loving corporation Target heavily promoted it, as I saw in my local store on Friday. Wicked sinful picture books that are full of pornographic images were being sold as well as immodest clothing promoting the evil pop star. These wicked things were gobbled up by those who are secular, including the "Christians" who are Roman Catholic, Eastern Orthodox, Mainline Protestants, or weak sauce "Evangelicals!" Probably some other wicked apostates like Jews, Muslims, and Mormons in there too! True Christians like Independent Fundamentalist Baptists find this sinful content repugnant and a direct violation of the Word! You cannot serve two masters! YOU CAN ONLY WORSHIP GOD, OR YOU CAN ONLY WORSHIP TAYLOR SWIFT! Choose wisely, because your eternal fate depends upon it!
There is one song so egregious that Swift's mother left the room and her manager plugged his ears. Yes, it was that bad! The song is called "Dress" and the vile lyrics are as follows:
"All of this silence and patience, pining and anticipation My hands are shaking from holding back from you (ah, ah, ah) All of this silence and patience, pining and desperately waiting My hands are shaking from all this (ha, ha, ha, ha)
Say my name and everything just stops I don't want you like a best friend Only bought this dress so you could take it off, take it off (ha, ha, ha) Carve your name into my bedpost Cause I don't want you like a best friend Only bought this dress so you could take it off, take it off (ha, ha, ha)"
So, what does this tell us about the morality of the sinful and wicked Swift? Romans 14:13-23 says " Let us not therefore judge one another any more: but judge this rather, that no man put a stumblingblock or an occasion to fall in his brother's way. know, and am persuaded by the Lord Jesus, that there is nothing unclean of itself: but to him that esteemeth any thing to be unclean, to him it is unclean. But if thy brother be grieved with thy meat, now walkest thou not charitably. Destroy not him with thy meat, for whom Christ died. Let not then your good be evil spoken of: For the kingdom of God is not meat and drink; but righteousness, and peace, and joy in the Holy Ghost. For he that in these things serveth Christ is acceptable to God, and approved of men. Let us therefore follow after the things which make for peace, and things wherewith one may edify another. For meat destroy not the work of God. All things indeed are pure; but it is evil for that man who eateth with offence. It is good neither to eat flesh, nor to drink wine, nor any thing whereby thy brother stumbleth, or is offended, or is made weak. Hast thou faith? have it to thyself before God. Happy is he that condemneth not himself in that thing which he alloweth. And he that doubteth is damned if he eat, because he eateth not of faith: for whatsoever is not of faith is sin."
That passage is clear as crystal, plain as day, but Swift heedeth not!!!!!! Matthew 4:7 says "Jesus said unto him, It is written again, Thou shalt not tempt the Lord thy God." IF YOU BUY THIS ALBUM AND LISTEN TO IT, YOU ARE INDEED TEMPTING THE LORD THY GOD AS TAYLOR SWIFT TEMPTS WEAK AND FEEBLE MEN BY MAKING THEM TURN INTO VULTURES EAGER TO GET THEIR NEXT FIX OF SEXUAL IMMORALIITY! WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO! SAY AMEN IN THE HOUSE OF THE LIVING GOD!
Look, brothers in Christ, it is not worth eternal damnation! Sure, sex was the result of the fall as recorded in Genesis 3, but any sin can be overcome with meditative prayer and daily reading of the Word of God! Women might not be able to overcome their worldly fleshly desires, but MEN IN CHRIST OUGHT TO BE ABLE TO DO SO! OWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW!!!!!!!!!!!
THIS SKIMPY DRESS IS IMMODEST, AND IT IS ONLY BOUGHT TO BE TAKEN OFF! IF YOU LISTEN TO THIS VILE ALBUM, YOU ARE BENT ON YOUR OWN DESTRUCTION AND WILL END UP IN THE LAKE OF FIRE UNLESS YOU GET THE ALBUM OUT OF YOUR HOUSE AND BURN IT AND TURN BEFORE YOU BURN YOURSELF! SWIFT IS QUITE IMMODEST AND YOU WILL SUFFER GREATLY IF YOU DO NOT SAVE YOUR SOUL BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE! TAYLOR SWIFT AND HER FLESHLY SINFUL BODY AND HER TRASHY LYRICS AND SEX OUTSIDE OF MARRIAGE ARE NOT WORTH ETERNAL HELLFIRE! ACCEPT JESUS CHRIST AS YOUR LORD AND SAVIOR NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! DO IT, BROTHER! God's people said AMEN!

The Rev. William H. Grimes, New Testament Baptist Church 21 Comments [11/13/2017 4:45:06 AM]
Fundie Index: 7

Quote# 134144

Don't worry Bob, Captain Cook tried to sail around Antarctica back in the 1800's and after circumsailing 60,000 nautical miles he never found a way around it

That's probably why the writers of the bible mention "to the ends of the earth".............over fifty times

or why the earth is described as a signet ring pushed down in wax....................because it leaves a big circular wall around the perimeter

The bible warned of the coming false science, its ironic you probably grasp evolution is a lie, not understanding that the deceived are not part of the conspiracy but simply were deceived into believing the lie, that's how satan has been deceiving even the elect, he deceives the unbelievers and has them propagate his deception

NASA is one of satans kingdoms..........he only had to deceive many of the workers who in return deceive the masses............nothing gets through the firmament


back2bible, Carm 13 Comments [11/13/2017 4:36:24 AM]
Fundie Index: 8

Quote# 134143

What's the dream Bob?.................do you believe the old and new testament authors were ball earth believers?...............your new age philosophy has only come to be believed since the 1500's

Its not what anyone in the bible believed.................that's the fact you can not argue Bob!

when you discover NASA and free Masons are not a trust worthy bunch of people you will begin to see how the wool has been pulled over your eyes...............but you have Cognitive Dissonance on the one hand you want to believe the entire bible but the world has changed what you believe and it stands in contradiction to what the bible clearly teaches.

back2bible, Carm 3 Comments [11/13/2017 4:35:35 AM]
Fundie Index: 8
Submitted By: Christopher

Quote# 134142

The same as it would take for me to not believe that Jesus is God's Son...............not a chance in this world would ever convince me differently...............remember I was a globe earther before I investigated the matter, my whole premise of investigation was to disprove the flat earth theory....................the only thing that stood in the corner of the flat earth theory for me, was the word of God and how the entire bible is filled with flat earth language and was written by flat earth believers....................then when you start realizing that we do see much further than the curve allows and start putting all the pieces together you can see heliocentrism is a satanic deception of grande proportions............just looking up at the stars at night you can see the stars are laid out in a dome shape, the sun shining down through the clouds with crepuscular rays shows the sun is close and local

back2thebible , Carm 5 Comments [11/13/2017 4:34:45 AM]
Fundie Index: 7
Submitted By: Christopher

Quote# 134141

back2thebible: actually I believe just the opposite, much like those in the 1400's who believed God's word over the invented philosophies of men the philosophers overtook the church with there errant cosmology and it became the launch pad for evolution, even solid Christians today have a hard time reconciling scripture with what is plainly portrayed in the text.

AVoice: I see your point.
Just considering the many Christians now who laugh at evolution because it is not honest science. Also many atheists cannot accept evolution because of the IT technology within living organisms. But instead of accepting the Bible, they choose to identify the obvious higher power to be aliens who started life here long ago. The admission being; that chance and random accidents for the ordered, highly intelligent, and coordinated systems, is absurd. So my idea was that given the research and facts being presented by the FE community; if the course that transpired for the evolution delusion was replayed by the new facts emerging concerning FE, it seems reasonable that given enough time, under accommodating circumstances, the mindset 'evolving' from RE to FE would be anticipatory.
I suppose as you say in effect, the atmosphere or circumstances that would accommodate such an evolution; there doesn't seem to be much hope for that.
The media is non-stop deluding the masses, along with the education system.
I am thinking of putting an ad in the local free paper making it known that a Flat Earth Research Group operates in this area. Only one member, me, so far. But how do you know who else is interested unless you let it be known there are others around with whom things can be discussed and notes exchanged?

'Herd mentality' is a plague.



AVoice, Carm 5 Comments [11/13/2017 4:33:34 AM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: Christopher

Quote# 134140

astronaut confirms fallen angels are here on earth

Of course he calls them extraterrestrials because he obviously isn't as big a believer in God as he leads us to believe, (NASA astronauts are all luciferian freemasons) because if he was he would know that we never see any UFO leaving our earth and venturing out in space, satan and his angels are trapped here just like we are and nothing gets past the firmament.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BlfkusEkLYA

back2thebible, Carm 2 Comments [11/13/2017 4:32:08 AM]
Fundie Index: 7
Submitted By: Christopher

Quote# 134139

Yes he married a 6 years old girl he was 50 peace be upon him .yes we are not ashamed . that what allah said . it is common and acceptable in Yemen to marry a young girl.and i dont know whats wrong with that.this story is about our prophet peace be upon him we are not ashamed of our religion and what allah legalized .?




abu lahab abd al uzza, Youtube 7 Comments [11/13/2017 4:31:30 AM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 134138

A line from 2nd Timothy




It's time for the left to invent their own language, since they're pretty much incoherent at this point.

Mick Williams, Disqus - Faith & Religion 17 Comments [11/13/2017 4:31:07 AM]
Fundie Index: 8
Submitted By: Jocasta

Quote# 134137

One must first understand that 1400 years ago was very different than now, times have changed and so have humans. 1400 years ago it was something very common to marry young girls, in fact they were not considered young girls, and rather they were considered young women back then. It is a historic fact that girls from the ages of 9 to 14 were being married in Europe, Asia, and Africa, in fact even in the United States girls at the age of 10 were also being married just more than a century ago. Yet with these facts no historian claims that all these people were sick perverts, historians would call anyone who made such a claim to be arrogant and very stupid who has no grasp or understanding of history.?



Yousef Shakur, Youtube 4 Comments [11/13/2017 4:29:24 AM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 134136

AUSTRALIA’S GAY MARRIAGE VOTE MAY LEAD TO SPECTACULAR FAILURE FOR THE LEFT

Australia is currently voting in a postal survey on whether to legalise gay marriage. A clear majority of Australians support gay marriage but I predict that the “No” side will win the vote. When this occurs, the radical left will have no one to blame but themselves. There is a strong feeling of a Trump or Brexit type upset in the air, but the main reason that the “No” campaign will win is because the “Yes” side’s campaign has alienated the sensible center.

Australia is one of the few countries in the world that has compulsory voting in elections but this postal survey is not compulsory and I would be surprised if turnout is much over 50%. Opinion polls over recent years have consistently shown that around two thirds of Australians support gay marriage, but the expected low turnout makes the result of the postal survey hard to predict. Just as the “silent” Trump voters skewed the exit polls in the 2016 US Presidential election, there is probably also around 5% of Australians who are telling pollsters that they support gay marriage but who will in fact vote no.

The “Yes” and “No” campaigns

The “Yes” campaign is led by around half of the ruling centre-right Liberal/National government, including Australia’s Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull, plus the opposition centre-left Labor Party and the far-left Greens Party. Almost all prominent Australians are supporting the “Yes” campaign.

The “No” campaign is led by religious organisations and a few conservative politicians. The fact that most Australian Muslims will undoubtedly vote no is an ironic turn for the leftists who have campaigned so hard to allow them into the country. The overwhelming support for the “Yes” side amongst prominent Australians from politics to media to entertainment to sport is reminiscent of opposition to Trump in the US and to Brexit in the UK.

The “Yes” side is not really making much of an argument, they just keep saying “love is love”. Presumably they do not think that incest, paedophilia or polygamy are ok because “love is love”, but they haven’t elaborated.

The “No” side is not making much of an argument about gay marriage either. Instead, it is arguing that gay marriage is another step towards political correctness and denial of free speech and religious freedom. Australia’s former conservative Prime Minister Tony Abbott is urging a “no” vote to “stop political correctness in its tracks”.

The left’s counterproductive tactics

The left is making two key strategic errors in its campaign. Firstly, it is arguing that there should not be a public debate or public vote on this issue. Secondly, it is bullying, persecuting and harassing anyone brave enough to declare that they will vote “no”.

The left has long argued against a public vote on same sex marriage saying that it will hurt gay people’s mental health and that straight people should not have the right to decide if gay people have “human rights”. The left does not appear to understand that people don’t like being told what they are and are not allowed to discuss, debate, say or think.

Some of the more radical leftist individuals and groups have also harassed, bullied and persecuted people who oppose gay marriage. On September 22, a “Yes” campaigner head butted Tony Abbott. A former champion boxer, Abbott assured the media he was “entirely unscathed” but said that he worries about “the brave new world of same-sex marriage if this is how some of the people who are most enthusiastically supporting it are behaving”.

In Canberra, an 18-year-old woman named Madeline was fired from her job at a children’s party business for advocating a “no” vote on her private Facebook wall. Capital Kids Parties owner Madlin Sims said she fired Madeline because “advertising your desire to vote no for SSM [same-sex marriage] is, in my eyes, hate speech”.

In Brisbane, the National Union of Students organised a rally outside a church to harass the attendees at a “vote no” meeting. The rally turned violent and one woman was arrested.

When “no” campaigners hired Skywriting Australia to write “vote no” in the sky above Sydney the business was abused on social media and the business owner received a torrent of harassing text messages including the following:

…you really are a shit human. You’re definitely the biggest piece of shit in Australia today. Probably tomorrow too. Hope you’re proud of yourself. Don’t be surprised by the hate coming for you. Titt for tatt, it’s only fair, right? You stupid, ignorant, remorseless, pathetic, old, LOSER.

The organisers of the skywriting later reported that GoFundMe “has decided to freeze our funds, until we give our names and locations. This is on the back of a massive amount of hateful messages we have received by people who want to silence our message and personally attack us.”

Of course, there are people on the “No” side who have behaved inappropriately too. The difference is that within the “Yes” camp the arguments that there should be no debate, or that those who oppose gay marriage should not be allowed to state their views, is mainstream.

Unlike the United States, Australia does not have constitutionally protected free speech. The Australian Parliament has passed laws imposing fines of up to $12,600 for anyone “vilifying” or “intimidating” another person during the gay marriage debate. I expect these laws will be enforced selectively against “no” campaigners for “homophobic” comments.

Lessons for the right

We shouldn’t underestimate the radical left, but we shouldn’t overestimate them either. Let them be themselves and they will alienate ten people for every one they convert. We on the right must not get down into the gutter to fight with these radical leftists or we will come out at least as dirty as they are. Let’s maintain the moral high ground and promote civilised debate, free speech, and non-violence.

Ned Kelly, Return of Kings 11 Comments [11/13/2017 4:28:32 AM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Chris

Quote# 134135

Some people think that the substitutionary atonement doctrine is immoral because it amounts to child abuse (the Father sent the Son to die for us) and that it makes the innocent suffer for the guilty (Jesus was without sin and suffered for us).

As far as the criticism that the innocent has suffered for the guilty, there is a factor which this criticism overlooks. It is that God is the one who is offended, and He has the right to forgive. Since Jesus is God in flesh, He is the one who is resolving the sin problem which is against Himself.  In other words, the one offended is also the one atoning. The criticism, on the other hand, excludes this point.

Matt Slick, carm 7 Comments [11/13/2017 4:22:41 AM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Tony

Quote# 134134

Let's say that I am at your house and we are having a discussion about the nature and extent of the atoning work of Christ. In my excitement, I knock over a lamp and break it, but you are a gracious person, and you forgive me for my offense against you. However, you then require $10 as payment even though you have forgiven me. Is it true forgiveness to require a payment for what you have forgiven? Of course not. But the lamp needs to be replaced. So, in true forgiveness who is left to pay for the replacement of the lamp? You are (now in a real-world situation I would, of course, offer to replace it, but this illustration is meant to exemplify what true forgiveness really is as it relates to payment). If I were to pay for the replacement of the lamp, a payment has been made and you, the owner, are satisfied. With God, we the lawbreakers are not capable of making a sufficient payment to rectify our sin problem because our righteous deeds are filthy rags before God (Isaiah 64:6). Since we are not capable of making a sufficient restitution payment, the only one left to do this is God. Therefore, logically, God must be the one who makes the payment just as you, the lamp owner, in true forgiveness, would pay for the replacement of the lamp. God is the one who is offended by our sin against him, yet He also forgives.  But His forgiveness does not negate the necessity of the law being administered because the law, which is a reflection of the character of God, states that he who sins must die (Romans 6:23). Sin is breaking the law of God (1 John 3:4), and God cannot arbitrarily dismiss His law, otherwise, He is not just. So, He takes the law upon Himself via the transference of our legal debt to Himself on the cross and dies with it. Therefore, the law is satisfied, and we are forgiven.

Matt Slick, carn 12 Comments [11/13/2017 4:22:10 AM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 134133



Praise be to Allah. If someone do not criticize, usually them will be silent. Surprisingly, Aisha praised the kindness of the prophet Muhammad PBUH. AMAZING........... AFTER THE DEAD OF PROPHET. THERE ARE ZERO HADITH NARRATED BY AISHA ABOUT.

1. The disadvantage of early marriage.

2. Her Children with Prophet Muhammad Pbuh.Praise be to Allah Aisha never     pregnant.

3. Her genital rip and torn.

4. Muhammad Pbuh touched her body was too early.

5. Unpleasant things along with the Prophet Muhammad Pbuh. Anybody who want to help me to find that information. Islam always win.?




bdullah Muhammad, Youtube 3 Comments [11/13/2017 4:21:04 AM]
Fundie Index: 3

Quote# 134132

One of the delusions that we will clear up at the outset of this exposé is the lie that leading Satanic cults do not believe in (or truly worship) the devil. First of all, it should be understood that Anton LaVey (pictured above), the founder of the Church of Satan, viewed Satan as a true entity that he actually worshipped before his death. Anton LaVey deceived a lot of people who joined the Church of Satan by claiming that Satan only represented the repressed forces of nature but was not a real entity.

In my interviews with former Charles Manson family member Susan Atkins (who is still in prison after being convicted of eight murders), she blew the lid off of Anton’s lie. As a former associate of Anton LaVey’s, who danced for him and spent personal time with him before joining the Manson family, Atkins was privy to conversations with LaVey before he became popular. Atkins told me repeatedly that while LaVey promotes a watered down, palatable form of Satanism to the ignorant masses which he is deceiving, he acknowledged the exact opposite to her and to his inner core of Satanist’s in the church of Satan. Susan Atkins shared with me that LaVey had told her emphatically while she was in his home that they truly worshipped Satan as a real entity and as the one who began the initial rebellion against God.

Atkins also stated: “Anton told me that as a Satanist he does believe in the God of the bible but he refused to worship Him and made a conscious decision to worship Satan instead.” (My personal interview with Susan Atkins) We have pictures of Atkins with LaVey in his ritual chamber when she associated with the Church of Satan. LaVey was aware that few people were ignorant enough to truly turn their lives over to Satan, knowing that they would not only be allowing themselves to be deceived by their worst enemy, but that they would spend eternity in the fiery torments of hell. LaVey therefore presented a seeker sensitive, user-friendly form of Satanism in the hopes that it might appeal to the masses he was seeking to deceive.

LaVey sought to put a spin on Satanism as a kinder and gentler form of Devil worship, claiming that Satan merely represents a “force in nature” and that rather than Satanist’s sacrificing animals and little children they are animal activists who love children. All of this was done to garner unwitting recruits. For starters, one should never trust a Satanist. Satanist’s view lying to be among their highest virtues, as do true Christians truth. LaVey and other Satanists serve the one who Jesus repudiated as “The father of lies” (John 8:44). It would be just like the father of lies to cloak his religion in non-reality. Satan has long been about deception and has successfully deceived many recruits into believing that they are simply worshipping a symbol rather than a reality.

Satan relishes in such ignorance. Atkins’ testimony that LaVey was deliberately duping Satanist’s in the outer circle is corroborated by evidence from LaVey’s own admissions. LaVey let his guard down when responding to other Satanists that considered him “not extreme enough”. LaVey, while in a defensive mode, admitted that the image that he presented publicly was deceptive, declaring: “If they’re at all intelligent [other true Satanist’s] …they’ll realize that there’s only so much I can say publicly…I will not advance things in print which make my position untenable…How long would the Church of Satan have lasted if I hadn’t appeased and outraged in just the right combination? It required a certain amount of discretion and diplomacy to balance the outrage.” (Anton LaVey, Lucifer Rising: A Book of Sin, Devil Worship and Rock ‘n’ Roll by Gavin Baddeley (Plexus Publishing, 1999), p. 133)

Purposeful deception is needed among leading Satanists to enslave those who they recruit as unscrupulous and unsuspecting pawns who feel more comfortable believing Satan is a symbol or force. Few Satanists realize the evil intentions among the inner core of Satanists and how they view lower initiates as mere puppets to be used and later discarded. Those in the higher echelon of the movement are often aware of the nature of Satan and the demonic realm that they serve. Notwithstanding, they are often bound and blinded on another level because they have become addicted to the power that Satan deceptively promises. Kenneth Anger, who was a cofounder of the Church of Satan with Anton LaVey, used a similar spin on Satanism, as did LaVey. Kenneth Anger stated in the 1960’s, in his film, Lucifer Rising, “Lucifer is the light god, not the devil,” (From the jacket of the film Lucifer Rising). This delusion that Lucifer is really the God of light and not Satan should not surprise us as God’s word warns that Satan himself “masquerades” as an “angel of light” to draw the unsuspecting into his evil web and that his agents do the same:

“And no wonder, for Satan himself masquerades as an angel of light. It is not surprising, then, if his servants masquerade as servants of righteousness. Their end will be what their actions deserve.” (2 Corinthians 11:13-15) Years later, after Kenneth Anger had deceived multitudes of people into thinking they were worshipping the supposed “light god,” an entity that was not really Satan, Anger “confessed” that Lucifer whom he worships had always been the historical “Satan” (Lucifer Rising, p. 47).

It was too late though for many Satanists who had been deceived and long before died in their sin and are in hell right now. It is too late for the multitudes that are now cursing Satan, Anton LaVey and Kenneth Anger from the place of indescribable and horrific eternal torment. It is not too late though for the reader who may have been deceived by the same lie and yet still has a small window of time to turn from Satan to Christ and be saved. It appears that Marilyn Manson is merely playing the same mind game with his fans as did LaVey and Anger. Besides following LaVey who deceived his followers, Manson admitted, “I’ve taken a lot of my inspiration from Kenneth Anger.” Sadly, while the leaders among Satanists realize that Satan is for real, many who swell the ranks of their churches have been duped into believing that they are in some nature religion. They are taught that either a real Satan does not exist or that hell will not be all that hot. This, of course, is sheer non-sense!

Anton LaVey himself was severely deceived as he stated in his Satanic Bible that he would reign with Satan in hell. LaVey now realizes he was the most deceived of all. The Scriptures are clear that Hell was created as a place of torment for Satan and his angels (Matt 25:40-43). Moreover, God’s Word declares that Satan will be stripped of his power and rendered “weak” and “covered with worms.” Satan will be rendered one of the weakest and most pathetic beings is the universe, an object of ridicule and scorn by those who were deceived by him. Those who have been deceived by him will marvel that this once powerful fallen angel has been rendered powerless and will mock him as a “carcass trodden under foot” in their torment (Isaiah 14:9-19). So even leaders in the church of Satan who are deceiving their initiates are themselves deceived, believing that they will have some place of power in Hell. As the apostle Paul prophesied:
“Evil men and impostors will go from bad to worse, deceiving and being deceived.” (2 Timothy 3:13)

Richard Ramirez, known as the night Stalker, was deceived by Anton LaVey’s assertion in the satanic bible that Satanists could reign in hell. Ramirez believed that his human sacrifices to Satan would earn him a place of rulership in hell next to Jack the Ripper and other serial killers. Further evidence of what leading Satanists really believe is proven in admissions by Lieutenant Colonel Michael Aquino of the United States Army. Aquino was a leader in Anton LaVey’s Church of Satan and said to be LaVey’s “second-in-command” before he broke off to begin his own satanic order called The Temple of Set. Aquino ended up taking several of LaVey’s followers with him. The Temple of Set would eventually attract the likes of Anton LaVey’s daughter Zeena LaVey. So rabid a Satanist is Aquino that he had the number 666 tatooed on his scalp.

(..)

We have already proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that Aleister Crowley was not only a confessed Satanist, but that he was the father of the Hippie Movement from which popular New Age teachings first became entrenched in Western civilization. (See our expose on Aleister Crowley.) Almost gasping for air, Winfrey declared in response to Aquino’s assertion: “Well, the way you explain this is the way a lot of people who are into metaphysics now and the New Age movement and New Age thinking, they say the very same thing. Are you saying that it’s the same?” Aquino, without skipping a beat, said “Yes” to Winfrey’s question, implying that New Agers and Satanist are on the same wave length in their rebellion against God and in their quest to achieve god-hood as they follow in Satan’s footsteps. He only clarified that most New Agers are not aware that they have joined a satanic rebellion against God and that Satanists know what’s going on. Aquino stated: “Yes, except that I would say we [Satanists] have a more precise grasp…We would say that we understand what’s actually happening a little better than many New Agers.”

Much to Aquino’s chagrin, the Temple of Set would find out that even as debauched as the world has become most people are still smart enough not to knowingly serve Satan and end up spending eternity in hell. After bringing Satan out of the closet, The Temple of Set failed to enlist the large amount of recruits they apparently hoped for. In their failure to acquire more recruits they changed their method of evangelism and returned to a formula more in keeping with that of the Church of Satan. Today the Temple of Set, like the Church of Satan, espouses a more palatable, seeker-sensitive form of Satanism so as not to scare off potential recruits. The result is that Satan is once again cloaked in ambiguity and the song remains the same as inner circle initiates are deceiving outer circle initiates.

Winfrey was surprised that Aquino, as a confessed Satanist, would try to deny the hard facts of the evil behind Satanism when Aquino stated that they as Satanists have “nothing to do with evil,” she said: “It’s just difficult for me to understand that the devil is a good thing…that Satan isn’t evil, which is the opposite of what everybody in this world has been taught…” Winfrey went on to exclaim: “In every state of the nation authorities are investigating some form of what they call satanic activity…Children are telling the same stories about infants being murdered before their eyes in strange devil rituals. The list of bizarre stories goes on and on.”

Not surprisingly Aquino tried unsuccessfully at this point to put another typical spin on Satanism by claiming that they are not into such things. Even as leading Satanists like to hide the fact that they are truly worshipping Satan, so it is that they seek to deny that Satanists sacrifice humans, including children. The truth of the matter is that Aleister Crowley, whom Aquino acknowledges, had an incredible influence on Aquino and the Temple of Set, and not only taught his followers to engage in child sacrifice, but admitted to sacrificing scores of children himself.

We have fully documented this fact in our exposé on Crowley. After Aquino made the false claim that Satanists don’t really sacrifice children, a law enforcement officer spoke up and stated: “To say that there are no bodies and that these [Satanists] are not committing crimes is the farthest from the truth…in every case that I’ve investigated, now extending over 200, I have found this particular book [The Satanic Bible].” At this point the investigator held up a satanic bible. In the Satanic Bible LaVey, in seeking “not advance things in print which make my position untenable” lest he find himself behind bars, stated that his followers were to commit human sacrifices by proxy: “We perform human sacrifices, by proxy you might say—the destruction of human beings who would, let’s say, create an antagonistic situation toward us—in the form of curse and hexes, not in actual blood rituals because certainly the destruction of a human being physically is illegal.”

(..)

Son of Sam who was part of a Process coven made up of 22 Satanists and connected to several other satanic covens also murdered several people at the direction of the coven. We show his videotaped admissions in our video They Sold Their Souls for Rock n Roll (full length version). Richard Ramirez, who followed the Satanic Bible, met with Anton LaVey before his satanic killing spree killing 20 people. Ramirez even went so far as to torture his victims and made some “swear to Satan.” Between Manson, Son of Sam and Richard Ramirez alone, we have dozens of murders in the name of Satan. We could easily add to this list – case after case that could easily fill a book – but we have more than sufficiently made our case for those who will honestly look at the evidence! We have now seen conclusive evidence that the most influential and notorious satanic leaders have had a campaign to dupe their followers into becoming unwitting followers of Satan himself. We have seen not only their admissions, but the deceptive web they have spun to prey on outer circle initiates.

Dear reader, if you have been deceived by any of the aforementioned Satanists, we plead with you to recognize the magnitude of the deception at hand. We plead with you to recognize that which is obvious to all of us who have eyes to see and ears to hear. Jesus Christ promised that he would not cast away any that would come to Him (John 6:37). Turn to him now before it is too late. Your life is very short and Satan is playing for keeps and your soul is his prey. Wake up and turn from these demonic parasites that prey upon your souls and turn to the Lord Jesus Christ who loves you and died for your sins so you would not have to go to hell.

It is not by accident that you are reading this article. God is seeking to use this article to open your eyes to a deception that has deceived you for too long. Do not bet your soul on Satan, he is the ultimate loser! Don’t gamble, you will surely lose! The odds are too great, the stakes are too high and eternity is far too long. Cry out to God right now and receive Jesus Christ as your Lord and Savior. If you do He will miraculously deliver you from demonic powers. He will deliver you from Hell and give you a new destiny. He will deliver you from the penalty of death and give you new Life. Hope to see you in heaven!

Joe Schimmel, Good Fight Ministries 3 Comments [11/13/2017 4:20:23 AM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Katie

Technobabble Award

Quote# 134131

It is commonly assumed that homeopathic medicines are composed of extremely small doses of medicinal substances. And yet, does anyone refer to an atomic bomb as an extremely small dose of a bomb? In actual fact, there is a power, a very real power, in having atoms smash against each other. Homeopathic medicines are made through a specific pharmacological process of dilution and vigorous shaking.

However, when skeptics say that there is nothing but water in homeopathic medicine, they are proving their ignorance, despite the incredible arrogance in which they make these assertions. Dr. Martin Chaplin, a respected British professor who is one of the world’s experts on water, has verified that “homeopathic water” and “regular water” are not the same, and his review of almost 2,000 references to the scientific literature on water (!) confirm this fact (Chaplin, 2009). It should be noted that a large number of homeopathic medicines sold in health food stores and pharmacies are made in doses with known physiological doses. In fact, there are several thousand (!) studies in conventional scientific journals showing a wide variety of biological effects from extremely small doses of various substances on specific systems.

Homeopathic medicines can and should be considered to be a type of “nanopharmacology” (Ullman, 2006). Although the word “nano” also means one-billionth of a size, that is not its only definition. In fact, “nano” derives from the word “dwarf,” and “nano” is the only word in the English language that is used on common parlance as denoting extremely small AND yet extremely powerful. Homeopathic medicines are both extremely small in dose and yet extremely powerful in their therapeutic effect. For 200 years now, millions of physicians and hundreds of millions of homeopathic patients have observed and experienced the power and effectiveness of homeopathic medicines.

Precisely how homeopathic medicines work remains a mystery, and yet, nature is replete with mysteries and with numerous striking examples of the power of extremely small doses. For instance, it is commonly known that a certain species of moth can smell pheromones of its own species up to two miles away. It is no simple coincidence that species only sense pheromones from those in the same species who emit them (akin to the homeopathic principle of similars), as though they have developed exquisite and specific receptor sites for what they need to propagate their species.

Likewise, sharks are known to sense blood in the water at distances, and when one considers the volume of water in the ocean, it becomes obvious that sharks, like all living creatures, develop extreme hypersensitivity for whatever will help ensure their survival. That living organisms have some truly remarkable sensitivities is no controversy. The challenging question that remains is: How does the medicine become imprinted into the water and how does the homeopathic process of dilution with succussion increase the medicine’s power? Although we do not know precisely the answer to this question, some new research may help point the way.

The newest and most intriguing way to explain how homeopathic medicines may work derives from some sophisticated modern technology. Scientists at several universities and hospitals in France and Belgium have discovered that the vigorous shaking of the water in glass bottles causes extremely small amounts of silica fragments or chips to fall into the water (Demangeat, et al., 2004). Perhaps these silica chips may help to store the information in the water, with each medicine that is initially placed in the water creating its own pharmacological effect. In any case, each medicinal substance will interact with the silica fragments in its own idiosyncratic way, thereby changing the nature and structure of water accordingly.

Further, the micro-bubbles and the nano-bubbles that are caused by the shaking may burst and thereby produce microenvironments of higher temperature and pressure. Several studies by chemists and physicists have revealed increased release of heat from water in which homeopathic medicines are prepared, even when the repeated process of dilutions should suggest that there are no molecules remaining of the original medicinal substance (Elia and Niccoli, 1999; Elia, et al., 2004; Rey, 2003).

Also, a group of highly respected scientists have confirmed that the vigorous shaking involved with making homeopathic medicines changes the pressure in the water, akin to water being at 10,000 feet in altitude (Roy, et al., 2005). These scientists have shown how the homeopathic process of using double-distilled water and then diluting and shaking the medicine in a sequential fashion changes the structure of water.

One metaphor that may help us understand how and why extremely small doses of medicinal agents may work derives from present knowledge of modern submarine radio communications. Normal radio waves simply do not penetrate water, so submarines must use an extremely low-frequency radio wave. The radio waves used by submarines to penetrate water are so low that a single wavelength is typically several miles long! If one considers that the human body is 70-80 percent water, perhaps the best way to provide pharmacological information to the body and into intercellular fluids is with nanodoses. Like the extremely low-frequency radio waves, it may be necessary to use extremely low (and activated) doses for a person to receive the medicinal effect.

It is important to understand that nanopharmacological doses will not have any effect unless the person is hypersensitive to the specific medicinal substance. Hypersensitivity is created when there is some type of resonance between the medicine and the person. Because the system of homeopathy bases its selection of the medicine on its ability to cause in overdose the similar symptoms that the sick person is experiencing, homeopathy’s principle of similars is simply a practical method of finding the substance to which a person is hypersensitive. The homeopathic principle of similars makes further sense when one considers that modern physiologists and pathologists recognize that disease is not simply the result of breakdown or surrender of the body but that symptoms are instead representative of the body’s efforts to fight infection or adapt to stress.

Using a nanodose that is able to penetrate deeply into the body and that is specifically chosen for its ability to mimic the symptoms helps to initiate a profound healing process. It is also important to highlight the fact that a homeopathic medicine is not simply chosen for its ability to cause a similar disease but for its ability to cause a similar syndrome of symptoms of disease, of which the specific localized disease is a part. By understanding that the human body is a complex organism that creates a wide variety of physical and psychological symptoms, homeopaths acknowledge biological complexity and have a system of treatment to address it effectively.

Although no one knows precisely how homeopathic medicines initiate the healing process, we have more than 200 years of evidence from hundreds of thousands of clinicians and tens of millions of patients that these medicines have powerful effects. One cannot help but anticipate the veritable treasure trove of knowledge that further research in homeopathy and nanopharmacology will bring.

(..)

Quantum physics does not disprove Newtonian physics; quantum physics simply extends our understanding of extremely small and extremely large systems. Likewise, homeopathy does not disprove conventional pharmacology; instead, it extends our understanding of extremely small doses of medicinal agents. It is time that physicians and scientists began incorporating both Newtonian and quantum physics into a better understanding of what healing is and how to best augment it.

The founder of homeopathic medicine, Samuel Hahnemann, MD, rewrote and updated his seminal work on the subject five times in his lifetime, each time refining his observations. Homeopaths continue to refine this system of nanopharmacology. While there is not always agreement on the best ways to select the correct remedy or the best nanopharmacological dose to use, the system of homeopathic medicine provides a solid foundation from which clinicians and researchers exploring nanopharmacologies can and should explore.

Dana Ullman, Huffington Post 14 Comments [11/13/2017 4:09:16 AM]
Fundie Index: 9
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 134130

How does homeopathy work?

The aspect of homeopathy that is implausible for many people is that the medicines are often – though by no means always – diluted to the point where there may be no molecules of original substance left. One of the leading current proposals for how such ‘ultramolecular’ dilutions work is that water is capable of storing information relating to substances with which it has previously been in contact. Recent research on hydrogen bonds in water provides some support for this ‘memory’ theory. The Swiss chemist, Louis Rey, found that the structure of hydrogen bonds in homeopathic dilutions of salt solutions is very different from that in pure water.

He reached the conclusion that the phenomenon results from the vigorous shaking of solutions that takes place during homeopathic ‘succussion’. Moreover, using the laboratory technique called spectroscopy, other researchers have found that different homeopathic medicines and different dilutions of the same medicine can be distinguished from each other, even though all should contain nothing but water.

An alternative mechanism is suggested by the results of research from South Korea. Studies on molecular clustering in water solutions showed that as a solution is made more and more dilute, very stable and larger ‘clumps’ of material develop in dilute solutions rather than in more concentrated solutions. This means that residual molecular clusters of the original substance might just be present in homeopathic dilutions. Succussion might also be responsible for creating very tiny bubbles (nanobubbles) that could contain gaseous inclusions of oxygen, nitrogen, carbon dioxide and possibly the homeopathic source material.

However they work, there is increasing evidence that homeopathic dilutions have a demonstrable effect on living organisms examined under laboratory conditions. Researchers in Germany have observed an inhibitory effect of an ultra-diluted chemical on the bacterium Vibrio fischeri.5 And there is important work from a consortium of European laboratories showing that very high dilutions of histamine may exert a biologically significant effect on the white blood cells that take part in the immune response. Viewing the evidence overall, there is some experimental support for the idea that ultra-molecular homeopathic dilutions may possess unique physical properties and can exert physiological effects.

A systematic review evaluated 67 in-vitro experiments in 75 publications of research on homeopathic dilutions.7 A majority of papers reported measurable effects from highly diluted substances. Positive findings were obtained in nearly three-quarters of all replicated studies, but no positive result was stable enough to be reproduced by all investigators.

British Homeopathic Association, British Homeopathic Association 2 Comments [11/13/2017 4:03:33 AM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 134129

My Climate Skepticism WAS formed by what I was taught by my ‘Elites’. Specifically what I was taught by my Leftist teachers in school, what I learned from reading Popular Science, and what I saw in my games and entertainment. All through the 70’s and 80’s as I was growing up, I was bombarded by the twin scares of Overpopulation and the coming End of Oil. The predictions were based on clear scientific principles and statistics, and were undeniable. The solutions were equally clear, and presented as the coming waves of Clean Energy and UN/Socialist control of society. I spent hundreds of hours reading about Wind and Solar Power, the Hydrogen economy, and how the UN would soon lead us into a United Federation of Planets style of utopia.

But something odd happened as the 80’s gave way to the 90’s. Or several things, to be honest. None of the prediction of collapse or shortage came to pass. And the clean energy revolution that was just around, well, STAYED just around the corner. Then one by one the Communist ‘Command’ economies that we were supposed to start emulating for their ‘efficiency’ started collapsing. And the strangest thing of all? Despite all the failures of the predictions and solutions and GOVERNMENTS, the Left kept right on saying the same things. In fact, they just doubled down.

By the time Global Warming (aka Climate Change, Climate Disruption, Global Weirding, Climate Crisis, Extreme Weather, etc) became a major component of the Eternal Scare, I had stopped believing anything they said. The fact that 2 decades of further failure still hasn’t caused them to reevaluate their beliefs isn’t exactly likely to change my mind on that, and seeing just how dishonest many of them are willing to be (Climategate, Mann, Gleick, Lew, etc, etc) has left me highly unlikely to change my mind. At this point, NOTHING they might find of discover would, because I would just assume it was wrong… or FAKE.

schitzree, Watt's Up With That 1 Comments [11/13/2017 4:01:27 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 134128

Another article showing that the real concern of the progressives is not the science but how to persuade people. And that’s the problem that they don’t understand.

They are far more worried about politics than data and good science because “Climate change” Is THE political issue that offers a path to the kind of overriding government control of all aspects of the lives of the citizens they believe it should have.

The government controlling everything from energy, to transportation, to land use and ownership, etc can be justified using environmental/climate change arguments. Conservatives intuitively understand this, and thus will resist.

RAH, Watt's Up With That 3 Comments [11/13/2017 4:00:07 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 134127

The left’s meltdown began with the 2016 election, but the unhinged behavior has escalated over the past year to the point where for anyone outside their indoctrinated bubble (read, anyone who can think for themselves) these people now have ZERO moral or intellectual authority.

H. Clinton’s lies and extreme grifting are now in daylight, her Hollywood flying monkeys have been exposed (literally!) for the amoral and hypocritical nuts they are, and the Democrat party has no message beyond doubling down on their failed and divisive identity politics.

Meanwhile, the economy is roaring, the President is enjoying far more prestige and respect overseas than his predecessor ever received, and I guarantee you that people making money have NO COMPLAINTS.

If you took away the MSM’s bias toward the perspectives of statistically small groups of perennial malcontents and attention-seekers, what would the “problem” be really?

Goldrider, Watt's Up With That 11 Comments [11/13/2017 3:59:41 AM]
Fundie Index: 7
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 134126

CAGW gives its devotees a reason to have Power (control over others’ lives), Pelf (other peoples’ money) and Position (reason to consider themselves better than others). PPP is the holy trinity of the parasite class; CAGW can’t possibly be a lie.

But a parasite is never satisfied; taking stuff from the people who make stuff is their job and their joy; they will do it ’til the end of the world and never have enough.

Lark, Watt's Up With That 2 Comments [11/13/2017 3:58:59 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 134125

(=This is a comment on a Youtuber who was a former Flat Earther, and now devotes his Channel to debunking them=)

Ninja Man: Jeranism is as real and truthful as they come. The earth is flat and motionless so keep cheering for NASA and spreading free Masonic lies. We have heard it all before and are really not interested. People are waking up!?

B Robinson: What we have here folk is nice sellout shill.....sold out the whole human race for coins....Judas. The earth is flat and stationary, once are our eyes are open we are not going back, anyone that realizes the earth is flat and stationary does not go back to believe it is a spinning ball. You would have done better to just try to debunk the videos instead of pretending to be a flat earther than quitting....BIG SHILL GIVEAWAY.....You will pay for your shilldom, our Father the maker of the Flat Earth hates liars and he is angry with the wicked every day....?

Ninja Man & B Robinson, Youtube 1 Comments [11/13/2017 3:58:34 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Christopher

Quote# 134124

Supermarket Tesco has condemned "sickening" online comments about their latest Christmas advert, which featured a Muslim family.

The clip provoked a racist response. Some called it “very wrong”, others promised to boycott the supermarket.

Maajid Nawaz was discussing the backlash when he spoke to a born again Christian who insisted Maajid would be welcome to join him for Christmas lunch.

But when the invitation was requited to Maajid's Eid celebrations, his caller couldn't accept.

He explained: "That's a celebration of something that's wrong. I don't embrace another religious practice.

"I'm sorry, but that would be a sin. Unrepentant sinners categorically go to hell, please do not.

"Hell is a place where Jesus is not, it is literally hell. It is a lake of fire where you will be tormented forever. You will burn but won't be burning up.

"It was not designed for you, it was designed for Satan.

"Hell is place of torment and gnashing of teeth."

Anonymous, LBC 1 Comments [11/13/2017 3:57:46 AM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: Yossarian Lives

Quote# 134123

You guys have no idea how correct you are with the Soviet comparison. In Soviet Union people who didn’t believe communism/socialism could work were treated as mentally ill. It was simply incomprehensible to believe that. It’s the same with feminism/liberalism and men like this idiot I’ve been trashing around here.

You guys have never lived in the communist state though (probably, I guess). But my ancestors did and I have the encyclopedia from that time. In that entry under Capitalism you can literally see a cartoonish picture of rich fat cat torturing the hungry masses by throwing a roasted chicken manipulated by a rope in front of them. That’s literally how capitalism had been perceived at the time and gives you a good insight into the psychology of men like Johnny. Notice how he didn’t even bother to comment on the part where I told him that shirnks themselves rejected to “treat” me or that any sincere discussion with a shrink would result in me being arrested. This he doesn’t want to talk about because the former doesn’t fit his narrative and he is cautious enough not to openly admit that he does want to see me arrested regarding the latter.

When people firmly believe in the horrible ideas they have and think they are as natural as breathing and have the power of police and psychiatry behind them it gets very nasty and turns their previously free countries into next USSR.

(To clarify above)
Well, they didn’t exactly live in a communist one, not even USSR was communist, but the point was more about totalitarian systems. And keep in mind, my ancestors aren’t even from USSR but a place with the most liberal strain of totalitarianism during the Cold War.



caamib, Rantsofanincel 5 Comments [11/13/2017 3:57:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 134120

In the front row there were again upset Muslims, that neither accepted the factual justified criticism of Islam nor were able to bear it. They take it as a personal offence against themselves because they inseparately link their identity with that of Islam. Every criticism is rejected and the people that comment are being insulted, threatened and not too rarely attacked.



The Muslim that stretched out his middle finger to me insulted me as an "Idiot" too. When he wanted to ask questions I noted that I don't discuss something with someone who defames me. After that he apologized. I accepted that and that way I gave him the opportunity to expound his position. He claimed in a stiff and fixed tone that the Quran would forbid murder. Even after we proved that he made a disastrous mistake, he denied the insight and had the opinion that it wasn't Islam.

This obstinate refusal to accept reality is something we constantly experience in our communication with Muslims. In the ten days in which I did the job to enlighten people together with my fellows, I haven't seen half a dozen Muslims that were ready to recognize the dangerous parts of Islam and the need to change. A further characteristic of a fascist ideology that doesn't accept any criticism and threatens with death those that leave it.

Original German:
In den vorderen Reihen waren wieder einmal aufgebrachte Moslems, die die faktisch begründete Islamkritik weder akzeptieren noch ertragen können. Sie fassen dies als persönlichen Angriff gegen sich selbst auf, da sie ihre eigene Identität untrennbar mit dem Islam verknüpfen. Jegliche Kritik wird abgelehnt und die sie äußernden Personen werden beleidigt, bedroht und nicht selten auch attackiert.



Der Moslem, der mir hier den Mittelfinger entgegenstreckt, beleidigte mich auch noch als „Idiot“. Als er Fragen stellen wollte, wies ich ihn darauf hin, dass ich mich nicht mit jemanden unterhalte, der mich diffamiert. Daraufhin entschuldigte er sich, was ich akzeptierte, und so gab ich ihm die Gelegenheit, seine Position darzulegen. Er behauptete steif und fest, dass die Dschihadisten, die Terroranschläge durchführten, keine Moslems seien. Als wir ihm die Plakate mit den eindeutigen Koranbefehlen zeigten, ignorierte er sie und behauptete, der Koran würde das Töten verbieten. Selbst als wir ihm seinen verhängnisvollen Irrtum nachwiesen, verweigerte er die Einsicht und meinte, das sei nicht sein Islam.

Diese hartnäckige Realititätsverweigerung erleben wir im Umgang mit Moslems ständig. In den zehn Jahren, in denen ich zusammen mit meinen Mitstreitern diese Aufklärungsarbeit verrichte, habe ich nicht einmal ein halbes Dutzend Moslems erlebt, die bereit waren, die gefährlichen Bestandteile des Islams anzuerkennen und die Notwendigkeit zu einer Veränderung einzusehen. Ein weiteres Merkmal einer faschistischen Ideologie, die keine Kritik zulässt und jeden mit dem Tod bedroht, der sie verlässt.


The editorial staff of the Civil Movement Pax Europa, Civil Movement Pax Europa 0 Comments [11/13/2017 3:55:41 AM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 134118

God’s choosing to be gracious to some is not unfair to the others. No one deserves anything from God; therefore, no one can object if he does not receive anything from God. An illustration would be a man randomly handing out money to five people in a crowd of twenty. Would the fifteen people who did not receive money be upset? Probably so. Do they have a right to be upset? No, they do not. Why? Because the man did not owe anyone money. He simply decided to be gracious to some.

got quesitons, got questions 4 Comments [11/13/2017 3:53:44 AM]
Fundie Index: 1