1 2 3 4 5 10 12 | bottom
Quote# 138325

America is heading down the path of degeneracy faster than predicted

Obesity continues to increase, people are getting uglier. People are getting gayer. This country will be third world in 30-50 years.

It would've been nice to have been born 50 years from now so that we don't have to live through the incoming shitshow, but I digress, it should be somewhat entertaining though mostly sad.

LuciferTakeMySoul, incels.me 4 Comments [6/26/2018 6:49:06 AM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 138324

Why do incels have dicks?

I'm ok being a permanent incel worker bee for the Chad and Stacy party, but can I at least not have a sex drive so that I think about sex and companionship every day?

I don't get why incels have genitals. Incels should be castrated at birth. Subhumans don't deserve to feel the pleasure of orgasm. They should be forced into labor camps and lashed for thinking impure thoughts.

big nose bug eyes, incels.me 7 Comments [6/26/2018 6:48:51 AM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 138318

When will inclusionists stop lumping trans and bi people with aces. We never had a shared history and never will!! Like stop!! Leave bi and trans people alone lmao!!

#ace discourse #mogai discourse #transgender #bisexual #aces arent lgbt #aces will never have anything in common with trans and bi people sorry!


slimeboytwink, Tumblr 4 Comments [6/26/2018 6:42:23 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Thanos6

Quote# 138316

Question: "Is annihilationism biblical?"

Answer: Annihilationism is the belief that unbelievers will not experience an eternity of suffering in hell, but will instead be “extinguished” after death. For many, annihilationism is an attractive belief because of the awfulness of the idea of people spending eternity in hell. While there are some passages that seem to argue for annihilationism, a comprehensive look at what the Bible says about the destiny of the wicked reveals the fact that punishment in hell is eternal. A belief in annihilationism results from a misunderstanding of one or more of the following doctrines: 1) the consequences of sin, 2) the justice of God, 3) the nature of hell.

In relation to the nature of hell, annihilationists misunderstand the meaning of the lake of fire. Obviously, if a human being were cast into a lake of burning lava, he/she would be almost instantly consumed. However, the lake of fire is both a physical and spiritual realm. It is not simply a human body being cast into the lake of fire; it is a human’s body, soul, and spirit. A spiritual nature cannot be consumed by physical fire. It seems that the unsaved are resurrected with a body prepared for eternity just as the saved are (Revelation 20:13; Acts 24:15). These bodies are prepared for an eternal fate.

Eternity is another aspect which annihilationists fail to fully comprehend. Annihilationists are correct that the Greek word aionion, which is usually translated “eternal,” does not by definition mean “eternal.” It specifically refers to an “age” or “eon,” a specific period of time. However, it is clear that in New Testament, aionion is sometimes used to refer to an eternal length of time. Revelation 20:10 speaks of Satan, the beast, and the false prophet being cast into the lake of fire and being tormented “day and night forever and ever.” It is clear that these three are not “extinguished” by being cast into the lake of fire. Why would the fate of the unsaved be any different (Revelation 20:14-15)? The most convincing evidence for the eternality of hell is Matthew 25:46, “Then they [the unsaved] will go away to eternal punishment, but the righteous to eternal life.” In this verse, the same Greek word is used to refer to the destiny of the wicked and the righteous. If the wicked are only tormented for an “age,” then the righteous will only experience life in heaven for an “age.” If believers will be in heaven forever, unbelievers will be in hell forever.

Another frequent objection to the eternality of hell by annihilationists is that it would be unjust for God to punish unbelievers in hell for eternity for a finite amount of sin. How could it be fair for God to take a person who lived a sinful, 70-year life, and punish him/her for all of eternity? The answer is that our sin bears an eternal consequence because it is committed against an eternal God. When King David committed the sins of adultery and murder he stated, “Against you, you only, have I sinned and done what is evil in your sight” (Psalm 51:4). David had sinned against Bathsheba and Uriah; how could David claim to have only sinned against God? David understood that all sin is ultimately against God. God is an eternal and infinite Being. As a result, all sin against Him is worthy of an eternal punishment. It is not a matter of the length of time we sin, but the character of the God against whom we sin.

A more personal aspect of annihilationism is the idea that we could not possibly be happy in heaven if we knew that some of our loved ones were suffering an eternity of torment in hell. However, when we arrive in heaven, we will not have anything to complain about or be saddened by. Revelation 21:4 tells us, “He will wipe every tear from their eyes. There will be no more death or mourning or crying or pain, for the old order of things has passed away.” If some of our loved ones are not in heaven, we will be in 100 percent complete agreement that they do not belong there and that they are condemned by their own refusal to accept Jesus Christ as their Savior (John 3:16; 14:6). It is hard to understand this, but we will not be saddened by the lack of their presence. Our focus should not be on how we can enjoy heaven without all of our loved ones there, but on how we can point our loved ones to faith in Christ so that they will be there.

Hell is perhaps a primary reason why God sent Jesus Christ to pay the penalty for our sins. Being “extinguished” after death is no fate to dread, but an eternity in hell most definitely is. Jesus’ death was an infinite death, paying our infinite sin debt so that we would not have to pay it in hell for eternity (2 Corinthians 5:21). When we place our faith in Him, we are saved, forgiven, cleansed, and promised an eternal home in heaven. But if we reject God’s gift of eternal life, we will face the eternal consequences of that decision.

Got Questions, Got Questions 11 Comments [6/26/2018 6:40:13 AM]
Fundie Index: 2

Quote# 138315

The Blasphemy of Conditional Immortality

An examination of the false teaching of conditional immortality or annihilationism. This doctrine was developed early on by men who were heavily influenced in their theology by pagan philosophy and rhetoric. Justin Martyr who is a Catholic saint held this position. I will look at more recent proponents and this blasphemous doctrine in the light of God's word. Yea, let God be true and every man a liar.
www.thelionofjudah.org
Sons of Thunder, Old Time Preaching on face book
Titus 3:5

mwilson70201, Youtube 0 Comments [6/26/2018 6:39:34 AM]
Fundie Index: 2

Quote# 138310

By destroying the institution of marriage, the "gay rights" LBGQTI movement made possible the extension of similar "legal rights" for other "lifestyle choices," including zoophilia, consanguinamorous relationships, necrophilia, pedophilia, polygamy, and every other "fluid" sexual preference or identification—including sologamy and trans-polyamorous relationships.

Efforts to normalize sex with animals as an accepted lifestyle choice resulted in one documentary winning an award this year that idolizes a sexual relationship between a man and his bottlenose dolphin lover.

The 40-year movement to legalize sexual interaction with children is working. People are publicly advocating without shame: "I'm a pedophile, but not a monster;" and, "pedophilia is natural and normal for males."

Now, incest activists in the consanguinamorous community argue it's their turn to have their sexual preference and lifestyle choice validated socially and legally.

Because of a case in New Mexico that's making national headlines, incest activists argue exactly what homosexuals argued to normalize incest.

"I was born this way."

"I can't choose who I love."

"I have a right to be happy just like everyone else."

"We aren't hurting anyone."

"Who is the government to legislate love?"

Incest activists maintain that all sexual preferences and acts should be legal if they are consensual and don't harm anyone. More importantly, the government should not be legislating love.

Christina Shy, an incest activist who runs an advocacy and support website for consanguinamorous people, and is in a relationship with her half-brother, argues that incest "needs to be brought to the attention of everybody in the country and people need to start thinking differently. It was the same with gay people just a few years ago and now they can get married they are accepted. Well why not consanguinamorous people like us? We are all adults. We are not pedophiles, there's no domestic issue. We are in love, we want to be together, but we are related. That shouldn't be a deciding factor."

She's right—if sex is consensual among adults in the privacy of their own home—how is it wrong or even illegal?

How is consensual sex between two adult men different than consensual sex between adult brothers and sisters or adult mothers and sons? If two adult men can legally marry each other, why can't consensual adult incestuous couples?

Why should one consensual relationship be denied and another legal?

Incestuous adults aren't coercing anyone. They are knowingly making choices about their own bodies, so why does anyone have a problem with it? It's really none of anyone else's business.

If transgender people in America, who represent less than half of one percent of the population, can have the government dictate bathroom policies for non-transgender people in public schools and stores, why won't the government legalize consanguinamorous relationships?

Homosexuals, who represent less than 3 percent of the population in America, can legally marry and adopt children, why can't incestuous, polygamists, pedophiles and zoophiles?

If morality and laws are determined by personal preferences (that are fluid and always changing) to justify societal norms, why is a different standard being used to legislate incest, necrophilia or pedophilia than that of same-sex relationships?

Incestuous relationships are mutually consensual, therefore they should be legal. (The same reasoning can be applied to murder. Surely, if two people agree to murder someone, in fact a group of people consent to murder another group of people, their consent justifies their action, which should therefore legalize murder.)

The same goes for polygamy. And necrophilia.

Why is having sex with dead people wrong? The corpse doesn't care. It's dead. It doesn't hurt the corpse; it doesn't even know what's happening. Granted, it can't consent to the sexual act, but that doesn't matter because there are enough necrophiliacs to argue that their sexual preference is normal.

When it comes to not hurting anyone, incest activists argue that abortion is legal, so again, what standard is being used to legislate harm to another person?

They are right. If a baby has no constitutional rights, and adults do, why can't the adults, who aren't harming anyone else, be together?

Practicing homosexuality used to be illegal. Now gays can marry. Times have changed, so who has the audacity to suggest that incest is not the new normal of the 21st century family? Or bestiality?

"Non-human animals have incestuous relationships and multiple partners," some activists argue. Likewise, it's well-known that kings and queens had incestuous relationships for centuries to 'keep their bloodline pure.'

So, who is the government to legislate love? Everyone has the right to love whomever they choose. All love is equal. How is heterosexual love better than incestuous love or being in love with multiple partners?

As the defendant in the New Mexico case argues, as to why he should be allowed to love, have sex with and even marry his mother, he says: "This is about whether I have the right to love someone. And I sure (expletive) have the right to love Monica. You can't tell people who to love or who not to love."

His mother's name, Monica, could easily be "Matthew," the name of a brother, father, uncle or homosexual boyfriend.

No love is wrong.

Gay rights activists and corrupt politicians who chose to legalize same-sex marriage and transgender bathroom policies, have no justification to prevent the legalization other sexual behavior.



Bethany Blankley, Charisma News 8 Comments [6/26/2018 6:38:25 AM]
Fundie Index: 3

Quote# 138361

On a serious note; rape will still happen - probably forever and no matter what.
So what can we (as an individual) do?

Protect ourselves.
Clothing does play a part in that protection, believe it or not.
If clothing plays a part in other scenarios, why doesn't it here?

I don't walk through a super-ghetto here where I live in the middle of the night dressed in formal clothing for obvious reasons.

I don't dress provocative (nazism, fascism, communism, anti-religious etc) in public because it brings risks, vocal or physical conflict.

I don't get shitfaced unless I plan to sleep at some buddy or something because it brings risks, getting mugged or attacked in the night on the way home.
Neither do I wear my most expensive clock, jewlery, work+private phone, etc because it's unnecessary and also increases the chances of getting mugged, especially if you're passed out on a bus.

Why is it so taboo to say that, MAYBE, going piss ass drunk wearing next to nothing, is a bad idea compared to being only slightly drunk but wearing full clothing?
It's not about victim blaming, it's about common fucking sense.

"But but... muh clock and jewlery", yeah I agree. I SHOULD be able to dress however I want. But in current society, I can't.

Wazzbo, MMO Champion 6 Comments [6/24/2018 6:49:09 AM]
Fundie Index: 2

Quote# 138360

My response would be that women are not a sexual minority we are half the population of the planet (if nature is let to take its course) and femicide (e.g. sex selective abortion, differential treatment and female infanticide) is not part of the equation. So why should we be on the side of sexual minorities when their goals are not the same as ours. They want to use our numbers to legitimate their cause and co-opt our movements to pursue their own, very particular agendas.

The fight of trans-identified males is not our fight. The rights of biological females (lesbian, bisexual, trans-identified females (biological females)) is our fight. Women are not a marginal group in society. I have often felt like the odd person out given my lack of interest in conforming to the notion that women should centre their lives around men. Thing is, you can be heterosexual but not like the behaviour or entitlements of men and not want to spend your life pandering to them. You have a right to reject the company of men, doesn't make you an outlier. But people are intent on making you feel like a weirdo for finding the way society is organized pretty toxic.

Alienigena, Feminist Current 6 Comments [6/24/2018 6:48:52 AM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 138358

There are no forests on Flat Earth Wake Up

(1 hour 20 minutes video on various rock formations being the remains of a gigantic antedeluvian silicon-based tree.)

Lyudyn R?sy, YouTube 6 Comments [6/24/2018 6:22:20 AM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 138352

Scientific Evidence: Human Bodies and Consciousness are Evolving at an Accelerated Rate -- Are We Becoming Gods?

What if I told you that in 1000 years, we will look like petty cavemen in our current physical and mental state compared to future humans? There is an overwhelming amount of scientific evidence that proves that not only are our physical bodies evolving at an accelerated rate, our consciousness is as well.

We are indeed in the evolutionary fast lane, and perhaps we are witnessing the prophecies of apotheosis in action. Our consciousness and bodies are evolving at a rate never seen before in the history of the earth.

We can look around the world and see the signs of dramatic spiritual evolution as we continue to actualize our fullest potential. There is an awakening happening right now, and December 21st 2012 really did mark the dawn of a new age of enlightenment. But as this global awakening is happening, our physical vehicles and intelligence levels are also evolving as we step into the light of this new age.


In 2007, Dr. John Hawks, professor of anthropology at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, published an article in the peer-reviewed journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) titled “Recent acceleration of human adaptive evolution”.

This article showed that positive selection within human beings has occurred at a rate 100 times higher than any other time in human history, and that this massive acceleration within evolution has happened particularly within the last 5000 years(3).

The study specifically looked for DNA sequence variation known as SNPs which are mutations at a single point on a chromosome. As indicated in Health and Medicine Week, “The researchers identify recent genetic change by finding long blocks of DNA base pairs that are connected.

“Because human DNA is constantly being reshuffled through recombination, a long, uninterrupted segment of LD is usually evidence of positive selection. Linkage disequilibrium decays quickly as recombination occurs across many generations, so finding these uninterrupted segments is strong evidence of recent adaptation, Hawks says” (4).


The researchers concluded that as the population of human beings continues to increase, the acceleration effect of evolution has also increased because of the amount of room there is for new mutations to occur and be passed throughout the population. According to the original journal article publication, approximately 1800 genes, or 7% of our entire genetic system, have experience recent positive selection.

They add that “To the extent that new adaptive alleles continued to reflect demographic growth, the Neolithic and later periods would have experienced a rate of adaptive evolution >100 times higher than characterized most of human evolution”(5).


With the cultivation of agriculture, the constant changes and experimentation in diet (such as the adaptive tolerances to lactose in milk), the exposure to diseases (such as the introduction of the CCR5 gene to make people resistant to AIDS), and the massive spike in human population within the last 10,000 years, nature has been presented with the optimal breeding grounds for positive selection and new adaptive mutations in the introduction of a massive gene pool and constantly changing environments.(6)

For example, in only the past few millennia, Europeans have experienced rapid changes in the gene for a protein that transfers potassium ions in and out of taste buds and nerve cells, as well as changes in genes associated with Alzheimer's disease and even cancer.(7)

John Hawks' boldest of claims was recorded on the University of Wisconsin-Madison website, where Hawks says: “We are more different genetically from people living 5,000 years ago than they were different from Neanderthals.”(8)


In other words, if you take a human being from 3000 BC such as an ancient Egyptian, you will find that they are more similar to Neanderthals in terms of their genetics than they are to us.

Anthropologist and geneticist Dr. Henry Harpending from the University of Utah also participated in conducting this study, and told National Geographic that “If humans had always evolved at this rate, the difference between modern humans and chimps should be 160 times greater than it really is.”(9)


There is a vast body of empirical evidence that suggests that human beings have recently been the subjects of accelerated natural selection within genetic information.

There is also evidence that this recent acceleration in evolution is not only biologically physical, but is also mental in terms of intelligence. J.R. Flynn, professor of political science at the University of Otago in New Zealand, discovered that IQ scores across the globe have went up 3 points on average per decade for each decade for as long as IQ test scores have been recorded (which has been since 1910 in the United States).

This means that someone that scored in the top 10% on the IQ test 100 years ago would now been in the weakest 5%. These increases have been occurring at a steady rate amongst both male and female genders and have been empirically verified in over 20 countries(10) (see Figure 1).

The average IQ score has always been set to 100, so if a person passes the IQ test with a score of 130, they are among the higher end of performers, and a score of 80 would deviate far from the average raw score. What is striking is that IQ scores have had to be continuously made more difficult over the last century to keep the mean score at 100.

Flynn discovered that the greatest differences were found in culturally reduced tests and fluid intelligence. Fluid intelligence is the ability to think rationality, abstractly, and find solutions to novel problems independent of acquired knowledge.

He makes adamant the fact that these are not learned-content gains through more information being accessible to people, as this would only reflect crystallized intelligence regarding the application of learned knowledge (11).

And furthermore, other environmental factors such as more education and better economic situations are impoverished when trying to adequately explain the gaps in some of the cases, such as the increase in IQ scores by a total of 20 points in 30 years by the Dutch.


As Flynn states in one of his original papers “The international data fall into the same pattern as the American data. Gains are about 18 IQ points per generation (30 years) on Ravens, somewhere between 9 and 18 points on Wechsler and Stanford–Binet tests, about 9 points on purely verbal tests, small or nil on Wechsler subtests such as arithmetic, information, and vocabulary”(12).


The Ravens test measures reasoning abilities using abstract objects independent of language, writing, and reading. This means that these test increases are not a result of people having more access to knowledge and information, but shows that on the contrary, the most significant results were indicated in testings that involve pure problem-solving intelligence, such as identifying non-verbal patterns and relationships.(13)

Environmental impacts that can explain these increases in IQ scores have yet to be identified, and are still being speculated upon.

These are some of the most important discoveries in psychology, which Flynn calls “a cultural renaissance too great to be overlooked”(14).

Contrary to some of the scientific consensus, human evolution is undergoing dramatic increase in terms of genetics and intelligence. We now have scientific proof that evolution is not merely a matter of cultural ingenuity and social conditionings.

Nor is it exclusively reserved for physiological adaptation, but is in fact a concrete measurable phenomenon in human psychology that happening within our species right now.

Evolution can now be spoken of in something that is currently in a state of progression towards complexity, as we have seen from the evidence of geneticists and psychologists alike.

Is this accelerated state just one random hiccup that will plateau in the near future? Will we continue to evolve at this exponential rate from this point forward? Are we witnessing the physical manifestation of the ancient prophecies of human apotheosis in action?

This area remains ripe for investigation, and insofar as the conditions in which this evolution is occurring remain present (population increases, environmental changes, technological and intellectual refining) we should see this effect sufficiently sustained as we enter this new age of evolution and continue to explore this exciting frontier.

In 1000 years, we will be literal gods in comparison to our current state. We will have technologies and abilities that we could only dream of right now, and our bodies will be so much more evolved that we will look back a millennium and wonder how ancient man lived such primitive lives with such archaic bodies.

Maybe we really are entering the Golden Age of spiritual and physical evolution that so many ancient cultures spoke of.

Spirit Science and Metaphysics, Humans Are Free 8 Comments [6/24/2018 6:18:10 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 138351

Scientifically Proven: Planets in Our Solar System Aligned as a Crucifix, the Day that Jesus Died

Call it whatever you want, but according to researchers it scientifically proven. It's an extremely rare astronomical phenomenon, it did not happen again after 33 AD for 600 years. It is an astronomical discovery that one that cannot take lightly.

by EWAO

On the 3rd of April 33, the date on which researchers agree that the crucifixion of Jesus took place, Saturn, Uranus, Jupiter, Earth and Venus lined up and took form of a crucified man.

The discovery of this curious phenomenon was made possible thanks to Miguel Antonio Fiol, a historian at the University of Wisconsin-Madison.


According to a press release published by the Christian Newswire, an illustration released on Monday depicts the planets Saturn, Uranus, Jupiter, Earth and Venus aligned on an orrery model to form what looks like Jesus Christ on the cross "with the head, the hands spread out and the legs together in accurate positioning, rotation and on a galactic scale."

“There are quite e few studies which indicate with precision the date that Jesus Christ died: The bible, Calendars, Astronomical conditions and even geology,” said Miguel Antonio Fiol.

"Those planets rotate as opposites or mirrors, like your left and right hand and your feet," said Miguel Antonio Fiol, the researcher who made the discovery.


An illustration published to show the discovery shows what position the planets adopted during that time, 2000 years ago. Thus it can be seen that the rings of Saturn, on top of the planetary figure, have the appearance of a halo or a crown, reminiscent of the crown of thorns on Jesus' head.

Likewise, Uranus and Jupiter represent hands, while the feet would be formed by Earth and Venus.

"Even at first glance I knew it looked like the crucifixion," Mr. Fiol stated. "But it took time to uncover all the incredible parallels. According to the historian, the planetary alignment began in mid-March and lasted until the middle of April in the year 33. This same alignment occurs once per cycle of 333 years, which means that it has happened six times, between the year 0 and 2000.

"It's hard to put it into the coincidence category," Mr. Fiol told the Gospel Herald in an emailed statement. "This unique alignment happened for only a month in 33 A.D. and then not again for 600 years. So rare is it that models show me it won't happen again from now until around the year 2900."


EWAO, Humans Are Free 14 Comments [6/24/2018 6:18:06 AM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 138348

What are things a Christian can tell an atheist to make them doubt their belief?

Well to be truthful, absolutely nothing, They are intelligent people, who are temporarily insane on this one point of wisdom, but God is at work in the minds of all people, and one day when God has prepared them to accept the truth, a light will go on, and the light of God will brighten their life forever. Their biggest problem is getting past the false concept that science is always right, and religion is always wrong. I think the easiest way to get them to conceive of a brighter mind in the universe than theirs is this, Genesis 1, 3,000 years ago God sat down a common shepherd, Moses and told him how the universe was created, and he wrote it down. It still stands as the only logical explanation of the creation of the universe, but it suffers because of ignorant translators. No one questions the order of life coming into this world, They question the existence of a God and His ability to do it. They question the time reported for Him to do it in. that is where the ignorant translators come in. the Hebrew word translated as day, actually originally meant a period of time, not a set 24 hour period, so it could have been millions of years. He didn’t mention dinosaurs, but he was writing for people 3,000 years ago and there were no dinosaurs 3,000 years ago, if he had mentioned it no one would have believed him until about 200 years ago. That’s it now if you are dense enough to think a common shepherd could have sat down and come up with that on his own, you deserve to be an insane atheist. Now let me prove Noah’s flood and the tower of Babbel

I don’t know of any scientists who believe there was ever a world wide flood as described in Genesis, and yet there is historical proof that there was one, and it was world wide. I don’t know of any scientist who believes the tower of Babel was the cause of all the different languages in the world, but again, there is historical proof, which is contained in the proof of the flood, that something like the tower of Babel happened. Nothing happens in this world unless God causes it or allows it to happen.

1. If there was a world wide flood, and if Noah had 3 sons, we would expect to find, in history, 3 separate stories of this flood that would be similar, but different, that came down through the following generations, one story for each son and his children. These stories, would be major stories that were recorded long before Moses wrote Genesis, possibly by thousands of years.

Historically this is exactly what we find.

2. If the Tower of Babel story is true, The names of Noah and his children and other principle characters, would be different.

Historically this is exactly what we find.

3. If this was a true world wide event, we would find similar stories in almost every culture in the world.

Historically this is exactly what we find.

4. If the Tower of Babel story is true, none of these stories would contain the same names of any character in the Bible story.

Historically this is exactly what we find.

Conclusion: since all of the above is true, this proves the existence of God, proves the happening of a world wide flood, and proves an event that can be equated with the Tower of Babel story where all the languages of the world were changed from an original language.

Noah’s name in the 3 major stories handed down by his three sons was, Atrahasis, Utnapishtim, and Deucalion. All of these stories are known to have been recorded prior to the writing of Genesis.

In addition to these three major stories, there are over 500 other stories of a world wide flood, that have been found through out the world.

All of these stories can be found on the internet, by doing a search for “flood traditions.”

Final conclusion: there was a world wide flood, God exists, The Tower of Babel, happened.

Gary Sechler, Translator, Quora 11 Comments [6/24/2018 6:13:58 AM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Denizen

Quote# 138339


After a man allegedly tried to inappropriately touch a 15-year-old girl on a bus in Queens, New York, Morancy stepped in, pinned the accused creeper against a seat and sent a simple message. He said,
"Don’t ever do that shit again."
Eventually the cops came to the scene to sort the situation out. When they arrived, Morancy told them there was a man touching a little girl. Morancy also told them he was defending her.



And what was a teenager doing on a bus by herself?


1) What does that have to do with anything? 2) How do you think teenagers get around in New York?



1. Pretty poor parenting to let a teenager who can't take care of herself go around New York alone. I know it's victim blaming but you see where her being alone got her, almost sexually assaulted. Imagine if this dude hadn't of been there.

2. Hopefully with their parents or in a group


1) You're right, it is victim blaming. How is being groped by a stranger on a public bus the fault of the parents or the girl? Or a demonstration that she can't take care of herself? Half the neckbearded, "independent", adult men commenting in this very thread are too cowardly to even confront this guy themselves, by their own admissions. Grown women get raped and molested by strangers too, should they be followed around by mommy and daddy every where they go? If a total stranger walked up behind you and punched you in the back of the had, are you going to claim it was your parent's fault for not picking you up after work?

I seem to have struck a nerve.

Here's a tip for life, if you can't take care of yourself don't be by yourself. This girl was clearly not able to take care of herself so she shouldn't have been by herself. By all means blame the groper, but when you jump into the fray you run the risk of getting hurt. And from your own observations here this girl was lucky the good guy was there to protect her because how many of us would jump in, right?

Nice to know my town is part of "fantasy land" instead of reality.

As for the rest of your tirade, you have failed to explain why the girl was on the bus by herself. Were her parents to busy to escort her? Did they not care for her enough? As you've explained, New York/L.A./etc. are pretty big cities. Why take the chance in letting a teenager who can't take care of herself ride the bus alone? When she's a grown woman who can take care of herself then the parents shouldn't have
anything to do with it.
If someone comes out of alley and you don't see them and hits you in the head with a bat, that's you screwed.

Then that's your ass for not paying attention to dark allies. The victim of something isn't off the hook because they are the victim. If someone fails to protect themselves from a possible event then it's still on them. Walking into a street with your eyes closed doesn't absolve you when you are hit by a car. Going into public alone when you are too young to protect yourself doesn't mean you or your guardians are in the right
I neither conveyed nor even inferred anything about what should or should not have happened. I simply said that she, like most people, was likely not expecting to be blatantly, gratuitously fondled on a crowed bus in the middle of the day.

So a woman doesn't expect to get groped on a crowded bus? I may not have much experience riding on public transit but I'm willing to bet this happens too often.




Templar 331, MMO Champion 11 Comments [6/23/2018 9:27:18 AM]
Fundie Index: 7

Quote# 138337

Message to Psycho Killers with Asperger's Syndrome

I understand what Asperger's can do to people. I have one son with severe autism and another son with Asperger's. I also have years of experience at trying to talk sense to young people with Asperger's.

I have tried to help these victims understand how they have been brainwashed into believing that Asperger's is something to take pride in rather than seeing that they had their brains mangled by mercury in vaccines. I have offered to help them cure themselves by teaching them how to remove the mercury from their brains. Sadly, I think I have only been able to reach a few of them who I know did seek help.

The propaganda from our own government who causes the Asperger's by allowing the mercury to remain in vaccines is intense. Obama appointed a psychopathic liar named Ari Ne'eman to national positions where he helps set policy regarding autism. Young Mr Ne'eman, who calls himself autistic in spite of the fact that he is only diagnosed with Asperger's campaigns vigorously and dishonestly to discourage people from curing any form of autism. Mr Ne'eman thus helps our corrupt government to encourage deranged psycho killers who murder babies to remain mentally ill instead of seeking the cures that have been available since 2000.

The largest increase in these brain damaged kids happened among those born in 1991 when the HepB vaccine was initiated on the day of birth. They turned 21 this year. Millions more are quickly coming of age and I fully expect more crazed acts of violence from them. These kids are largely friendless, will probably never have consensual sex unless they pay a hooker and consider themselves rejects from society. Their lives are miserable. Sometimes they snap.

I can't say I can understand why they would decide to shoot little children but I do understand their anger and frustration at their mental conditions. Most don't know that it's possible to cure their condition because that information is suppressed by our government and the liars like Ari Ne'eman who they hire to promote a bunch of untrue nonsense about autism and Asperger's. These Aspies, as many of them call themselves, have been misled to believe that their social ineptitude is genetic. They have been taught through bogus IQ tests that they are more intelligent than the rest of us and they believe it. They think that remaining brain damaged is a good idea since they don't even know that they were poisoned by mercury which eats their brain cells and lowers their IQs.

I don't suppose I will be successful now at convincing any Aspies to try chelation to remove the mercury from their brains and try to better their lives. Maybe I can reason with them though in case a future psycho killer reads this.

If you're an Aspie who is considering mass murder to take your frustrations out on the world, please don't hurt any innocent children. Be aware that your brain damage was caused by doctors who shot mercury into you, politicians who refused to stop the poisoning due to bribes from the Pharmaceutical Industry and liars like Ari Ne'eman and his band of associated psychopaths from Neurodiversity and the Autistic Self Advocacy Network (ASAN) who discouraged people from curing you. These are your enemies. These are the people who destroyed your lives. Please leave the little children and other innocent people alone. And, if you want to try to improve your lives instead of going nuts and suiciding yourself, ask me how to cure Asperger's. I'll be happy to help you.

John Best, Hating Autism 20 Comments [6/23/2018 6:37:30 AM]
Fundie Index: 9
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 138334

Fact: Obama separated children from their parents. The conditions were horrible and children were thirsty and hungry, and in cages, sleeping on the floor.

Fact: Trump followed the same law as separating children from adults which makes sense when Obama did it as well since some of those adults are not parents but are traffickers and it takes time to sort out. Nevertheless, Trump is the one that didn't like it and signed an executive order to fix it. OBAMA DID NOT.

Fact: conditions under Trump were very different. Kids get good meals, beds, blankets, drinks, education, games, clothes, outings to the zoo, egg.

Fact: it costs money. Democrats refuse to help allocate the funds in Congress...because they like the turmoil because they think if they can blame Trump, like you and Robert are doing, people are more likely not to learn the truth and vote for them.

It is much like the mayor of Puerto Rico who is now being prosecuted for hiding food and water, well...actually throwing away food. Why? So she could tell the people Trump,didn't care about them.

The lies about Trump and the glossing over of past administrations are not going to work with informed people.

Shar

sharaleigh23, Realabortiondebate 10 Comments [6/23/2018 5:54:38 AM]
Fundie Index: 2

Quote# 138331

I love watching society burn

Women and hypergamy may have unlimited power but seeing more and more men get fucked over is hilarious.

Your wife divorced you, destroyed your life and took your children forever? LOL. Shouldn't have shit all over "bitter angry men" who told you not to do that.

Young nu-male cuck can't even get a woman to hug him? Enjoy a lifetime of isolation until your eventual suicide.

That shit is hilarious. I love watching men who rejected the blackpill suffer endlessly.

mylifeistrash, incels.me 13 Comments [6/22/2018 11:10:22 PM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 138329

why you should never see a therapist

([pizzapastasandwich on r/TwoXChromosoms on "A guy just called me ugly. I know I am but why does it still hurt and how can I stop crying over it?"]
My therapist always told me just because someone called you a certain word such as ugly doesn’t mean it’s true. It’s just their opinion, it’s not a fact.

jfl at spending large amounts of money going to a therapist just to have them spit blue pill platitudes at you.

of course it's twox so femoids eat that deluded shit kind of thinking up of "everyone is beautiful" because "feeelz"

symmetry and proportions are what makes faces ugly or not, this has been exhaustively proved by blackpill and people like faceandlms

refmd, incels.me 6 Comments [6/22/2018 11:10:18 PM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 138328

(Poll; status 23rd June 2018, 5.51 UTM)
If all crime were legal would you...?
ER...........................................................Votes: 3 (23.1%)
Rape/Torture.........................................Votes: 3 (23.1%)
Rope......................................................Votes: 0 (0.0%)
LDAR................,....................................Votes: 3 (23.1%)
Watch society and the world burn.....Votes: 2 (15.4%)
Endless JBs on demand........................Votes: 2 (15.4%)

Various anonymous incels, incels.me 10 Comments [6/22/2018 11:10:16 PM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 138327

I wish “The Purge” was real.

Legally for 24 hours all crime would be legal. All the people who made me suffer would pay. I could shoot numales/cucks in their soy filled bathtubs, and slit roastie throats with barbed wire dipped in lemon juice.If ERing would actually be legal it would actually solve most of our problems. Virgin? Take a femoid by force.LTR? Chain her to the walls in the basement. Chad? Dismember his manhood to prevent his seed from spreading. Roasties? Lock them in a secluded room, deprive them of food and water. Forcing them to lick the sweat from my balls as sustenance.

Zaetheus, incels.me 11 Comments [6/22/2018 11:10:13 PM]
Fundie Index: 8
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 138319

Question: "How is eternity in hell a fair punishment for sin?"

Answer: This is an issue that bothers many people who have an incomplete understanding of three things: the nature of God, the nature of man, and the nature of sin. As fallen, sinful human beings, the nature of God is a difficult concept for us to grasp. We tend to see God as a kind, merciful Being whose love for us overrides and overshadows all His other attributes. Of course God is loving, kind, and merciful, but He is first and foremost a holy and righteous God. So holy is He that He cannot tolerate sin. He is a God whose anger burns against the wicked and disobedient (Isaiah 5:25; Hosea 8:5; Zechariah 10:3). He is not only a loving God—He is love itself! But the Bible also tells us that He hates all manner of sin (Proverbs 6:16-19). And while He is merciful, there are limits to His mercy. “Seek the LORD while he may be found; call on him while he is near. Let the wicked forsake his way and the evil man his thoughts. Let him turn to the LORD, and he will have mercy on him, and to our God, for he will freely pardon” (Isaiah 55:6-7).

Humanity is corrupted by sin, and that sin is always directly against God. When David sinned by committing adultery with Bathsheba and having Uriah murdered, he responded with an interesting prayer: “Against you, you only, have I sinned and done what is evil in your sight…” (Psalm 51:4). Since David had sinned against Bathsheba and Uriah, how could he claim to have only sinned against God? David understood that all sin is ultimately against God. God is an eternal and infinite Being (Psalm 90:2). As a result, all sin requires an eternal punishment. God’s holy, perfect, and infinite character has been offended by our sin. Although to our finite minds our sin is limited in time, to God—who is outside of time—the sin He hates goes on and on. Our sin is eternally before Him and must be eternally punished in order to satisfy His holy justice.

No one understands this better than someone in hell. A perfect example is the story of the rich man and Lazarus. Both died, and the rich man went to hell while Lazarus went to paradise (Luke 16). Of course, the rich man was aware that his sins were only committed during his lifetime. But, interestingly, he never says, “How did I end up here?” That question is never asked in hell. He does not say, “Did I really deserve this? Don't you think this is a little extreme? A little over the top?” He only asks that someone go to his brothers who are still alive and warn them against his fate.

Like the rich man, every sinner in hell has a full realization that he deserves to be there. Each sinner has a fully informed, acutely aware, and sensitive conscience which, in hell, becomes his own tormenter. This is the experience of torture in hell—a person fully aware of his or her sin with a relentlessly accusing conscience, without relief for even one moment. The guilt of sin will produce shame and everlasting self-hatred. The rich man knew that eternal punishment for a lifetime of sins is justified and deserved. That is why he never protested or questioned being in hell.

The realities of eternal damnation, eternal hell, and eternal punishment are frightening and disturbing. But it is good that we might, indeed, be terrified. While this may sound grim, there is good news. God loves us (John 3:16) and wants us to be saved from hell (2 Peter 3:9). But because God is also just and righteous, He cannot allow our sin to go unpunished. Someone has to pay for it. In His great mercy and love, God provided His own payment for our sin. He sent His Son Jesus Christ to pay the penalty for our sins by dying on the cross for us. Jesus’ death was an infinite death because He is the infinite God/man, paying our infinite sin debt, so that we would not have to pay it in hell for eternity (2 Corinthians 5:21). If we confess our sin and place our faith in Christ, asking for God’s forgiveness based on Christ’s sacrifice, we are saved, forgiven, cleansed, and promised an eternal home in heaven. God loved us so much that He provided the means for our salvation, but if we reject His gift of eternal life, we will face the eternal consequences of that decision.

Got Questions, Got Questions 21 Comments [6/22/2018 11:12:19 AM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: Christopher

Quote# 138311

[Re. the 2007 film, Bridge to Terabithia]

This movie is straight from Hell. To no surprise, they even deny the existence of Hell in the movie. While riding in the back of a pickup truck, Jess and Leslie begin talking about Hell. Jess is portrayed as being brainwashed, and believes that those who don't believe the Bible go to Hell. Leslie openly states that she doesn't believe people go to Hell for disobeying the Bible, arguing that God is too busy maintaining His creation to have time to, in her own words, DAMN PEOPLE TO HELL. Please keep in mind that this movie is targeted towards the youth, and clearly sends out a blasphemous message that open-minded people don't believe in Hell.

The entire movie is rooted in animosity against Christian churches, families, and beliefs. At one point in the movie, Leslie suggests that she would like to go with Jess to church on Sunday. Leslie is wearing pants, so Jess makes the statement... "Women aren't allowed to wear pants in our church." Leslie sarcastically responds by stating that she does own some dresses. At church, the old familiar hymn is sung, The Old Rugged Cross. It is shortly after this scene that Jess and Leslie are discussing Hell in the back of the pickup truck. Leslie makes the statement to Jess... "You believe what you believe because YOU HAVE TO, and hate it; I believe the same thing because I want to and it's so beautiful." Do you see the trickery in her words? She claims to believe the SAME thing as Jess, but she just denied God's judgment upon sinners, by refusing to believe that God would damn anyone to Hell. Clearly, she doesn't believe the same thing as Jess, but is made to appear as the wiser.

Terabithia Film Claims God Too Busy To Send Anyone To Hell

The Bible warns us in Proverbs 14:12, “There is a way which seemeth right unto a man, but the end thereof are the ways of death.” Many people cannot grasp the reality of an angry God Who casts people into a burning Lake of Fire and brimstone, but that's exactly what the Bible teaches in Revelation 21:8, “But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death.” Brimstone is sulfur. I don't know about you, but I'm not going to bet against God's Word. Here's some of the film's script, teaching children that God is too busy to send anyone to Hell...

Large excerpt from the Bridge To Terabithia script


As you just read, the Christ-rejecters at Walt Disney have much contempt and hatred against Christianity. Laura points to the trees and nature around her when she says “He's too busy running all this” in the preceding quote. God is not TOO busy! The Lord is not pressured, constrained by a demanding schedule or too busy to send people to Hell. Along with their support of gay-rights, Rock music and premarital sex, Disney refuses to believe that the Bible is true; specifically concerning the existence of a real Hell that burns with fire and brimstone, where Christ-rejecters will spend eternity (Revelation 20:11-15).

Walt Disney thinks they know better than the holy Bible—indoctrinating children to question, deny and hate the Bible for proclaiming the truth that God casts sinners who die in their sins into the Lake of Fire for all eternity. The Bible warns that anyone who died IN THEIR SINS (John 8:24) will be tormented, suffering God's angry vengeance (2nd Thessalonians 1:8-9; Romans 5:9). You had better obey the gospel, by believing the Bible's good news that Christ died for your sins, was buried and miraculously raised-up after three days. In fact, Laura in real life would have plunged straight into the fires of Hell in her unbelief! Hell is filled with liberals, Modernists and freethinkers who despise and reject the Word of God. God commands all humanity to repent, it's not an option!

David J. Stewart, Jesus is Savior 10 Comments [6/22/2018 9:30:11 AM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 138308

It's a double standard. Men are seen as sexual beast unable to control themselves and if a guy finds himself in a situation like this, this outcome is to be expected of him. Any other outcome would mean he wasn't really a man. Women on the other hand are seen as sexually in control. Both of themselves and of the man or men they are sleeping with. If one ever went on a sexcapades like this, banging two older guys at one time, she would be labeled a slut.

I see no problem with the kid banging his teachers. And it's not just because I'm a guy. One of the main reasons I see no problem with this is because the two women are physically, and hopefully mentally, mature. Meaning if a child were to come from this encounter, and let's hope that doesn't happen, they could properly raise it. If roles were reversed and a teenage girl was knocked up by two guys, she wouldn't be physically or mentally capable to deal with the child, at least properly. And I know this sounds weird, but in a way it was better that he had sex with older women than it would have been if he had sex with girls his age. I'm not saying he's not, and he probably is, but it seems less problematic.

Templar 331, MMO Champion 6 Comments [6/22/2018 8:12:21 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Menomaru

Quote# 138306

[at 23:30]

Jesus Christ doesn’t live in the throne room all the time. He actually has His own mansion. He deserves it. He had to come and live as a man and put up with all that, right? He died for us, so I think He deserves His own place. He has a magnificent mansion that’s in the biggest field of flowers that all sing. They sing all the time. And I mean they have faces and they sing and they’re beautiful. And I’ve seen inside of the mansion.

… It’s a big place where there’s tables labeled with all kinds of desserts… Every dessert you’d ever want because Jesus likes sweets. And there’s dancing there all of the time. And He plans special parties when someone comes home. He will actually send someone in His Golden Chariot with an invitation to that individual which is given by one of His angels — his personal angels — and they will read off of this beautiful scroll that they are going to be the guest to honor. The honored guest at a party thrown by Jesus Christ…

… He loves flowers, dancing, and sweets. That’s His three favorite things, besides us.

Kat Kerr, Facebook 13 Comments [6/22/2018 8:11:43 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Citizen Justin

Quote# 138295

(= Regarding a pastor and his support for polygamy=)

"The Holy Trinity is a polyamorous relationship. "

Nonsense. Where does the Bible remotely hint at the idea that the members of the Trinity are sexually involved? How truly sick and twisted such an idea is.

"JH: The only people who have responded negatively are church assholes that have no knowledge of God. "

Oh, you mean like Jesus, who affirmed the exclusivity of man/woman marriage?

That's as far as I read of this blasphemous article.

Oh, you mean like Jesus, who affirmed the exclusivity of man/woman marriage?

That's as far as I read of this blasphemous article.

Mo, Patheos 8 Comments [6/22/2018 8:09:40 AM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Christopher

Quote# 138309

Tangent002:
But hey, asylum seekers who make it to the US will be detained, separated from their children, and prosecuted as criminals.

Guest Verified:
Asylum seekers are not separated from their children. Illegals are separated from the children they are bringing over unless they can prove they are family members. Out of the 12,000 brought across thus far this year, 10,000 were brought with human traffickers or pedophiles. You should read what the New Yorker, Washington Post, and Breitbart said about this when it happened under the Obama administration. That's why Sessions' suggestion of DNA testing doesn't sound all that far fetched. Who knows how many missing children may suddenly be found?

Guest Verified, Christian News Network 8 Comments [6/22/2018 7:47:32 AM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: Jocasta
1 2 3 4 5 10 12 | top