Quote# 124674


God's truth always turns the ungodly away from religion. Jesus guaranteed that the world will hate His approved workmen just as much as it hated Him.

Receiving hate from the ungodly is a telltale sign that a godly person is an approved workman of God! That's why, for example, all the ungodly posters on here hate KiBL, me, Kirk Cameron, and any & every other Bible-believing a.k.a. true Christian in the world.

The converse is also true: any so-called "Christian" who the world at large does not hate is most definitely not doing God's work, because as we said, God's work guarantees hate against the person who performs it!

Navaros, IMDb 10 Comments [2/19/2017 3:17:06 PM]
Fundie Index: 5

Quote# 124673

[...] I am just one of millions who has stopped being homosexual, and become heterosexual.
The sick irony is that many people have absolutely no problems when someone goes from "straight" to "gay," suggesting that the person had a latent homosexuality that was just waiting to "come out!" But, what about the possibility that nobody has a latent sexuality that is anything other than the freedom to choose? Homosexuality is a choice, not a born identity. It may develop - those same-sex desires - in people for various reasons, but rather than focus on the reasons for same-sex desire, it's far more important to focus on the reality of choosing homosexuality, and the ramifications for society as well as the individual soul's relationship with God.
Those who claim they can't imagine a person leaving homosexuality are trapped in a mindset that - at its root - doubts Christ's ability to overcome. A person trapped in another sinful addiction will never be told, by any good-hearted person, that he can't possibly quit, so he should never try! But, seemingly "virtuous" people actually SAY that to friends and family members, with regards to homosexuality!? People who take the side of evil will INEVITABLY take the side AGAINST that which is good. This is a major sin; and, honestly, anyone who doubts the truth needs to seriously spend some time in prayer with God, before opening their mouths again and pushing people much further into bondage. Christ is liberty; it is up to Christians to get all of our arrogant assumptions and misconceptions out of the way, and let Christ free the trapped souls.
I don't have much patience for Christians who pretend they are "concerned" about this issue, but doubt God's truth - acting as though they, somehow, are more intelligent than God. Those people have issues.

[On those who can't "pray away the gay" even after years or fall back]

People spend too much time doubting the power of Christ, and living - instead - an entirely grace-less, self-indulgent life. The truth of the gospel is that Christ's life actually comes to life within your body, and you are no longer alive - you have been made dead in Him. So, there is nothing to complain about, if the God who created the universe and loved us enough to send His Son to become sin on our behalf, dwells in our very body!
Sure, life has its challenges; but, there is not a man or woman on earth who does not have challenges in life! People need to rise up out of their victim-mentality, their supreme self-indulgence, and let Christ have the pre-eminence in their lives. Only then will they be filled with the "fullness of joy" of glorifying God with every "word and deed," and they will love their lives in Christ so much, no matter where He takes them.
So, I reject the victimhood approach. If I were to say that a person who struggles with homosexual temptations were any different than a person who struggles with other temptations, I would be only observing one - selected - portion of reality, rather than the whole thing. And, in that unity of mankind, Christ understands what we're all going through, because he was in all ways tempted just as we are, but without sin. Thus, he can succor those of us that suffer - WHICH IS ALL OF US! It's about how you view your walk through life. If it's all about you, you, you, you're probably going to whine and complain a lot - ultimately, directly rebelling against God, doubting His Goodness, and suggesting He isn't powerful enough for you! But, if you submit - recognize, as a Christian you're dead in Christ... essentially "get over yourself," - you will find the true liberty in the grace of God, which will take you through some remarkable places, including deliverance from sins and a far better life lived for the true glory of the living God. But, don't take my word for it - or, you're bound to just think I'm an opinionated man with no compassion. Study the Bible. Get to know God yourself. It's your choice.
Many people fail because a part of them would rather wallow in despair than accept the fullness of God's grace. It is a subtle form of pride; no surprise full healing can't happen amidst that kind of a spiritual condition!!!

Michael Glatze, mojpribeh.sk 15 Comments [2/19/2017 3:16:57 PM]
Fundie Index: 5

Quote# 124667

If you reach the age of 20 and you still have yet to see a naked female, you are doomed

Family nudity, strip clubs, porn, movies and such don't count. Nudity before adolescence/puberty also doesn't count as you the time thought girls were gross because they had cooties. I'm talking a woman who isn't your moher either being voluntarily nude around you or not minding you seeing her nude.

IFA_MTBL, /r/incel 31 Comments [2/19/2017 8:25:08 AM]
Fundie Index: 13
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 124666

There is a whole antitheist industry or modus of entertainment/expression based around ridiculing all of theism which rides on the back of unfalsifiability.

Apart from revealing the inner redneck there is real social harm to be had here.

The term ''there might be categoric differences'' is disingenuous.

These are either points to take seriously or humourously. If we are to take philosophy seriously we must look to non categorising or generalising.

Atheists find God unfalsifiability.

Atheists find ridiculous things unfalsifiable

Atheists then conclude that all unfalsifiables are ridiculous

Atheists challenged by multiverse

Atheists conclude not all unfalsifiables are ridiculous.

Antitheists still like the ridicule link though.

Antitheists arbitrarily single out which unfalsifiables are ridiculous and include God.

Antitheists take the rise out of theists and mock them on the same bases that homophobes might ridicule say a gay pride march........ based on logical fallacies.

Emergence - The Musical, Religion and Ethics 13 Comments [2/19/2017 8:25:02 AM]
Fundie Index: 9
Submitted By: Nearly Sane

Quote# 124665

I will say though that anybody stating that methodological materialism is/gives you a model of reality which is adequate for them is dripping philosophical entailment since the statement is not a methodological naturalistic one, And certainly if adequacy entails using such arguments to discuss God as an inferior to philosophical materialism.

Emergence - The Musical, Religion and Ethics 10 Comments [2/19/2017 8:24:59 AM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Nearly Sane

Quote# 124664

[But remember, it's everyone else who's fake news.]

Donald Trump appeared to invent a terrorist attack in Sweden during a campaign-style rally in Florida.

On an evening during which he attacked the news media and the judges who ruled against his travel ban, Mr Trump used his speech to talk about migration in Europe and linked it to terror attacks in Brussels, Nice and Paris - before inexplicably adding Sweden to the list.

Mr Trump told supporters in Melbourne: "We've got to keep our country safe. You look at what's happening in Germany, you look at what's happening last night in Sweden.

"Sweden, who would believe this. Sweden. They took in large numbers. They're having problems like they never thought possible. You look at what's happening in Brussels. You look at what's happening all over the world. Take a look at Nice. Take a look at Paris."

One of the country's official Twitter accounts, controlled by a different citizen each week, reacted with bafflement.

Its current administrator, a school librarian, said: "Nothing has happened here in Sweden. There has not [been] any terrorist attacks here. At all."

What Mr Trump's remark referred to in unclear, but it came after Fox News aired an interview with filmmaker Ami Horowitz, whose latest documentary examines whether high crime rates in areas of the country is attributable to its previous open-door migration policy.

Donald Trump, Independant.co.uk 30 Comments [2/19/2017 8:24:52 AM]
Fundie Index: 9
Submitted By: Kuyohashi

Quote# 124663

Tens of thousands of Malaysians rallied in the capital on Saturday to support the adoption of a strict Islamic penal code, a proposal religious minorities fear could infringe their rights.

Prime Minister Najib Razak has thrown his weight behind the contentious bill, which seeks to incorporate parts of the Islamic penal code, or "hudud", into Malaysia's existing Islamic legal system.

Najib, who is currently embroiled in a corruption scandal, is hoping to burnish his Islamic credentials in order to boost his chances in national elections that must be held by August 2018.

Critics of the bill warn that it could pave the way for full implementation of hudud, which prescribes punishments such as amputations and stoning, and disrupt the fabric of Malaysia's multi-cultural and multi-religious society.

"The so-called 'empowerment' of the Shariah Court will only exacerbate the unequal treatment of Muslims and non-Muslims before the law," said Bebas, an NGO that organized a smaller counter-rally.

No official figures were available on how many people attended Saturday's peaceful support rally in Kuala Lumpur, but estimates were in the tens of thousands.

Tuan Ibrahim Tuan Man, deputy president of the hardline Islamist opposition Parti Islam-se Malaysia (PAS), one of its organizers, said 100,000 people were expected to attend.

The PAS presented the bill in parliament last year but later withdrew it in order to fine tune the legislation. It is now expected to be reintroduced in the next parliamentary session, in March.

Najib, who has resisted calls to resign over a scandal at state fund 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB), where he was an adviser, backed the bill despite the anger of members of his own United Malay National Organisation (UMNO) ruling coalition.

Lawsuits filed by the U.S. Justice Department in July last year said nearly $700 million of the misappropriated funds from 1MDB flowed into the accounts of "Malaysian Official 1", who U.S. and Malaysian officials have identified as Najib.

Prime Minister Najib Razak, Parti Islam-se Malaysia, Tuan Ibrahim Tuan Man and Malaysian demonstrators, Reuters 5 Comments [2/19/2017 8:24:46 AM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: JeanP

Quote# 124660

What debate? What conversation? That's what progs call it when they lecture a deplorable on why he is so very deplorable. They are going to have to accept reality: equality is false, "equality" means abdicating the moral responsibility to judge what is better and what is worse, it means preferring the worse to the better, which is bad under every possible system of ethics. Treating unequal people equally is unjust. [edit cut...] Replacing the former nation with others will predictably lead to the US becoming as non-functional as Brazil, India, or South Africa. No amount of pretending equality is going to change the genetic facts.

[edit cut ...]. Non-whites were ~10% of the US in 1965, now ~40%. More than half the children under 10 are now non-white. That displacement will only accelerate as Whites are driven from power by the treason of their politicians, their academics, their clergy. Then Whites will be treated as they are in Zimbabwe or South Africa and civilization will sputter out.There is nothing to debate, our essential interests are irresolvably opposed.

Multan, Information Processing 4 Comments [2/19/2017 8:24:19 AM]
Fundie Index: 5

Quote# 124658

In Defense of Feminism

Here I will defend feminism, but not for the typical reasons. In order to understand this post, you must understand these two previous posts of mine:

Human Evolution where I explain why women in feminist cultures are attracted to stupid immoral men.

The Rise and Fall of Christian Culture where I explain how American Christianity failed in the 1800s, meaning lost the ability to impose morality.

In the "Human Evolution" post I explained that women simply choose the type of man who is evolutionarily optimal in the current environment. Let me take this one step further. Probably the most important thing for a woman is which men she has sex with, because this will determine the future success of her genes. Because this is so important, one can reasonably assume that a significant part of a woman's brain is dedicated to this issue. This means that women can intuitively determine which men are genetically "good" much better than men can using analytical reasoning. In other words, men have no right to doubt women's mating choices in terms of genetic suitability. When a woman says that a man is "hot", she is unquestionably correct that he is a good genetic choice in her current environment. And when a woman says that a man is a (genetic) loser, she is also unquestionably correct in her current environment.

One of the worst things that can happen to a woman is mating with a genetically unsuitable man. A woman can only have a limited number of children, so who she chooses to be the father of those children is critical. Mating with an unsuitable man is almost like the loss of a child because that child's genetic future is bleak. The word to express this tragedy is "rape". Men badly misunderstand rape because we interpret it from a male perspective. We think that the critical element is violence. This is because for men, violence is a huge risk for our genetic future since many men are killed through violence. But for women, this simply isn't the case. Violence plays a much smaller role in the genetic success of women. So now let's consider a woman in modern culture. If a violent thug forces this woman to have sex with him, is this rape? No it isn't because the violent thug is well suited genetically for modern culture. So there is no issue of mating with a genetically unsuitable man. Now let's consider the case of this woman being seduced into sex by a nice guy who studied seduction techniques. This clearly is rape since nice guys are genetically unsuitable for modern culture. Whether the sex was violently forced or voluntary is irrelevant, all that matters is the quality of the man's genes. In modern culture, any sex with a nice guy is rape regardless of the circumstances because nice guys have unsuitable genes for modern culture.

Throughout history, women have depended on society to protect them including protecting them from rape. Men in society have always played a role in protecting women from mating with unsuitable men. But of course it is ultimately up to women to decide what types of men are unsuitable. In an effective patriarchal society where promiscuity is heavily punished, intelligent moral men are optimal and stupid immoral men are unsuitable. In such a society, women expect society to protect them from stupid immoral men. And similarly, in modern culture where stupid immoral men are optimal and intelligent moral men are unsuitable, women expect society to protect them from intelligent moral men. In both cases, the motive is exactly the same, to protect women from rape, namely sex with unsuitable men. This is why modern society is currently implementing all these strange sexual consent laws. These laws are very well designed to protect women from intelligent moral men.

At this point it should be clear why feminism makes sense for women in modern culture. All feminism is really about is allowing women in modern culture to mate with genetically good men and avoid mating with genetically bad men. Why should women be prevented from this? But now let's move away from women's perspective and consider what is best for humanity.

The optimal society is a moral patriarchal society. In such a society, promiscuity (outside of prostitution) is strictly limited. Women are expected to virgins at marriage. Adultery (sex with another man's wife) is severely punished with the guilty being removed from the gene pool one way or another. Seducing virgins is also punished. In such a society, moral men are the optimal mating choice for women. So women in this society will be attracted to moral men and will consider immoral men to be losers. There is absolutely no chance of feminism occurring in such a society because women there simply wouldn't want it.

Now let's consider what happens when such an optimal society starts to break down. What happens is that for some reason society loses its ability to enforce sexual morality. This means that promiscuity and adultery become a viable evolutionary strategy for men. Women realize this, and these immoral men become exciting for women. And so the evolutionary decay of the society begins.

Feminism is the natural expression of women's changing mating preference in a decaying society. But let's imagine that we could magically eliminate feminism. Would this be better for humanity? I believe that what this would look like is America almost permanently stuck in the 1950s. As I explained in "The Rise and Fall of Christian Culture", American culture began to break down in the 1800s when religion went from encouraging people to follow Jesus's moral teaching to simply having a personal relationship with Jesus. With such a change, it was inevitable that society would lose focus on the core issues of sexual morality, and lose the ability of effective enforcement. In the 1950s, America retained the facade of a moral culture, but underneath society was breaking down. Women clearly expressed sexual excitement for "bad boys" in movies. And I am certain that this must have corresponded to a rising adultery rate. Without feminism, the facade could have remained intact for centuries, with moral men continuing to find wives but these wives cheating on them and having illegitimate children with immoral men. The genetic breakdown of society would have been much slower, but the ultimate result would have been the same. So instead of taking decades for society to call apart, it would have taken centuries. Which is preferable? I think it is preferable for a morally broken society to fall apart as quickly as possible so that it can be replaced by something else. Feminism doesn't change the end result, it only speeds it up. And so I support feminism.

What about the poor suffering moral men in modern culture who can't get women? One can read the complaints of these men all over the internet. If you suggest options to these men like using a prostitute or looking abroad, they will tell you that they want validation. Any moral man who wants validation from a woman in modern culture is simply a moron who deserves to suffer and die without reproducing. Unlike feminists, he hasn't slightest understanding of evolution. The only sound evolutionary strategy for moral men is to join together to form moral patriarchal societies. Such societies are evolutionarily superior to modern culture. When modern culture has decayed sufficiently, a good moral patriarchal culture should attack modern culture and slaughter all of its men for the genetic good of humanity.

If a woman from the modern culture calls a moral man a loser, the correct response is "I would be a loser if I were a member of your culture, but I am not. My culture is superior to your culture and my culture will eventually destroy your culture." Intelligent moral men must reject modern culture and find an alternative. And from the perspective of an alternative culture, we can recognize feminism as a good thing that is helping to destroy our enemy, namely modern culture.

(Submitter's note: Emphasis added)

fschmidt, Mikraite 18 Comments [2/19/2017 3:53:31 AM]
Fundie Index: 11
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 124657

Whether one calls the negative anti-morals of modern culture morality is just a semantic question. I do call this negative morality because I don't know how else to describe it. Of course patriarchy is required in any positive moral system.

fschmidt, Mikraite 12 Comments [2/19/2017 3:53:28 AM]
Fundie Index: 7
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 124656

Only patriarchal moral values count as morality

Patriarchal moral values = Natural Law/Divine Law/Biblical Law/Koranic Law

Matriarchy - the antithesis of the above. (Some might call it legal positivism which allow such ideas as Transnational Progressivism to contaminate the body politic. Transnational Progressivism can only be pushed on a society that has already been corrupted by feminism.)

What is the purpose of patriarchal moral values? Group solidarity.

What is the nature of matriarchy? Degeneracy and then the defeat of the group by a group practising patriarchal moral values.

What is the essence of patriarchy? Moral restraint.

What is the essence of matriarchy? Sexual liberation.

Andromeda07734, Mikraite 5 Comments [2/19/2017 3:53:25 AM]
Fundie Index: 7
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 124653

Compared to Jesus, Satan is simply a chained, ferocious dog that cannot bite me, but only can bluff me. The real most horrifying Entity is Jesus Himself. Believe me. Through blood and tear, I learn this concept, that is, Jesus is Emperor and I shall never disobey Him. I’m Jesus’ darling, but I’m still His humble servant.
*****************************************************************
And tell you all what my immortal plan is, that is, once I’m immortally in Heaven, Jesus is gotta be my immortal gorgeous white “Alexander the Great”. And, I’m gotta be Jesus’ “Hephaestion”, an immortal “Hephaestion” concubine with an ass of immortal tightness. We both can go naked swimming, naked diving, naked sun-bathing, naked playing volleyball, doing everything just all naked in the Pacific island, a private island, just Jesus and I, a 2-guy world. I’m gotta be the sweetest, immortal ice-cream boy that always melts down in the arms of Jesus on His shirtless and white and sun-tan Big Chest when we hang out in the island in the Pacific. I’m Jesus’ Massage Boy, too.

usachinanukewar, All-out US-China nuclear war, looming, to wipe out one-fourths of the earth 15 Comments [2/19/2017 3:53:06 AM]
Fundie Index: 8
Submitted By: Denizen

Quote# 124651

Hey lgbt sisters and brothers… if u voted for H(illary)R(odham)C(linton) I hope you get HIV, can’t afford to medicate yourself and die young, before you are able to come to terms with the fact it’s really over

saugmeinenjohann, Tumblr 4 Comments [2/19/2017 3:52:48 AM]
Fundie Index: 8
Submitted By: Thanos6

Quote# 124650

There is no proof that Muhammad rape Ayesha, yes he married her which was common practice among arabs at the time but he did not rape her?

Faris Khan, youtube 16 Comments [2/18/2017 8:35:14 PM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: PETF

Quote# 124649

"Asia has a way of radicalizing white people who live there for any length of time, and i believe it does so in two ways.

1) Contrary to what you are saying, whites are exposed to a lot of racism in Asia. At the same time, they are also give far more positive attention then they would be back home. This creates an unbalanced inferiority/superiority complex. But the racism directed at whites in Asia – which is “soft”, but pervasive and widespread – should not be underestimated as a factor in the radicalization of whites who have lived in Asia. For the first time, whites begin to see, even if in subtle ways, what being a minority really means.

2) Secondly, whites who live in Asia get to see first hand what it means to live in a mono-cultural society that retains traditional virtues and positive social attitudes long vanished from multi-cultural white societies – and they love it, and it evokes in them nostalgia for 1950s America.

Greg, BigWOWO 8 Comments [2/18/2017 8:33:43 PM]
Fundie Index: 3

Quote# 124648

I have similar views to many of these guys - alt right, anti-feminist.
Maybe I can help to describe how some of these men feel (but I don't think it applies to all of them, some of them don't deserve to be on the list).

If you really think that your own race of women have been corrupted, it is natural to look elsewhere. Traditional morality held that a woman should be chaste before marriage, that the marriage vows were sacred, and divorce was either illegal or scandalous. And also, women would stick to more feminine/maternal activities.

I do deeply resent the fact that these things have changed. If you are a white man looking for a wife in the modern environment, you encounter women who care more about their careers than getting married, who might not have a strong desire for kids (they've been told it's not important), who might have had a lot of sexual partners, and who have a divorce court system in their favor. I don't know for sure if this is true or not, but let's assume it's also true that obesity, drug use, alcohol abuse, and tattoos/piercings are more common now than they were for most previous generations.

So if you're in this environment and you don't like it, you might feel that it is too hard to find someone you're happy with. It is tempting to say "screw this" and go somewhere the odds are in your favor.

It's sort of like the conservative white guy is a foreigner in his own country now. The culture he's swimming in just doesn't feel right. Maybe it's like being a freshwater fish thrown into the ocean.

But as I wrote on a post here the other day, I do now think that it is a mistake to date outside your race as an escape from what you see as the current defects with your own culture. And it's particularly unfortunate if you find someone who will marry you not for you as an individual but because she values your race.

Ultra-conservative white men who are tempted to go Asian should remember:

"It is not the strongest of the species that survives, nor the most intelligent. It is the one that is most adaptable to change."

Thankshapas1, Reddit 3 Comments [2/18/2017 8:33:36 PM]
Fundie Index: 1

Quote# 124647

[From "Brexit: Jo Cox’ Death was Not a Tragedy and the World is a Better Place Without Her"]

Today is Brexit day.

As we patiently await the results, I am compelled to comment on the most high-profile Brexit related event this year: the murder of Jo Cox.

Let me begin by saying I am against violence, and I do not approve of the assassination of politicians. I am also able to see that while Thomas Mair’s alleged actions won’t swing anyone who was already decidedly pro-Brexit, the media hoopla about how Brexit supporters are murderers could possibly have swayed uncommitted voters to vote “stay.”

All things considered, it probably would have been better, politically, to not murder this woman.

All these caveats having been given, I must state this frankly: Cox’ death was not a “tragedy,” and the world is a better place now that she is dead.

Jo Cox was an aggressive supporter of mass immigration. She lobbied for it, she enabled it to take place. And as such, untold buckets of blood were on her hands. Given the unimaginable suffering that she helped to cause, she deserved to die. It is simply justice. It is no more a “tragedy” than the execution of a murderer or a rapist is a tragedy.

By assisting the invasion of Britain, she was both a murderer and a rapist.

Lee Rigby was murdered by a Black Islamic terrorist. His blood is on the hands of Jo Cox.

[...]

Jo Cox was evil and she deserved to die.

Her death was not a tragedy, it was justice.

And the world is a better place with her six feet underground.

Andrew Anglin, Daily Stormer 13 Comments [2/18/2017 8:33:27 PM]
Fundie Index: 8
Submitted By: JeanP

Quote# 124639

My three lifelong fantasies

1. Having mental powers to kill everyone around me

2. Having a female twin who finds out about my existence and comes to find me, killing everyone around me in the process (EDIT: yes obviously we also have sex)

3. Just killing everyone around me using any tools available

StAliaHarkonnen, /r/incels 30 Comments [2/18/2017 8:33:14 PM]
Fundie Index: 15
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 124629

Can't tell you how good I felt when Jesus touched my child.

Rev. Dr. Kwasi I. Kena, Discipleship Ministries 15 Comments [2/18/2017 8:32:56 PM]
Fundie Index: 1
Submitted By: Denizen

Quote# 124646

(Comment on article "Bella Vista Man Accused Of Sexually Assaulting Children In Neighborhood)

Touching is not evil. It is evil to not have like the kind loving lord of glory in you. Fear God. He will be fire to those that don’t have him in them. God will be worse than any forest fire or nuclear fire to evil people. Jesus touched children. ,Jesus is not evil.

artiewhitefox, 5 News 13 Comments [2/18/2017 12:57:47 PM]
Fundie Index: 10
Submitted By: Denizen

Quote# 124645

Texas Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick joined Tony Perkins, president of the anti-LGBT hate group Family Research Council (FRC), twice in the past two weeks to promote SB6, the so-called “Texas Privacy Act,” a top legislative priority for Patrick during this session.

“Lt. Governor Dan Patrick of Texas is taking off the gloves with those pushing the false narrative that protecting women and children will hurt the Lone Star state economically,” Perkins told listeners while introducing Patrick on the Feb. 8 edition of his “Washington Watch Live” web-based radio show.

“Yes, we are taking off the gloves,” Patrick responded. “We’re not going to stand by and allow the LGBT community to take over some business groups in order to attack our very common sense legislation to keep men out of ladies’ rooms, allow businesses the free enterprise to make those decisions, allow their customers to make those decisions, and to keep boys and girls from showering together in the 10th, 11th and 12th grade.”

In the short segment, Patrick dismissed claims that, should the bill pass, it would prove economically detrimental to the state. Both he and Perkins claimed SB6 has overwhelming support because it protects women and keeps boys and girls from “showering together.”

A common falsehood perpetuated by anti-LGBT groups is that allowing trans people to use restrooms in accordance with their gender identities will allow sexual predators to “pretend” they’re trans to access women’s restrooms and locker rooms to prey on women and children.

More recently, Patrick appeared live in the studio alongside Perkins in “Privacy and Freedom: Good for Business,” a webcast streamed from the FRC studios on Feb. 15. Perkins first spoke with FRC senior fellow in legal studies Cathy Ruse who claimed sex ed classes teach “transgenderism as a healthy alternative lifestyle” and cause psychological damage to children.

Next on the show was North Carolina Lt. Gov. Dan Forest who joined via video to discuss his state’s 2016 law, HB2, which was passed in a hastily called session in response to the city of Charlotte’s February 2016 anti-discrimination ordinance, which included sexual orientation and gender identity.

HB2 nullified all LGBT anti-discrimination ordinances in the state. Trans people who have not taken legal and surgical steps to change their gender markers on state documents have no legal right to use public restrooms that correspond with their gender identities. The law also makes it more difficult to pursue any claim of discrimination based on race, religion, national origin, handicap or biological sex.

During Patrick’s time with Perkins, he reiterated some of his statements from the Feb. 8 “Washington Watch,” claiming that Texas’s SB6 protects women and children from sexual predators, prevents boys and girls from showering together, and that predictions of harmful economic fallout as a result of the bill’s passage are dubious. The only people, Patrick claimed, who don’t support SB6 are “Anglo elite liberals, and a lot of them control the print media.”

Perkins directed viewers to a particular page on the FRC website which includes a link to the action center of Dan Patrick’s website where people share their stories about why they believe that “no Texas law should allow men in women’s restrooms or women in men’s restrooms.”

Patrick has promulgated the dangers of allowing trans people to use restrooms in accordance with their gender identities since his vocal support of the dismantling of the non-discrimination equal rights ordinance in Houston (HERO) in 2015. Patrick appeared on radio and TV urging voters to reject the city’s equal rights ordinance. HERO was overwhelmingly defeated in November 2015, largely on the basis of anti-trans fear mongering.

The Texas bill comes on the heels of Patrick’s battle against 2016 guidelines issued by the Obama administration in which trans students in public schools should not be marginalized to separate bathroom or locker room facilities or forced to use facilities inconsistent with their gender identities. Schools who discriminate against trans students could face federal lawsuits or a loss of federal funding.

In response to these guidelines, Texas attorney general Ken Paxton filed a lawsuit against the federal government in late May of 2016. A week later, Patrick announced that he would be directing all state school superintendents not to follow the guidelines and — in fact — to actively defy them.

Patrick’s crusade against allowing trans people to use public facilities in accordance with their gender identities and his association with hate group members continues. Patrick will also be speaking — along with Texas Gov. Greg Abbott, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton and Perkins — at an FRC co-sponsored event in Austin, Texas on March 7, “Pastor’s Briefing at the Capitol,” billed as a “special briefing for pastors across Texas to hear urgent updates on legislation protecting women and children, religious freedom, and the future of our state.”

Tony Perkins, Dan Patrick and Ken Paxton, Southern Poverty Law Center 10 Comments [2/18/2017 12:57:27 PM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Demon Duck of Doom

Quote# 124641

Most men cannot fathom living a life without sex. But blessed are those few men, who perceive the worthwhile sacrifice of forfeiting marriage for the kingdom of God (such as the apostle Paul). A man who forgoes marriage can serve God day and night, without hindrance, as a faithful servant sold out to His precious Savior!

David J. Stewart, Jesus is Precious 16 Comments [2/18/2017 12:56:57 PM]
Fundie Index: 2

Quote# 124637

I'm tired of seeing feminist cunts and bluepill fags tell us it's our personality.

If that was the case, then why do the assholes over at /r/theredpill get laid so frequently?

Either it's our persssssonalityyyyyyy or everyone who posts at /r/theredpill is a liar.

Pick one normiescum. Just fucking pick one and stay consistent.

NoHopeLeft25, /r/incels 21 Comments [2/18/2017 10:48:51 AM]
Fundie Index: 8
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 124636

Mikraites attempt to follow an old book, the Old Testament, as an alternative to modern culture. The word "Mikra" means Old Testament in Hebrew. Unlike the New Testament and the Quran, the Old Testament does not require faith. It only requires moral action. This makes Mikraite a real alternative to faith-based religions. We also think that the fact that modern culture hates the Old Testament more than any other book is a good sign that the Old Testament is a very good book.

The Old Testament specifically supports trust ("You must not act deceptively or lie to one another." - Leviticus 19:11) and cooperation ("love your neighbor as yourself" - Leviticus 19:18, "If you come across your enemy's stray ox or donkey, you must return it to him. If you see the donkey of someone who hates you lying helpless under its load, and you want to refrain from helping it, you must help with it." - Exodus 23:4-5). We are a very small group, but we are serious about helping each other succeed in business and in personal life. You will not find anything like this level of cooperation in modern culture.

We have chosen a set of five required practices which we believe will select for good people and exclude bad people.

1. Keep the Sabbath.
2. Dress modestly.
3. Have no tattoos.
4. Keep Passover.
5. Make the Mikraite Declaration.

We are not like Rabbinic Judaism which is based on the Talmud. Rabbinic Judaism defines members by who your mother is. We define a Mikraite as one who follows the five required practices. Unlike Rabbinic Judaism, we consider God to be reasonable and understandable. Deuteronomy 6:24 makes clear that the commandments are for our benefit, and therefore we can analyze the commandments based on how they benefit us.

fschmidt, Mikraite 9 Comments [2/18/2017 10:48:47 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 124635

Now both liberals and muslims both hate America but that is not a reason why you would love someone who wants to cut your head off. The liberal/leftie/feminist/communist lives in a world of feelings, not logic, or discriminating intelligence, and certainly not facts.

Liberalism is a religion where the state assumes the role of God and when you believe in something as a religion no thinking is allowed or needed. Through brainwashing by the state/cultural Marxists they have been taught to not love their own kind but rather to love the other outsider different one more than themselves. They no longer love themselves, their country, their culture, their race, their family, or their religion. Now the white femininists are self genociding by having less than 1.2 children in Europe. This means extinction in 3 generations.

Quote-“ By destroying the nuclear family ideal feminism has unleashed the maternal instinct on the political realm where instead of protecting her biological children her new minority allies are her adopted brood.” End Quote This is also a part of it for women.

It is the inability to think and the total lack of information about islam that allows the liberal/lefties/feminist/communist to actually love someone who wants to kill them or destroy their way of life. And they think if you don’t love the muslim then you are the evil one and they must stop you.

It is not Stockholm syndrome because they have yet to be oppressed by the muslims. But that day will soon come.

Liberalism is a religion of suicide and they will take the rest of us down with them. Sun Tzu said: Those who do not know themselves nor their enemy will be defeated in battle. "The enemy will never attack where you are strongest...He will attack where you are weakest. If you do not know your weakest point, be certain, your enemy will."

Our weakest point is a total lack of leadership by our politicians and the suicidal stupidity of the left. Today’s politicians are followers and appeasers who have sold out to the muslims.

Anonymous Coward, Godlike Productions 11 Comments [2/18/2017 10:48:41 AM]
Fundie Index: 6