Quote# 124733

The leftists and globalists are puppets, and we are the puppetmasters.

We act, they react.

We can exploit this and destroy them for good.

Matt Forney, Gab 13 Comments [2/22/2017 12:07:19 AM]
Fundie Index: 5

Quote# 124732

Milo should also hammer on about how the left's promotion of "gay acceptance" has normalized pederasty in Western societies.

Instead of being given the help they need, molested boys are left to adopt the "gay lifestyle," with its life-destroying psychological and health problems.

Matt Forney, Gab 5 Comments [2/22/2017 12:07:15 AM]
Fundie Index: 5

Quote# 124731

If Milo wants to repent as WELL as live up to his moniker as the "Dangerous Faggot," he can reveal the truth about the sodomitic lifestyle as he's experienced it... namely that homosexuality and pedophilia are connected. You cannot legitimize the former without legitimizing the latter.

Matt Forney, Gab 5 Comments [2/22/2017 12:07:08 AM]
Fundie Index: 7

Quote# 124730

The Milo incident has shown how reactive leftists have become in their desperation.

Think about it. In the process of taking him down, they had to ruin their multi-year campaign to normalize pedophilia, and they've also put LGBT rights in jeopardy by revealing what homos are really like.

Matt Forney, Gab 9 Comments [2/22/2017 12:07:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 10

Quote# 124725

[Comments under "The anti communist alliance" having as OP a pic featuring a Hoppean snake wearing Pinochet's cap and sunglasses, Pepe with a Nazi hat and a bird with the same hat as Mussolini]

@123xyz123xyz:
Nazis and fascists are temporarily allowed as commie removal agents. But sadly their helicopters won't have enough fuel for the return trip. I'll miss u pepe.


@EternallyMiffed:
They prefer walk-in ovens.


Nazis are National Socialists so they have to go too bud.

123xyz123xyz, EternallyMiffed and bland8126, Reddit - r/Physical_Removal 9 Comments [2/21/2017 10:43:30 AM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: JeanP

Quote# 124723

When you get to the age of 20 without even having kissed a girl, you are a freak

Normies that tell me otherwise are lying. Read a thread on PPD regarding when it starts to get weird to be a male virgin. Most said 20 or 21.

When you get to my age without kissing a girl, with doing NOTHING with a girl despite wanting to, you are a freak. You are garbage, and no woman will ever want you.

IFA_MTBL, /r/incels 14 Comments [2/21/2017 10:07:49 AM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 124722

Sometimes my intelligence is hindering me from getting females hymen to carefully strap off

I have noticed it, whilst females are laughing about TV, I am thinking of parallel universes and Saddams torture methods, I truly am a man of magnificence. I think I was not meant for this world, I am a star that was destined to shine for a very short amount of time, and leave this earth in an amazing fashion.

I think my intelligence is just too much sometimes and I would gladly trade off 20 points of my IQ just so I could be on the same level as most normies.

SUPHAMSULU, /r/incels 27 Comments [2/21/2017 10:07:42 AM]
Fundie Index: 7
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 124721

My Plan For Incels

I have devised a scheme for incels here that will give you all a happy life. I intend to become rich and save you.

I will round up incels and invite them to come to my private incel compound. It will be monetised and open to visitors to ensure we can live our lives in a luxurious manner. I believe that incels are truly repressed to not know love and I will try and save you all from that.

In the morning we will all meet in a grand hall to discuss and debate whatever we wish, in an organised manner. These debates will be recorded as a piece of history and will be uploaded to the internet. Incels are then given free time to do whatever they wish, I will provide gyms and private grounds to walk, access to the internet and literature, and even a place to talk to normies, chads, stacies, landwhales etc.

Each incel will have their own room. I cannot guarantee how big or luxurious they will be, but I can guarantee that all will be able to sleep in the grand hall if they so wish. Incels will all eat together in comradeship and will be encouraged to be open minded.

Willing females will be allowed in to certain areas where incels can interact if they wish. Those who do not may spend their time building, philosophising or creating art.

At 9pm we will all gather in the hall, and incels will pray to me and ask for better lives. There is no doubt that by publicising inceldom people will take notice and learn to be more inclusive. If not then we will gather enough incels and declare ourselves a new state. You will all slowly but surely become chads, and those with the best genes will be allowed to breed with women who also possess powerful genes. Our eugenics programme will eventually allow incels to function in society, and wipe out this plague that affects you all.

Friend_Of_Incels, /r/incels 24 Comments [2/21/2017 10:07:35 AM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 124717

According to the rich white liberals that run things, racism in America beings and ends with white people from the South. It's racist to question bilingualism. It's racist to expect people living here to know enough English that they don't confuse oral sex terms with cannibalism. It's racist to expect foreigners to assimilate or learn American history and culture, even if those lessons include the American ideals of equality and opportunity for everyone. It's racist even to say America HAS a culture. Rich white liberals love to crow about California becoming a majority minority state, essentially bragging about how great it is that whites are dying off or being displaced. (Their standard refrain: "Are you Native American? Gee your ancestors should've asked permission before coming here. And you do know that California used to belong to Mexico, right?") Oh blacks? They don't exist in the CA narrative. Rich white liberals only talk about "people of color" to blur the distinctions, and keep people from wondering why CA is only 6% black if this is supposed to be the land of milk and honey for minorities. Rich white liberals are OK with these conditions because they live in those very expensive, 90% white communities that you are having trouble getting into.

Kaphawoman, City-Data 23 Comments [2/21/2017 3:29:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 5

Quote# 124715

Info Wars



Because of all the fake news coming from the mainstream media Trump declares war via twitter. Political Cartoon by A.F. Branco ©2017.

More A.F. Branco cartoons at Patriot Update here.

A.F.Branco 2017 Calendar <—- Order Here!

Donations/Tips accepted and appreciated – $1.00 – $5.00 – $10 – $100 – it all helps to fund this website and keep the cartoons coming. – THANK YOU!

A.F. Branco, Comically Incorrect 28 Comments [2/21/2017 2:54:22 AM]
Fundie Index: 8
Submitted By: Chris

Quote# 124714

Suspect says he is Christ, wants to have sex with wife and daughter

POGO, Ala. -- Authorities say 65-year-old Jean Timms of Gun Town, Miss., broke into a Franklin home on Sunday, said he was Jesus Christ, then told the property owner he was there to have sex with his wife and daughter, the TimesDaily newspaper reports.

A mental health evaluation has been ordered for Timms, who is charged with third-degree burglary, attempted indecent exposure and resisting arrest, authorities told the TimesDaily of Florence, Ala. Timms encountered the homeowner in the living room, told him he was Christ, stood there for a few minutes, then claimed to be Elvis Presley and pulled his pants down to this knees, according to reports.

Jean Timms, TimesDaily report 19 Comments [2/21/2017 2:54:09 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Denizen

Quote# 124713

God Wants to Have Sex With You

Ok, What’s the Catch?

I realize that some of you are hesitantly reading this post. You are half-interested and half-scared what may be said. With that in mind let me quickly clarify what I mean.

God gave us marriage to represent His love for His people. (Ephesians 5:31-32). This verse is about the two becoming one flesh. Sex represents the level of intimacy and partnership He is after with us. He wants a relationship with us where we are naked and not ashamed (Genesis 2:25), so He can pour His full love on us.

[snip]

Encounters with God can be very enjoyable, but they are invitations to know God more. The Israelites experienced the deeds of God, but only Moses pressed in to know God’s ways (Psalm 103:7). Saul experienced a touch from God after being anointed king (1 Samuel 10:9-11), but he didn’t develop his relationship and lost his kingdom. Encounters with God are intended to deepen our love. God wants more of us. God wants all of us.

It may still be too uncomfortable for you to think that God wants to have sex with you. However, please know God wants personal encounters with you. Knowledge about God is good. Praying to God is good. Worship is good. But, don’t stop there. Press into the holy of holies. Jesus tore the curtain so we can come before the throne of God with confidence knowing He wants us with Him. May you experience more and more encounters with our loving God even this week. Blessings!

Kevin Shorter , Prayer Coach 20 Comments [2/21/2017 2:53:56 AM]
Fundie Index: 10
Submitted By: Denizen

Quote# 124711

Dempsey Obama was funding ISIS, I know that people who loved Obama were ISIS supporters, like him, that's why Trump won, because America is not evil and stupid like people like you. Hillary with Obama funding ISIS. Others that justify, hatred towards blacks (ignoring the reverse racism) etc... I can just easy tell you, you lost terrorists, now go back to your rabbit holes.?

Antun Šturlic, Youtube 9 Comments [2/21/2017 2:53:34 AM]
Fundie Index: 5

Quote# 124710

Non-human animals have no moral worth. Only humans have rights.

Would that mean that, for example, torturing animals for fun would be morally acceptable?


It's undesirable, but it's morally acceptable.

pizzlybear, reddit 17 Comments [2/21/2017 2:53:26 AM]
Fundie Index: 6

Quote# 124709

Sorry to break this to you, but YOU ARE WHAT YOU ARE and when push comes to shove, you are counted amongst your people whether you like it or not. Just like all the self hating whites will be getting their heads cut off right next to me (a racist) if Blacks or Muslims took over?

Hank J Wimbleton, Youtube 7 Comments [2/21/2017 2:53:15 AM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 124708

Suppose communal living, or something of that nature, becomes popular and is determined to be better than capitalism in a society of free association. Would you mind this? I'm just wondering if acceptance of another system, if it is proven to be better in the free market and in the realm of free association, is an opinion that the others here and in the world share.



It would be consistent with my political system, but inconsistent with my value system. I don't like communal living, just like I don't like drug use or diversity. There are many immoral, undesirable things people can do that are still legal under libertarianism, I'll oppose them all.

I'm curious, what about diversity don't you like?



I value those more genetically similar to me and my cultural traditions in general. There's also the fact diversity increases social tension and conflict.


It's a spectrum, almost everyone prefers homogeneity over diversity at least a little. This is explained by evolution, it makes sense that people would care more when their community is more genetically similar. The empirical evidence backs this up, areas with greater racial diversity exhibit lower social trust, between and within races. Race riots in prisons and schools, the disproportionate Black on White crime, the fact most genocidal/tribal conflicts occurs within the same border, and the balkanization of groups under our democratic system of government suggests diversity is not desirable.

so you dont mind the conflict that occurs when humans interact with other species of animals. you like that kind of diversity, because your side always wins.



Animals are insignificant compared to humans, I don't attribute any moral worth to them. Humans share my genes and general behavior, as well as the fact we are a breeding population. I value the existence of some higher mammals, like Apes and Canines, but they have no place in my ethical system. I care about the lives of other humans, while I don't care if animals suffer at our hands.




pizzlybear, reddit 9 Comments [2/21/2017 2:52:53 AM]
Fundie Index: 8

Quote# 124707

Say you see a car in a parking lot, it is 95 degrees outside, the car is not running and there is a child or an animal inside of it. If you broke into the car to save the life of the animal or child, are you violating the owner's right to his property? Thoughts?


Children are one thing. I'd say it's fine to break into a car to aid one. The parents are acting criminally, your response to their negligence would be justified.

Animals have no rights and are only property. You may not break into someone's property to help them.


Other humans share the bulk of my genes, so there is an evolutionary advantage in not harming others. Survival of our genes is all that matters, everything we do or feel is in service to that prime directive. I'm not concerned with arguments of "sentience," one has rights simply by virtue of being human. Perhaps if some non-human was as advanced as humans we would be forced out of necessity to recognize legal rights, but I cannot recognize the ethical rights of non-humans.

What about those humans who possess inferior or defective genes



They have as much of a responsibility to ensure the survival of their genes. Not sure what you're asking.



What advantage is there in not harming a infertile cripple over not harming a dog? If a person is not intelligent enough to understand the concept of property then surely by your definition an act of aggression against them would not be morally wrong.





If the person is a threat, or acts criminally, then their life's value does diminish. If they are extremely mentally disabled, then they're basically the property of their family.

I don't see what impotency has to do with anything. We are a social species, and as such depend on others aid. Harming innocents hurts social cohesion and others would target us as a threat to overall safety.

so if you saw someone torturing a dog you wouldn't try to stop them?




Probably not. I would certainly speak up, but likely not use force. Of course it's also possible my emotions may outweigh my rational thought and I would use force, but I hope I wouldn't.




pizzlybear, reddit 7 Comments [2/21/2017 2:51:18 AM]
Fundie Index: 8

Quote# 124706

http://thinkprogress.org/lgbt/2012/04/23/469667/california-ex-gay-bill/

A California Senate committee today advanced SB 1172, a bill that would help protect citizens from harmful, ineffective ex-gay therapy. The law does not outright ban all ex-gay therapy, but it does prohibit anyone under the age of 18 from undergoing sexual orientation change efforts. It also requires that any prospective patient sign an informed consent form that includes the following disclaimer:

"Having a lesbian, gay, or bisexual sexual orientation is not a mental disorder. There is no scientific evidence that any types of therapies are effective in changing a person's sexual orientation. Sexual orientation change efforts can be harmful. The risks include, but are not limited to, depression, anxiety, and self-destructive behavior.

Medical and mental health associations that oppose the use of sexual orientation change efforts include the American Medical Association, the American Psychological Association, the American Psychiatric Association, the National Association of Social Workers, the American Counseling Association, the American Academy of Pediatrics, and the American Association for Marriage and Family Therapy." [/qupte]




Against this, if a gay christian teen wants to pursue this, then that's their choice, not the governments. If California is ok with snake oils like healing crystals(as somebody already pointed out), then I see no reason to not allow people to pursue other kinds of snake oils(like pray the gay away).



[quote] but it's not their choice, it's a choice parents are making for them. that's why the law is specifically aimed at legal minors.


Like I said, if gay christian teenagers want to pursue pray-the-gay-away places let them. If the teenager makes the choice, why can't they pursue it


Because ex-gay-therapy does not work.

Because there is no way to prove that it is the teenager's choice and not their parents forcing them to do it.

Because it is inherrently harmful to the teenager's metal health.

If they want it, they can wait until their 18 to undertake it. There's a laundry list of treatments, "Treatments", procedures, and other such things you can't legally do as a teenager



You didn't read my post did you? I said the "therapy" was a snake oil. As for consent, how do I know that a teenager likes the a certain kind of music, or likes a certain kind of fashion and it isn't their parents forcing them? Simple, I ask them if that is what they want. If a kid can operate a machine that can kill multiple(a car), they can choose to go to a pray-the-gay-away place.



I'll be honest and say that I don't know how you would make sure its their choice.



Again, if it can be shown that the teen has chosen to go through with this therapy, they should be allowed to go through with it. If the state is so concerned with people doing things that harm them, why are people allowed to drink alcohol, smoke cigarettes, or each cheese burgers?



Alcohol, cigarettes and cheese burgers are legal. Although in Norway these things are not legal for teens save your "cheese burger". Where did that come from?

Which part of harmful practice are you not getting? I am pretty sure they didn't sit down one day and said! "Lets ban this". There is research behind this and they conclude that this is not healthy practice. Google up on teen gay suicides to get a picture of what it is about. The teenage mind is a fragile thing that should not be messed with by religious nut jobs playing at being Sigmund Freud. They have no business telling kinds they are not normal for being what they are.


So then if this form of "therapy" is harmful, why allow anybody to take it? If it really is to help people, then why only prevent teens from taking it? Which goes back to my point about cigarettes, alcohol and cheese burgers. If the state is just trying to look out for the health of its citizens, then why are the other things I mentioned allowed to be consumed by the general public?



As has been pointed out, alcohol and tobacco are prohibited to minors. Should they not be?


My point was that if the therapy is harmful, then why is allowed when a person becomes a adult? If the state is trying to prevent people from harming themselves, shouldn't they care about adults as much as they do children(both are people and both are citizens)? And if they do try to pass a bill to ban this "therapy" for adults, then why not ban other things that harm adults like alcohol, cigarettes and cheese burgers?

Helmholtz Watson, The Escapist 11 Comments [2/20/2017 6:03:17 PM]
Fundie Index: 2

Quote# 124705


Should homosexuality be considered a criminal offense/act? Also, what's your view on Morality?

Ok Escapist community, this is a two part question, the first on justification for cultural imperialism and the second on the different views of morality.

First issue:
Now I just finished reading an article on Malawi law that bands homosexuals and one particular section of the article made me feel uneasy. It stated that,

"On Tuesday, US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said the US would use foreign aid to encourage countries to decriminalise homosexuality. UK Prime Minister David Cameron expressed a similar view in October, saying that gay rights were a human right."

The article later went on to state that "Homosexual acts are illegal in most African countries, where they are often viewed as un-Christian and un-Islamic" and the President of Malawi, Bingu wa Mutharika, called homosexuality "evil and very bad before the eyes of God".

I don't know how to feel about the whole situation, because while I don't think it should considered a criminal act, I am also uncomfortable with the reactions I see from the Western political leaders, the reason being is that their attempts to manipulate the laws in Malawai on homosexuality come off as a subtle form of cultural imperialism. What I mean is do Western Nations have the right to manipulate the laws of other countries if they go against the social norms of Western culture? Is it wrong for western nations to try to manipulate others so that they agree with the social norms of western culture?

Here a few other articles about other African countries against homosexuality and how the West is responding:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-15558769

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-15992099

Second Issue:
When I read the article on Malawai, it made me think of another question on morality, does Moral Universalism exist, or does Moral Relativism exist? I bring this up because, I don't think homosexuality should be outlawed and that it is wrong to do otherwise, and I think that if I was to believe in Moral Universalism, then I would also feel that it is wrong for those African countries to have such a law. However, if I subscribe to the idea that Moral Relativism exist, then while I might not agree with such laws, I guess I would feel that those laws were just a reflection of the morals of the various African cultures and not automatically "wrong". Tbh, I'm not sure how I would feel about the African laws if I followed the idea of Moral Nihilism.Articles such as these give me the impression that Western leaders believe in the idea of Moral Universalism, but what about you? People of Escapist, do you believe in Moral Universalism, Moral Relativism, or Moral Nihilism?

NOTE: For the poll answers, CI stands for Cultural Imperialism, MU stands for Moral Universalism, MR stands for Moral Relativism, an MN stands for Moral Nihilism.




People in at least one african nation are in danger of being fucking executed for being gay.

I have very little problem with the idea of cultural imperialism for the purposes of preventing the institutionalized murder of thousands.


and /thread at the first post. It probably is morally questionable to deny these countries aid based on their stance on Gay rights. However, on the other hand it is very definitely morally wrong to persecute (or worse) an entire sub-culture of your own society just for being different to you; and when we fund governments, by extension we are funding their beliefs and their actions. So if we are committed to Gay rights we can't associate ourselves with people who actively oppress Homosexuals.



would you feel the same way if the African countries were banning bestiality or pedophilia and the West was denying them aid because of the creation of such laws? Wouldn't people who are attracted to children or animals also be an "entire sub-culture of your own society"? Wouldn't those laws be a form of persecution?



Helmholtz Watson, The Escapist 9 Comments [2/20/2017 6:03:04 PM]
Fundie Index: 9

Quote# 124704

Even if Uganda was a perfectly functioning democracy and even if there was no influence taken by external Christian fundamentalists pushing for such laws and spreading propaganda and whatnot:
Most people in favour of democracy also realize that a democracy can become a tyranny of the majority and that minorities need protections.
Otherwise one could obviously argue that it's perfectly alright for a democracy to... say... enslave a minority if the majority is in favour of it. Or to dispossess a minority of their businesses, homes, to remove their voting rights, put them in prisons or concentration camps etc..
So, no, when a democratic nation comes to the decision to abhorrently violate human rights, we don't respect that. Human rights stand above the will of the majority in most countries' laws and that's a good thing.





..so it's ok for the West to live in the past and try to rule over Africa whenever they do something that Europe or America disagrees with?



Since I mentioned this one and other Western atrocities before: Wouldn't you want the international community to get involved if, say, the Holocaust was repeated? Do you think something like that should be left up to the rulers of Nazi Germany?



Are you really trying to compare what happened to my family to being put into jail because a person is gay? You realize how insulting your comparison is? My family couldn't change their ethnicity but a gay person can decide not to engage in "homosexual behavior"[1]. The two scenarios are NOT the same, my family never had the option to "stop acting Jewish".


Is the idea that, as long as they don't attack foreign countries, it's okay to do that to their citizens? The Holocaust didn't start with the concentration camps. At first, people were disenfranchised, lost their public rights, their businesses, their estates and so on. Then they started getting arrested for trumped up or nebulous reasons. Then they started vanishing. And considering this is the same Ugandan law that had the "kill the gays"-part attached to it in an earlier iteration, I don't think the comparison is far off at all.


If Uganda starts treating gay people like how Germany treated Jews(systematic genocide), then I'll agree with you that there should be foreign intervention. HOWEVER, if they are just jailing gay people, then I would say that I disagree with it but I will not support foreign intervention. My reason is that it doesn't make sense that Uganda should be punished for this, but places like Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Iran[2] are not subject to the same disciplinary action by the West. Now, if that were to change, and the West stopped playing favorites with other countries, I might be willing to support intervention.

Helmholtz Watson, The Escapist 9 Comments [2/20/2017 6:02:40 PM]
Fundie Index: 8

Quote# 124703

I am kind of upset seeing how many dumb men here praising and flattering women with gold and honey. I feel sorry for them. I wouldn't call them dumb since men should have a basic intelligence by born. All these men are very innocent and too naive in character. They think women are angels and love the feeling of getting female attention in return. Pathetic but what can we do, ignorance is not completely curable. I try my best to educate men about how useless women really are but its still a long way to go. What these weak men, white knights or manginas should do is to wake up and see the true color of woman. Women are evil by born, women are selfish, arrogant, narcissistic, dumb, brainless, weak, cold blooded, criminal minded, wolf covered in sheep skin and blood thirsty vampires who has no relevance in our society apart from being a sex machine and baby producing factory. Women have done nothing to our mankind, women invented nothing, women still believe earth is flat. How can these dumb creatures be any significant and earn any any respect from men? Basically women are absolutely useless.

Anonymous coward, Y! answers 14 Comments [2/20/2017 6:02:25 PM]
Fundie Index: 10

Quote# 124702

Social (and the resulting legal) attitudes toward the appropriate age of consent have drifted upwards in modern times. For example,ages from 10 to 13 were typically acceptable in western countries during the mid-19th century so many people globally married at the age of puberty even in North America
This is because early procreation was a necessity for human survival. Lifespan ranged from 20 to 30 years,due to high death rates. Even until the 18th century,8 children were still needed by each fertile wife just to maintain the population.
Also, sexual attraction accompanies puberty, which genetically ranges from ages 7 to 13 in women. So, whether one believes this instinct resulted from evolution, or part of God's plan, procreation after puberty in history is natural and acceptable.

• According to the Journal of Psychology & Human Sexuality, the "age of consent throughout history...usually coincided with the age of puberty" with "the absolute minimum at seven". Both that Journal and Encyclopedia Britannica state that age of consent laws were passed from Roman law to the Church to English Common Law, which states: "between 7 years and puberty there could be consent but not consummation" until puberty, with no parental consent required from the age of 12. This was confirmed in 1877 by the US Supreme Court. Even today, 6 states and the District of Columbia allow this Common Law marriage, and such marriages are then constitutionally recognized in all 50 states.
• Marriage as early as age 7, which was considered the "age of reason", or directly after puberty was the norm for the vast majority of all human society even until the 19th century.

New Horizon, youtube 10 Comments [2/20/2017 6:02:19 PM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 124701

A quick note on what we mean by "ultra-leftist."

An ultra-leftist is someone who clamors for things for which the material conditions don't exist yet. For example, with regards to the Syrian conflict, most MLs support the Syrian government against the "rebels" *even though* the Syrian government is a bourgeois nationalist government. Why? Because in a fight between the national bourgeoisie of a country and the imperialist bourgeoisie, the national bourgeoisie represents the progressive force. This of course does not hold if the conflict is between say the national bourgeoisie and the working class, in which case the workers would represent the progressive force and we'd switch our allegiance.

This is a basic application of dialectical materialism: the fact that what is reactionary in a particular situation can be a progressive force in another situation. Things aren't static and rigid but are continually changing. Capitalism was a progressive force against feudalism but is reactionary against socialism. The French Revolution was a progressive advance against feudalism even though it was a bourgeois revolution. This is the Marxist position.

The ultra-leftist position is: no, full communism in Syria! This ignores the existing material conditions in Syria, misunderstands the strength and position of the proletariat, and jumps to establish the ideal society by ignoring the messy present. This, of course, results from a gross misunderstanding or lack of knowledge of dialectics which make them hold to the position that nationalism or the bourgeoisie are always and always "bad."

This is what an "ultra-leftist" is. It's not someone who's the farthest left on the political spectrum (please) and it's not something to be proud of (at least if they understand the way Marxists use the term against them).

Socalist Musings, Facebook 10 Comments [2/20/2017 6:02:11 PM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Ivurm

Quote# 124695

i am 45 and married to already 15 years now after the sexual desire of my woman has nearly gone i am looking to marry again. And i would like to marry a woman who is 12 years old, her father and she has also agreed, my first wife told me that it could make problems if it will be a big different in age, and also some of my children are older than my second wife. What is your advise ? And is it allowed for me to have already sexual intercourse with these woman after we are married or to i have to wait till she reach at special age ?

Question 6737 from Germany, web.archive.org 19 Comments [2/20/2017 6:01:46 PM]
Fundie Index: 10

Quote# 124692

Masturbation really is demonic https://deliverancefromdemonsinjesusname.wordpress.com/2016/12/01/masturbation-a-demonic-practice-and-one-of-the-biggest-and-most-common-sins-the-church-rarely-addresses-or-condemns/

(About Mack Major, so I think he could believe in what he says.)

jamaalw27, mandawritesthings.wordpress 1 Comments [2/20/2017 6:01:38 PM]
Fundie Index: 6
1 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 19 24 26 | top