Quote# 124601

Satan is not creative. His strategies and tactics are tediously predictable, once you recognize them. Of course, it’s not easy to stand firm when it seems like you’re about to be engulfed by a mountainous rushing wall of fire, but if you do stand firm the illusion vaporizes on contact and you realize it was a lie. Once you’ve stood up to that wall a few times it loses most of its effect on you.

No group is better at this satanic strategy than the “gay” political movement, which was an unstated reason why open homosexuals were never allowed into the intelligence agencies in the history of the nation, a policy upheld by the none other than the 9th Circuit US Appeals Court in the 1990 case, “High Tech Gays v. Defense Industrial Security Clearance Office.” (Indicating just how dangerous to our nation the idea of homosexual spooks was even to the farthest left-wing judges in the country: J. Edgar Hoover was by no means an anomaly.) But then along came Bill Clinton who issued Executive Order 12968 on August 2, 1995, opening the intelligence agencies and top secret security clearance to the Machiavellian “gay” network.

That policy continued under W. Bush, and when Obama came into office the floodgates really flew open. My guess based solely on my knowledge of the “gay” movement and Obama’s personal priorities, is that the today’s alphabet soup of intelligence agencies could easily be condensed to just four letters: LGBT, since that’s almost certainly who’s driving the agenda evidenced in the ongoing treasonous sabotage of the Trump administration.

More critical to the process of creating the false reality by which the far left has steered American public policy for decades is the mainstream media. Again, an industry so heavily dominated by “gays” and homosexualists that there is no longer even a pretense of balance on stories related to LGBT issues. Pro-family views are openly equated with racism and denied inclusion in news reporting. That same subjectivity and arrogance drives their narrative on their entire slate of issues.

My greatest concern about the Trump administration is that secular-minded advisors will allow self-defeating politically-correct assumptions to convince them to leave the “gays” in the swamp, assuming that will win them points with the ultra-powerful LGBT lobby and the larger progressive community it dominates, as well as crossover libertarian and secularist constituencies.

My prayer is that President Trump will awaken to the correlation of anti-Trump radicalism on the left with the “gay” movement and realize that on virtually any issue one can name the most aggressive liars and agitators are homosexuals and their closest surrogates, and that these people absolutely, positively cannot be placated (just ask the Boy Scouts of America). In other words, there is a spiritual dimension to the culture war in which the key common denominator is LGBT affiliation.

I call on Mr. Trump to adopt my earlier recommendation to establish a “Separation of LGBT and State” as outlined here.

I further urge him to take the bold and courageous step of revoking Executive Order 12968 and restoring the ban on “gays” in the intelligence agencies as it existed until 1990.

Scott Lively, Right Wing Watch 12 Comments [2/17/2017 5:24:37 PM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: Demon Duck of Doom

Quote# 124600

Who are we to question why God does things the way He does? I humbly submit that my human brain is no match for God's wisdom.

Alan Burns, Religion and Ethics 10 Comments [2/17/2017 5:24:28 PM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Nearly Sane

Quote# 124599

I’m trying to start a new petition to view atheists as fully subhuman, subhuman beings.

I had a petition on another site but some atheists cried and got it removed for “hate speech” or whatever, nasty people always trying to force and impose their way and their beliefs onto the entire world.

So if you agree with me that atheists should be viewed as subhuman just a post a comment, it’ll count as like a signature.

On my other blog post I explained why I view atheists as fully subhuman as opposed to partially human or human:

Reasons for viewing atheists as fully subhuman:

Atheists refuse to oppose racism and nationalism but voice up their position on things like gay rights and abortion rights
100% of all modern day atheist countries are extremely racist/nationalist beyond imagination (Denmark, Sweden, Latvia, Estonia, New Zealand, and every other atheist country)
Atheists and the atheist-controlled media refuse to attack free-will believers like how they attack Creationists even though the scientific evidence telling us that free-will is non-existent is like a million times more concrete than the evidence supporting evolution(young Earth Creationists are more rational than free-will believers)
Atheists refuse to acknowledge the undeniable historical consensus that religion directly caused the scientific revolution and insist on telling lies thoroughly debunked by historians (there aren’t any modern day historians that believe in the “Dark Ages” lie portrayed in the atheist-controlled media)
Atheists refuse to acknowledge the undeniable historical fact that Faraday’s religion directly caused Maxwell’s Equations to come into existence, and instead lie and portray the opposite
Atheists are trying to redefine the definition of science so that all that matters is authority and incredulity instead of empirical observations and valid reasoning, turning science into pseudoscience
Atheists are trying to throw away a very important principle in science – criticism and scrutiny, and turn science into pseudoscience
Atheists don’t allow people to question, scrutinize, and criticize atheistic arguments, they just breakdown and cry and interpret any criticism as “trolling”
Atheists insist on telling many lies thoroughly debunked by historians and scientists (see my post “Common Lies Spread By Atheists“)
– From post, Reasons for viewing atheists as subhuman beings

itsnobody, itsnobody.com 16 Comments [2/17/2017 5:23:39 PM]
Fundie Index: 9

Quote# 124598

Women's quest for external power has left a frightening vacuum in Western society in the area of moral training, where women formerly held sway. Rampant crime, child abuse, kidnapping, and the dramatic rise in violence against women are symptoms of a society gone amok, where many people have no concept of right and wrong, of honesty, fairness, compassion or self-control.

Today's internal decadence is eroding the quality of life in America as fast as external political and technological advantages are improving it.

Clearly, the lot of women cannot be improved by political and financial progress if the inner dimension of society -- its morals and compassion -- is neglected by the very people who have traditionally been made its custodians: women.

A typical male analysis of such political problems customarily blames them on external factors, e.g., low income families in impoverished neighborhoods inevitably leads to a high rate of violent crime, substance abuse, etc.

If this were true, then Jerusalem's religious neighborhood of Mea Shearim, which has one of the highest poverty rates in Israel and where families typically number seven to ten children in a three-room flat, should be a hotbed of violent crime. Instead, Mea Shearim has virtually no violent crime and very little substance abuse, this despite the total absence of policemen on its streets.

[...]

Thus, defined Judaically, the issue is not whether women should or should not have power, but rather on the kind of power on which they should concentrate, both for their individual development as well as for the good of the whole society.

Tziporah Heller, Aish.com 5 Comments [2/17/2017 5:23:10 PM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 124596

Bravo Michael, excellent article. Tip of the cap as well to Mr. and Mrs. Duggar. I read that either he or his wife chaperone all of their daughters' dates to ensure that their chastity stays intact. Of course the feminists mocked them and said it was "ridiculous" and "creepy", but I assume they're just mad because their vaginas have more mileage on them than a '72 Pinto whereas his daughters' are still factory fresh. They can't seem to grasp the simple fact that a woman's virginity is her greatest asset and the greatest gift she can give her husband, and no matter how much you call yourself a "Born-Again Virgin" on your wedding day by not fucking your fiance in the six months leading up to your marriage, that white dress doesn't make you any less damaged goods.

Samson, Return of Kings 15 Comments [2/17/2017 5:22:59 PM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: Chris

Quote# 124592

I would give my right pinky to talk about "The Atheist Delusion" with both of these gentlemen.

There is undeniable scientific evidence for the existence of God. If you don't believe that, watch the award-winning film at www.FullyFreeFilms.com

Stephen Colbert, Ricky Gervais debate existence of God
A Sunday school teacher and an agnostic walk onto the set of “The Late Show.”
NYDAILYNEWS.COM


Ray Comfort, Ray Comfort's Facebook page 26 Comments [2/16/2017 11:16:12 PM]
Fundie Index: 11
Submitted By: Chris

Quote# 124589

Progress is a unique feature of Western civilization. With the exception of the introduction of technology, the entirety of the third-world has made no progress and continues in the natural state of man--constant, low-lying ethnic/tribal warfare.

Furthermore, who says we're against technical change? Whenever a leftist brings up "progress" it is almost inevitably in the social sphere, which yes, we do oppose. Currently speaking you have to be detached from reality not to notice that the threats to technical and scientific advancement are from the left who engages in suppressing work that doesn't fit a political narrative and who also peddle postmodernism which kills objective research.

No, diversity sets off warning bells and as I've said in a previous post, raises transaction costs and harms moral and social norms. The moral emotion of purity most likely developed to prevent such a thing from happening--you cannot diversify the heartland of a nation without repercussion.
To flip this, I find it funny that you people never assume that racism reciprocates. Native Americans were brutal to the settlers and currently blacks disproportionately commit crimes on whites, including rape which to my knowledge is not rooted in economic issues.

"The old system often benefits you conservatives, explaining why most of you are white. The old system benefits you mainly in wealth and society. Discrimination still exists because we have not foregone this system that doesn't work in today's society anymore."

Ding ding ding We aren't cucks who are going to go quietly into the night. We want the institutions that we helped build and were built for us to continue to benefit US. The bourgeois sold out the American white middle class and we won't forget it.

"Discrimination still exists because we have not foregone this system that doesn't work in today's society anymore."

Discrimination exists because multi-ethnic democracy and a multicultural society are alien and should be done away with. I'm not discriminatory toward Mongolians because they're on the other side of the Earth.

Why is an ethnic separation so apocalyptic to you? Or are you really using sheep's clothing to dress up the right for the global downtrodden to use our country as a battered women's shelter?

Trifle and Shadow, Reddit 21 Comments [2/16/2017 8:33:21 PM]
Fundie Index: 13

Quote# 124586

Today on “The 700 Club,” Pat Robertson wondered if President Obama and other Democrats may have participated in a grand conspiracy to bring down President Trump’s national security adviser Michael Flynn, who resigned on Monday over his communications with Russia’s U.S. ambassador.

While Flynn and other White House officials said that the two did not talk about U.S. sanctions against Russia before Trump’s inauguration, such statements conflicted with “reports from U.S. intelligence and law enforcement agencies that routinely monitor the communications of Russian diplomats.”

Robertson, however, wrongly suggested that U.S. intelligence agencies were specifically monitoring Flynn, not the ambassador, and then warned of a larger plot involving Democrats, liberal government officials and members of the media that he believes could be working to take Flynn down and damage the Trump administration.

Referring to Psalm 2:2, “The kings of the earth rise up and the rulers band together against the Lord and against his anointed,” Robertson said that those challenging Trump are really fighting against God:

"I think, somehow, the Lord’s plan is being put in place for America and these people are not only revolting against Trump, they’re revolting against what God’s plan is for America. These other people have been trying to destroy America. These left-wingers and so-called progressives are trying to destroy the country that we love and take away the freedoms they love. They want collectivism. They want socialism. What we’re looking at is free markets and freedom from this terrible, overarching bureaucracy. They want to fight as much as they can but I think the good news is the Bible says, 'He that sits in the heavens will laugh them to scorn,' and I think that Trump’s someone on his side that is a lot more powerful than the media."

Pat Robertson, Right Wing Watch 25 Comments [2/16/2017 8:29:07 PM]
Fundie Index: 8
Submitted By: Demon Duck of Doom

Quote# 124585

Adultery and acceptance of the sinner


My daughter had an affair with a married man and seems he isnt going away as I have been praying.
I know we are all sinners and I know how Jesus treated the woman caught in adultery.
I am having trouble processing this. I could use wisdom.
He has filed for divorce from his wife.
He has kids and so does my daughter.
I told her to never bring that homewrecker around me.

Cindy S., RaptureReady 14 Comments [2/16/2017 8:29:00 PM]
Fundie Index: 3

Quote# 124584

Classic violent liberals. Why can't you be civil? Use your mouth words, retard.

Edit: Everybody say it with me now.... PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP

I'd also like to add: We all know that Republicans are not the ones killing cops, rioting in the streets, terrorizing conventions, protesting every event the opposition holds... I mean laugh all you want at what I said but you cannot deny that Democrats have proven they are the party that uses violence to try to silence the opposition. Correct The Record shills, COME N GET IT.

VeryHighEnergy, r/4PanelCringe 17 Comments [2/16/2017 8:28:54 PM]
Fundie Index: 10
Submitted By: Daspletosaurus

Quote# 124578

Inherit the Wind is biased, shameful, pro-Evolution propaganda.

The entire purpose of Inherit the Wind is to push the agenda that the theory of evolution is fact that should be taught in public schools. At the same time, Christianity is bashed in this movie and portrayed as wrong. Those who believe in Christianity in this movie are hatefully portrayed by the movie as idiots. The Atheist teacher who indoctrinates his students with Atheism & Evolution is portrayed as a hero and genius, as are all the other Atheists/Evolutionists in the movie. Inherit the Wind urges all it's viewers to take these sick 'lessons' to heart in real-life and hate & suppress Christians and any anyone who refuses to agree that Atheism and/or Evolution is correct and must be forced down everyone's throat against their will in schools.

In reality, the theory of evolution is not fact, never has been fact, and never will be fact. If anyone thinks Evolution is correct, that is only an *opinion.* The way Inherit the Wind serves as pro-Evolution propaganda is a disgrace and slap in the face to film-making, God, Christianity, and mankind as a species.

The fact that this movie and play is sometimes served up to unwitting students as a mandatory part of their public education is nothing short of disgusting! They want to brainwash the youths to hate Christianity and believe in Evolution, just like the "heroes" of the movie and play do. This is *not* educational, it's disgusting propaganda in it's worst form.

Inherit the Wind has the bald-faced *gall* to have a line spoken in the movie which says anyone who doesn't believe in Atheism & Evolution is dead. The strong, direct meaning of this line is that even while they are alive physically, they are 'brain-dead' for not accepting Atheism and Evolution. Could a movie *possibly* be any more disgusting and shameful propaganda? No, no it can't.

"Inherit the Wind" is a phrase taken directly from the Bible - a Holy Book which the movie bashes wickedly as much as it possibly can. The filmmakers/playwrights might have thought it was "funny" to title their movie after the words in the Bible, only to then viciously bash the Bible with the movie. It is doubtful though, that they *still* found it funny after their lives on Earth and run their natural course, and they came face to face with the God who they were so keen to bash and fight against by making this movie during their fleeting time on Earth. Inherit the Wind was made in 1960. It's now 2008. Using common sense, it's easy to figure out where the filmmakers/playwrights are now. And it's *not* in a happy place with a smile on their face for bashing God & Christianity in their brief moment on Earth when it was "funny" to do so.

Guess in the end, it goes to show that contrary to what Inherit the Wind claims, it's not those who believe in God and reject Evolution who are brain-dead after all.

Navaros, IMDb 16 Comments [2/16/2017 3:34:36 PM]
Fundie Index: 10

Quote# 124576

There's an ungodly organization called, Affirming And Welcoming Baptists (AWAB), which is trying to unite Baptist churches with the homosexual agenda. IT IS WICKEDNESS!!! AWAB Find-A-Church—WICKEDNESS!!! (Baptist churches are adopting same-sex PERversion!). Homosexuality is a horrible sin, but more than just a sin, it is a DEATHSTYLE OF SIN!!! The homosexual agenda is deliberate sin, intentional sinning, which is EVIL!!! The Bible has nothing good to say about sin. America has become so wicked that people today are attempting to justify murdering children by abortion, homosexuality, public nudity, adultery, divorce, idolatry, stealing and all manner of evil.

Faithful Christians who hate evil and fight against the ungodly abortion industry are being called “nutty religious people.” Count me in as a nut friend. We'll see on Judgment Day in front of God in Heaven who's the nut!!! I promise you that the abortion crowd won't boast and tout with arrogance in that day! I promise you in that day that there won't be a grand reunion of homosexuals in Heaven, parading their filth with a smile, defying God's Holy Word, downplaying their wickedness as “love.” Job 20:5, “That the triumphing of the wicked is short, and the joy of the hypocrite but for a moment?” As we draw nearer to the appearing of the Antichrist (the man of sin), the world is going to plunge deeper-and-deeper into wickedness, returning to the deplorable spiritual condition of Noah's time (Matthew 24:37-39).

As I mentioned, not too long ago I attended a local Independent Baptist Church for about a year, and boy were my eyes opened to the apostasy in churches today. Although I tolerated their New-Evangelicalism because I wanted to help them, they refused to tolerate my fundamental Christian views. They confronted me on a Wednesday evening after handing the senior pastor a copy of Dr. Al Lacy's “NIV: The Antichrist's Bible,” and also “I Never Knew You” (.pdf) by Michael Bowen, which are both awesome books! Well, I might as well have handed them a Penthouse smutty magazine. In fact, if I had handed them a dirty-girly-magazine, they likely would have scolded me and said they'll pray for me, but I doubt if they would have told me to get out and don't come back. The truthful books that I gave those pastors scared them, because if church members read them it would open their eyes and expose their pastors as heretics. The truth hurts, but it needs to be said. I'm not going to stop preaching the truth to keep anybody!

I had also given a copy of I Never Knew You to the pastor's son-in-law (an associate pastor in the church) one Sunday evening at church, who after inviting me over for dinner the next day on Monday with his wife, blew-me-off and never even explained why he cancelled the dinner invitation. The book had greatly offended him. You don't invite someone to dinner, and then just forget about them. People can be so mean.

David J. Stewart, Jesus is Precious 28 Comments [2/16/2017 3:34:12 PM]
Fundie Index: 7

Quote# 124575

Secular laws alone cannot bring about peace and justice on earth. While secular governance is important, without personal Godliness it is incomplete. Morality cannot be legislated. Secular laws cannot limit the wandering eye of a would-be rapist as he scopes his next victim — instead the burden is placed on women to avoid getting raped. Secular laws cannot limit the greed of the super wealthy as they pound the poor with extraordinary interest rates advancing perpetual poverty and misery. Secular laws cannot hold accountable those who wage illegal wars in which hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians die — instead the burden is placed on the helpless who are left to deal with the emerging terrorist groups.

Qasim Rashid, www.onfaith.com 16 Comments [2/16/2017 3:34:07 PM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: PETF

Quote# 124574

What a great fool it is to be an atheist.

Now the fools (atheists) have come up with more lies/atheistic propaganda. They discourage criticism and scrutiny of their atheistic propaganda because they know that their propaganda is all wrong and false.

Why would an atheist allow people to question, criticize, and scrutinize their propaganda since they are staunch anti-science fanatics and strongly the oppose the concept of criticism and scrutiny (one of the main principles in science).

Atheists claim that “less religious or atheist nations are more peaceful” and point out the murder rates in like 3-5 supposedly atheist countries (Denmark, Sweden, and New Zealand).

Now it’s time for me to debunk this claim:
Counterexamples:
Religious countries in Northern/Western Europe with lower murder rates than New Zealand, Denmark, and Sweden:
– Austria
– Switzerland
Austria is one of the most religious countries in Northern/Western Europe according to the 2005 Eurobarometer poll, and Austria’s murder rate is lower than all atheist countries in Europe and lower than every single US state as well.
Less Religious and atheistic countries with high murder rates:
– Estonia
– Latvia
– North Korea
Estonia is the country in Europe with the lowest percentage of believers in God (lower than all the other countries in Europe) according to the 2005 Eurobarometer poll and 2008 Gallup poll and Estonia’s murder rate is consistently one of the very highest in Northern Europe year after year.

So this claim has thoroughly been falsified by me with counterexamples to both (religious countries with low murder rates and atheistic countries with high murder rates).

I wonder why atheists conveniently leave out Estonia when mentioning how peaceful atheist countries are? It’s probably because they feel bad that multiple sources clearly show that Estonia is the least religious country in the world and that Estonia consistently has the highest or one of the highest murder rates in Europe.

What a shame Estonia is for atheists.

Correlation is not causation:
Distorting statistics to support propaganda is easy since correlation is not causation.

The countries atheists point out as being “peaceful” had low murder rates long before they were less religious or atheistic.

Since they had low murder rates long before they were less religious or atheistic this tells us there’s absolutely no causal link between religiosity and murder rates, meaning the reason these supposedly “atheist” countries have low murder rates is despite being atheistic.

Racism is peaceful?:
The countries atheists point out as being peaceful also happen to be the most racist countries in the world (according to all the studies done). Is a country with daily or weekly racism what atheists consider as peaceful?

But I forgot, atheists don’t consider racism to be immoral or not peaceful.

100% of all atheist countries are extremely racist, there is not even one atheist country in the entire world that is not extremely racist.

What a great fool it is to be an atheist, it’s no wonder they discourage criticism and scrutiny of basically all of their claims and any other claim that they personally agree with.

If a claim really is true then it will stand up to any amount of criticism and scrutiny, which is why atheists strongly discourage criticism of any claim that they personally agree with (knowing that it’s all wrong and false).

If we are to be honest with ourselves we can see that truthfully atheists are among the worst of all human beings, always out to deceive others, and trick people in order to gain converts.

Atheists will try anything to gain converts. They are so desperate and lame.

The simple fact is, I always win, always.

Sources for Religiosity:
– 2005 Eurostat Eurobarometer poll (http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_225_report_en.pdf)
– 2008 Gallup poll (http://www.gallup.com/poll/114022/State-States-Importance-Religion.aspx)

Sources for murder rates:
– UNODC crime statistics (http://www.unodc.org/documents/data-and-analysis/statistics/crime/Homicide_statistics2012.xls)
– Eurostat crime statistics (http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ITY_OFFPUB/KS-SF-12-006/EN/KS-SF-12-006-EN.PDF)

itsnobody, itsnobody.wordpress.com 14 Comments [2/16/2017 3:34:02 PM]
Fundie Index: 7

Quote# 124572

James C. Green, vice-chair of the Wasatch County Republican Party in Utah, asserted this week that laws mandating equal pay for women could cause hardship for men.

In a letter to the editor published by The Wasatch Wave, Green outlines what he says is “the problem with the Equal Pay bill being considered by the Utah Legislature.”

“Traditionally men have earned more than women in the workplace because they are considered the primary breadwinners for families,” Green writes. “If businesses are forced to pay women the same as male earnings, that means they will have to reduce the pay for the men they employ… simple economics.”

Green predicts that a reduction in pay for men “will mean more Mothers will be forced to leave the home (where they may prefer to be) to join the workforce to make up the difference.”

Additionally, the GOP official worries that men may miss out on the best paying jobs as they compete with women in the workforce.

“It’s a vicious cycle that only gets worse the more equality of pay is forced upon us. It’s a situation of well-meaning intentions, but negative unintended consequences,” he opines. “We should encourage our Legislators to drop the whole notion. Let the marketplace determine what free-market forces should prevail.”

James C. Green, Raw Story 15 Comments [2/16/2017 3:31:14 PM]
Fundie Index: 9
Submitted By: Demon Duck of Doom

Quote# 124571

Antichrist Obama is not dead yet

Furious about national security adviser Michael Flynn’s resignation, Alex Jones posted a video commentary this morning warning about the threats President Trump is facing from what Jones described as a demonic conspiracy out to destroy him.


Among the plotters, according to Jones, is Barack Obama, whom he accused of living in a “bunker” in Washington, D.C., where Jones believes he is personally directing and “recruiting with [George] Soros an army for a Bolshevik-style revolution.”

He warned that the Foreign Policy article is a sign that globalists are getting ready to “execute really horrible devastation: starting huge wars, setting a nuke off in D.C., anything, talking about ‘time to kill Trump.’”

“There was a coup over America under globalism by stealth, there was a counter-coup with Trump, and they’re launching a counter-counter-coup right now,” Jones said. He added that Trump is trying to “empower humanity” and bring down the demonic systems that secretly run the world.


Alex Jones, Right Wing Watch 14 Comments [2/16/2017 3:31:09 PM]
Fundie Index: 8

Quote# 124570

[OP of "Hitler and the "Big Lie""]

I'm so sick of people accusing Hitler and Goebbels of saying that they brainwashed the masses by repeatedly telling massive lies. What Hitler actually said is that Jews do this. And Goebbels was accusing the English of doing the same thing. So, if anything, Hitler was proven right since Jews constantly misquote Hitler...

CertifiedRabbi, Reddit - r/NationalSocialism 11 Comments [2/16/2017 3:31:04 PM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: JeanP

Quote# 124565

"Yippee, another completely missed point.

For someone who claimed to have dazzling dry wit and intelligence a very simple quip went right over your head. You tried rather childishly to mock the idea of a study of attractiveness by implying they'd be taking calipers to people's faces and got a response that boils down to: It's really not that complicated to look at people and rate their attractiveness. It's something you happen to do as a matter of course and somewhat more legit than the standards incels use."

It's not difficult for ME to evaluate other men's attractiveness. It is, however, for most men. Most men suck at it.

What part of that don't you understand?

This is why I do not respect the "study" you linked. I put absolutely no faith in the ability of others to rate other people's looks.

"Is English just not your first language? Because you've alluded to having difficulty understanding a lot of what is being said to you more than once. The first time you tried to imply that we're overcomplicating terms and when that got thrown back in your face you confusingly acted like that was some kind victory for you and now you're drawing a blank on sarcasm."

No, dipshit. "Because eyeballs a general aesthetic sense are such rarities" is not a valid construction. I can't even begin to decipher what it is you were trying to say (assuming it was you who wrote this). It literally looks like you did "Google Translate" on a sentence in another language and came up with a classic unintelligible translation.

"But despite dismissively saying you couldn't make heads or tails of the comment you responded by claiming that unlike the ignorant masses who are apparently too stupid to know what they find personally appealing or a panel of sociologists conducting a study you have a good sense of what's objectively and universally attractive. But like your claim to wit what we've of you so far casts extreme doubt on that. Speaking of your underwhelming sense of humor the fact that the nature of dry wit - if you're even using the description correctly - is based in covertly insulting people or telling jokes that deliberately go over the subjects heads and implies one of two things: That everywhere you went you would laugh at somebody else's expense which when done wrong isn't funny and done frequently makes you a dick or your jokes were directed at the women you were trying to impress meaning you were mocking them to their faces and expected it never to backfire on you. And if your overinflated opinion of yourself is any indication you were far less subtle than you think and refused to notice that your audience clued in on what you thought of them."

~sigh~ No, moron, that is not what "dry wit" means.

Don't tell me...did you...look it up in fucking URBAN DICTIONARY, thinking URBAN DICTIONARY is a real dictionary? Please tell me you didn't, because I might not survive the laughter if you did.

"I think you're trying to downplay how badly you missed the mark about models being gold diggers when their income is already on par with their husbands and in Benchy's case even greater. He's far from the ugliest guy on the list but the stark difference in their incomes makes an absolute mockery of your assumption. But if you want to split hairs I'd say he's an average looking guy. The kind of guy where if I didn't just show you a photo of him with his wife - who makes more than him - you'd assume women give him the cold shoulder. Of course when you see his picture you immediately make up other reasons for him to be in a relationship and you've probably got it in your head that he's a jerk because how your self-serving bias works. Also, not quite as handsome as Elliot Rodger."

No, he's a handsome 52-year-old man. Easily above average. I would say that regardless of what I knew about him.

"The BMW and tendency to draw attention to shallow displays of wealth were something of a hint."

And when did they see him in his BMW? When did he tell them about his BMW?

"When your parents give you a BMW just because you ask them to the distinction is pretty moot, especially if you're of the opinion that women aren't smart enough to know the difference bestiality boy. (As that will undoubtedly go over your head I must condescend to explain the joke. You view women as less than plants and animals, bestiality is the act of sexual intercourse with an unintelligent animal. You're going to counter with semantics, someone else will note that if you want to stick your dick in something without cognitive thought that blow up dolls are cheap and never give you lip, you'll say something insipid and contradictory... well now that's just dragging this out so why don't we skip it?)"

No, they know the difference. That doesn't make them smart.

Your "joke" is an utter failure, by the way. I said women are BELOW animals, not that they literally ARE animals (bestiality is sex with animals). I said I would never insult animals by comparing them to women.


"And now for the last bit. It would have been nice for you to use the {img} tags. (Replace {} with [] to use.) Oh well, I'll have to do it for you."

I have no interest in that. It's not my fault this forum is a piece of shit. It fits you guys perfectly, though.

"So putting aside that you're reducing two people with medical conditions, one of them horrific and potentially fatal, to a stock insult (anorexia is right in the image file name) Trust me, no matter how ugly a person is I've seen uglier people with girlfriends and the bottom two (I can't see the acne guy's face) definitely aren't any uglier than Phillip Jablonski. It would take a lot more than fat lips to tip that scale."

Women want men who look like men. That's the minimum requirement. You can't look like a boy, you can't have acne, and you can't have certain types of builds.

Jablonski was ugly, but he looked like a man.

"Unfortunately their marriage didn't last due in part to Ty's PTSD. According to him the separation was both mutual and amicable. He even managed to date a little afterwards. Tyler Ziegel passed away in 2012. Loved and missed by those he left behind."

The bride sure looks happy in that picture. That's sarcasm, by the way.

It's almost as if they got together when he was physically attractive, and then after what happened to him, she knew she'd appear to others to be a horrible person if she left him...only to later come up with a way to get out of it anyway.



TimRattayGotScrewed (as "YouLoseAgain"), FSTDT comments 12 Comments [2/16/2017 3:30:49 PM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 124569

Incel ranking system

Official Incel ranking system organized from least normie to most normie

-Note: Females cannot be incel, they can be Volcel though.

-TKHHHV: Talkless Kissless Hugless HandHoldless Virgin. This incel has never even talked to a female, nonetheless done anything else with one. This was the least normie type I could find.

-KHHHV: Kissless Hugless HandHoldless Virgin. This incel has talked to females before but, has not kissed, hugged, held hands with, or has had sex with a female.

-KHHV: Kissless HandHoldless Virgin. This incel has talked to females before, and had hugged at least one before but, has not kissed, held hands with, or had sex with a female.

-KHV: Kissless Hugless Virgin. This incel has talked and held hands with a female before but, has not kissed, hugged, or had sex with one.

-KV: Kissless Virgin. This incel has talked, held hands, and hugged a female before but, has not kissed or had sex with one.

-Virgin. This incel has done everything with a female but has not had sex with one.

-Volcel. This isn't an incel, but a voluntary celibate. This person chooses not to have sex when they have opportunities to.

-Prostitute Virgin. This incel has only had sex with a prostitute before and has not had sex with a regular female.

-Normie. Has done everything with a female including has had sex with them. Seen as scum to us incels because sometimes they try and take their anger out on us, unsuccessfully.

-Chad. Fucks multiple women each second, has pumped and dumped every female you've ever known. The epitome of masculinity, everyone should strive to be a Chad but, only the top 20% make it.

If I forgot any ranks, let me know and I'll add it to the list.

TopKekketus, /r/incels 50 Comments [2/16/2017 7:58:40 AM]
Fundie Index: 12
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 124567

[From "Catherine Booth ...A BAD EXAMPLE FOR CHRISTIAN WOMEN TODAY!"]

Biography of Catherine Booth

Comments by David J. Stewart: I've commented the following biography in bold green type

Catherine Booth (1829-1890), the daughter of a coachbuilder, was born in Ashbourne, Derbyshire, in 1829. When she was a child the family moved to Boston, Lincolnshire and later they lived in Brixton, London.

Catherine was a devout Christian and by the age of twelve she had read the Bible eight times. She had a social conscience from an early age. On one occasion she protested to the local policeman that he had been too rough on a drunken man he had arrested and frog-marched to the local lock-up.

Catherine did not enjoy good health. At the age of fourteen she developed spinal curvature and four years later, incipient tuberculosis. It was while she was ill in bed that she began writing articles for magazines warning of the dangers of drinking alcohol. Catherine was a member of the local Band of Hope and a supporter of the national Temperance Society.

In 1852 Catherine met William Booth, a Methodist minister. William had strong views on the role of church ministers believing they should be "loosing the chains of injustice, freeing the captive and oppressed, sharing food and home, clothing the naked, and carrying out family responsibilities."

Catherine shared William's commitment to social reform but disagreed with his views on women.

NOTE: William Booth has no business marrying a woman who didn't believe in wifely Biblical submission.

Catherine was an avowed feminist.

NOTE: This is a shame. For any professed Christian wife to publickly voice her disagreement with her husband is sinful. Feminism is a rotten evil in any society, church, or home. Shame on Catherine Booth!

On one occasion she objected to William describing women as the "weaker sex."

NOTE: Catherine Booth rejected the plain Scriptural teaching that women are the weaker sex. 1st peter 3:7... "Likewise, ye husbands, dwell with them according to knowledge, giving honour unto the wife, as unto the weaker vessel, and as being heirs together of the grace of life; that your prayers be not hindered." Catherine Booth disobeyed God, by rebelling against her husband and the Bible. Catherine Booth is a disgrace to womanhood.

William was also opposed to the idea of women preachers. When Catherine argued with William about this he added that although he would not stop Catherine from preaching he would "not like it." Despite their disagreements about the role of women in the church, the couple married on 16th June 1855, at Stockwell New Chapel.

NOTE: William Booth sinned, by unequally yoking together in marriage with a woman who didn't wholly believe the Bible (2nd Corinthians 6:14-17). The Bible instructs us to SEPARATE from those who walk worldly... "But now I have written unto you not to keep company, if any man that is called a brother be a fornicator, or covetous, or an idolater, or a railer, or a drunkard, or an extortioner; with such an one no not to eat" (1st Corinthians 5:11). This would definitely forbid marrying a feminist!!!

It was not until 1860 that Catherine first started to preach. One day in Gateshead Bethseda Chapel, a strange compulsion seized her and she felt she must rise and speak. Later she recalled how an inner voice taunted her: "You will look like a fool and have nothing to say". Catherine decided that this was the Devil's voice: "That's just the point," she retorted, "I have never yet been willing to be a fool for Christ. Now I will be one."

NOTE: It was the Devil's voice alright, that seized her and compelled her to rise and speak, because the Bible states... "But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence" (1st Timothy 2:12). Catherine Booth, as many rebellious woman today like Melissa Scott, have twisted the Scriptures in an attempt to justify their rebellion. God calls men to preach, NOT women.

Catherine's sermon was so impressive that William changed his mind about women's preachers.

NOTE: This is a bad reflection on William Booth. He compromised his beliefs to appease the wicked.

Catherine soon developed a reputation as an outstanding speaker but many Christians were outraged by the idea.

NOTE: Christians should be outraged by women preachers, because they are ALL false prophets!

As Catherine pointed out at that time it was believed that a woman's place was in the home and "any respectable woman who raised her voice in public risked grave censure."

NOTE: Would to God that this were America today. America's feminism is responsible for massive pornography, child abuse, a skyrocketing divorce rate, 48000000 abortions, legalized prostitution, etc. Feminism is of the Devil.

In 1864 the couple began in London's East End the Christian Mission which later developed into the Salvation Army. Catherine Booth took a leading role in these revival services and could often be seen preaching in the dockland parishes of Rotherhithe and Bermondsey. Though often imprisoned for preaching in the open air, members of the Salvation Army fought on, waging war on poverty and injustice.

The Church of England were at first extremely hostile to the Salvation Army. Lord Shaftesbury, a leading politician and evangelist, described William Booth as the "antichrist". One of the main complaints against William Booth was his "elevation of women to man's status."

NOTE: When God's people commit sin, it gives the sinful world ammunition to legitimately attack us. I receive hundreds of e-mails from people, who point out the hypocrisies of professed Christians today, such as praising George W. Bush as a man of God, when in reality he is a follower of Satan. Catherine Booth was a rebel. Feminism is not about women's rights; but rather, about women rebelling against an authoritative husband, pastor, or God. Feminists resent masculine authority.

In the Salvation Army a woman officer enjoyed equal rights with a man. Although William Booth had initially rejected the idea of women preachers, he had now completely changed his mind and wrote that "the best men in my Army are the women."

NOTE: Women have equal human rights, are of equal worth, and are not inferior to men in any way; BUT, woman do not have a right to usurp authority over men. Feminism DEMANDS equality in the area of authority, and cries "inequality" if they don't get it. This is what Lucifer said in Isaiah 14:14... "I will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will be like the most High." Lucifer just wanted EQUALITY, wanting to be "like" the most high. Feminists claim they are simply asking for equality, to be "like" men in authority. Today, America is infested with women in authoritative power positions, and America is going to Hell because of it. Homosexuality is commonplace, abortion has become completely shameless, pornography is considered normal, divorce is highly encouraged nowadays, etc. Sin! Sin! Sin! Feminism is a Trojan Horse sin, that brings with it a slew of godlessness and woeful evils. Feminism and the Word of God are DIAMETRICALLY opposed to each other!

Catherine began to organize what became known as Food-for-the-Million Shops where the poor could buy hot soup and a three-course dinner for sixpence. On special occasions such as Christmas Day, Catherine Booth would cook over 300 dinners to be distributed to the poor of London.

NOTE: Oprah Winfrey has donated millions to the poor, but is also the biggest propagator of New Age damnable heresy in the world today. Millions of people are going to burn in the fires of Hell one day because of Oprah Winfrey. Oprah has openly denied Jesus Christ (John 14:6). Oprah will be cast into the lake of Fire. Likewise, the Salvation Army does much good today, as far as helping the needy, but what does it profit a man if he gain the whole world, but lose his own soul? What good is it to help the needy, if they are going to burn in Hell when they die because we fail to preach the Gospel to them? The Salvation Army is more army than salvation.

By 1882 a survey of London discovered that on one weeknight, there were almost 17,000 worshipping with the Salvation Army, compared to 11,000 in ordinary churches. Even, Dr. William Thornton, the Archbishop of York, had to accept that the Salvation Army was reaching people that the Church of England had failed to have any impact on.

It was while working with the poor in London that Catherine found out about what was known as "sweated labour". That is, women and children working long hours for low wages in very poor conditions. In the tenements of London, Catherine discovered red-eyed women hemming and stitching for eleven hours a day. These women were only paid 9d. a day, whereas men doing the same work in a factory were receiving over 3s. 6d. Catherine and fellow members of the Salvation Army attempted to shame employers into paying better wages. They also attempted to improve the working conditions of these women.

NOTE: Some of societies biggest phonies, Modernists, and Christ-rejecters are also the biggest social reformers. One such imposter was Martin Luther King Jr.,--a Christ-rejecting, Communist, womanizing, who denied the Virgin Birth and the Deity of Jesus. Catherine Booth was another social reformer, an avowed feminist, and a false prophet (which all women preachers are).

David J. Stewart, Jesus is Savior 25 Comments [2/16/2017 7:58:31 AM]
Fundie Index: 7
Submitted By: JeanP

Quote# 124564

The fake news media is going crazy with their conspiracy theories and blind hatred. @MSNBC & @CNN are unwatchable. @foxandfriends is great!

Donald Trump, Twitter 29 Comments [2/16/2017 7:57:14 AM]
Fundie Index: 8
Submitted By: Chris

Quote# 124563

First let's define what exactly is meant by multiculturalism, because it seems we're not even arguing over the same thing. If you read through my past replies to you carefully, you should notice that I typically prefaced "multiculturalism" with qualifiers like "societal-scaled" or "large-scaled", which only really exist in the most metropolitan cities in the Western world: NYC, LA, Toronto, London, Paris, etc. That is the type of multiculturalism, which is actually what most people interpret the term to mean nowadays, that I am against and attacking. You on the other hand seemed to be implying, intentionally or not, that I was against any form of human movement. That's a complete strawman, and I've made it quite clear explicitly that small-scaled "multiculturalism" is to be encouraged, except that form of interactions between different groups of people is not what's associated with the modern concept of "multiculturalism". In other words, you once again resorted to semantic arguments, just like when you tried to make it sound like I was against technological and economic progress when I first criticized social progressivism.
And I wholly reject your completely unsubstantiated conjecture that multiculturalism is necessary for technological and economic progress. Seriously, how the hell do you even come up with this kind of drivel? Once again, the exchange of ideas between different groups of people is important, but there's absolutely no need for large numbers of different groups to inhabit and encroaching on each other's living spaces in order to achieve that. Exchange of valuable ideas and information are usually done between the intellectual classes of the various groups of people anyway, and they're the ones that disproportionately drive the civilizational progress. There's absolutely no reason to import the average Joes from groups XYZ into one's home nation.


Jethreezy, Reddit 7 Comments [2/16/2017 7:57:09 AM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 124562

Our own government is using our tax money to advocate for the genocide of it's own people. Obviously the Liberals and the redditors here will ask, "But whats wrong with white people going extinct, white is only a skin color?" The problem here is that Africans, Arabs, the Chinese etc. do not share our history and as such they have no incentive to protect, preserve, and teach the history of European 'Western Civilization', as we see here.
Maybe I'm wrong. Maybe when Canada has a population of 100,000,000 and the largest religion in this country is Islam, and the most popular language in Canada is Cantonese we will look back at the people that created this country as us rather than them, but that is a huge risk to take. We've already seen this happen. For example, we have already seen the push for curriculum that reflect the diversity of schools, which means no more white male authors in 2100 for example. Canadian History Class will begin with the advent of multiculturalism in Canada, with other units on 'The Migrant Crisis' and 'Western Imperialism'. The Seven Years war in Canada? No longer relevant in the slightest.
What about the cultural products of Western Civilization? Is the Miserere going to be sung by Muslims? Can anyone find any recordings of the Lux æterna done by an Islamic choir? What about the Pietà; will African immigrants to Canada in 2040 consider it their cultural legacy? These are real worries that are not rooted in 'supremacy'. We have already seen what has happened to the uniquely British elements of our culture in Canada, can someone assure me that our culture as a whole is safe?

Triarious100, Reddit 8 Comments [2/16/2017 7:57:04 AM]
Fundie Index: 6

Quote# 124561

However, I am not entirely convinced that this student’s lack of interest both in the book and in the essay were all that bad in the grand scheme of things. Specifically, the summaries I have since read on this book strongly suggests to me that it is a very clear case of progressive propaganda being forced onto unwitting children. In fact, I was at once reminded of my own experience in high school with similar propaganda. “Speak” by Laurie Halse Anderson. Where as speak was only concerned with feminists conceptions of rape, “The Kite Runner” appears to focus more on Muslims/Afghans (although it also goes into rape as well).

In summaries of the plot, it follows two boys in Kabul who play with kites together. One is of an Islamic sect which is considered lower class than the other. The lower class boy in one scene protects his superior from being beaten up, while in another, later scene the higher class boy does nothing to stop the former from being raped (by a male). Typical prog lionization of lower classes; as well as an awkward insertion of rape. Later the high class boy escapes the soviet invasion and moves to America as a refugee where he experiences guilt at his luck generally (he regularly imagined the hard lives of his friends back home) as well as specifically with respect to this friend he didn’t save from the rape. Finally, he finds out that this friend who he didn’t save from a rape both had died and also had a son during the general turmoil in the country. He goes back and saves this friend’s son and brings him to America as well.

In this story we seem to have both support of cat-lady style saving of refugees as well as touching on rape hysteria. There was probably little mention that there might be a connection between the ethnicity involved and tendency for rape and violence. At least that is how it seems. Without reading the book, I can’t be entirely sure of how much it is in fact propaganda and how much it is just a story (though my own experience with progressive propaganda leads me to a specific guess). I won’t comment further on the content of the story itself. However, the student also showed me his rubric and instructions on what topics were allowed for the essay. All of the designated topics were clearly progressive points of interest (such as “human rights,” which is what this student chose) which leaves no doubt that whatever merits this story has on its own, if any, it is being used in schools to indoctrinate children into progressive positions.

...

Anyway, I focused mainly on non-content related suggestions to improve his essay. However, I also made a point that when he spoke of human rights he did so in a very general sense, yet all of the examples from the story were from a very specific group of people with a very specific religion. After all, we don’t hear about Theravada Buddhists raping and murdering Mahayana Buddhists. To generalize Muslim culture in Afghanistan as if it were a world wide issue for every group of people is inaccurate and absurd. This is as much crimethink as I dared to inject into the situation, but I think the point was taken and will be considered by the student. In my head, I thought facetiously that the human rights issue he should write about is forcing young children in schools across the country to read and write about progressive propaganda; with their essay conclusion being determined in advance of writing. I did not say this however, as I anticipated the comment would not be appreciated by the adults who would no doubt hear about it. If you are a parent, I would suggest keeping an eye out for this story in your child’s curriculum so that you can do any necessary damage control when they are forced to regurgitate prog propaganda as a graded assignment.

Atavisionary, Atavisionary 8 Comments [2/15/2017 10:56:48 PM]
Fundie Index: 11

Quote# 124560

He complains (rightly) that the progs in the entertainment industry use their influence over plot lines to create propaganda for children, when they are least able to critically evaluate it and so soak that crap in like a sponge. I remember once we were talking about education around my teenage nephew and he, at different points, both said “that is sexist” and “that is racist.” Poor guy. This is probably more to do with the school system than cartoons, but same difference (same same, but different?). Keep in mind that I do sort of, maybe try to tone myself down at family events. Apparently dismissing blog posts isn’t the only thing I do halfheartedly. After the third or so statement of this sort, being the cold-hearted, insensitive asshole I am, I responded with “reality is racist” and he suddenly seemed to be deep in thought. I didn’t hear about being racist again. It turns out crazy uncles might have more influence than low-IQ education majors! Who knew?

In any event, I almost never watch TV anymore except stuff I can be very preselective with on the internet for this very reason. Every time I give a show a chance, which is rare anymore, I am invariably disappointed and disgusted by the progressive parasites infesting the story. For example, I like gore and zombies. Who doesn’t? I was told The Walking Dead was a pretty decent show and reluctantly gave it a chance. The first 4 seasons were on netflix so I watched them. For the most part it was pretty good, but they just can’t leave out the prog propaganda. A mindless show revolving around killing zombies can’t just be about killing zombies; it also must be progressive. At least the progs finally did something right though, a post-apocalyptic wasteland seems the appropriate setting and endpoint of progressivism. The third and final straw happened in the last episode in which they introduced some gay dudes and had them make out. Ya, I am not shitting you. The gay dudes make out in the show. I have a very bad feeling that those two are going to stay on as characters for a long time. I am not going to find out, though, because I am done watching it. It isn’t that I have anything against gays, like everything else in human psychology (most importantly intelligence), I am pretty sure it has biological origins and that they are unfortunate misfits born with a bad combination of alleles. Gnon was not kind to them. But understanding that does not mean I want to see them make out (or have civilization cater to them or give them special victim status). Even then, that isn’t even the major problem for me (though it is an important problem). The major problem is the er…hrmm northern aggression of it all. It is the fact that these assholes can’t keep their fucking values to themselves. They HAVE to try to propagandize me and everyone else who don’t want to have anything to do with them or their values; even if we would never bother or hinder them in their personal lives at all if they just left us alone. It isn’t enough that I am (or was) willing to just let them be if they let me be. They HAVE to get in my face about it. Fuck them. Goodbye libertarianism.

...

It isn’t that other people have different values that bothers me, it is that people are trying to forcibly push their values on me and others who may be ambivalent or in strong disagreement. Most important is that the values they push are objectively shit. Ya, maybe I haven’t been a paragon of virtue in the past, but at least when pressed I can objectively evaluate what values are best for civilization as a whole. I don’t pretend like self-interested behavior is anything other than self-interested behavior. If people disagree with a set of values they should be able to disassociate and allow Gnon to be the judge of who is right or wrong. We aren’t being allowed that privilege. This northern aggression can not stand.

EDIT: I just remembered there was another thing that was dumb in the show. There was a group at a hospital being lead by a small framed women. This was just stupid, in such an apocalyptic setting strength and endurance are what matter most and men wouldn’t follow someone who would never be able to keep up with them. Post-institutions affirmative action would not apply and she would have been demoted to a support role she was actually suited to.

Atavisionary, Atavisionary 16 Comments [2/15/2017 10:56:44 PM]
Fundie Index: 10