Quote# 137173

The thing is, the conservatives speaking out against this are the some of the same conservatives who also celebrate disemploying and jailing people for racism, anti-semitism, and Holocaust denial, and support both state and federal laws criminalizing speech in support of the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions Movement and denying federal contracts to corporations that boycott Israel. All of which result in penalties considerably more harsh than simply not being able to graduate from one particular university.

Why is the enforcement of the cuckservative narrative any more acceptable to these self-professed champions of free speech than the SJW narrative or the Fake Science narrative?

So, to be blunt, I don't give a damn about any these so-called "free speech" rights anymore. The First Amendment is observably dead and it's now clearly all just a power game of "who, whom" between rival identity groups, which means it is time for Anglo-American Christians to go back to having the temporal courts enforce blasphemy laws that criminalize all blasphemies against God, including denying His being or providence, all contumelious reproaches of Jesus Christ, all profane scoffing at the Holy Scriptures, and exposing any part thereof to contempt or ridicule, and punish violators with death, imprisonment, corporal punishment and fine.

That is not only more legitimate than these various anti-speech laws and public policies, it is actually part of the common law that has been degraded by non-Anglo immigrants who never understood it due to their historical lack of exposure to it.

Vox Day, Vox Popoli 3 Comments [3/10/2018 11:06:50 AM]
Fundie Index: 5

Quote# 137172

The Islamophilic discourse of the Jews in the 19th century can generally be regarded as an early example of Jews weaponizing (fake) history to corrode the culture, patriotism and faith of the people they live among.

czakal, Wordpress 0 Comments [3/10/2018 11:04:44 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: hydrolythe

Quote# 137059

Don't let him define himself as 'gay'. It's a 'desire' and an unnatural one. Thats about it.

If he stops following the desire...then it will no longer exist after a while. The only reason he feels gay is because he is looking at something which makes him feel desire...so tell him that he needs to lower his gaze. After a while he will forget such a thing as 'gay' even exists.

You only feel gay if you follow your gay desires and because society keeps telling you. For millions of years people didn't feel the need to identify themselves as 'gay', because society never encouraged them and even if they did have something, they would immediately feel guilty and that was the end of it. The islamic advice for any kind of desire would be to lower your gaze and refrain from following your lusts. Then after that you won't need to call urself 'gay' anymore, cause u can only be gay if u do something of that nature, otherwise it's just a thought that crossed your mind.

abc123d, Ummah 11 Comments [3/10/2018 10:21:28 AM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 137058

[You're a mean one, Mr. Day, you really are a Beale]

The reason the ideological Right has limited cultural power these days is because the Left, with (((David Brooks))) and his nation in the vanguard, have worked very hard for at least four generations at attempting to eradicate everything from the culture that betrays any sign of Christian influence or Western tradition.

And the reason that they are failing despite their near-complete control of the cultural high ground is because they have literally nothing to offer in its place. All they ever had to offer was reaction, negation, ugliness, filth, and snark. Sure, you can adulterate Christmas, and you can substitute Silver Bells, shopping, Santa, and Seasons Greetings for Silent Night, Hark the Herald Angels Sing, Scrooge, and We Wish You a Merry Christmas, but at the end of the day, either you come up with a substitute or your efforts will eventually prove futile.

What did they come up with in over a century of frantic effort? Festivus, the Hannukah Aardvark, and horrible movies that are bad even by Seth Rogen's standards. Hardly an attractive exchange for even the most godless pagan.

We not only can win this cultural war, we cannot lose it so long as we continue to create things that are good, beautiful, and true, and continue to refuse entrance to the infiltrating wormtongues who are always there with their helpful blandishments and seductive offers to sell your creative soul to Mammon.

So let them turn Elsa of the Crowleyesque anthem into a lesbian. Let them transform Superman into an SJW superhero fighting for global migration, one-world government, and AIPAC. Let them continue to preen and posture and sneer and snark in futility. It will avail them nothing. Like their Father the Devil, they cannot create, they can only corrupt. And that is why the greatness of Tolkien, of Howard, of Lovecraft, and of Wright will continue to be recognized over time despite the Left's best efforts to denigrate and diminish it.

Vox Day, Vox Popoli 5 Comments [3/10/2018 10:21:10 AM]
Fundie Index: 5

Quote# 137055

I can tell that youngcels here think being incel is a joke

They think its only temporary, they still have hope and think that eventually theyll graduate out of being incel. I used to be like that too when I was younger, I thought it was funny and I would make jokes about it for shits and giggles thinking that one day Id eventually lose my V card.

But OH BOY WAS I WRONG, not in a million years would I have guessed that I would end up a virgin in 2018

Once you hit 21 and realize how truly over and hopeless it is youll stop finding it amusing. It goes from irritating to painful in a matter of weeks. I hate everyone and everything because of it. Im at the point where I literally want bad things to happen to people so I wouldnt feel so horrible about myself. Being incel gets worse over time too. At 16 you might be worried about not having sex but in your 20s youre now a virgin with 0 chance of experiencing young love.

It gets exponentially worse, just you wait younglings

Total Imbecile, incels.me 10 Comments [3/10/2018 10:18:12 AM]
Fundie Index: 1
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 137052

A Muhammadan once told me that the West is the greatest danger to civilization in the world, and I responded by saying that the West is civilization, and everything else, save a few East Asian countries, is barbarity.

I believe that this is supported by fact: every other "civilization," be it the Muhammadans, Jews, Africans, Aztecs, Incas, Aborigines or Indians are plagued with superstition, irrationality, mutilation practices, low intelligence and various forms of degeneracy.

It was the West that produced the Industrial Revolution, the West that gave women equality, the West that invented the telephone, car, internet, computers, the printing press, and antibiotics.

The only other civilization that has ever been able to compete with the West on any level was East Asian Civilization- exclusively China and Japan who invented paper, firearms and the steam engine, and who were for a brief period more advanced than us until the Industrial Revolution.

It has been a mixture of our race, culture and values that has produced this, and which has made the West worth preserving and defending.

Nationalist1776, Stormfront 1 Comments [3/10/2018 10:17:40 AM]
Fundie Index: 0
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 137049

The high-profile men and women of the Right absolutely need to stop thinking about maximizing their short-term benefit and start looking to support the platforms that are not going to a) silence them, b) sell them out, or, c) leave them completely exposed to their enemies. And they also need to stop "fighting for free speech". Free speech is little more than anti-Christian Enlightenment propaganda, which very few of its self-appointed defenders seem to know.

Vox Day, Vox Popoli 2 Comments [3/10/2018 10:16:55 AM]
Fundie Index: 3

Quote# 137048

It's amusing that he thinks "moral standing" is relevant in a political environment in which basic, fundamental concepts such as "male" and "illegal" are treated as variable, and traditional definitions are designated as outdated and immoral. It's understandable, though just as incorrect, to claim that free speech is a moral issue. It is not. In fact, the pro-blasphemy position is actually the observably immoral position.

But his biggest mistake is to claim that "the moral high ground" is why one side wins. This is simply more conservative posturing that reliably leads them into disaster. The center is not abandoning the Left because the Left has abandoned a moral high ground that it never held, it is being abandoned by a Left that moves ever deeper into madness.

Those who believe in a path to victory through "the moral high ground" inevitably find themselves outflanked by those who are willing to surrender even more nobly. That is why no successful strategist in history has ever designed a strategy that relies upon moral posturing. And appealing to the moral sense of an immoral people whose morality is constantly in flux is neither a rational strategy nor a winning one.

Listening to a conservative talk about strategy is like listening to a blind man's advice on how to drive a Formula One race car. They are reliable counter indicators.

Vox Day, Vox Popoli 0 Comments [3/10/2018 10:16:44 AM]
Fundie Index: 1

Quote# 137047

He seriously wants to take YOUR unalienable right to self-defense away. He does not respect your Second Amendment rights. At all.

So, why should we respect his First Amendment rights? We should not, as NN Taleb advises in his excellent new book Skin in the Game.

Start by being nice to everyone person you meet. But if someone tries to exercise power over you, exercise power over him.

This philosophy means that every individual who attempts to infringe on our Second Amendment rights, in any way, has lost any claim to our consideration for their First Amendment rights.

Vox Day, Vox Popoli 1 Comments [3/10/2018 10:15:43 AM]
Fundie Index: 1

Quote# 137046

being religious should preclude anyone from being in any public office . 

Walter, Religion and Ethics 0 Comments [3/10/2018 10:15:15 AM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: NearlySane

Quote# 137044

frederick:

The answer to your question is very simple, and it would help you to use the Christian Bible (AV1611!) and not corrupted (per)versions relative to your Biblical enlightenment. To put it in a very simple form, the answer is yes, they are the same. There are several words in the language of the Heeb that refer to God: El, Elohim, Baruh, and a few others. All of these simply mean God. El can mean either god or God. Elohim is the plural form and is an equivalent of the royal "we", which ultimately means capital-G God. Simple stuff! Lord can mean two things: either God or Jesus are praised as the Lord or it is a substitute for God's name after the manner of the Jew's tradition of not saying it outloud and instead saying "Lord" in the Hebrew language. In fact, Heebs, even before they became heretics, forgot the proper pronunciation of God's name, so nobody really knows if it's Yahweh, Yahova/Jahova, or Yehova/Jehova!

But not to worry, since we have our Jesus of the Christian Bible, we can avoid all the confusion of the Jew, by simply referring to our beloved Jesus the Christ! Simple, isn't it?!

In the name of our Savior,
Brother T

Tony Demarcus, Ph.D., D.D., Disqus Grace and Truth 6 Comments [3/10/2018 10:15:02 AM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 137042

(Comments on article "The Latest LGBT TV Show Is So Outrageous It Will Leave Your Head Spinning")

(Surjit Kaila)
Sent the basterds to Muslim countries so they can be thrown off the high builddings

(Robert Miller)
I'll second that motion!! Let's include the liberal Judges,liberal politicians and the other sick bastards who promote this life style!!

(Vangie Martinez)
Thats not an answer that is acceptable. We don't want to be a part of a Death Cult and it's own Agenda and Ulterior Motive to destroy People. No what they need is JESUS. But in a Worldly way of doing things hit them in their Pocket Book and Continue to Boycott the Station and the Companys that put Ads with these Stations and Shows.

(Sue Brooks)
I wouldn't let any kid anywhere near these type shows....they're the best way to warp young minds!

(Robert Miller)
That's what their objective is!!

(Katie Drew)
These things have to happen before the return of Jesus for His church, the Bible says so. Bring it on!

(Philomena Holian)
God save us all from SATAN'S EVIL.

(Angela Thompson)
Of course gender exists. This movement is idiotic.

(Cheryl Detar)
I do not watch any shows that push the LGBYXTUVWA agenda. A couple weeks ago, I watched a new show, 911, Initially, I was OK, with the 2 lesbian actors. It wasn't being flaunted. However, the other night, the 2 were in bed, passionately, "going at it." I immediately turned it off and will NEVER watch it again.

(Sharon Melvin)
I started watching the Good Doctor and when it presented a Transgender person, I stopped watching it. When something like this comes up use the power of the remote control. There are millions of conservatives out there. I will not watch the Oscars, Emmys or other shows for the same reason. I stopped watching NFL games because I do not like the disresect. We conservatives need to make our voice heard. It sure has hurt the NFL.

(Robert Withrow)
I am for any person to live their lives as they want, but use decorum, this gawdy debauchery of sexism about gender same sex marriage to a level that shows no restraint or integrity. Shockism is not how you bring others with opposing, or diffrent views to your support. The age of innocene has long gone. If only the LGBT as they call it, will walk with dignity, and talk respect for themselves ,and all others of different orientation. Yes I know I am going to be called ugly names. We all stand under one flag, one nation, and with that those freedoms we all enjoy everyday. Last thought, when you respect yourself, you then can respect others no matter the creed, the sex, or political affiliation. The word is RESPECT...

(Frank W Brown)
There are TWO, count em, TWO genders, EVERYTHING else is MENTAL ILLNESS that needs treatment in the worst way!

(Larry Draper)
All: Yet *another* article which simply recognizes the absolute
*insanity* of the LGBTQ viewpoints that *any* amount of surgeries or
hormones could *ever* delete the effects of the XX and XY chromosomes that
have been *evolving* in the human race for *millions* of years, and
*billions* of years for all gender-based life, or that reSocialisticization
could realistically replace societal norms such as *marriage* and *family*
after 7000 years or so of religious and law-making norms. //Larry Draper//

(Jay Yother)
Wonder if Mommy Activist knows they are advertising gay dating sites on her page??

(Beverly Charles)
You can bet Facebook put that ad in place deliberately!

various commenters, Mommy Underground 1 Comments [3/10/2018 10:14:37 AM]
Fundie Index: 2

Quote# 137041

The Latest LGBT TV Show Is So Outrageous It Will Leave Your Head Spinning

The LGBT community has hijacked the entertainment industry and filled the airwaves with their warped agenda.

From homosexual marriage, to “transgender” couples, it’s no wonder more and more Americans are saying “no thanks” to cable TV.

But this latest show introduces a character that takes it even further.

In fact, as this show reveals there’s no telling just how far the LGBT community will go to shock America and attempt to make their way of life “mainstream.”

Instead of introducing a transsexual, or another homosexual couple, Showtime decided to introduce its first gender “non-binary” character.

The LGBT community deems a “non-binary” person as one who doesn’t identify with either gender.

Determined to strip away any sense of decency, Showtime pushes the envelope and introduces this bizarre character to the world.

CBN reported:

“Dillon uses singular they pronouns and her role on the show is the first gender non-binary character on American television.

The move is seen as a huge step forward for LGBTQ inclusion and representation in pop culture.

But Elizabeth Johnston, also known as the ‘Activist Mommy’, says Showtime’s decision to cast a non-binary character is all part of the LGBTQ’s plan to normalize it.

“This is an LGBT agenda that is being pushed on our nation,” Johnston said in an interview with CBN News. “Truth and science and facts matter and just because someone says that two plus one equals five that doesn’t make it true.

There’s something called facts and truth and the truth of it is we are born xy or xx or we have a biological or psychological pathology and what we’re seeing with gender dysphoria is pathological and it is not normal and we’re being asked to embrace it as normal and celebrate it.”


Elizabeth Johnston nailed it.

Just because the LGBT community refuses to “see gender”, doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist.

People with gender dysphoria need help, mental counseling, not exposure to the world to promote their way of life, which will further confuse those who already struggle.

The biggest lie of all is the LGBT community wants to “live a quiet life in peace.”

Nothing could be further from the truth.

As Mommy Underground previously reported, they have a record of sneaking their perverted agenda into shows that target children.

But while the LGBT community thinks they have power, they’re forgetting one thing – if people decide to boycott these shows and refuse to watch them, it will help stop the spread of their twisted agenda.

After all, networks are ultimately about ratings.

If conservatives can show network officials they will no longer pay nor subscribe to such filth, perhaps things can change.

And if not, parents must refuse to let their children watch these shows.

What are your thoughts on the new “non-binary” character?

How do you prevent your family from watching shows like these?

Tell us your thoughts in the comments below.

And to stay current on the latest Mommy Underground stories, follow us on Facebook and be sure to like and share our posts!

Unknown writer & Elizabeth Johnston, Mommy Underground 0 Comments [3/10/2018 10:14:21 AM]
Fundie Index: 2

Quote# 137170

The Ten Commandments of a DemonRat

* This should not be taken as an endorsement of the useless Republican't Party.

1. You shall always support massive government spending, massive deficits, high taxes, endless money printing, and any regulatory scheme or executive mandate that will increase and consolidate the dictatorial power of the Federal government.

2. You shall always blame the ensuing economic dislocation and inevitable hardship caused by the 1st Commandment upon "the rich" and the business class. Rub raw the wounds of public discontent and then present your yourself as the benefactor of downtrodden humanity while rolling out the next program for government expansion.

3. You shall always support the killing of unborn babies -- referring to them as "fetuses" -- right up until the 9th month of pregnancy and even afterwards. Selling the organs for cash is an added bonus.

4. You shall always support, promote and protect insanity, ugliness, godlessness, perversion and depravity of any kind -- including abstract art, degenerate music, literature and film, pornography, adultery, graphic sex-education for children, promiscuity, the glorification of the "single mom," child pornography, homosexuality, lesbianism, cross-dressing and even, albeit it with necessary caution, bestiality and the raping of children.

5. You shall always support any incremental step toward the ultimate abolition of private firearm ownership. Use "the children" as your main front for this project.

6. You shall always support any incremental step toward the ultimate blending out and murdering off of the White Race. This includes discrimination, imposed under the high-sounding name of "diversity," against White college applicants and job candidates; the agitation of Blacks, Browns, Asians and Jews into envying and hating Whites; the tearing down of the memory of famous historical White personages; and the constant guilt-shaming of Whites into self-hatred.

7. You shall always support unlimited legal and illegal immigration from the Turd World, along with the welfare programs and voter registration that follow. Defend all migrants as "dreamers" and opponents as "xenophobes."

8. You shall always support any incremental step toward, or organization working for the establishment of an all powerful one-world government.

9. You shall always work toward the feminization and dis-empowerment of males, and, conversely, the masculinization and empowerment of females, with the ultimate objective being the effective abolition of marriage the traditional family.

10. You shall always promote and never deviate from the fake sciences of St. Hawking's Bing Bangism, St. Darwin's Evolution, St. Einstein's Curved Space Relativity, and St. Gore's manmade CO2 based Global Warming / Climate Change.

Mike King, Tomato Bubble 12 Comments [3/10/2018 9:59:13 AM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: Yossarian Lives

Quote# 137169

Pro-death is forever.

Once you have killed that innocent child, there is no undoing that.

All of your questions pertain to killing those living humans outside of the womb as well as inside of the womb.

Based on the "logic" of your questions, you have just justified killing the homeless, the uninsured, all children up to the age of adulthood, the disabled, the incarcerated, impoverished children in other countries, children with cancer, victims of gang violence, HIV victims, and LGBT.

Are you Muslim by any chance - you sure do love death for all kinds of people. You left out sex selection abortions and honor killings for little girls - all to save your precious State money.

Kill them all so they don't suffer, right?!? That is YOUR view. Thank you for your transparency!

It must be so easy to be "pro-choice" when YOU are not the one being aborted.

WorldGoneCrazy-NotMurderedYet, Live Action News 5 Comments [3/10/2018 9:58:41 AM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: Jocasta

Quote# 137019

Anytime you atheist attack God it's usually because you're bitter towards Him. I don't even think [Disqus user] goo gle is an atheist. Most of you here are not atheist, just mad at God for something that you think He did wrong, some injustice that befell you that you blame God for........And this site is your vengeance. As if you can hurt God in any way. Or some of you just plain want to live in the flesh without any restrictions. It's not because you don't believe He exist. Most of you aren't really atheist at all, or you sure wouldn't be on a religion channel kicking something that don't exist..........Who do you think you're fooling?

Ken Faivor, Disqus - Religion 4 Comments [3/10/2018 9:44:03 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Jocasta

Quote# 137003

The United States Constitution guarantees us the right to worship God unimpaired by the United States government. It in no way shape or form guarantees us the right not to worship God.

ari, Y! answers 4 Comments [3/10/2018 9:42:51 AM]
Fundie Index: 3

Quote# 136984

: Do you think we should put people in prison for getting caught with snuff films and gore like we do for child oorn? They're all psychos who need to be locked up before they hurt someone imo



Wow did you ever pick the wrong tree to bark up here my friend
I’ve probably got at least a gig worth of gore shock images on my hard drive as well as a far greater amount of BDSM porn that’d freak out most normal people
Also I don’t even think child porn should be illegal and I’m pretty sure I’ve defended that position here before but I’m always happy to do so again
It’s been shown again and again that if there’s some correlation between having some antisocial mental condition and seeking out violent/sexual/etc media the causation runs backwards from what you’re implying - people who were born with a problem express that through their media choices, rather than the consumption of media causing the issue. Meanwhile enormous numbers of perfectly sane and harmless people enjoy violent entertainment and pornography for their entire lives and never hurt anyone. The state should simply never be allowed to ban any sort of media at all - no exceptions.

sadoeconomics, tumblr 0 Comments [3/10/2018 9:42:19 AM]
Fundie Index: 1

Quote# 136933

I do not hate freedom. But I hate selfish sociopaths who who use "freedom" as a shield to hide behind while caring not in the slightest for anyone else's freedom or the other needs of society.

And projection it is. I care for others, look at any the averages, right wingers donate more than liberals. And you say not caring for anyone else’s freedom? On what they are free unlike In a socialist system where they can’t voluntarily transact. It’s not charitable to reach into some one else’s wallet man, dig into your own. Obviously you lack the basic knowledge of the situation or you would be on my side.

a socialist system where they can’t voluntarily transact.

Which I do not advocate (in character or in reality), nor does any but a few fringe lunatics with zero relevance in real life.
Obviously you lack the basic knowledge of the situation or you would be on my side.

[eyerolling smiley]

cough fascist Blackshirt thugs aka antifa cough not to mention corbyn having a literal communist and attending communist meetings... well to be fair europe is unimportant anyways

FreedLymonia, NationStates 2 Comments [3/10/2018 9:39:44 AM]
Fundie Index: 1
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 136913

Psychologists and psychiatrists are not epidemiologists; they don't necessarily want to find out causes, even if they should. They want to make the world a better place, which to them usually means progressive , where findings supporting conservative or liberal viewpoints will be judged measureably differently on that basis alone. As Psychology Today notes, in psychology and social work, "there has been a good deal of resistance to evidence-based practice."

For example, when Regnerus authored a study that suggested gay parents had worse outcomes, which led to calls for the journal where he published to be boycotted and the editor to resign, there were no allegations of fraud or the like, to quote the critic's own response to his paper, "Much of the controversy surrounding the Regnerus study involves its political ramifications and questions of the propriety in the review process." and "The acceptance of this article has not only been damaging for same-sex equality, but it also shows the utility of checks and balances in the current peer review system need improving."
His paper could be quite misleading if you didn't look closely, but that is far from unique, check the data on lots of political papers psych papers and they often have far worse mistakes, see how well the conclusions match the results, or the sources actually say what they are supposed to but as long it is favorable to liberal subjects, it gets little notice, whereas Regnerus' underwent an audit and lots of scrutiny for not toeing the progessive line. Even then, they found nothing retration worthy.

These things are further polluted by psychologists, psychiatrist and other academics following in, not wanting to stigmitize certain minority groups, leading to UVA's own Dr. Haidt saying, '"They’ll embrace science whenever it supports their sacred values, but they’ll ditch it or distort it as soon as it threatens a sacred value.”

... But academics can be selective, too, as Daniel Patrick Moynihan found in 1965 when he warned about the rise of unmarried parenthood and welfare dependency among blacks — violating the taboo against criticizing victims of racism."...“Open-minded inquiry into the problems of the black family was shut down for decades, precisely the decades in which it was most urgently needed. Only in the last few years have liberal sociologists begun to acknowledge that Moynihan was right all along.”...Similarly, Larry Summers, then president of Harvard, was ostracized in 2005 for wondering publicly whether the preponderance of male professors in some top math and science departments might be due partly to the larger variance in I.Q. scores among men....“It blamed the victims rather than the powerful. The outrage ultimately led to his resignation." '


Pro-gay groups and anti-fornication conservative groups teamed up to make America think AIDS was a major heterosexual threat in the west and AIDS was not a gay disease, wasting billions on blanket awareness campaigns that could have been spent on AIDS prevention among vulnerable groups. In all these, the science and data wasn't even important enough to verify. The important thing was their ideas wouldn't progress things.

In the end this can lead to a house of cards, as it has before.

To quote the last psychiatrist blog (which goes way more into the depth of the rabbit hole of psychiatry):
"In order for this to be a science, there has to be a testable hypothesis. There isn't any of that in psychiatry. "

Example: antidepressant induced mania is the kind of testable question amenable to scientific investigation. Do they cause it, or not? ... You could do a billion studies on every drug ever made, in every description of "depression" imaginable and that would only allow you to say, "ah, I know the answer in a billion specific situations" but would still have no insights into the nature of the phenomenon.

....

When you give someone Paxil, you are playing the odds: this worked in 25% of the guys we gave it to in 1997. There's nothing wrong with doing this, that's what you're supposed to do; but it does not allow you to speculate on either the nature "antidepressants" or "depression."

...

In physics, such empty theories don't hurt anyone, and there's value in the theory itself. String theory may turn out to be wrong, but you at least are going to be really good at math. Okay.

But in psychiatry these empty questions and empty answers are still applied to social concepts as if they carried the weight of scientific validity. The question of "antidepressant induced mania" may be empty, but that doesn't stop the legal system from using it. You can't imagine the defense proposing that at the precise moment of the murder, the universe split into two equivalent eigenstates and the defendant, in this eigenstate, had been already determined to have had to have been committing the act of murder, which he already had even before he started; but that explanation carries considerably more scientific merit than the psychiatric one, by which I mean both have absolutely none at all.


TLDR:
Psychology is a very soft science, regardless of any access to brain scans or whatever they use to build legitimacy. They are very progressive (in a good and bad way) and are going to say what they think will put them on the right side of history, regardless of costs to scientific understanding.

Rotornabe, Kiwi Farms 0 Comments [3/10/2018 9:39:08 AM]
Fundie Index: 1

Quote# 136911

[James Woods on Twitter: If the #Democrats manage to reverse this election with their usual dirty tricks, there will be #CivilWar. This is not going to end well.]

It will be a very brief war. Our side has most of the guns, cops, military, veterans, hunters, survivalists, essential infrastructure workers, food producers and truckers. It will end with the dems isolated in their cities, starving. And Donald J. Trump appointed Emperor for life. The left does not study history.

Trumpsyeruncle, r/The_Donald 10 Comments [3/10/2018 9:35:11 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: The Reptilian Jew

Quote# 136906

(Arguing against Annhilationism)

Responding to Ronnie's latest above: I was speaking from a pagan's point of view. If there won't be a final accounting for my sins, why should I repent of them and be saved? Why not live it up, knowing that God will merely annihilate me, rather than make me suffer as I have made others suffer? From nothing into nothing? Most pagans believe that already. Are we to tell them that they're right, that all that religious talk about hellfire and eternal damnation is just rot, and that an eternity without God and Christ is no big deal? Are we not comforting them in their sins? A strange form of evangelism, to be sure.
And yes, I do believe in degrees of punishment in hell, just as I believe in degrees of reward in heaven (Rev. 20:11-25). The greatest torment will lie in being separated from the presence of God by one's own choice, forever.

Mark, Deeper Waters Apologetics 3 Comments [3/10/2018 9:35:09 AM]
Fundie Index: 1

Quote# 136902

MO bishop convicted for failing to report child abuse; 1st US bishop convicted in such case

http://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/sdut-mo-bishop-convicted-for-failing-to-report-priest-2012sep06-story.html


To be fair, I wouldn't also report it. Narcing is morally more despicable than anything the priest did (took a couple of photos).

xomaleo, reddit 2 Comments [3/10/2018 9:29:27 AM]
Fundie Index: 2

Quote# 136891

There is nothing inherently harmful or immoral about having sex with children CMV

There are a number of arguments used by proponents of the prevailing cultural mythology on the subject:

1. Children are psychologically damaged by sexual activity

Sex is an inherently pleasurable activity- the claim that children are inherently "harmed" or "traumatized" by sex is demonstrably false, supported by no scientific research, and is essentially absurd, as children are not asexual (a point I will address later).

"The self-reported effects data contradict the conclusions or implications presented in previous literature reviews that harmful effects stemming from CSA are pervasive and intense in the population of persons with this experience. Baker and Duncan (1985) found that, although some respondents reported permanent harm stemming from their CSA experiences (4% of males and 13% of females), the overwhelming majority did not (96% of males and 87% of females). Severe or intense harm would be expected to linger into adulthood, but this did not occur for most respondents in this national sample, according to their self-reports, contradicting the conclusion or implication of intense harm stemming from CSA in the typical case. Meta-analyses of CSA-adjustment relations from the five national studies that reported results of adjustment measures revealed a consistent pattern: SA respondents were less well adjusted than control respondents. Importantly, however, the size of this difference (i.e., effect size) was consistently small in the case of both males and females. The unbiased effect size estimate for males and females combined was ru = .08, which indicates that CSA, assuming that it was responsible for the adjustment difference between SA and control respondents, did not produce intense problems on average."

Rind, Bruce & Tromovitch, Philip (1997). "A meta-analytic review of findings from national samples on psychological correlates of child sexual abuse," Journal of Sex Research, 34, 237-255.

The Rind meta-analysis is peer-reviewed, and its conclusion has not been discredited to date.

Often, when psychological damage does occur, it is not the result of the act itself, but rather the result of society's reaction to it:

Nelson's relationship marked "the happiest period of [her] life." "When I was a child I experienced an ongoing incestuous relationship that seemed to me to be caring and beneficial in nature. There were love and healthy self-actualization in what I perceived to be a safe environment. Suddenly one day I discerned from playground talk at school that what I was doing might be "bad". Fearing that I might, indeed, be a "bad" person, I went to my mother for reassurance. The ensuing traumatic incidents of that day inaugurated a 30-year period of psychological and emotional dysfunction that reduced family communication to mere utilitarian process and established severe limits on my subsequent developmental journey."

Sexologist Joan A. Nelson in Children and Sex, on her relationship with an adult cousin at 8 years of age December, 1981

In other words, if the prevailing belief was not that having sex as a child is the worst thing that could possibly happen, psychological issues stemming from childhood sexual experience would lessen drastically.

2. Children are essentially asexual

This is false. The orgasmic reflex develops in the womb:

"We recently observed a female fetus at 32 weeks' gestation touching the vulva with the fingers of the right hand. The caressing movements were centered primarily on the region of the clitoris. Movements stopped after 30 to 40 seconds and started again after a few minutes. Furthermore, these slight touches were repeated and were associated with short, rapid movements of pelvis and legs. After another break, in addition to this behavior, the fetus contracted the muscles of the trunk and limbs, and then clonicotonic movements of the whole body followed. Finally, she relaxed and rested.

We observed this behavior for about 20 minutes. The mother was an active and interested witness, conversing with observers about her child's experience.

Evidence of male fetuses' excitement reflex in utero, such as erection or ?masturbation” movements, has been previously reported.

The current observation seems to show not only that the excitement reflex can be evoked in female fetuses at the third trimester of gestation but also that the orgasmic reflex can be elicited during intrauterine life. This would agree with the physiologic features of female sexuality: The female sexual response is separate from reproductive functions and doesn't need a full sexual maturity to be explicit."

Giorgi, Giorgio, and Siccardi, Marco (1996). "Ultrasonographic observation of a female fetus' sexual behavior in utero," American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 175, 3(1, part 1), 753.

"In a 1999 study of undergraduate students, 5.2% of females and 12.8% of males reported having engaged in sex play with their peers involving genital contact before elementary school, and that 1.3% of girls and 4.0% of boys had engaged in sex play involving anal/genital insertion (with objects or fingers) or oral-genital intercourse before elementary school. By the end of elementary school, the numbers increased to 29.2% for females and 32.9% for males for genital contact and 12.3 for girls and 10.1% for boys for insertion or oral sex. Very little pressure and almost no coercion were reported."

Reynolds, M.A., Herbenick, D. L., & Bancroft, J. (2003). The nature of childhood sexual experiences: Two studies 50 years apart. In J. Bancroft (Ed.), Sexual Development in Childhood (pp. 134-155). Indiana: Indiana University Press.

If children masturbate, orgasm, and have sex with each other, it is absurd to claim they are asexual.

3. Children cannot consent, and therefore having sex with children is rape, and we all know rape is harmful and immoral

Consent refers to the provision of agreement- if children are capable of initiating sexual activity, it is nonsensical to claim they cannot consent to it.

For example, in the animal kingdom, which has no taboo on childhood sexuality, sex between adult and children is common:

"Both adult males and females interact sexually with adolescents and juveniles (three-to-nine-year-olds). In fact, young females go through a five-to-six-year period sometimes referred to as ADOLESCENT STERILITY (although no pathology is involved) during which they actively participate in heterosexual mating (often with adults) but never get pregnant. Sexual behavior between adults and infants of both sexes is common - about a third of the time it is initiated by the infant and may involve genital rubbing and full copulatory postures (including penetration of an adult female by a male infant). (Biological Exuberance - 274)

Who is raping whom when the infant initiate sexual activity? Does the infant rape itself or does the adult rape the infant by not denying it sexual gratification?

3a. Children lack the ability to make informed consent

Sex is not some kind of complex and incomprehensible activity that requires a lot of knowledge to preform correctly- it is one of the simplest things in existence. Animals surely don't "understand" what sex is, yet it would be absurd to say all sex between animals is harmful or immoral.

5. This thread is disgusting and so are you.

This is not an argument.

Note that even though there is nothing inherently harmful about having sex with children, in our sex-negative culture, it very often is- see Joan A Nelson's quote above for an example. The harm did not come about from the sex itself, but from society's reaction to it- but regardless, it is still grossly immoral to risk ruining a child's life for the sake of an orgasm, even if the damage comes from iatrogenic sources.

So I'm not saying it's OK to have sex with children in this day and age- it most certainly is not. But the only reason it isn't is because of society's hysterical, unscientific, and maladaptive attitude towards this subject- if this were different, I see no reason why engaging in a harmless and mutually pleasurable activity with a child would be either harmful or immoral.

Svarog123, Reddit 2 Comments [3/10/2018 9:28:49 AM]
Fundie Index: 2

Quote# 136885

narwa asked:

I'm what you call "seriously disabled". Mostly mute, bad at understand people, rockin' back and forth, getting meltdowns left and right. Guess what! It's not because theres too much metal in my brain. And i wouldn't want to cure it. Ever. It's not a bad thing. I was just born different than most, and instead of trying to change what we can't change, maybe let's try to make the world more friendly for autistic people. And stop spreading bullshit.


How do you know why it is or isn’t? do you have clairvoyance? not wanting to change is your choice, you have no right to push it on others.

I would rather not have anxiety depression, and fibro. i’ve been ill since my smallpox vaccination at 11 or 12.

my daughter would rather not have insomuch and anxiety which mars her life.

what about money?

we are poor/living on benefit. i get the feeling that people with autism on tumblr aren’t. else they’d worry seriously about their future unless they are well enough to work ectr.

nobody ever answers that question.

how do you know you were born different, after all, depending on your age you’ll most likely have had the hep b at birth.

i don’t spread bullshit, i spread info. i ask people to inform themselves. very different from trying to shut them up/force vaccines on them.

in fact there’s supposed to be informed consent, anything else is violation of the nuremberg code/fascism.

#autism #chronic illness #vaccination #informed consent #fascism #narwa

sabelmouse, Tumblr 3 Comments [3/10/2018 8:53:40 AM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: Thanos6
1 5 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 | top