Quote# 135695

The Inglorious Death Of The West

Michael is arguably the most acclaimed and accomplished pro wrestler in history out of Northern Europe, as well as the pro wrestling pioneer of Finland, where he has lived since 1996 after moving from his homeland of Canada. Michael is known as an outspoken figure that bucks the system and swims against the tide. Known in pro wrestling circles as “The Rebel” StarBuck, Michael has been a champion the world over, in addition to being a rock vocalist in three bands, a personal trainer, a voice-over pro, a business owner, an actor, an artist and a husband.

We have obviously come to the end of the West and Western civilization as we know it. No longer does it take a sociological “expert” or someone with a university degree to argue the point. Now it’s apparent all across the board. Our Western culture, whatever that even is anymore, is fastly disappearing and dying. And we’re letting it happen without even putting up a fight. This, I argue, will be to our own deserved demise.

We need to take a cold, hard look at what has led the West down the road of cultural ruin. After all, we’re only getting what we’ve ordered not too long ago.

Nietzsche the Prophet

I steadfastly argue that the single greatest factor that has led the west into the shitstorm it is now faced with is the abolishment of God and its resignation from all things even remotely Christian. Simply, we became inconvenienced with and ashamed of God and His statues regarding how we ought to orchestrate our lives. Even after the founding fathers of the West chose God-fearing, Biblical statutes to orient the ethical direction of the free world, we chose to balk at the freedoms and blessings afforded us under its banner and umbrella. Excuse my bluntness, but what the fuck?

What the hell was the big problem to begin with, that our Western society had to get rid of God and become so secular? Was it the allure of all things dark, forbidden, and sinful, much like the tempting apple in the Garden of Eden? Or was it just rotten, base human nature that tends to fuck up everything it’s given unless its spiritual self wakes up and enlightens the individual to better living? Or perhaps it was it the sins of the Catholic Church at large throughout world history, with its Crusades and and Inquisitions?

Any reasonable, sane person would understand that just because there is a killer loose in Disneyland, it doesn’t imply that the fault lies with Mickey Mouse. Anyone with even the slightest amount of intellect should be able to discern the obvious difference between what is faith and what is religion: one is a belief system that ordains personal decisions and and conduct of life at large, the other is a social construct of political yoke that serves to bind its members to its bylaws, rules and regulations.

Then again, the same applies to any secret society, alma matter, or club at large. So let’s get real for a moment and ask the hard, central question: what was wrong with the statues and morals of the God of Christianity, that we, as the West at large, decided to dump Him and move out from under His protective hand, as it were?

I suddenly recall a report that came out about the public school system in Canada back 1988, after the government decided to pull the Lord’s Prayer from schools in Ontario, where I spent the majority of my youth. What followed was a plummeting of school grades across the board, funny as that may seem. Don’t try to connect the dots, only consider the consequences at face value. The bottom line is, something happened in conjunction with this paradigm shift, and it wasn’t for anyone’s betterment.

Friedrich Nietzsche was right with his “death of God” analogy back in the day. We decided to kill God off from our lives and our society – societies that were largely built on Biblical principles and safeguards to ensure the posterity and safety of its people – and we left the door open for a horde of diverse and tumultuous demons to come in. We made our collective bed, in which we now lay. And the wages of sin is death. How fucking inconvenient for us!

The Fallacy of Relative Morality

There’s really no use or sense in complaining. It was a completely willful and conscious decision by us as a people and a collective society. God didn’t fit into our big picture and so we discarded the nagging voice of right and truth. We wanted our very own, custom-tailored, relative morality. We wanted to all be special snowflakes who would have their personalized cake and eat it, too. And in our deliberately blind gluttony, heresy, hedonism and salaciousness, we laid the groundwork for the inescapable law of reaping as we’d sown. Hey, don’t be fooled!

God is not mocked, and neither is the still, small voice of common sense and conscience within each and every one of us.When the dam broke, we were too ignorant to fix it. We let the landslide advance, unabated. The West let in the aggressive demands and doctrines of the east, the doctrines of which were adverse and foreign to the West to begin with.

The healthy not only tolerated but sought to accommodate the complaints and wishes of the perverse. The waters became muddied, unassimilable, and undrinkable. We were like spectators at the Colosseum, watching our own, unethical passion play unfold before our eyes, amused and sedated by it all at the same time. Things went from bad to worse and we just clamored for more fun, frills, and entertainment to fill our empty heads and void lives. Anything to dull the unnerving voice and moment of truth that kept beckoning to each and every one of us.

We didn’t protect our borders, our customs, our beliefs or our values, because we didn’t respect what we had. Someone else built the house which we inhabited; it wasn’t any skin off our own backs. We had no more sense of collective self, of tribe, clan or us. It became every dog for themselves. Me, me, me and even more me. Not you, not us. Just more of what’s in it for me, for my own, personal benefit, entertainment and pleasure. We took it all for granted, and now it’s being taken away from us.

With the death of God, we adopted new gods, albeit lesser gods at that. Mock gods like those offered at the altar of television, a conduit that taught us to believe whatever was fed through it; the media, who we believed all too eagerly at face value, without enough critical sense to question absolutely everything and ask the crucial and central question: “In whose interest is this message being sold to us?”

Popular music and its altar of indoctrination that has been admittedly so stealthy and shrewd, that even I, as a musical artist for nearly 20 years, can only marvel at its potency in conditioning the behaviors and attitudes of its audience.

Only as you age and grow as a person do you begin to see more clearly, but only if you steer clear of the mass sedation being force-fed all around you. That said, these new faux gods—and many others like the aforementioned—have filled the spiritual vacuum left behind by the absence of light that took immediate effect following the death of God, as foreseen by the accidental prophet, Nietzsche.

The Wages of Sin

In hindsight, we, as the West, have raped, spit on, shamed and insulted the Christian values that our lands were built on. We’ve become so goddamned secular, so boastful in our arrogant pride, that we’ve been ignorant of replacing the dismissed guards of our ethics and societal self with new, virtuous guardians of any kind. We’ve simply let ourselves drift, happily clueless, on our sea of indulgence and hedonistic pleasure. No one saw the hordes in waiting, and now it’s too late.

In our weakened state of constant self-gratification, we, as the West, have become weak. We’ve become milksops: easily offended and readily yielding, fragile individuals who hide behind the cloak of Big Brother. How the prolific words of Benjamin Franklin ring loudly now: “Those Who Sacrifice Liberty For Security Deserve Neither.” Indeed.

Even what’s left of our weakened, watered-down Christianity has become a feminized, ineffective, dead symbol of religious ritualism and ineffective, empty clamor. Gone are the strong men of old, the spirit of the founding fathers. Gone is the bravado, the chest held high with its breastplate of uprightness, the strong and unmoving fortitude that was ready and able to wield the sword of truth and brandish the shield of faith. Woe to us, for gone is the faith that was steadfast, the powerful beliefs that steered the moral uprightness of entire societies. We’ve got it coming to us, folks. In spades.

Summa Summarum

We need that old time Christian warrior mentality now more than ever. Our lands need it. Our people need it. The West needs it. Because the West will not survive without a return to its Christian roots. The secular mindset will not accommodate laws to protect the West, for were it able to provide that, it would have offered them up already. The proof is in the pudding, we’ve already seen the degeneration and decline of morality and societal spine under the banner of secularism.

No religion, no bullshit. Just rock solid Christian values and respect for the freedoms afforded by the vastly gracious nature of Christian and Biblical beliefs. The proof is in our past, if you need further evidence.What have you got to lose? Only the last, scarce remnants of your personal freedoms that are all being stripped away, falling through your fingers, if you choose to remain embedded in secular indoctrination. And if that be your choice, good riddance.

Michael Majalahti, Return of Kings 16 Comments [1/3/2018 2:42:47 PM]
Fundie Index: 10
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 135688

Consider that Jews are running the simulation as a new hypothesis under the broader earth simulation hypothesis. Imagine that you are in a Jewish soul simulation and all others who do not have the Jewish soul are the unwitting gamers that Jews get to kill. If you are not Jewish then you are, unfortunately, a self aware meatbag in a bloodthirsty Jew simulation.

This Jewish soul simulation is heaven for Jews and hell for you. Your only purpose is to serve them as fodder or as slave. You have no recourse but to knuckle under to their control or commit suicide. Since they want you to live so you can be abused by them, they use their holy book to condemn self termination. The Jew wishes to control your life, everything you think, your very perception of reality, the money you use, the house you live in. Everything including your life.

Religion also plays a major role in the simulation – religion keeps the Goyim avatars pacified and confused. Christians believe that Christ will return some day and rescue them from earth treachery. The Second Coming is an illusion created by the Jew to keep you pacified about your state of bondage to the Jew. As the meek Christian worker slaves lay up treasure in heaven, the Jew stacks up gold in his bank account.

GluttonousDragon, Youtube 8 Comments [1/3/2018 10:42:37 AM]
Fundie Index: 9
Submitted By: hydrolythe

Quote# 135686

Trump isn't the antichrist, he's Jesus's little brother if anything.

RetroSpriteResources, DeviantArt 14 Comments [1/3/2018 9:39:59 AM]
Fundie Index: 11

Quote# 135685

If [The Bible] isn't evidence, then your science books aren't evidence either.

RetroSpriteResources, DeviantArt 13 Comments [1/3/2018 9:39:54 AM]
Fundie Index: 9

Quote# 135682



Image reads:

You have no business telling anyone to vaccinate unless you can answer these questions CORRECTLY.

You have no business telling ANYONE TO VACCINATE, unless u can answer these questions:

1. Name 5 vaccine ingredients.
2. Name 5 possible adverse reactions.
3. Are the doctors or vaccine manufacturers able to be held liable if you or your child does suffer an adverse reaction to a vaccine?
4. How many doses are currently administered to children from birth to age 18?
5. Is it true that you have to be vaccinated in order to attend public school?
6. What is the name of the reporting system for the vaccine injured?
7. How much has currently been paid to vaccine injured families and who pays them?
8. Which vaccines shed, for how long and what exactly does shedding mean?
9. Is there still mercury in vaccines?
10. Do they offer single doses of measles, mumps, rubella, tetanus, pertussis, or diphtheria?
11. Have there ever been any studies on the safety or effectiveness of cocktail vaccines or the current vaccine schedule?
12. Give me one other interesting fact that was not already asked or discussed.

#vaccination #vaccines #where there is risk there must be the ability to withdraw consent

tinfoil-crown, Tumblr 19 Comments [1/3/2018 8:40:27 AM]
Fundie Index: 7
Submitted By: Thanos6

Quote# 135681

Porn is not consentual or reciprocal.

Porn is women being raped and violated for money.

Porn is corrupt men commodifying women’s bodies and sexuality.

The women in porn are not there because they enjoy what’s being done to them, they are there because they need the money.


#boycott porn #consent

ragiestodaisiesunfazied, Tumblr 16 Comments [1/3/2018 8:40:18 AM]
Fundie Index: 8
Submitted By: Thanos6

Perplexing Prudery Award

Quote# 135677

The common mode of sexual intercourse is not even natural. Our genitals are not for pleasure, they are for procreation, and that occurs when two people are very much in love and wanting to reproduce. Nature takes its course when the couple are asleep laying naked and embraced. Procreation occurs by the vagina acting as a vacuum, drawing the flaccid penis inside to a climax and eventually, ejaculation.

The vagina then releases the penis, all the while not disturbing the peacefully sleeping couple.

Forceful sexual intercourse is unnatural.

EoinHbern, Reddit 34 Comments [1/3/2018 5:17:01 AM]
Fundie Index: 23
Submitted By: Daspletosaurus

Failing Your Own Religion Forever Award

19th Century folk theology is totally biblical, but Genesis 6 is heresy!

Quote# 135675

At the Rapture, we will receive a glorified body like unto the Lord's glorified body (Philippians 3:21; 1st Corinthians 15:52-57). We will be as the angels without reproductive organs. The idea that angels mated with human women in Noah's time is heresy. Angels cannot mate with humans. It is impossible. Although angels always appeared in masculine form, the Bible is clear that they do not marry nor reproduce. The human "flesh" is one of the believer's three enemies: The Devil, the world and the flesh. This is what someone has called “the Devil's 3-string banjo of damnation.” Of these three enemies, I believe the flesh is the greatest threat. 1st Corinthians 15:52-27 teaches that at the Rapture, mortality shall put on immortality. If we could sin in our resurrected body, then we would have to die again.

David J. Stewart, Jesus is Savior 19 Comments [1/3/2018 5:16:31 AM]
Fundie Index: 5

Quote# 135673

Given that Finns were clearly reacting against the Establishment and its plans for mass Third World immigration, why didn’t the Finnish Right strike? The answer lies in the Finnish national character itself. Political Correctness is more dangerous in Finland than elsewhere in Western Europe. Like East Asians (some geneticists argue Finns have relatively high East Asian admixture by European standards), Finns are conformist. They can’t stand disagreement. They’re chronically shy, conflict averse and rule-governed. As I argued above, this may reflect adaption to extremely harsh yet predictable conditions, where cooperative groups are more likely to survive. Society is harmonious and efficient but with a tiny gene pool everyone thinks similarly. You don’t risk being shamed. Indeed, scholars have highlighted the way that Finland has an effectively East Asian “shame culture”

Harri Honkanen, Unz 5 Comments [1/3/2018 5:16:15 AM]
Fundie Index: 6

Quote# 135672

Listening now and loving it so far. Still reading Mein Kampf and had already read Hitler's Table Talks. Hitler is still my hero whom I admire with all my heart.

The Ultra Green Party, Youtube 11 Comments [1/2/2018 2:53:19 PM]
Fundie Index: 11
Submitted By: hydrolythe

Quote# 135671

Why is consent so simple (as it should be) to progressives until it involves where you work and what the terms of that are?

#consent #freeblr #anarchy #leftism #ancom

endthestate, Tumblr 11 Comments [1/2/2018 9:41:57 AM]
Fundie Index: 1
Submitted By: Thanos6

Quote# 135668

Remigration.. the solution to mass immigration and ethnocide against the current population of original peoples.. this would include natives .. how long before their 'reserves' are asked to be multicultural? Time will tell.. it would be amazing to have the aboriginal leaders support the immigration restraint policy... how could we hope to make this happen?

Katebushfan66, Eurocanadian 8 Comments [1/2/2018 9:41:25 AM]
Fundie Index: 9

Quote# 135665

Lady Checkmate's headline: "Hillary Clinton backer paid $500G to fund women accusing Trump of sexual misconduct before Election Day, report says"

(Fox News story cut-and-paste: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/12/31/hillary-clinton-backer-paid-500g-to-fund-women-accusing-trump-sexual-misconduct-before-election-day-report-says.html)

Veritas Vincit:
We have some major fools in this country, that presume Trump would mess with women who are orders of magnitude below those who he has betrothed.
As a man, we talk of women in some manners not perceived as gentlemanly as most assuredly occurs when women are in similar groupings. What a shame that Trump behaved as a male, not one of the desired emasculated peons the left so dearly loves.
Some may dearly love those males who run as danger approaches, yet I approve of those who stand and act as the age old protector of the family. the Real Man.

Lady Checkmate:
Veritas Vincit (Veritas Vincit), I think you just exposed one of your sock accounts. I have no quarrel with you and actually agree with you, mostly, on this comment (but, never with the race baiting you some times engage in). Still, cool it kiddo. Sock accounts are a Disqus TOS violation and a violation of our community guidelines.
*Please read our community guidelines before commenting or posting here again...the link is in our channel's description (top right hand corner of your screen). Do not send me any off topic comments, nor questions nor concerns about my request here. If you have follow-up/clarifying questions or concerns please post them in the proper forum, not here, again, the link is in the guidelines. Sock accounts are both a Disqus TOS violation and a violation of our community guidelines.
Thanks for understanding.
For your convenience: https://disqus.com/home/discussion/channel-newsnetwork/news_network_community_guidelines/

Asher:
Fox News = Fake News

Lady Checkmate:
...only to the alt-left.

Asher:
There is no alt-left.

Lady Checkmate:
http://time.com/4919011/donald-trump-alt-left-antifa/
Yeah, uhm NOPE - you're wrong, again. The era of alt-left trolls attempting to change the definitions of words to fit their hateful agenda and thinking they're the authority on reality is OVER.
Welcome to 2018! But, wait, that article came out in 2017...catch up.
Enjoy your day.
Happy New Year!!
PS: Here's a picture of two alt-left thugs beating the heck out of a guy they "suspected" was a Trump supporter:


Lady Checkmate, Disqus - News Network 10 Comments [1/2/2018 9:41:14 AM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: Jocasta

Quote# 135664

You completely miss the point. Of course there will always be hypocrites who will attempt to bend and misuse the scriptures to justify their own position. We have exactly the same situation today where some people claim that God does not condemn homosexuality as a sin. These people are hypocrites. The Bible always condemned the type of slavery that was practiced in the U.S. and some other Western nations for a short while. E.g. Ex 21:16. This form of slavery was a product of Muslim doctrine and slavery practices that greedy people in the West took to their own and then tried to justify, exactly as people try to justify the immoral practices these days that denigrate and disrespect sexual fidelity. People will wake up long before fifty years are up because the lies regarding homosexuality that are promulgated these days are profound and slowly becoming more obvious to even the most ignorant.

Mike W, Charisma News 9 Comments [1/2/2018 9:41:10 AM]
Fundie Index: 5

Quote# 135661

I'd rather have a pedophile in office rather than a democrat any day of the week and twice on Sunday. Pedophiles only screw kids while democrats screw everyone.

Carroll Bryant, Twitter 14 Comments [1/2/2018 9:40:04 AM]
Fundie Index: 18
Submitted By: The Reptilian Jew

Quote# 135660

If democrats throw temper tantrum over DACA then I hope president Trump and the republicans will SHUT IT DOWN! ... America could use a good 3-6 month government shut down.

Carroll Bryant, Twitter 16 Comments [1/2/2018 9:39:57 AM]
Fundie Index: 8
Submitted By: The Reptilian Jew

Unwarranted Self-Importance Award

Quote# 135659

I wonder how many of my democrat stalkers will show up today? Pathetic 10 year old adults with little to offer and nothing better to do than to check up on the great Carroll Bryant and call him names again. I'm just important enough for them to tell me how unimportant I am.

Carroll Bryant, Twitter 22 Comments [1/2/2018 9:39:43 AM]
Fundie Index: 7
Submitted By: The Reptilian Jew

Quote# 135658

Social equality is not realistic. You will not get social equality from socialism, communism, fascism, or terrorism anymore than you can get it from capitalism. Social equality is the big liberal lie. To want it promotes hate. Only the laziest, and poorest want social equality.

Carroll Bryant, Twitter 5 Comments [1/2/2018 9:38:01 AM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: The Reptilian Jew

Quote# 135657

I hope everyone had as wonderful a Thanksgiving as I had. Or as the democrats call it, "Gender Neutral Bird Eating Protest Trump Kill Babies In The Womb Day".

Carroll Bryant, Twitter 19 Comments [1/2/2018 9:37:11 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: The Reptilian Jew

Quote# 135656

If I had to choose between voting for a terrorist or a democrat to serve in public office, I'd vote for the terrorist.

Carroll Bryant, Twitter 12 Comments [1/2/2018 9:36:25 AM]
Fundie Index: 7
Submitted By: The Reptilian Jew

Quote# 135655

Some weeks ago prominent Imams, scholars and activists signed their name to a letter declining to lead Janazah prayers for those responsible for the London Bridge attacks. At the time, supporters of the letter argued that there was a precedent in the Sunnah where the Messenger of Allah declined in similar circumstances, and that there was value in demonstrating to non-Muslims that Muslims abhor such killings. Others opposed the statement – though also abhorred the killings – having other concerns including the implied acceptance of collective blame. Now emotions have cooled a little, I would like to share a serious concern that many of us (including some of those who signed the statement) may share.

As more of us become aware of the external pressure to ‘reform’ Islam – i.e. to change this Deen such that it conforms to secular liberal norms and policies of the political establishment, it is interesting to consider how religious reformations have occurred in the past. Orthodoxies were not re-evaluated in a political vacuum. Rather change was encouraged in the context of political pressure. The most famous example in British history is that of Henry VIII when he put pressure on clerics to find a religious solution to his failure to produce a male heir with his first wife, allowing him to remarry. Some of the clerics, faced with political pressure, searched for a legitimate solution within the Papal Law of that time – an annulment. The Pope rejected this – also for political reasons – to avoid a rift with Spain – leading to the wholesale change of the Church in England. In subsequent years, both under Protestant and Catholic monarchs, the opposing factions were pressured to make doctrinal concessions in order to prove their political loyalty, or else face suspicion, persecution or execution.

Of course, analogies have limitations and I am not offering this one except to make the point that political pressure has often driven theological change. Today, political pressure is usually applied at a time when Muslims feel at their most vulnerable. Following the attacks of 9/11 and 7/7, Woolwich, Manchester and London Bridge, responsibility is placed on the Muslim community, deliberately and collectively, through a variety of political messages carried by the corporate media – varying from explicit statements of the type Blair and Cameron used to make, to the implied blame from politicians and commentators expecting Muslims to ‘do more’ to deal with the issues at hand.

We have become used to calls for Muslims to ‘condemn’ such attacks and ‘endorse’ a variety of policy initiatives in their aftermath. However, condemning acts of murder is not sufficient – one is expected to condemn the ‘ideology’ supposedly associated with it – including the very idea of Jihad, the institution of Khilafah, and a number of other matters. Moreover, condemnation must be reserved for individual acts by Muslims and never state-sponsored acts of politically motivated violence – more bloody and terrifying by many degrees.

Uncritical endorsement is expected, for government policies supposedly related to preventing violence – but which can be extremely oppressive, targeting activities such as browsing the Internet and writing poems. We are expected to endorse the government’s use of ill-defined words like ‘extremism’ and their explanations for the causes. We are expected to endorse the idea that Muslims can and should do more to stop such attacks; and displays of loyalty that call for us to celebrate the armed forces that have been complicit in violence in Muslim countries.

These pressures are aimed to demonise authentic Islamic opinions about Jihad; Khilafah; relations between men and women; same-sex relationships; opposition to the occupation of Palestine; opposition to western foreign policy and military ventures; and opposition to the regimes in the Muslim world. We then start to see theological justifications for a changed position – not because they were considered theologically strong, but because they conform to political and ideological pressures around us. The theological justifications often start, like Henry’s annulment, applying a legitimate principle but then extending it beyond its original context just to meet political pressures; or exceptional circumstances become generalised to being normal practice.

For me, the statement about refusing to lead the Janazah prayers of these attackers rang alarm bells – not because it was baseless, but because it was drafted at an extremely emotive time (and hence a point of maximal political pressure), and arguably took the matter beyond the original Sunnah precedent. Yes, the Messenger of Allah declined to honour certain people with the blessing of his Imamah at their funerals, instead telling one of his noble companions to lead the prayer. But to gather dozens of names, announce the matter publicly with a press release, and to call for others not to lead the prayer – exceeds his noble example by some measure. It also puts any Imam who decided to read the funeral prayer, for example to help a traumatised family, at risk of being labelled an ‘extremist’.

Aside from the social and political implications of such messaging, what is needed at this time is for Imams, scholars and Muslims who are active in their communities to actively engage in understanding and then explaining the relevant issues as they are, not as the government or extreme secularists would like them to be. In that way we would be true to our Deen, explaining it clearly to our community and not falling into the reformation traps laid for us.

Advocates of reform argue that there is no obligation of Khilafah; no Jihad like the ghazawaat of the Messenger ; no problem with joining armies that will attack Muslims; no problem with Riba-based contracts; no problem with man legislating and ruling by other than what Allah has revealed; no problems with joining or supporting secular political movements; no problem with un-Islamic sexual relationships; no problem with nation state constructs taking precedence over Islamic loyalties; and no problem with a national ‘tribal’ identity taking precedence over an Islamic identity. These are all positions that some of the same people would have shunned only a few years ago without today’s political pressures. Yet consistent pressure has forced a change in their views.

Our role is not merely to resist the pressures to reform, but to actively uphold and explain authentic precepts that are demonised – not fearing the blame of the Blamers. It is to resist the temptation to look for exceptions to general rules, without teaching the general rule first and restricting the exceptions to their appropriate context. It is to guard against using examples out of their context. It is to be aware that pressures are applied in order to force Muslims to change.

Muslims who have validated the institution of Khilafah have been denounced as ‘extreme’, not just because ISIS have soiled it but because reformists argue it isn’t an obligation any more, as modern political constructs are acceptable. Yet many remain silent on the reformist argument and allow the misinformation to go unchallenged. Muslims who uphold the idea of Jihad in all its forms are denounced as ‘extreme’, not just because some individuals exceed limits set by Allah in taking innocent life, but because reformists argue the only Jihad is jihad-al-nafs. Those of us who know both positions are flawed, rarely educate the community about what Jihad really means.

So, as to my question – can such joint statements become a vehicle for reformation? Not always. But several by the ‘usual suspects’ leading the reform agenda have – and I am concerned that this most recent statement shared some of those aspects I have highlighted in this open letter – and it is for this reason that I offer this nasiha, which I pray is clear for those who read it, and accepted by our Lord, Allah .

Abdul Wahid, Hizb ut-Tahrir 2 Comments [1/2/2018 9:35:56 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 135654

As is traditional at the end of each year in the West people review what has happened with a view to learning lessons and setting new goals for the next year. However, for organisations that have a sinister agenda this is an opportunity to vaguely summarise the past year’s events, loosely link them together to make outrageous insinuations, and thus justify even more despicable plans for the next year.

Such was the case this week with the secular extremists in the mainstream media and the Office for Standards in Education Ofsted. Chief Inspector Amanda Spielman released a statement in which she accused a number of “faith” schools of having been judged by her own organisation of failing to meet the secular standards that she herself set, as they were “spreading beliefs that clash with British values.”

The media in turn wasted no time in promoting her call for more power to impose her own liberal secular beliefs and values on all the children in the UK. The fact that millions of British people, Muslims and others, do not share her extremist secular values did not factor into her statement, as she claimed that her love of democracy and support of the anti-religious LGBT lobby’s agenda were “mainstream thinking” and the real British values, and that religious institutions were undermining them.

This should not come as a surprise, as this is the same Amanda Spielman who ludicrously claimed that the hijab was a sign of premature sexualisation of young Muslim girls, without a hint of irony in the hyper-sexualised atmosphere created by the media, fashion and popular culture industries. For someone who can shamelessly twist the facts so blatantly, it cannot have been difficult for her to ignore the contradictory logic in her recent outburst. Her pretence is that the religious schools have failed to meet academic standards, yet they are being failed by her own organisation on the grounds that their values are different to hers, regardless of their academic performance.

Her attack went beyond the schools, however, as she then accused the religious schools serving the surrounding community of “deliberately resisting” beliefs and values that she does not agree with, as they are not “British” enough for her. She said “We have found an increasing number of conservative religious schools where the legal requirements that set the expectations for shared values and tolerance clash with community expectations.”

The secular liberal elite’s ‘Muscular Liberalism’ is increasingly exposing the emptiness of their professed values. A Department for Education spokeswoman is reported to have said “we changed the law and the requirements on schools so that they have to actively promote the fundamental British values of democracy, the rule of law, individual liberty, and the mutual respect and tolerance of those with different faiths and beliefs.” They are willing to sacrifice all of their “freedom of religion” to protect their most important freedom, that of ownership and their desire to hegemonize the world’s economy.

It would be easy to assume that Ms Spielman has a personal grudge driving her agenda, which may be a factor, however, we should recognise that Ofsted and the media are driven by a far more sinister agenda of the liberal secular elite. Jewish and Christian schools and communities have long taught held views at odds with the “mainstream,” yet only now that the focus is on tackling the rise of Islam in the world are they all subject to criticism for opposing the ever-changing “British mainstream” values.

It is the imminent return of Islamic Khilafah (caliphate) on the way of Prophethood that they worry about, as it will focus the world’s attention on their unjust colonial exploitation that has gone unchecked for the past century. With this paranoia of the elite, the atmosphere in the West has become increasingly and notably hostile to all religious values, and particularly Islam.

We shouldn’t be fooled by the rhetoric of the secular establishment, that it believes in tolerance and religious freedom. It is no more likely to heed these restraints than the wolf would respond to the complaint of the sheep. However, we should not shy away from explaining the failure of the secular capitalist way of life to look after all the people, in particular its inability to deal with minorities and its favouring the benefit of a powerful elite over all others.

Muslims should realise that expecting Muslims to be treated like other religious groups is no longer appropriate in this atmosphere of intolerance of all religious values and practices. Rather the focus of our criticism should be on exposing the irrational basis of the secular creed (aqeedah) itself, along with the failure of its ideology to bring anything other than misery to mankind.

Such direct pressure on Muslims to conform to the backward “mainstream British” values of democracy and individual liberty, by imposing it upon the children who are incapable of arguing against its fallacy, should only strengthen our resolve to stand up on their behalf, calling all mankind to understand and witness the pure deen of Islam.

Yahya Nisbet, Hizb ut-Tahrir 6 Comments [1/2/2018 9:35:52 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 135653

Secular law is evil and those who believe it is right and above the law of Allah are some of the most evil people alive.

Evil. They pass laws to suit their interests at the detriment of others, csusing oppression which becomes utter corruption "fasad" on earth.

They are bigoted, prejudiced, ignorant, differential, and lie to "the people" and the people, like cattle, follow them.

The corruption of the entire world and mankind is a result in part of the evil machinations of these.

Abu Kamel, Ummah 7 Comments [1/2/2018 9:29:36 AM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 135651

Ever notice how Normies spam anecdotal evidence and almost never post actual studies?

"That's not true! I saw a short guy with a tall hot girl!"

"Yeah, females are picky, but I see ugly guys date hot chicks all the time!"

If we were to believe Normies (both Blue and Red Pilled), we'd be seeing fat fuckers fingerbanging multiple sluts right out in the open all the time. Normies try to say that they never says Looks don't matter...but then they'll shame you if your Looks are so bad, they strike you out of the sexual market place. So they really NEED for Fat Fuck Theory to be true for their ideology to hold any water.

Except its not true. My Grandparents married their Looksmatch. My attractive uncle married his attractive Looksmatch. My fat and ugly aunts and uncle married their fat and ugly Looksmatch. My father is less attractive than my mother, but has a 10 year age gap between them, allowing for more money and status. When I look on the street, I see attractive people with attractive people, average people with average people, ugly people with ugly people, and ugly, autistic nerds with fucking nobody.

So whose "I see"ism are we supposed to believe? Is "I see"ism drawing us any closer to understanding male-female nature? This is all just a distraction away from the actual, statistical evidence indicating, no, personality doesn't especially matter, your Looks, Money, and Status dictate your romantic success in life, with some sneaky fuckers able to replicate the appearance of Money and Status to leech lays that way (to very, very mixed success).

In the end, most Normies have the intellectual capacity of a Goldfish. What they see (or selectively remember), is. Their feels > Your reals. And there is no number of Black Pills in the world to prove otherwise.

TheIncelPill, incels.me 17 Comments [1/2/2018 9:29:26 AM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 135648



What type of person are you?

True believers (Wheat) are Holy: sanctified by God.

They believe and confess that Jesus is Lord, the Son of God, even part of the Trinity

False Christians (Weeds) , those who profess to be Christians but are not, believe that Jesus was a real person but not God and never rose from the dead

- they believe he was mad - giving us a licence to sin. They are wrong.

Those who reject the Gospel but have good values and believe Jesus was a Good person (Sheep) are right in a sense.

They live harmoniously with the True believers and refuse to worship the Beast and receive his Mark

Vile non believers who believe Jesus is Bad (Goats), worship the Beast and take his Mark.

They persecute the True Believers.

Nigel Hawkins, The Truth in Love 21 Comments [1/2/2018 9:25:39 AM]
Fundie Index: 9
Submitted By: Denizen
1 5 10 11 12 13 14 15 | top