Quote# 125168

Does Size Matter?



We’ve heard much talk about crowd size Left vs Rightand that the left’s crowd is larger. Could the reason be work ethic. Political cartoon by A.F. Branco ©2017.

A.F. Branco, Comically Incorrect 20 Comments [3/8/2017 1:41:23 PM]
Fundie Index: 9
Submitted By: Chris

Quote# 125167

Normies Want Us to Get Therapy

Well I tried it against my will recently and it was a joke. This roastie just made me talk about my life while looking bored as hell.

Then she told me to go play MTG at the cardshop and look people in the eye. That was her only advice the whole session.

Therapy, mental illnesses, and medicine are all scams perpetrated by the Jews in the JewPill industry trying to get you hooked to their services by telling you there's something wrong with you!

H77b, /r/incels 26 Comments [3/8/2017 1:41:10 PM]
Fundie Index: 10
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Trifecta!!!

With a side order of word salad

Quote# 125200

COLD WAR RUN BY SEMITIC HALF MAD

Jews at Washington DC and New Mexico said #russian testing nukes in Andromeda to break the nuclear weapons ban tests treaties.

that starts the #coldwar Jews be evil and dumb and live in fantasy land.?



#cyrus , a #persian #arab white skin will work with #hillaryclinton for #2020ad #potus run. This will ensure #donaldtrump a second term, if #Bush or MEAMIC does not #assassinate him like the last #noord , John F Kennedy and Robert #Kennedy . source Miley Twitter, linked at my pages ISil
Red text are my edits, to spit the trufths.
lock up her mother, family and dad's DNA, we need to lock them out of planet earth. only Miley at this time has Special conditions for her second death or the deletion of her #soul #IAM Bookoflife.org #arcmichael ; and you know where you can find me too.

Jews ban #bisexual relations not Jesus, he threw those out. Jews do not accept Jesus and False #Christians aligning to fakehebrews are the problem on planet earth. Source Bible #bookoflife #bookofjudges = banned and throw out the jew laws. and #christianity Jesus says only two laws apply for Christianity, which #Miley failed to follow, at all, both. someone get this to #Miley Cyrus.

#nickiminaj can do anything she wants to Miley Ray Cyrus and I will not punish u in the afterlife. Anything to anyone of her family. She represents vile hatred on this earth.

Her musical ability also suxs

I coded long time ago that #hillaryclinton cannot become a leader of any country on earth.

Arc Michael, Holy Bible Maimonides 26 Comments [3/7/2017 3:23:48 PM]
Fundie Index: 19
Submitted By: Citizen Justin

Quote# 125198

We are committing national and cultural suicide through abortion.

I think of the Stalin-era levels of abortion - 7 or 8 abortions per woman - under the old Soviet Union.

I ask our abortionist each day: "WHO are you aborting today?"

The deathscorts usually reply "Jeffrey Dahlmer" or "sidewalk counselors," thinking they are being clever. But, in fact, this just goes to show that they really do believe in the death penalty for the innocent - for those who have not committed any crime.

WorldGoneCrazyBDeadLongLiveWGC, Live Action News 24 Comments [3/7/2017 3:23:05 PM]
Fundie Index: 11
Submitted By: Jocasta

Quote# 125197

These are a form of self-refutations, like "There is no truth," or "This sentence is not in English." Ironically, religious dogma most often DOES involve "should" statements.

Here are a few of my fave self-refutations - see if you can figure out why:

"It's true for you but not for me."

"No one can know any truth about religion."

"You can’t know anything for sure."

"Only fence-sitters are the truly enlightened ones."

"Only science can give us truth."

"You shouldn’t judge."

"You shouldn’t force your morality on people."

And some funny ones:

"No hablo Espanol." or "Je ne parle pas francais."

I will bet we can come up with some really great self-refuting statements made by pro-aborts, eh, Pere? Or at least terribly hypocritical ones like "The zygote is just a clump of cells!"

WorldGoneCrazyBDeadLongLiveWGC, Live Action News 12 Comments [3/7/2017 3:22:49 PM]
Fundie Index: 7
Submitted By: Jocasta

Quote# 125193



Sorry folks, there is no civil right to engage in any sexual behavior you feel like engaging in. But the liberals/left have been doing this for a long time, claiming that whatever they feel like doing but are prevented from doing by law or decency is a right just so that they can escape from being held accountable to laws and long standing morals of society, from abortion, to the sexual behavior "revolution" of which homosexuality and "transgender" is a subset of. Basically, playing the "rights" card in order to be allowed to do whatever they feel like doing.


RedRaider, Newsbusters 15 Comments [3/7/2017 12:48:34 PM]
Fundie Index: 12

Quote# 125192

One, no one is "gay". Your neighbors are not "gay". There is no such thing as "gay". Just because they like engaging in a deviant behavior does not mean they are equivalent to a new race or gender. All that is is one of many made up words and phrases as marketing terms to sanitize homosexual behavior to make people like you think it's normal when it isn't. You apparently bought it. It's not true.

And yeah, it's mighty telling. It's mighty telling that apparently many Republicans have no principles. Is that what you think is telling? If not, what do you think is telling? What he said is true. Many people who think they are "gay" were molested. But many have just bought the lies that it's normal and think just because it feels good to them, it's right and normal.

RedRaider, Newsbusters 18 Comments [3/7/2017 12:48:25 PM]
Fundie Index: 14

Quote# 125191



They have already had millions of years to develop complex language and intelligent thought. If it hasn't happened by now, it's not going to happen. And can anyone say why evolution stopped, why, at this very time, there is not an ongoing, wide range transient forms apes to humans in all ranges of evolution in existence right now? If it is so natural, wouldn't it reason that many of those transient forms of animals between apes and humans would be in existence now?

But providing that is actually happening, I think that in several million years, if evolutionists are right, and as is often shown on Star Trek, you would think that humans would have evolved to pure energy of thought, or some similar form, and will not be dependent on anything physical such as this planet. Which makes me wonder why evolutionists don't think like that anymore. But, after all, your comment assumes that apes will be evolving and that means humans won't be exactly standing still, stagnant while that happens, but will be evolving also. If not that, what are humans evolving to?


RedRaider, Slacktivist 20 Comments [3/7/2017 12:48:20 PM]
Fundie Index: 8

Quote# 125188

Republican state Senator Rob Schaaf believes that when people die of a drug overdose it “just removes them from the gene pool.” He has led a small group of senators for the last six years against any prescription drug monitoring programs, making Missouri the only state in the country not to monitor.

In one legislative session, Schaaf led filibusters against any proposal to establish a monitoring program and threatened to do so again in other sessions, STAT News reports. Programs vary state by state but all require doctors and pharmacists to enter prescriptions into a database to prevent patients from doctor hopping looking for painkillers. Schaaf is a physician, so it’s unclear if he’s preventing these laws because it might hurt his own bottom line, critics say.

In Oct. 2016, Schaaf explained those databases don’t work and infringe on people’s privacy. “Most people don’t want the government to have that information and have it on a database in which many people can get it,” he said.

A new program that Schaaf is proposing isn’t a typical monitoring program at all, rather it would require doctors to send a list of names of patients they’re considering giving painkillers to the state’s health department. The state would manage a database that would then alert the prescriber to any troubling patterns and the prescriber could decide how to proceed. So, some doctors could continue to charge patients to dole out painkillers regardless of the state’s concerns. No other state operates this way.

The Missouri State Medical Association has come out against the bill, noting that the bill would create a system so different that Missouri couldn’t coordinate with other states. It’s problematic for cities like Kansas City and St. Louis that are close enough to Kansas and Illinois respectively to allow addicts to cross state lines to obtain painkillers.

The National Association of State Controlled Substances Authorities also opposes the bill because it would remove medical decisions about risk from doctors.

“You are charging [the bureau] with making a medical decision and that doesn’t make any sense to me,” Larry Pinson, who serves on the board, told STAT News. “How are they going to know if there is a true medical reason for that patient to need a narcotic?”

Another bill has been proposed by two other Republicans that would form a more traditional program. Schaaf told the St. Louis Post-Dispatch that he will filibuster it.

“I’d just as soon not have a PDMP. Would they rather have a database that protects privacy or no database at all?” Schaaf said.

There were 1,066 overdose deaths in Missouri in 2016. The company that manufactures oxycodone, headquartered in St. Louis, Missouri, has expressed support for the legislation that sets up a more traditional program and not Schaaf’s bill.

Rob Schaaf, Raw Story 14 Comments [3/7/2017 12:46:43 PM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Demon Duck of Doom

Quote# 125186

Well it seems like it is time to give a little lesson here, one l thought someone would have known, but hey if you did then you could not have poked fun at Christianity.
7 in the scriptures represents completeness, it is connected with perfection it is a running theme throughout the scriptures. So how does this apply to this thread, well the natural rainbow has 7 visible colors this is the perfect bow God set in the sky as a covenant to remind us that there would never be another global flood.
Now the number 6 is a representative of incompleteness and associated with Satan, it is a number of unworthyness. Yep, you've guessed it the gay pride flag only has six of the seven colors and I'm sure l do not have to go into detail about what that means for the LGBT movement do l.

GC

Godschild, AtheistForums.org 12 Comments [3/7/2017 12:43:50 PM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: Stimbo

Quote# 125181

The ruling class wants you to believe that without their protection, nothing can stop the hells angels from raping your children. Your comment is free propaganda for them.

The only difference between a government and a hells angel chapter boss is percieved legitimacy of authority.

Dyz, FSTDT 25 Comments [3/7/2017 1:56:52 AM]
Fundie Index: 11
Submitted By: Demon Duck of Doom

Quote# 125180

To look at the bloc of white garbed Democrat women was to look at oracles of Delphi who have mystically discerned the most sacred right of women is the right to sacrifice their own offspring. To look at the high priestesses dedicated to the religion of radical feminism is to see leaders of a cult, the chief sacrament of which is abortion.

For nearly all leftist feminists, abortion is a holy rite, a religious ritual to be conducted in the cathedrals of Planned Parenthood and to be blessed by “faith leaders.”

Fay Voshell, BarbWire 15 Comments [3/7/2017 1:55:37 AM]
Fundie Index: 13
Submitted By: Demon Duck of Doom

Quote# 125161

It’s ok to punch nazis AND white male libertarians who wanna talk about free speech.

Mike Monteiro, Twitter 13 Comments [3/7/2017 1:55:22 AM]
Fundie Index: 6

Quote# 125160

It's no longer the 1970s, it's now 2017. If you wanted to immigrate, you should have done it when there was a severe shortage back in the 1950s, 1960s, 1970s, 1980s, or 1990s. You deserve no protections here ESPECIALLY when OUR H1-B visa you come here on is purposefully used to pay a lower salary and not because you're any more accomplished (9 times out of 10 you're not). Want to prosper? Stay in India. Narendra Modi has an 'India First' mentality, just like Donald Trump has an 'America First' mentality. If an IT professional from India wishes to come, that's fine. But we'll never treat you like you were born here. We'll continue to laugh and point behind your back and we'll ridicule you until you're miserable and you'll want to leave.

Rohan Patel, BuzzFeed 10 Comments [3/7/2017 1:55:13 AM]
Fundie Index: 9

Quote# 125179

@RealDonaldTrump needs to purge Leftists from executive branch before disloyal, illegal & treasonist acts sink us.

Steve King, Twitter 17 Comments [3/7/2017 1:54:37 AM]
Fundie Index: 8
Submitted By: Demon Duck of Doom

Quote# 125176

[Gab doesn't seem to do threading so each segment will have a link given]

An interesting observation: many of the former leaders of the "manosphere" (Roosh etc.) are more right-wing than many alt-righters.

Today, Roosh proposed stripping women of their right to vote. I can't think of a single anime Nazi who would do the same.

[https://gab.ai/mattforney/posts/5860751]

...

Many alt-righters aren't traditionalists. They aren't even that right-wing. Their vision of an ideal white society is Japan: a dying nation full of anesthetized cucks who live only for the most autistic of pleasures.

But hey, Japan doesn't have any blacks or Jews, so they're good! Right?

[https://gab.ai/mattforney/posts/5860799]

...

I guess it would make sense.

The manosphere was formed by men who sought to cultivate masculine virtue: meet women, lift, become financially successful etc.

It fits that they'd end up being better traditionalists than a bunch of adenoidal shut-ins addicted to Japanese cartoons.

[https://gab.ai/mattforney/posts/5860887]

Matt Forney, Gab 13 Comments [3/7/2017 12:39:39 AM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 125174

I’ve had a front-row seat in the culture war for over a decade, but I haven’t made any big policy declarations like other movements. Men’s rights activists their “family law reform” platform. The MGTOW group has “legalize prostitution and invent realistic sex bots.” The alt right has “white ethno-state.” The alt lite has “civic nationalism.” When it comes to policy, I’ve been quiet, solely focusing on fostering truth and masculinity. Only now am I ready to make the commitment to a policy platform which nips the essential problem in the bud in a way that other movements do not. We must repeal women’s suffrage, starting with the 19th Amendment in the United States. Once this is accomplished, no other planned or conscious action must be taken to solve nearly all our societal ills.

...

Today’s problems are all branches of a radical leftist root that has been normalized through feminism, social justice, and socialism. Allowing women to vote has made it effortless to elect leftist politicians who hate the family unit, men, and healthy market competition, while simultaneously weakening society by pushing women into work and giving them generous welfare in the form of handouts to single moms and the able-bodied along with make-work jobs for females in bloated government bureaucracies.

Thanks to leftism, we have seen the rise of a techno-matriarchy with an agenda of male disempowerment and persecution that transfers resources and soft power from men to women while solidifying hard power among elite globalists who control it all to uphold their own high-level aims. Individual globalists work together as an oligarchy to enact a divide-and-conquer strategy among races and sexes to fund leftist causes, politicians, and NGOs. The group with the most money to influence “democratic” politics and public opinion implants their useful idiots and political puppets to maintain control.

These puppets, whether on the “right” or “left,” have a true center on the left end of the spectrum for the sheer reason that votes from women must be gained. The manosphere cannon has shown that women have special mental faculties that operate almost exclusively on emotion, submission, and social conflict more than logic, dominance, and merit. Western countries have transformed into a national representation of the female psyche.

...

To appease female voters and their destructive nature of promiscuity and drama, a symptom of which is collectively propelling a book about a woman being brutally dominated by a man (50 Shades Of Grey) to one of the best selling books of all time, society has veered so far to the left that it is crumbling at its base through declining birth rates and collapse of the family unit. Because we have given women suffrage, it has become necessary to gain their votes by promising whatever they want in the moment, including the removal of all gates to the sexual market so they can engage in the great game of “alpha male hunting,” which has led to such unbridled chaos and sterility that we have to import third-world people as these empowered female voters abort nearly 60 million American babies. The demographic crisis the West faces today is primarily due to allowing women to do as they please instead of imposing healthy standards on their behavior and choices. The direct cause of this horror movie is giving women the vote.

I haven’t even touched the surface of the problems we have today that stem from having to appeal to the female vote: lowering of academic standards in universities to allow them to “excel,” promotion of degeneracy in media, invention of apps and technology to allow frictionless casual sex with bad boys, promotion of sex change operations among children, re-defining fat women as “beautiful at any size,” legalization of gay marriage, use of murder (abortion) as birth control, maligning normal masculinity as “toxic masculinity,” and elevation of damaging myths such as “rape culture” and the “wage gap” to foment gender fear and confusion. The culture has degraded because women have been at the forefront of degrading it. Their true nature, once unimpaired by societal limits, embarks on an tragic mission of destruction to recreate reality in a way to make them appear more attractive to high status men, no matter the consequence.

The problems I mentioned above would take thousands of local and Federal laws to address individually, and it would meet intense opposition from globalists who would fund the sort of antifascist protests and Deep State interference that we have seen thwarting Donald Trump. And even if those thousands of laws are passed, there is no guarantee that a renewed leftward push, thanks to ongoing demographic changes, wouldn’t roll them back. Is there a way to solve the problems while being assured that they couldn’t be repealed over the course of several generations? I’ve thought about this dilemma for years, after scratching the surface with previous thought experiments, and can only come to one conclusion: the problems in society can only be solved, and remain solved beyond one generation, by repealing women’s suffrage.

...

Take away the power of women to vote, and the degradation stops. The paltry population of male feminists, who are likely suffering from low testosterone due to environmental plastics, would offer no barrier in stopping the return to patriarchal normalcy. Women, helpless at enacting political change, would just whine and nag endlessly, and when they tire themselves out, they’d complete their protest by buying dildos or cats. Consider that no Democratic candidate for President since Jimmy Carter would have likely won if women were not allowed to vote. Upon repeal of women’s suffrage, a new party to the right of Republicans would be created as conservative men seek true conservatism and tradition.

Remove a woman’s right to vote and within just one national election, every single leftist party would be crushed. Within two elections, politicians would speak directly to men and their innate interest for patriarchy, economic success, stable families, and an equitable distribution of females among society. More than half of the candidates running for office would already be more conservative than Donald Trump, who is still liberal on social issues like equality and gay marriage.

Within three elections, the entirely of the liberal platform of the past 50 years would be rolled back, and the only living audience a woman can gain for her political opinions is from her feline friends. Within four elections, the global elite would be forced to retrench while sitting on billions of capital with no direct path of influence except sponsoring color revolutions and coups that can be defeated in the name of patriotic national defense. By then, the power of NGOs, media outlets, and day care universities will have declined. Within five elections, cultural standards would have tamed the sexual marketplace, and birth rates would rise once more as both women and men see the incentive in spending their free time building families instead of endlessly trying to secure a sex partner for the fleeting moment.

Repealing women’s suffrage would also diminish other dissident movements whose solutions can only bring temporary success as long as women have the right to vote. Men will automatically push laws that account for men’s rights. They will automatically regulate the sexual marketplace to make it more fair, diminishing MGTOW. They will automatically regulate immigration and replace it with a policy of natalism, diminishing the alt right. And they will automatically have high standards for citizenship, diminishing the alt lite.

Even the concept of masculinity will be built into the crust of society where only men have a political voice and not women. My game guides would no longer be needed, allowing me to buy land and operate a real farm instead of a content farm where most of my life has been spent pushing back the harmful effects that were unleashed after allowing women to vote. There will be no need for counter-cultural movements of men when those in charge of national politics only need to cater to male votes. If women’s suffrage is repealed, the most reviled dissident today would even be able to easily attain political office.

...

It should be clear to you that women will always use their votes to destroy themselves and their nations, to invite invaders with open legs, to persecute their own men, and to ravage their economies with socialism. Because they don’t operate on logic like men do, you will always have this destructive element within the political ranks of your nation as long as women have the right to vote. Giving them this right was a terrible mistake. I can now claim to have one political dream, and that is to repeal women’s suffrage. I will vote only for politicians who put me closer to realizing this necessary reality. Within my lifetime, I’m certain that at least one country, in an attempt to save itself, will elevate a barbarous and ferocious strongman to fulfill this task, and he will have my full support, because repealing women’s suffrage is the only issue of our day that can single-handedly solve all the others.

Roosh, Roosh V 31 Comments [3/7/2017 12:37:54 AM]
Fundie Index: 13

Quote# 125173

Water, Water, Everywhere! BUT Nary a single sign of life about :-( !
So frustrating for big bang materialists that the expected spontaneous rising of life from the ground/pond scum via random chemical and physical processes all by itself does not seem to be observable anywhere.

Earth overflows with life but the rest of the solar system[and by silly extrapolation, the galaxy] is as barren as can be. How totally frustrating that must be.

FredJose, Phys.org 15 Comments [3/7/2017 12:37:39 AM]
Fundie Index: 7

Quote# 125172

As the gravitational models fail to reflect reality, unseen "dark" oceans are invented. The dark ages of astronomy continue...

cantdrive85, Phys.org 11 Comments [3/7/2017 12:37:35 AM]
Fundie Index: 7

Quote# 125159

“Every critic, every detractor, will have to bow down to President Trump. It’s everyone who’s ever doubted Donald, who ever disagreed, who ever challenged him. It is the ultimate revenge to become the most powerful man in the universe.”

Omarosa Manigault, The Huffington Post 67 Comments [3/6/2017 9:02:39 PM]
Fundie Index: 8
Submitted By: Denizen

Quote# 125157

Women often go for the most dominant male, especially when female sexuality is unrestrained. It's not a coincidence that so many women are attracted to Black guys and Muslims. If unrestrained, women will literally go to another tribe, fuck their men, and have their children, if that tribe has higher status or if those men are more dominant (signaling superior genetic material). This is why it's imperative for any culture to restrain their women's sexuality; women have less in-group loyalty because when the men from another tribe come through and murder the men, the women are kept alive for mating.

Rameses2, Reddit 13 Comments [3/6/2017 9:01:58 PM]
Fundie Index: 10

Quote# 125170

[OP of "Announcement : Pussy Pass Expansion"]

Fellow users of /r/PussyPass,

The introduction of this new project started out with a sore leg, and for this we apologize. As you all know, the entire world is going through a strange shift in balance; there are many forces of power acting upon our reality at any given time. At the end of the day the only thing a free being can hope for is a place to speak one’s mind, in accordance with rational thought.

Pussy Pass has always centered around the blatant double standards between the sexes, and rest assured this content is still welcome. With this expansion, we hope to not only broaden the type of content that points out these misgivings, we wish to also narrow down exactly where these problems arise. There is a systemic effort across the top levels of government around the world to undermine the basic nature of humanity. There is an agenda to dehumanize and decentralize the Family Unit.

Users of Pussy Pass have always leaned towards a certain rationality : realism. We have noticed the uprising of anti-male rhetoric, and we realize the harm it is doing. Traditional, realistic viewpoints are being overridden in favor of an egalitarian ideology that attempts in one generation to completely wipe out and replace tens of thousands of years of genetic memory. The most obvious of these attacks is the sudden disregard for Sex Realism.

While I will not be focusing on gender politics in this post, I will be calling attention to a bit of basic biology. Men and Women are fundamentally different, both sexually and mentally. We serve different biological functions. This is being ignored today. We have been put into a system that seeks to ignore our sexual hierarchy, trying ever so hard to make a square peg fit into a round hole. Feminism would have us believe that Men and Women are exactly alike, that we are capable of the same physical feats, that we should not be bogged down with traditional views. Moreover, feminism would teach that Men are the dogs of war, the senseless mutts who rape and pillage without mercy. Men are the misogynists, the oppressors, the evildoers. Men are the racists, the pedophiles, the murderers, the scoundrels. Men are the problem, the ones to get rid of. This is the way mainstream thought would have us believe. We would be castrated if they had their way. It is assumed that most of the subscribers to Pussy Pass are males, and for the women who are here we applaud you, for the only way you would have been here in the first place is if you had seen the truth yourself. Something is not right in the way we conduct our day to day interactions.

We at Pussy Pass have always known these notions to be false, and we have pointed them out. The Family Unit is a key part to a functioning, harmonious society. Numerous studies have shown the effects of good and bad parenting, the needs of children as they develop through emotional maturity. There is a basic biological algorithm for raising successful humans in this world : The Father, The Mother, and the obedient Children. This institution is under siege. There is a disruption in our society.

Disruption in society, what does that mean? Let us first examine what a society is, what it is comprised of. Traditional European Culture is rooted in mythology, not just the metaphors of old gods but the actual essence of their symbolism. There is a pattern that our people have adhered to for millennia, embedded in our subconscious. We are not created equal, there are differences inherent in us all. There is a natural hierarchy that has been established. We must take this conversation to the base level, the genetic level. Speaking biologically, Males and Females are different. This is obvious but overlooked. Too often are we bombarded by the notions that there is gender equality when we all know that this is a blatant ignorance of the truth. There is a completely different chemical makeup between the two, and this is natural.

Men have historically been known to be the warriors. Women have historically been known to be the nurturers. These roles are spurred by the chemicals Testosterone and Estrogen, respectively. There is a biological need to fulfill the functions we were born to do, and if we do not fulfill them then a complex is developed inside the psychology. Our bodies are telling us to do one thing while modern society is telling us to do something else. This is the source of the disruption.

Current thought places guilt on a Man for being masculine, instills rebellious spirits in Women, and casts the Children out to the wolves to have their consciousness be flooded with counter-intuitive propaganda. There is a growing trend to destroy the sanctity of marriage between a Man and a Woman, to teach that it is honorable for a Woman to abandon her natural role as Mother, and that it is acceptable for a Father to not tend to his household. If left unchecked this type of thinking will soon have us living in a disconnected reality, where Daddy is always gone, Mommy is always unhappy, and the Children are force fed bullshit by the State and the Mainstream Media.

Another topic of rational thought being suppressed is that of Race Realism. There is a distinction between people of all races. Simply by sight alone can one identify the separation in the races. This is the first step, to see a difference. The second step is to take into consideration the average known tendencies of the races. We all behave differently and in accordance to the race we stem from. Immediately one is branded a “racist, bigoted coward” if this topic is approached. This is ignorance, and a knee-jerk reaction by people too afraid or too dumb to see the truth. Racial Hatred has no place in a functioning society, indeed I find the hatred of anything to be especially demanding and difficult to procure. Racial Realism, on the other hand, is merely the scientific observation of all the peoples of the world. Why is it so wrong to point out empirical data? Each race has its own traditional culture, IQ Bell Curves, likes and dislikes, strengths and weaknesses. We here at Pussy Pass are not the racist bigots that others would think us to be. We only advocate for the truth, there is no assumption of supremacy. No one race is held in higher regard to others. We are all still human, we just act differently from each other. It is not racist to acknowledge this.

While this sub has mainly focused on one aspect of the problems I have listed, the new expansion project being carried out seeks to pinpoint the underlying mechanisms being used to illicit these problems. As stated before, all original PP content is still welcome. We know many users here have become outraged at this transition, and we sincerely apologize for the lack of communication. It is our hope to continue serving the reddit community, and we wish to actively engage each one of you in heartfelt, in-depth conversation about these issues. We invite you to stay and see where this project leads to, and even to contribute.

Thank You, /r/PussyPass mod team

FashyDash and r/PussyPass mod team, Reddit - r/PussyPass 23 Comments [3/6/2017 11:21:47 AM]
Fundie Index: 12
Submitted By: JeanP

Quote# 125169

Tucker Carlson Takes On Bill Nye On Climate Change – ‘You Don’t Know!’

The climate was definitely frosty Monday night as Bill Nye joined Fox News host Tucker Carlson for a heated discussion on the effects of human activity on the earth’s climate.

Tucker vs. Bill Nye the Science Guy

“The core question from what I can tell is why the change?” Carlson asked. “Is it part of the endless cycle of climate change or is human activity causing it? That seems to be the debate to me, and it seems an open question, not a settled question to what degree human activity is causing that.”

“It’s not an open question,” Nye replied. “It’s a settled question. Human activity is causing climate change.”

Nye threw a jab at Carlson and by extension others who are not believers that human activity drives climate change.

“Climate change denial is denial,” said Nye. “The evidence for climate change is overwhelming, so we’re looking for an explanation for why you guys are having so much trouble with it.”

“I think most people are open to the idea of climate change,” Carlson replied. “The core question, from what I can determine, is why the change?”

The two men disagreed on everything from what Nye said to the words he used in saying it.

“You’re using the language of politics, look you’re not a scientist as you know. You’re a popularizer and that’s fine,” said Carlson at one point.

“I’m using the language of economics,” Nye replied.

“I’m just saying to the extent that you prevent people from having an honest conversation you’re doing a grave disservice to science, don’t you think that?” Carlson asked.

Carlson tried to get Nye to admit that climate change theories are not settled fact.

“Would you like me to read your quote that people who disagree with you ought to potentially go to jail?” Carlson said at one point. “You said that, and I’m just saying actual skepticism baked into science. Should we be encouraging people to ask honest questions which I am doing, and you don’t seem to have the answers to those questions.”

“I gotta disagree with you,” Nye said, “I claim that I do have the answers.”

“You asked how long it would be before — what the climate would be if humans weren’t involved right now, is that right?” Nye later said.

“Yeah, yes, that’s exactly right. At what point would it have changed and I’m just saying you don’t actually know because it’s unknowable so why aren’t you open to questions?” Carlson said.

“So this is how long it takes you to interrupt me, OK? So it takes you quite a bit less than six seconds,” Nye shot back.

Nye then lectured Carlson that the climate of the Earth would be as it was in 1750 if it were not for human activity.

“So much of this you don’t know, you pretend that you know, but you don’t know, and you bully people who ask you questions,” Carlson added. “I’m open-minded, you are not.”

“Carry on, Mr. Carlson,” Nye said at the end of the interview. “I’m sure we will cross paths again.”

Tucker Carlson, Western Journalism 17 Comments [3/6/2017 11:21:17 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Chris

Quote# 125166

There's no such thing as a "good government".

"Good government" is the same as a "good christian" - you can't see the evil because there are some cute old grannies like Sweden or Canada.

Danilo Coronado Bernardes, Facebook 20 Comments [3/6/2017 3:20:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 7
Submitted By: Demon Duck of Doom

Quote# 125164

[On if a one world government is good]

No. Government sized in its current state is too large. For example, the divide between the trump supporters and the trump haters- what I mean is the trump haters want this to essentially be the "United States of California and New York" rather than "the United States of America"
What I mean is the bulk of their liberal populations are typically in those two states that have insanely large populations, and they refute the election because the law states popular vote doesn't matter at all with regards to the election, whereas the electoral college is everything and makes sense since it already accounts for population densities, it simply gives people in rural areas a larger voice than if it was strictly popular vote.

Tyler Wiese, Facebook 21 Comments [3/6/2017 3:19:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Demon Duck of Doom