1 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 16 21 25 | bottom
Quote# 130914

A few highlights from the website Honestfact.com, the website of a black Trump supporter and former Yahweh ben Yahweh cult member Michael Symonette

"The Real K K K Slave Masters Revealed, 2Thess.2:1-11 & they are CHEROKEE Indians (Hidden Babylonians). The reason GOD? YAHWEH chose TRUMP to be President is to be the White & Black Man's DELIVERER from the Babylon, like the Gentile King CYRUS, Isa.45:1-6!"

"ISIS & HILLARY RACE WAR PLOT TO KILL ALL BLACK & WHITE WOMAN OF AMERICA WITH MS-13 REV. 12:1-10.
Cherokee Democrats & Cherokee Republicans Like Flake & McCain Block Trump 2Thess.2:1-5 says must be revealed and voted out of the way. Make Cherokees & the Indians Pay Taxes & Save America economically because Deut. 21:17-19 says if you harm someone you help them get back on their feet. Now their back on their feet make them pay taxes."

"Republican Senators blocking Trump are Cherokees & Mormons & are infiltraters in the Rep. Senate like McCain to block Trump & Muller are coming down with Great Wrath because their wicked time to block good policy is short, Rev.12:10 & Dan.8:25!

Proof that tho ur mixed with these Racist Cherokees ur not them because ur Taxed & Regulated etc. & they're not, they hate black & white people perpetually Eze.35:5 & Gen.36:1-5!"

"Gentiles & Blacks were in America 1st. before Cherokees & we don't owe them Reparations & even if so u only here help them until back on their feet Deut.21:17-18 & Rev.1lania Trump. Slavs hate Slovians!"

"Slavs are Canaanites & are not Slavic/Slovenian Gentiles like our wonderful 1st lady Malania Trump. Slavs hate Slovians!"

"Republican Senators who're against Trump's HealthCare Policy & all of his Policies are Mormon Cherokee's. They are the Racist that believe White Gentiles & Black Republicans are Idiots & are not worthy to Rule"

"Black & White Americans are the Real HEBREWS, (Hos.4:6), Owned America & were in the Americas before THE CHEROKEE INDIANS!CHEROKEES took the Americas by Violence but now Claim Reparations from our Taxes for America they took from Us."

"Well Cherokees are healed for long enough now & must now pay TAXES & not get special Rights over us. This will HEAL America's Debt & all problems. Cherokees are DRUNK with the Blood (Tax Dollars) of the White & Black Man. No Conquering people ever paid Taxes to a People they Conquered while somehow we're paying Taxes to them. Keeping us so Poor & Regulated we Abort our Kids (fearing Child Support) while giving Cherokees $20,000 a month for Life per Child WOW! TRUMP stop unfair Business Competition"

Michael the Black Man, Honest Fact 16 Comments [8/24/2017 6:13:51 AM]
Fundie Index: 9
Submitted By: skybison

Quote# 130912

Should @CNN be declared a terrorist organization?

(Hint: They should)

Michael Flynn Jr, Twitter 9 Comments [8/24/2017 6:13:35 AM]
Fundie Index: 7
Submitted By: Daspletosaurus

Quote# 130911


The real answer to this question, of course is the work of conviction and renewal by the Holy Spirit in their heart.

But what do hardened atheists say when asked this question?

This is what atheist Peter Boghossian writes in his book A Manual for Creating Atheists:

“…if I walked outside at night and all of the stars were organized to read, “I am God communicating with you, believe in Me!” and every human being worldwide witnessed this in their native language, this would be suggestive (but far from conclusive as it’s a perception and could be a delusion).”

On Real Time with Bill Maher, Maher has a humorous response to what it would take for him to believe:

“Jesus Christ coming down from the sky during the halftime show at the Super Bowl and turning nachos into bread and fish.”

Silly atheists…

Delight in Truth would argue that some of these atheists would reject Jesus even if He came down during the Super Bowl and performed a physical miracle. Follow the conversations Jesus has with His opponents in John 6 and John 8. Despite the miracles He was doing in their midst, they still did not believe in Him. In fact, they wanted to kill Him. In the same way we have hardened people today who hate God (even though they claim he does not exists).

Clearly pharaoh did not believe in God despite the exceptional miracles performed through Moses… and in our case, Maher would have us think that he would believe in Jesus if he saw nachos turn into bread… This is an abominable proposition in the very least.

Why do atheistic activists fight with such fervor against the concept of a monotheistic God, especially the God of the Bible? When was the last time you saw an anti-theist mock an eastern religion? They focus on Christianity and Jesus because that is where the truth is, and the truth bothers them. They have no problem with Buddhism and other polytheistic religions, but they go after the Judeo-Christian beliefs.

Why?

Because they love sin.

God’s moral standard is perfect and they reject it in favor of their own system of so-called morality. They do this in order to numb their God-given conscience and continue to sin.

The next time an atheist or anti-theist challenges you, ask him why he fights so hard against a God whom he claims does not exist…

Delight in Truth, Delight in Truth 27 Comments [8/24/2017 6:13:28 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Christopher

Quote# 130910

[=The all caps words are from the poster=]

image
Delight in Truth follower Mr. Propeller-head (here) brings to our attention how badly the Word of God is twisted by the progressives who try to find biblical support for gay marriage.

In an article on Patheos (here), a large forum on faith discussion, the Rev. Eric Smith out of Vanderbilt Divinity School, an ordained minister serving in the church and a PhD candidate in Biblical Interpretation wrote an article in support of gay marriage.

I will paste here his first point to show how pathetic the argument is:

“There is no normative Biblical marriage. The Bible contains marriages between one man and one woman. But it also contains lots of other kinds of marriages—between soldiers and captives, a woman and her dead husband’s brother (seriously), between rape victims and their rapists, and, of course polygamy. In fact, if there is one major Biblical normative type of marriage, it is polygamy. Because of this, any claims that God’s plan is for marriage to be between one man and one woman will run into serious problems—namely, that it is not supported by the Biblical evidence.”

This is a PhD in Biblical Interpretation!

Here are a few of the comments:

“…the bible says that with God *ALL* things are possible…so if *ALL* things are possible, why is it wrong for two people to love each other and want to be in a monogamous, committed relationship…even if they’re the same sex? Surely not EVERYONE was meant to populate the earth…otherwise, we’d be so overcrowded that we’d have all been done in long ago with not enough resources to support us all.”

“…like Eric says, “the Bible needs interpreting.” The moral-ceremonial distinction is an interpretive lens through which you read Scripture; it does not come from Scripture itself.”

“One of the best articles I’ve seen written yet. Thank you!”

You are not alone if you feel a holy anger under the category “be angry and do not sin” when you read such scriptural deformity.

The progressives will have us believe that God didn’t really mean what He said when He said that “man leaves his father and mother and is united to his wife, and they become one flesh.” Gen 2:24

Do you remember who was the first to say “did God really say…?” Today the Rev. Smith is telling us “did God really mean…” for marriage to be only between a man an a woman?

Eerie in likeness to Satan’s approach.

The PROGRESSIVES OF HIS DAY also challenged Jesus to allow them to break up the family unit in Matthew 19 and Jesus clearly tells them that God did not intend for that to happen, because in the beginning it was not so.

Be shocked how today’s so-called Christian progressives are reinterpreting Scriptures toward their own destruction.

2 Peter 2:1 “But false prophets also arose among the people, just as there will be false teachers among you, who will secretly bring in destructive heresies, even denying the Master who bought them, bringing upon themselves swift destruction. 2 And many will follow their sensuality, and because of them the way of truth will be blasphemed.”

Delight In Truth, Delight In Truth 12 Comments [8/24/2017 6:13:23 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Christopher

Quote# 130907

Too many Americans have died in order that Afghan girls can be taught how to put a condom on a banana.

Trump has reversed course on Afghanistan. Perhaps he needed to do that to keep the officers on side, but this war needs to be won or lost. Keeping it going forever is costing far too much blood and treasure.

How do you win an Afghan war?

It is not hard: You need a genuinely Islamic strong monarch who can accomplish the difficult job of keeping order, and let him know that if trouble comes out of Afghanistan and reaches you, he is going to die.

The problem with our existing war is that it is a holy war, fought to emancipate women in Afghanistan, and to destroy conservative Islam, not to create order under the control of someone who can be held responsible for any trouble coming out of Afghanistan. If you are going to fight a holy war against a live religion, need to kill huge numbers of people and level their cities, which we are reluctant to do – although if they were white Christians, I am sure there would be no hesitation.

If we are reluctant to slaughter and burn on the require scale, then we need to let Afghans be Afghans. It is time to shut down those prog schools in Afghanistan.

Too many Americans have died in order that Afghan girls can be taught how to put a condom on a banana.

We forbid our soldiers to piss one hundred yards upwind of Koran, we forbid them to carry bibles, while we attempt to destroy the values taught in that Koran.

I would totally support holy war against the Afghans, fought with the methods necessary to win a holy war. I am not so keen on unholy war. We are fighting to destroy what is right with Islam, rather than what is wrong, fighting to corrupt Islam as Christianity was corrupted, and the Taliban rightly sees this as wickedness.

Jim, Jim's Blog 14 Comments [8/24/2017 6:08:27 AM]
Fundie Index: 11

Quote# 130904

Christian cult leaders arrested in raid on sex crime charges, death of child
Published: Wednesday, August 23rd 2017, 11:35 am EDT
Updated: Wednesday, August 23rd 2017, 11:40 am EDT

SACRAMENTO, CA (KCRA/KOAT/CNN) - Four members of a religious sect in New Mexico are now in jail. Two of them are accused of sexual abuse involving minors.

The others are charged in connection with the death of a child. The group is called "Aggressive Christianity Missions Training Corps."

It's a religious sect that was founded in Sacramento in the early 1980s. They left the state, after losing a lawsuit to a former member who says the group forced her to give up three of her children.

That woman, Maura Schmierer, spoke Tuesday about the charges facing the four sect members.

"At that time, I didn't think it was a cult," Schmierer said. "No. Nobody in there thinks of themselves as being in a cult."

She and her husband were the third and fourth members, but it eventually grew to about 30, living in an isolated compound.

"They would want us to beat the children," Schmierer said. "They wanted me to whip my young child, who was under 2 years old with a belt, because he didn't use the toilet."

Schmierer defied that.

"They changed my name to Forsaken, and they put me out in a shed in the backyard," she said.

That's when she got out and worked to regain custody of her four kids. Schmierer talked with KCRA 3 News then, in the late '80s, saying, "I was afraid. I was under their influence. I believed that if I left I would lose out on eternal salvation."

The remaining Aggressive Christianity Missions Training Corps members moved in 1989, eventually settling in New Mexico. Four members were arrested Sunday during a raid.

Member Stacey Miller in now in jail. Court documents show her son died after she refused to get him medical treatment in 2014.

The group's co-founder, Deborah Green, faces charges that include sexual penetration of a minor. Her son-in-law, Peter Green, face more than 100 charges of that same crime, and Joshua Green, Deborah Green's son, failure to report a birth.

After leaving the group in the '80s, a court awarded Schmierer more than $1 million - money she's yet to see. Now, more than 30 years after she got out, Schmierer still shutters watching Deborah Green.

"The same feelings come up," she said. "I get a knot in my stomach."

She hopes these arrests are the end of the religious sect.

"It's time that their ministry is shut down," she said.

In a statement, Aggressive Christianity Missions Training Corps calls the charges "totally false."

Aggressive Christianity Missions Training Corps, WIS 14 Comments [8/23/2017 1:34:09 PM]
Fundie Index: 10
Submitted By: Thanos6

Quote# 130901

A Muslim drives a van into a crowd killing and injuring many. Police shoot 5 Muslims wearing (false?) bomb-vests, they also drove into a crowd. If these bombvests were real they intended to walk into crowded bars and cafes and the death toll would have been in the hundreds.

In American the media is concentrating on Charlotteviille and slandering Trump. In Europe the politicians are saying that we have to learn to live with the terror.

There is only one way to stop the terror and that is to deport every single Muslim, innocent or guilty, because every Muslim is a potential terrorist.

The Left just refuse to understand and those that rule us are feeble-minded cowards.

ISLAM IS AT WAR WITH US!

And every Muslim is loyal to Islam before any other consideration. They are by association all guilty.

In WWII every German was the enemy, not just fully paid up members of the Nazi Party. Every Muslim is a fully paid up member of Islam.

Philip Smeeton, Facebook 12 Comments [8/23/2017 12:17:28 PM]
Fundie Index: 8
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 130900

Yes, men in modern culture are just as bad as women. All members of modern culture are evil.

fschmidt, /r/IncelReddit 26 Comments [8/23/2017 12:16:34 PM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 130899

Once while still alive, I had an NDE, and it was not like anything anyone has ever described. For me it was pure bliss, a total body orgasmic sensation that was greater than anything you could imagine. I saw in front of me a vortex spiraling counter-clockwise, and it seemed like it was composed of these purple rectangles surrounded by golden-yellow light, it was the most beautiful thing I had ever seen, and the next thing I knew I was not "here".

I faintly remember "sisterly" voices saying "he's awake! he's awake!" and I felt like I had awaken from a very long dream, and then a very omnipotent and familiar voice began speaking to me, describing some future world events, and in particular a time when everyone was at each other's throats there would be a mass awakening. I could not believe what I was seeing and I asked why it had to be like that, and the response was "it is the only way to wake them up". I was told that I would have to go back, and that I was to tell everyone that the Creator/Source is real (the term God was not used, but it was not "words" being "spoken" it was more of a telepathic communication because as I said I was not "here" as in here in my body at that time). I argued that I did not deserve to be talking to God, that I did not even believe in God, but the Creator was not angry with me, instead he asked me if I knew why I felt the way I did, and my answer was no, and then I began some automatic process of reliving my life, backwards, from present into the past, every detail every thought, every action. The question was repeated after each memory was reviewed, and it was not until I could answer "yes" (with full honesty) was I left alone....

But I was not alone, all around me were bubbles of light, on strings, I knew that I was also a bubble of light on a string, in fact I knew everything, all there ever was to know. I was totally in a state of complete bliss, and knew everything, all I had to do was focus on anything and it was known to me, but in that state, I was just so happy to be home I had a hard time focussing, but I remembered that I was to tell people about this place, and the Creator, so I focussed my thought on "is there a way to SHOW other people this place, not just tell them about it" It was then that my awareness began receiving information about a very interesting machine: what it was, how it worked, technical details, schematics, and even some visions of the machine in action.

It was at this point I regained consciousness, face down in a river, on a little island in the rapids. I coughed out water and my lungs hurt, but I was still feeling the sensation of total bliss for about 3 days after the event.

I have never built the machine, nor described much of its detail to anyone due to the nature of the machine itself, not that I wouldn't want people to see that place for themselves, but the machine induces a state where a person is quite vulnerable to outside influence, and in the wrong hands could be quite dangerous.

So in a nutshell: you wake up. I have been here sleepwalking for 24 years now (I was 21 when the event happened) waiting for the the world to match the visions I was given.

Dexter, Godlike Productions 15 Comments [8/23/2017 12:16:19 PM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 130898

My point was that we have small Children questioning their Sexuality because they may “act” like the opposite Sex.

The Parents (and so called Educators) who think they are helping their Child by letting their behavior overrule their DNA are nothing but Child Abusers.

Now that it has creeped into our Educational System heads should roll, but they won’t. They will be lauded for their courage or some stupid feel good Liberal group speak.

When I was young the word “Tomboy” was frequently used, but the Girl in question would never had felt it had anything to do with their Gender, just their likes and dislikes.

I cannot imagine raising Children in this day and age. The World has gone mad.

Kickass Conservative, Free Republic 9 Comments [8/23/2017 12:15:51 PM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 130897

I will state this as a family member who has a sister who identifies as a man. this is a mental disorder that has many source for happening to a person. it can be sexual abuse, there can be a birth defect, or it can happen from the intake of growth hormones as a child. ( my sister took growth hormones from age 3 because of a birth defect). Children do not become confused about there sexuality in a major way till they hit puberty it just is not a major importance to them.

Any child that has a parent who claim’s that there child is transgendered before puberty should be checked out by a mental health expert because there is a good chance the adult is the one with the problem and the child is the victim of a mentally ill adult.

Even if there is a child with gender dysphoria in the school district. the child’s problems should not be addressed in the classroom because of the confusion it will cause children and the parents of children in the classroom.

Please everyone when commenting on this issue have some love in your heart for those that have this mental illness. at this point anyone claiming to have the disorder is not getting the professional help they need instead you have groups like LGBT indulging there delusion or you have just pure hatred of people with this disorder. Because of groups like LGBT most transgendered individuals are totally alienated from there families or like myself we don’t discus the issue for fear that are loved one will totally cut us off.

PCPOET7, Free Republic 2 Comments [8/23/2017 12:15:38 PM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 130896

No scientific foundation.

Yes, children can for some unknown reasons make believe they are something they are not, fantasize about that, and eventually form a obsession of belief in that fantasy; to their long term detriment.

That is not a “nuance”, it’s a problem. Left ignored, untreated and enabled by parents it becomes a lifetime problem from the individual which not even surgical abuse of the body can adequately make up for, no matter how hard it tries.

I have no problem with laws that would say no, you cannot teach and preach transgenderism in the schools. You can teach and preach it to yourself and in your own family but not to children in school.

Enable a mental obsession and call it “O.K.”? No.

Wuli, Free Republic 3 Comments [8/23/2017 12:15:28 PM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 130895

With all LGBTQLMNOPLOL types, sex, as in the physical act, is the primary focus of their lives. The physical act of sex is what defines them and they are so insecure about it they have to flash it in everyone's faces and take umbrage when others disagree.

OK. it is not normal to be them but if they just lived their lives like most people, then if we saw them at a party or in public with their "significant other" most of us would just leave them alone and not insult them. They are the ones, knowing they are really sick, who have to justify it in their minds by flaunting it in our faces and being belligerent about it.

OldMissileer, Free Republic 10 Comments [8/23/2017 12:15:20 PM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 130892

Lady Checkmate's headline: "Attack Against the Family: Alt-left Teacher Forces Sexual Immorality on 5-year old Students Against Parent's Wishes"

(Text from link reproduced below) Link: https://www.toddstarnes.com/column/live-blog-todd-starnes-show-aug-22)

Parents in Rocklin, California were horrified to discover that a teacher led a kindergarten-age classroom discussion on transgenderism that included introducing a five-year-old who was transitioning from male to female.

Children at Rocklin Academy were subjected to readings from two storybooks about transgenderism. At some point, the teacher introduced a classmate who changed clothes for the big gender reveal.

"These parents feel betrayed by the school district that they were not notified," Capitol Resource Institute's Karen England told CBS News in Sacramento. "The kindergartners came home very confused, about whether or not you can pick your gender, whether or not they really were a boy or a girl."

Parents were not given advance notice of the lesson nor were they given the opportunity to opt-out of the classroom activity.

"My daughter came home crying and shaking so afraid she could turn into a boy," one parent told CBS News.

The school district defended the lesson -- saying the books were age-appropriate. The district also said under state law they are not required to notify parents when their children are being indoctrinated on gender identity. Additionally, the district said parents do not have the right to opt-out of the classroom discussions.

Teachers also defended the controversial classroom discussion.

"When we head in the direction of banned books or book lists, or selective literature– that should only be read inside or outside the classroom, I think that's a very dangerous direction to go," Kelly Bryson told CBS.

Don't forget to RECOMMEND. Lets get the Truth out so that Light may shine bright in this dark place and Jesus Christ may be glorified.Even if the discussion is closed, please still RECOMMEND.

Lady Checkmate, Disqus - Faith & Religion 10 Comments [8/23/2017 10:49:37 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Jocasta

Quote# 130879

Mothers friend tried to avoid introducing her daughter to her subhuman son for the purposes of arranged marriage

Not Indian, but Mum wanted to get me into a pseudo arranged marriage with some rich family because even she was being affected by my inceldom (she's afraid I will end up marrying a hooker). When the other mother saw me, she went cold on my mother (even though they talk quite often). She has been avoiding my mother ever since. My poor mum thinks she did something wrong but I know the truth: my looks.

Inceldemographic, /r/incels 21 Comments [8/22/2017 10:52:11 AM]
Fundie Index: 1
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Death Cult Award

“...some men aren't looking for anything logical, like money. They can't be bought, bullied, reasoned, or negotiated with. Some men just want to watch the world burn.”

Quote# 130878

(WeAreZero)
Modern females are corrupted beyond repair.

Feminism has destroyed the most recent generations of females. There would need to be a major cataclysm that would wipe out a very large portion of the world's populations to cleanse the degeneracy caused by feminism. Surviving would require a more intelligent and patriarchal way of life.

(incelwarrior95)
actually modern females are their natural and true state the one god intended from the start

(incellophane)
GTFO cuck

(incelwarrior95)
u r just butthurt because women ar eprogrammed to fuck chad only and u r not him. 80/20 is NATURE baby

(incellophane)
Bro you wouldn't be sitting in your room posting this retarded shit from your smartphone over the internet if it weren't for our millennia-long struggle with our own nature. Without forced monogamy we would be sitting in trees flinging shit at each other.

(BlackPill47)
Agreed. Through Western society itself seems to be corrupted beyond repair. The cultural revolutions of the 60s may have been seen to be a good thing, but this is when the road to hypergamy started.

(Medcel)
Well, extreme hypergamy. Hypergamy has always existed on some level, even at times when most marriages were arranged. Then the parents would try to pair off their daughters to men in wealthy families.

(noneofthemisvalid)
It won't last long, our patriarchal, agrarian forefathers fucked up matriarchal hunter gatherers. It will occur again. Muslims will invade European countries. Fascism will increase in West as a consequence. When fascism increases, those degeneracy lowers.

(ilieknothing)
I pray to St. Blackops2cel that Donald Trump starts a nuclear war.

(BlackPill47)
I long for WW3, brother. Either I will be nuked in the opening atomic exchange, or I will be drafted and sent to a killing zone. If by some miracle I survive, I could take part in the rebuilding of human society.

(ilieknothing)
There is no losing for us if WW3 happens. There is sweet relief if we die but if we survive the male population would be so depleted like the last world war we should get a female (you can never be certain as a subhuman).

(BlackPill47)
Agreed, brother. Either way, hypergamy will end and necessity will provide sex for all.

(Dingus_Incel)
Do you think its possible to just brainwash them again? If women are so malleable I think we could just inculcate the next germination to believe the sex is bad while marriage and loyalty are good.

(RodgerDodger509)
Telling little girls this adds to the problem I think. When they realize that it was just manipulation, they throw themselves into feminist shit.

(WeAreZero)
And how would 1-2% of the population have more influence on children than the majority? We're already being labelled as undesirables and creeps so imagine what would happen if we tried to approach children.

(alexjonesisaprophet)
And how would 1-2% of the population have more influence on children than the majority

Convert to Judaism

(uglyfreakcel)
Females are foolish creatures that easily conform to today's trends like sheeple

(BlackPillRevolution)
I utterly despise conformists

(bisexual_male_I'm mostly gay.)
/r/collapse

We're at the peak right now. By century's end, everything will have gone to hell.

So if it helps, the current social order is a very transient thing.

Various incels, /r/incels 15 Comments [8/22/2017 10:52:07 AM]
Fundie Index: 10
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 130876

Most of the time, scientists are not liars and are genuinely trying to discover and understand the laws of the universe. But whenever scientists are confronted with anything that has to do with God or evolution, then scientists on the whole always lie to us and they are brazen about it.

For example, until 1956, scientists falsely claimed that humans and apes had the same number of chromosomes and therefore humans evolved from apes. But the fact is, humans actually have 23 pairs of chromosomes while apes have 24 pairs of chromosomes. Apes, gorillas, chimpanzees, orangutans, etc. all have more chromosomes than humans.

During the first half of the 20th century, that fact would have seriously weakened “ape into human evolution theory” because there is no way to explain how apes, with 24 pairs of chromosomes, could have evolved into humans with 23 pairs of chromosomes. We all know that if we lose a pair of chromosomes, we cannot reproduce.

During the first half of the 20th century, there was a ferocious war between evolution theory and creationism and Darwin’s supporters were extremely hard pressed to “find the missing link.” Darwinians could not find the missing link so they simply fabricated one by faking the Piltdown Man skull.
Darwinians also were determined to hide any evidence that contradicted their beloved evolution theory. That is why atheist scientists simply concocted a lie and told us apes and humans both have 24 pairs of chromosomes.

An atheist scientist named Theophilus Painter took the lead and published a paper in 1921 claiming humans have 24 pairs of chromosomes. Other atheist scientists “confirmed” this in other scientific papers. It was not until 1956 that the fraud came to an end because evolution theory had gained enough support to not need to be buttressed by the 24 chromosome lie. The “apes and humans have the same number of chromosome lie” had done its damage to the truth - Adolf Hitler, Joseph Stalin, Mao Tse-Tung all pointed to the “24 chromosome lie” as a reason for them to ban the teaching of creationism from German, Russian and Chinese schools.

We bet you did not know that atheists claimed that “apes and humans have the same number of chromosomes.”

It is worthy to note that even now, scientists are prevaricating about this matter and they insist they did not lie to us about humans having 24 pairs of chromosomes. Instead they tell us they made an “understandable mistake” and it was very difficult to accurately count all the way up to 24 pairs of chromosomes.

It is absurd for atheists to assert that the counting of just 23 pairs of chromosomes was so difficult that none of them could do it correctly for over 30 years. Guess what? They had no trouble counting the much larger number of chromosomes for other animals, such as dogs who have 39 pairs.

Unknown author, DarwinConsipiracy 17 Comments [8/22/2017 10:51:43 AM]
Fundie Index: 8
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 130874

We are trained scientists and everything you read on this website is based on the latest scientific discoveries published in the most respected peer reviewed scientific journals.

Nothing we write on this website is based on the Bible or any religious beliefs.

But we are persons of faith and proud of it. In fact, we have no doubt we are better scientists because we embrace Divine Providence, as did all fifty-six Founding Fathers who signed the Declaration of Independence.

The only goal of this website is to use scientific methodology to seek the truth and the truth is there have recently been earth shaking scientific discoveries in genetics that now proven Darwin was wrong because:

“Ape to human evolution” is impossible - recent DNA tests reveal that ape and human DNA are far too different for humans to have evolved from apes.

“One species into another species evolution” cannot occur in bisexual animals becaue the laws of genetics and embryology preserve each species and prevent any bisexual species from evolving into another.

This website will provide you with details from peer reviewed scientific journals to support all this.

If you are wondering why you have not read about any of this, it is because a very powerful Darwin Conspiracy, led by atheists, has suppressed the truth about evolution theory and fed us lie after lie after lie for over 100 years.

The Darwin Conspiracy has both faked evidence, suppressed evidence and it currently constantly lies to promote Darwinism.

The Piltdown Man is an example of the power of the Darwin Conspiracy and how insidious the conspiracy has been.

In 1912, Darwin's “ape to human evolution theory” was at its most critical crossroads – Darwnians had to either come up with the “missing link” or evolution theory would become extinct. For decades, critics of “ape to human evolution theory” had pounded it by insisting that unless it comes forward with evidence of the “missing link,” then “ape to human evolution theory” should be put to death.

In the fall of 1912, the Darwin Conspiracy was formed and on December 18, 1912, the Geological Society, with the assistance of co-conspirator British Museum of Natural History, unvieled a faked skull that they claimed was the “missing link.” Their forgery led to headlines all over the world proclaiming “Missing Link Found – Darwin's Theory Proved.”

The faked Piltdown Man saved Darwin's Theory of evolution from being quickly extinct, and for the next forty years, atheists incessantly cited the fake Piltdown Man skull as irrefutable evidence for “ape to human evolution theory.”

Faking evidence is bad enough but the British Museum and other Darwin Conpirators went much further. They not only faked evidence but the British Museum insisted on being “keeper of the Piltdown Man skull” and refused to permit anyone to examine the Piltdown Man skull. In effect, the British Museum said “We have the evidence but we will not allow anyone to examine or verify our evidence and you just have to take our word for it.”

The British Museum claimed they were afraid the Piltdown Skull would be somehow contaminated or harmed if any one examined it. But the real reason no one was allowed to even look at it from a distance is that it was so obvious a fake.

For over three decades, the British Museum arrogantly denied any requests to examine the fake Piltdown Man skull. Most of the scientific community did not object because they were atheists and part of the Darwin Consipiracy

But then, Darwinians ran into a problem that forced the British Museum to change its stance.

By 1949, most Darwinists supported the “Man Came Out of Africa Theory” of human evolution which said that humans evolved from apes in Africa. But this theory was directly contradicted by the Piltdown Man skull because that faked skull would support the theory that humans came from England, or Europe instead of Africa.

In fact, in 1949, the fake Piltdown Man skull stood in the way of “Man Came Out of Africa Theory” and several prominent Darwinists, including Louis Leakey (who discovered “Lucy”) convinced the British Museum to allow them to examine the Piltdown Man skull.

A History Channel documentary revealed that Louis Leakey said that the Piltdown Man skull was so obvious a forgery that he could tell the skull was a fake from over fifteen feet away because the coloring of the jaw and skull were different. This fact proves the British Museum and all of its hierarchy knew it was a fake and also that it was easy for any expert to know the skull was a forgery and that is why the museum refused to allow anyone to examine it.

This is an example of how a very powerful Darwin Conspiracy, led by atheists, fakes evidence, suppresses the truth and spreads lies in order to promote Darwinian evolution theory.

We are here to combat the Darwin Conspiracy that prevents you from easily learning about the latest scientific data and information that are related to evolution theories. We promise to do our best to provide you with only what is factual and true, without bias.

Unknown author, DarwinConsipiracy 22 Comments [8/22/2017 10:51:34 AM]
Fundie Index: 7
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 130871

Evolutionists do not want us to teach in our public schools the science that shows the validity of creation. They want us to teach only their (with apologies to Rudyard Kipling) "Just So Stories."

Personally, I believe that we should teach evolution side-by-side with creation giving equal scientific emphasis and have our students learn to think critically. Let us show them both and allow them to decide for themselves which one they will believe because origins is a faith position. Evolutionists reject this two model approach to teaching about origins because they inherently know that they will lose every time.

If they will not allow the teaching in our public schools of the science to support creation and adamantly defend the teaching of evolution only, that is fine with me - as long as we teach the students more about evolution than the evolutionists do. If we teach students ALL about evolution then they will realize that evolution is intellectually bankrupt.

The solution to evolution is education!

Please allow us to teach the students the truth about the implications of the Laws of Science, such as the First and Second Law of Thermodynamics, and how these Laws disprove evolution. Please allow us to teach the truth about the whole and complete nature of natural processes, like photosynthesis and metamorphosis, and how these could not possibly come into existence by random chance. Please allow us to teach the truth about what is really in the ground, like the out of order layers and polystrate fossils, as opposed to what evolutionists say is in the ground.

Please allow us to teach the truth about the hoaxes and frauds that have been authenticated and perpetuated by evolutionists then later had to be retracted. Please allow us to teach the truth about: Piltdown Man, Java Man, Peking Man, English Peppered Moths, the Horse Series, Pithecanthropus alalus, Galapagos Finch Beaks, embryonic recapitulation and the Monera.

Please allow us to teach the students the truth about how the acceptance of evolution is the foundational justification to promote: human racism, homosexuality, abortion, euthanasia, lawlessness, pornography, and all the other immoral and unethical activities within our society.

Yes, I am convinced! We need to teach more about evolution in our public schools, not less!

With this admonition in mind, I want to give you a Primer on the Scientific Reasons that Evolution is Wrong. The following are only thirty basic points and are by no means the total list that we might make. This is just a list that you may refer to when you want a quick way to look up what is wrong with evolution.

1. The evolution of one kind into another kind is not happening in a measurable way in the present, nor can it be proven to have occurred in the past.

2. No new kinds of organisms are being observed coming from previously existing organisms. (We discover new kinds that we have never cataloged before, but this only shows our ignorance of their existence.)

3. No new structures or organs have been observed coming into existence. All observed structures or organs are fully formed when first observed. (The only observed changes to current structures or organs come from their decay and degradation.)

4. There are distinct gaps between the known kinds of organisms. One kind is not observed to change into another kind. We do not observe the "missing links" because they are missing, not there, don't exist.

5. Life only comes from life and reproduces after its own kind. Life does not come from non-living material. Life does not spontaneously generate itself.

6. Mutations, the supposed driving mechanisms of evolution, are random in nature and are neutral or harmful. They do not accumulate beneficially. Mutations produce the wrong kind of change and will not provide for the upward progressive increase in intelligence or complexity required by evolutionists.

7. We observe stasis, not change, in nature. Extinction is a proof of creation. We do not find change in the fossil record nor can we measure it in the present. Animal and plant kinds that exist today retain the same appearance but are smaller in size than their known predecessors.

8. The fossil layers are not found in the ground in the nice neat clean order that evolutionists illustrate them to be in their textbooks. There is not one place on the surface of the earth where you may dig straight down and pass through the fossil layers in the order shown in the textbooks. The neat order of one layer upon another does not exist in nature. The fossil bearing layers are actually found out of order, upside down (backwards according to evolutionary theory), missing (from where evolutionists would expect them to be) or interlaced ("younger" and "older" layers found in repeating sequences). "Out of place" fossils are the rule and not the exception throughout the fossil record.

9. Polystrate fossils, fossils which penetrate two or more layers of the fossil record (most often trees), are common throughout the fossil record. In rare cases even large animal skeletons have been found in vertical position rather than in a horizontal position.

10. Life forms are found to be complex even in the "oldest" layers of the fossil record. For example, various species of Trilobites are found to have very sophisticated eyesight. Yet evolutionists say that these creatures supposedly evolved into existence when the first multiple celled life forms began to evolve some 620 million supposed years ago.

11. Nature does not provide us with the proof for the "Tree of Life" so glibly talked about by evolutionists. We do not find life starting as simple and then branching upward and outward as it becomes more and more complex. We do not find that life forms follow the pattern of a single tree trunk with many branches. The physical evidence provided by nature gives a picture of an extremely large orchard with all plant and animal types represented from the beginning with their own individual trunks and branches producing the variations within kinds that we have today, but no new kinds progressing from previous kinds.

12. There are no transitional forms found in the fossil record. In spite of all the reports people may have heard, we have never found the fossil of a plant or an animal which is a true intermediate form. The "missing links" are missing because they are missing.

13. Be wary of artists renderings. An artists depiction, conception or illustration is imaginary. Simply because we see an artists illustration of a cow becoming a whale doesn't make it so. Human desire and imagination are not evidence.

14. Ancient man was not primitive. Ancient human cultures had more complex languages than we do today. The engineering feats of the past cultures are well recognized and in some cases have not been duplicated in modern times. There never was a Stone Age, Bronze Age or Iron Age. Man has used stone, bronze and iron tools in all ages of past human activity. Indeed, there is nothing new under the sun.

The observed Laws of Science contradict the various theories of evolution.

15. The law of Cause and Effect not only describes that for every effect there must have been a cause, it also tells us that the cause must be greater than the effect. No one can create anything greater than themselves. You do not get an increase in intelligence or complexity without the input from a greater intelligence.

16. The First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics work contrary to evolutionary belief. The First Law of Thermodynamics (The Law of Energy Conservation) proves that the universe cannot be the reason for its own existence. According to the First Law the universe cannot have been anything less than it is, and if it cannot have been anything less than it is, it had to come into existence whole and complete. If the universe came into existence whole and complete, then it had to be created. Simply adding energy to a system will not cause an increase in intelligence or complexity. The addition of undirected energy to a system accomplishes nothing, except possibly for the destruction of that system.

The Second Law of Thermodynamics (The Law of Entropy) proves that evolution cannot happen. The Second Law stipulates (a poor attempt by scientists to describe The Curse of Genesis Chapter 3 and Revelation) that in all activities some of the energy becomes unavailable for further useful work. The universe is running down, not up.

17. The concept of a "Big Bang" producing the universe is absolutely illogical. Explosions do not produce ever increasing order and structure. Explosions produce disorder and chaos. Explosions break things down or destroy what was previously ordered.

18. There is no substantiated method in nature which would allow stars to be "born." The Gas Laws prove that the pressure of hot gases expanding outward from a center is far greater than the gravitational force drawing them towards a center. Stars could not evolve into existence.

19. The Law of Biogenesis (the Law of Life Beginnings) accurately states that life only comes from life, and that life only reproduces after its own kind. Life cannot spontaneously generate and life forms do not change from one kind into another kind.

20. The input of undirected energy accomplishes nothing. The input of undirected energy will destroy a system, not build it up. Only the input from a greater intelligence will cause a beneficial increase in order and/or complexity.

21. Not only must there be the input from a greater intelligence in order to produce an increase in complexity and/or intelligence, that intelligence must have a preconceived plan of action. No master craftsman would start to build without first having a plan, a blueprint.

22. In order for evolution to be true atoms must form useful molecules such as enzymes, amino acids and proteins by random chance. It is mathematically impossible for these molecules, much less the far larger DNA molecule, to form by random action in nature. It cannot happen!

23. Natural selection and survival of the fittest are supposed to be the driving forces of progressive upward evolution. There are no selective benefits for a supposed transitional form. There would be no advantage for a creature to have a half-evolved eye or a half-evolved wing. Indeed, the existence of such structures would be detrimental and serve only to eliminate, not perpetuate, such disfigured organisms from a given population.

24. The presumed intermediates required by evolution do not exist. The missing links are missing because they are missing. Reptilian scales do not/cannot become feathers. These structures originate from different cells within the skin tissue. Reptilian lungs do not/cannot change to become avian (bird) lungs. Air flows in and out of reptilian lungs just as in humans. Bird lungs have a flow through design.

25. Living organisms are incredibly complex and have specific design features. In order to make this point please consider the following partial list: woodpecker tongue, Bombardier Beetle chemistry, insect metamorphosis, Giraffe heart and arterial system, Gecko feet and human eyes (or human brains for that matter).

26. Single-celled organisms such as bacteria, amoeba and algae have the same degree of complexity within them that multiple-celled organisms have within them. Single-celled organisms have a skeleton, respiratory system, digestion and elimination systems, circulatory system, reproductive system, command and communication system.

27. Life forms are irreducibly complex. To code for RNA production within a cell you must already have whole and complete DNA. To make DNA you must already have whole and complete RNA. In addition, it requires about 70 proteins to fabricate a DNA molecule, but you must have whole and complete DNA to fabricate those proteins.

28. When we see design we know that there is/was a designer. The human mind intrinsically knows the difference between randomness and design. When we see a plastic hair comb, one of the simplest structures ever designed and consisting of only one part, we know that it was designed and made through intelligent effort. A plastic hair comb does not come into existence by random chance.

If we see three stones sitting on the bottom of a clear stream we know that they got there by the random action of the water current. If we see the same three stones piled up one on top of the other sitting on the bank of that stream we know that an outside intelligence placed them there.

We see design throughout nature. For good health blood must clot when it gets outside the body, but must not clot inside the body. In addition, it must stop clotting and not continue to clot once exposed to the outside. The molecular motors which turn the cilia of cells look exactly like little electric motors complete with bearings, shaft and housing. Our bodies must make decisions to accept or reject foreign substances or our immunological system does not work. Our bodies must also manufacture effective countermeasures without killing us at the same time.

29. Charles Darwin stated that the existence of vestigial and retrogressive organs and structures in the human body were essential proofs of evolution. It has now been determined that there are NO vestigial or retrogressive organs or structures in a human body!

30. Evolutionary theories remain incapable of explaining the existence of sex, symbiosis or altruism.

I reiterate that the solution to evolution is education! If we teach the true facts of science and teach our people to think critically they will never believe the Just So Stories of the evolutionists.

Besides, what is so dangerous about the facts that support creation?

A belief in creation destroys the works of the Devil!

That is what is so important about it and why evolutionists cling to their faith position concerning it. Evolution is a religion of conveniences. The acceptance of evolution is the only way in which people may mentally justify that there is no God. The acceptance of evolution is the only way in which they may mentally justify that they may lead a sinless life with Jesus Christ. The Bible declares that this is manifest delusion.

Unknown author, Creation Worldview Ministries  21 Comments [8/22/2017 10:51:08 AM]
Fundie Index: 10
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 130869


I am really intrigued by the number of athiests who feel compelled to post on a Christian website,…come on guys, post to any of the suedo scientific sites that will have you. If just looking around doesn’t convince you that a huge intelligence made you and everything you see, there is little hope for you. Incidently, we Christians have the only thing that non believers will never have; a genuine hope for better things to come.

The agnostic and athiest world has NO hope of anything other than the forever dirt lunch. For those of you non-believers that are still with me, …hook up with a believer and see if you can learn the world of FAITH and begin to see a future for yourself. No more commentary is necessary,….this has been worn to a nub.

JOSEPH, United Church of God 14 Comments [8/22/2017 10:50:59 AM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 130868

No, it is evolution that is based off of zero real evidence. By contrast, the Bible is verifiable, had many many eye witnesses, and even those who lived in Jesus’ day and HATED Him could not deny the truth He preached and the miracles He performed because they saw it with their own eyes. I hope you did well on your test, but whether you believe what was on the test or not is irrelevant compared to what you believe about the God who made you and His Son who paid for your and my sins.

That is your real test, what will you believe, where will you make your stance? You need to decide if God exists or not, are you really so sure that you’re willing to bet your soul for all of eternity on the chance of an unproven theory from the 1,850’s when there is factual truth in all of creation in support of the Word of God?

Robert76, United Church of God 5 Comments [8/22/2017 10:50:55 AM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 130867

Can we prove that evolution is false without using the Bible? Certainly we can! Evolution is a scientific theory that stands or falls on the physical evidence. In fact, one can be an atheist, a person who doesn’t believe in God, and still not believe in evolution!

Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution, as taught at school, is a biological explanation of how creatures have supposedly “evolved” or developed progressively through natural selection and variation (now known as mutation) over eons of time from the tiny cell to the largest creatures on earth today. What is taught in classrooms is not mere micro evolution—small changes within a species—but macro evolution, the change from one type of creature to another quite distinct life form.

What many evolutionists are trying to convince you of is that there is no need for a Creator since, as they say, evolution can substitute as the mechanism for creating and transforming life. They teach that life arose from non-life and evolved from simpler creatures to more complex life forms. In other words, the tiny cell eventually became an amoeba, then a lizard, then a monkey, and finally— you !

In order to remember key points that disprove Darwinian evolution—the “molecules to man” theory—we’ll use the acronym FALSE. (A few of these points also disprove the compromise of theistic evolution—the notion that God employed macroevolution over eons in forming the creatures we see on earth today.)

A fossil is the preserved remains of a living thing. The fossil record around the earth extends an average of one mile deep. Below this level we come up with a blank slate as far as living, complex creatures are concerned.

I collect fossils of what are deemed the earliest type of complex creatures with hard bodies—trilobites. No previous ancestors of these arthropods have been found. Similar to some marine “bugs” we see today on the seashore that disappear into the sand when the waves retreat, trilobites had hard shells, all the basic organs, and complex eyes like those of flies, with hundreds of sophisticated lenses connected to the optic nerve going to the brain. Trilobite fossils are found around the earth, and in all cases the level of rock beneath them does not reveal other creatures with similar features.

As one source states: “The dominant life form was the now-extinct sea creature known as a trilobite, up to a foot long, with a distinctive head and tail, a body made up of several parts, and a complex respiratory system. But although there are many places on earth where 5,000 feet of sedimentary rock stretch unbroken and uniformly beneath the Cambrian [layer], not a single indisputable multi-celled fossil has been found there. It is ‘the enigma of paleontological [fossil studies] enigmas,’ according to Stephen Gould. Darwin himself said he could give ‘no satisfactory answer’ to why no fossils had been discovered. Today’s scientists are none the wiser” (Francis Hitching, The Neck of the Giraffe , 1982, pp. 26-27).

Question: If, after almost two centuries of digging beneath all the world’s continents, no previous ancestor of this first hard-bodied creature has been found, how then did the ubiquitous trilobite evolve? There should be some previous ancestor if evolution were true.

It’s like finding an exquisite watch on the seashore and yet never finding any previous primitive models of the watch on earth. If you reasoned as an evolutionist, you would deny there was a need for a watchmaker at all, maintaining that time, water, sand, minerals and actions of the elements are sufficient to producing a fully functional watch that runs. This is part of the reason it takes more faith to believe in evolution than in a Creator!

Further important evidence from the fossil record is the absence of transitional forms between species. Darwin was concerned that the thousands of intermediate stages between creatures needed to prove his theory were not in evidence, but he expected they would eventually be found. Yet those thousands of missing transitional forms are still missing!

Another reference explains: “If throughout past ages life was actually drifting over in one continual stream from one form to another, it is to be expected that as many samples of the intermediate stages between species should be discovered in fossil condition as of the species themselves … All should be in a state of flux. But these missing links are wanting. There are no fossils of creatures whose scales were changing into feathers or whose feet were changing into wings, no fossils of fish getting legs or of reptiles getting hair. The real task of the geological evolutionist is not to find ‘the’ missing link, as if there were only one. The task is to find those thousands upon thousands of missing links that connect the many fossil species with one another” (Byron Nelson, After Its Kind , 1970, pp. 60-62).

The absence of transitional forms is an insurmountable hurdle for theistic evolutionists as well. It also fits with our next point.

When there is no real evidence, evolutionary scientists simply make assumptions.

If evolution were true, then where is the evidence of different types of animals now “evolving” into other types? Where is the evidence of cats, dogs and horses gradually turning into something else? We do see changes within species, but we do not see any changes into other species. And, as mentioned, we see no evidence of gradual change in the fossil record either. Yet evolutionists continue to assume that transitional forms must have existed.

In Darwin’s landmark book On the Origin of Species there are some 800 subjective clauses, with uncertainty repeatedly admitted instead of proof. Words such as “could,” “perhaps” and “possibly” plague the entire book.

Evolution is still called a theory—a possible explanation or assumption—because it is not testable according to the scientific method, as this would require thousands or millions of years. Evolutionists will counter that a theory is not a mere hypothesis but is a widely affirmed intellectual construct that generally appears to fit all the facts. Yet evolution in no way fits all the facts available. Evidence does not support it—and in many respects runs counter to it.

The law of biogenesis as taught in biology class states that only life can produce life.

You’ve probably heard the famous question: Which came first, the chicken or the egg? It’s a real dilemma for an evolutionist to answer. An egg comes from a chicken, yet the chicken comes from an egg. How can there be one without the other?

To complicate matters even more, the chicken has to come from a fertilized egg that has the mixture of two different genetic strains from both its parents. So the problem of the origin of life and initial reproduction is still a mystery that evolutionary science cannot adequately answer.

Yet for someone who believes in special creation by a Creator, there is no dilemma here. First God made the male and female chickens, which produced the first fertilized egg—and the rest is history.

When one living thing needs another different living thing to survive, it’s called a symbiotic relationship.

A good example of this is the relationship between bees and flowers. The bees need the nectar from some types of flowers to feed while these flowers need bees to pollinate them. Both depend on each other to exist and survive. The question for evolutionists is: How did these plants exist without the bees, and how did the bees exist without these plants?

Again, atheistic scientists are stumped. Theistic evolutionists are perplexed as well. Yet if you believe in a Creator who specially created the various forms of life on earth, the answer is simple—both were created at about the same time.

All living things are exquisitely engineered or designed. Qualitatively, a bacterium is as majestically built for its purpose as a human body is for its function. Yet evolution says it’s only an illusion of design—that there is no real designer behind it. Reality is not an illusion! Living things are multi-functional, which means they do many complex things at the same time, something evolution with its step-by-step process has never been able to demonstrate.

One example of a living thing with exquisite engineering is the tree. It provides breathable oxygen for us while processing carbon dioxide, which would in high amounts in the air be toxic to us. It supplies wood, housing for birds, roots to limit erosion, fruit and seeds to eat, is biodegradable and gives shade. According to the U.S. Department of Agriculture, “A healthy tree provides a cooling effect that is equivalent to 10 room-size air conditioners operating 20 hours a day.” How could something so complex arise from a random, undirected evolutionary process?

Again, you need more “faith” to believe in blind evolution than in an all-knowing Creator who designed the marvelous tree in the first place.

Now you have five proofs that evolution is F-A-L-S-E and that special creation is true—and we didn’t even use the Bible. Remember the acronym FALSE when you read or hear about evolution—and do take time to read our Creator’s great book of truth! It has much to say regarding origins.

Mario Seiglie, United Church of God 11 Comments [8/22/2017 10:50:50 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 130866

Trump has fallen into line, lock step with Clinton’s ambitions. After all, Muslims are only untermensch and need our guidance or our help into the afterlife.

Squash ‘em like bugs because we are the heroes. “Thank you for your service” say the crawling politicians and also say the idiot citizens who should, in fact, be stringing up those same politicians and protecting our military from criminal adventures.

Predominately white, English-speaking, well trained and equipped somehow they have become the ‘victims’ of Muslim self defence.

It’s not fair? When 100 die for every 1 of ours. O thats right! They don’t have to find the cash, so they aren’t paying.

The emperor has no clothes and the Western world doesn’t utter a word.

Shame be upon us.

Steve Oz, Real Jew News 5 Comments [8/22/2017 10:50:45 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 130863





Adam Ford, Adam4d 20 Comments [8/22/2017 10:48:22 AM]
Fundie Index: 11
Submitted By: Daspletosaurus

Quote# 130862







Adam Ford, Adam4d 20 Comments [8/22/2017 10:42:59 AM]
Fundie Index: 9
Submitted By: Daspletosaurus
1 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 16 21 25 | top