Quote# 138897

People need to listen to Weev talking about the Chinese, look at the areas they're concentrated in America. Look at how they view human life, their people are disposable and they have hundreds of millions of them. If we lose 200 million each they win by default. They're investing in their navy and their populations are concentrated on the coast, it's looking increasingly like there is a long term invasion plan of America after they've bought out a lot more land and flooded the country with more of their people. I wouldn't be surprised if I see them launch a full scale attack in my lifetime at all.

We need to stop international capitalism ASAP if we don't want China to literally be SuperJewsTM.

MarkimusMeridius, Reddit 1 Comments [7/15/2018 11:58:40 AM]
Fundie Index: 3

Quote# 138896

I am trying to point out that women need to accept blame for their own actions.

If a woman walks to her car in a dimly lit underground parking lot, UNESCORTED then yes she has KNOWINGLY PUT HERSELF IN THAT POSITION.

I'm not saying this excuses her rapist, nor am I saying that its her fault the rapist raped her.

I AM saying that it is her fault that she put herself into a vulnerable position.

I AM saying that women have choices and preventative methods that they can take.

I AM saying that women who choose NOT to take these steps, are knowingly putting themselves in a position where they could get raped.

But no doubt "because they're female" they're what... too stupid to accept control of their own lives? They should be able to walk around, female, and unescorted, and make poor decisions, and not have consequences?

Damn.... if I could live life without consequence... what a life THAT would be.

You're right. I didn't realize how wrong it was to walk to my car all by myself. :(

Whatever was I thinking?


Clearly, you weren't thinking.

That's my point. We don't live in an age of ignorance. Like USCAdad pointed out, this IS our reality.

Obviously you would choose to be a victim, just to uphold your "I can be everything a man can be" ideals.... you would walk to your car by yourself. You would knowingly put yourself in a vulnerable position....

Good grief, I actually had some respect for you until now.

Persiana, Canadaka 7 Comments [7/15/2018 11:58:18 AM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 138895


Continuing with my theme that science supports the teaching of Jesus Christ just as Jesus supports his God and that they all respond to righteousness, which is the science extracted from the Holy Bible, we can embark on a trip to modern sciences latest laboratory…The Hadron Collider.

Here they smash nuclear particles together and measure what happens…what they are finding is that atomic particles split into many parts…shrapnel…and they measure the electric traces this shrapnel leaves behind before they annihilate themselves…but what no one has realised is that without anything holding them together, these particles are returning to their natural state…An invisible, undetectable state, that is the original, universal, dynamic state, that existed in superabundance in Almighty God’s laboratory…the universe…before the Great, Universal, Hadron Collider sent it all in to wild, hurricane storm forces that created stars and atoms, galaxies and life, according to very special laws that is still outside scientific reach but which has been carefully structured by the highest authority in the universe for our benefit…that is if everlasting life, resurrection, repair, peace, happiness, harmony and good-will is your thing…if not, then I’m afraid, you need to read Revelation again because it’s all in there.


NicholasMarks, Religion and Ethics 3 Comments [7/15/2018 11:58:06 AM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: NearlySane

Quote# 138894

Remember when the #LGBT used to tout "equality?"

Now that #LGBT is a protected class, it seems that "equality" has turned into #LGBT coercion.

Isn't it time to put these people back in the closet?

#Ghost

https://nypost.com/2018/07/13/protesters-call-for-vice-mayors-job-over-straight-pride-column/

Ghost, Gab 6 Comments [7/15/2018 11:57:50 AM]
Fundie Index: 2

Quote# 138891

This is a particularly interesting article on the end of the Bilderberg era in light of some of the rumors that are supposedly coming out of the most recent Bilderberg meeting. And notice how it all just keeps going back to Leon Trotsky[.]

...

"Burnham renounced his allegiance to Trotsky and Marxism, in all its forms in 1940."

Sure he did. The Scarlet Pill, redder than red, is to grasp the fact that the Trotskyite communists, the World Revolutionaries, the Neoliberal world order, the New World Order, Bilderberg, the neoconservatives, the Never Trumpers, NATO, the European Unionists, and the Silicon Valley technocracy are all different aspects of the same thing. And their latest vision for global empire has observably failed, and failed faster and more conclusively than anyone would have imagined.

It will be very interesting to learn if the elite can learn from its failures or not. There have been rumors floating around that the European migration is to be reversed for fear that the whole thing will come crashing down amidst a series of large-scale civil wars. Maybe saner minds have prevailed, maybe the God-Emperor is behind it, or maybe it's just fake news.

Interesting times, to be sure.

Vox Day, Vox Popoli 15 Comments [7/15/2018 8:39:06 AM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 138889

Only the best looking, most social, most well adjusted men will get laid

As a male you have to be perfect. Women do not tolerate any sort of weakness. Women's standards in 2018 are higer than ever. In order to compete, you have to be a super extroverted, sexually experienced Chad, smile all the time, always optimistic, always happy, always able to put others into good mood.

You cannot afford to be depressed or show any sort of negative emotions. Females want to be with guys who are fun to be around. They also want guys that everyone knows and loves, AKA guys with high status, which is acquired since young age and progressively built up through the years.

Disgusting abomiations like me will never cut it. We are subhumans, no face, no friends, no status, corrupted by years of rejection, there just isn't any hope. I should chop my balls and put them in oven or just rope at this point. I will never experience the joys of love that chad gets to live.

TrueAlphaMale, incels.me 7 Comments [7/15/2018 8:38:56 AM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 138882

First off, it ain't female genital MUTILATION. It is female circumcision. If you start calling female circumcision that, then I'll have every right to call male circumcision male genital mutilation. I suppose since I see both as absolutely abhorent (not to be confused with, "anyone who does this is stupid", but rather I would not consider it for me or my children), I ain't busy favouring one over the other.

All this double standard shit comes from some shitty multiculturalism. In tribes, the women do the female circumcision. Men aren't forcing it on the women so bye-bye 'sexism' or degradation of women (and the males in tribes may be circumcised as a rite of passage). Some female circumcisions are done at birth or a very young age and same with the male ones. Perhaps out of all of this comes the idea that AFRICA IS NOT A SINGULAR CULTURE. There are varying forms of female circumcision (total removal of external genital structures and the sewing shut of the vagina to removal of one external structure such as the clitoris). Also, I think it was the Nigerian government that tried to ban fat houses and female circumcision and utterly failed plus made the process more dangerous as it went underground.

Should we intervene? No. All intervening does is send over a bunch of fucking evangelical Christians to Nigeria so they can gain money off the witch-hunts of children. Get your nose out of other peoples' cultures because more often than not, nobody has any idea what the fuck is going on.

Lavi, The Escapist 7 Comments [7/15/2018 8:38:45 AM]
Fundie Index: 7

Quote# 138761

All Christianity sucks and arguing about the best form of it is like specifying what kind of cancer you would rather get.

"Simor Talisavec", NationStates 11 Comments [7/15/2018 6:57:25 AM]
Fundie Index: 0

Quote# 138885

The Lord God Jesus pointed toward a huge black door directly in front of us. The door must have been 8 feet tall and looked like to was made of black iron. There was a chain around the door with a strange shaped lock hanging from it. I noticed that there was something else on the door. It was a written inscription in English which read – ‘GEHENNA – THE SECOND DEATH’. The Lord God Jesus said to me “Come”. We approached the door, and the Lord God Jesus asked me “Would you like to see the lake which burns with fire that is also called the Lake of Fire?”
Before I could answer, I watched in amazement as the lock dropped to the ground and the chain unwound, as though some unseen hands had released them from the door. With a horrible, high pitched screech, the door began to open. An awful tormenting heat, accompanied by a deathly odor resembling the smell of burning flesh penetrated the air. The Lord God Jesus and I walked to the entrance of the door and we both looked in, and what I saw reminded me of an ocean that had been set on fire by gasoline. The liquid fire went as far as the eye could see. It was continuous in length and width. It also reminded me of looking into a Volcano erupting.
As I stood there with my eyes transfixed at the ocean of lava, I heard a mans voice speaking through what sounded like thunder and a windstorm with great authority saying ”Rejoice, oh you Heavens and Earth, for the devil your adversary has been cast down to the Bottomless Pit. He knows that he has but a short time. It shall be a time of one thousand years that he shall be bound, and then loosed from his prison for a short season. However, the Captain of His saints, who is the Lord God Jesus, shall prevail over the Hater of all good. Behold the place of the Second Death! This is the place for wicked men and women.” The voice then continued to say “Behold the place is prepared for the devil and his angels”
— Matt 25, 41 … “Then He will also say to those on the left hand, ‘Depart from Me, you cursed, into the everlasting fire prepared for the devil and his angels’”
— Rev 20,10 … “The devil, who deceived them, was cast into the lake of fire and brimstone where the beast and the false prophet are. And they will be tormented day and night forever and ever.” ((forever and ever – its never ends – eternal torment))
Then I saw an angel bearing the likeness of God ascend above the midst of that lake of fire, and I heard thunder within the room of the Lake of Fire. That same voice, with such authority spoke and said to the angel that was in the midst over the lake, “Measure the depth, length, and width of the Lake, record it in the Book of the Future Dead.” Also I heard the voice say to the angel, ”Take the temperature of the Lake of Fire and record it in the Book of the Future Dead, and keep it for the appointed time of the end.” The angel had within his hand, a long rod. White and gold was its appearance. I watched as the angel threw the golden white rod into the midst of the lake, and when he did, a huge flame of fire jumped out, almost splashing on me. I ran from the door screaming in horror!!
The Lord God Jesus came, put His right arm around me and said “Peace I give to you. Listen, look and learn. I brought you here into the Outer Darkness of Hell, on this particular hour to reveal to you the place of Final Judgment, prepared for the devil and his angels. This place, which is named Gehenna, the Second Death, and the Lake that burns with fire, will one day consume all those who hate their brothers or sisters, who speak from the heart and call their brothers and sisters fools, he and she that blasphemes (speaks against) the name of the Holy Spirit, all those who unrepentantly worship idols, unrepentant liars, unrepentant murderers, unrepentant adulterers, unrepentant thieves, and those who wilfully break my Commandments.”
— Matt 5, 22 … “I say to you that whoever is angry with his brother without a cause shall be in danger of the judgment. And whoever says to his brother, ‘Raca!’ (a term of contempt) shall be in danger of the council. But whoever says, ‘You fool!’ shall be in danger of Hell-fire.”
The Lord God Jesus explained to me that people who wont repent of the following occult practices will also be cast into this place, which is named Gehenna, the Second Death and the Lake that burns with fire. Those things are cursed and those who practice these things without repenting will be in danger of the fires of Gehenna.
WARNING: The Lord God Jesus said to all persons who get involved with the occult, that by practicing those things listed below, and not being willing to stop , they will be cast in the fires of Gehenna.
– Those who work many forms of occult practices
– Those who consult demonic familiar spirits
– Sorcerers
– Wizards
– Those who practice witchcraft
– Those who practice magic (black or white)
– Those who practice psychic demonic powers
– Those who practice astrology
– Those who practice Satanism
– Roots and Root Bags
The Lord God Jesus continued to say “This also includes those who practice immorality”. Sexual Immorality that the Lord God Jesus said would send unrepentant souls to Gehenna:
– Those who practice all forms of ungodliness
– Male and females who have sex outside of marriage
– Men who have sex with men
– Women who have sex with women
– Child molesters
Other sins that the Lord God Jesus said would send unrepentant souls to Gehenna:
– The unbelievers in God
– Those who are disrespectful to their parents (Exo 20,12)
– Any person who participates in any acts of abomination
The Lord God Jesus continued to explain to me, “ALL WORKERS OF SIN AND INIQUITY SHALL BE CAST INTO THE LAKE OF FIRE THAT BURNS WITH BRIMSTONE. The place that I named the Outer Darkness of Hell and everything within it shall be cast into the Lake of Fire. I brought you here into the Outer Darkness to reveal to you the wages of sin”.
— Rev 20,13-15 … “The sea gave up the dead who were in it, and Death and Hades delivered up the dead who were in them. And they were judged, each one according to his works. Then Death and Hades were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death. And anyone not found written in the Book of Life was cast into the lake of fire.”
— Rev 21,8 … “But the cowardly, unbelieving, abominable, murderers, sexually immoral, sorcerers, idolaters, and all liars shall have their part in the lake which burns with fire and brimstone, which is the second death.”
— Isa 66, 24 … “And they shall go forth and look upon the corpses of the men who have transgressed against Me. For their worm does not die, And their fire is not quenched. They shall be an abhorrence to all flesh.”
— Rev 2,11 … “He who has an ear, let him hear what the Spirit says to the churches. He who overcomes shall not be hurt by the second death.”’
And there are many other scriptures in the Bible about who ends up in Hell or the Lake of Fire. Read them and Take heed!
REPENT, BELIEVE & LIVE WHOLEY & HOLY FOR JESUS
*** As led SHARE with others to save souls ***

Roger Mills, Christ is Coming 15 Comments [7/15/2018 6:52:44 AM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 138884

"Reuniting children with their parents won’t be enough—undoing the trauma of separation will require a global response"

Right. Let's not tell their countries to stop being screwed up nuthouses. Let's allow them to continue to drive their own citizens away and then the world can pay for their kids shrinks--not of the trauma of living with violence, but for a temporary stay in US.

Education Realist, Twitter 4 Comments [7/15/2018 6:52:40 AM]
Fundie Index: 5

Quote# 138883

(Note: This Regards Roy Moore)

David Walker: Roy Moore for POTUS 2020!

xanxibar: you're dumb if you think anyone other than the Christian Taliban would vote for that scumbag.

David Walker: I knew the rabid Christophobes would show up here within a few minutes of each other once word was out on your websites. And I was right.

Rev. William H. Carey: Then try this: I'm a Christian, an evangelical, and an ordained minister. I wouldn't vote for Moore for dogcatcher, let alone POTUS.

simpleman36: then it only says to True believers of Christ, that you have turn your back against the Lord.


David Walker and Simpleman36, PJ Media 8 Comments [7/15/2018 6:52:28 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Me Thinks

Quote# 138881

[on female genital mutilation]

We make our children horribly obese and give them health issues, they circumcise girls both hurt the children and are probably not a good thing to be doing but we consider one moral and the other abhorrent. So no I don't think we have any right to judge cultures that are not our own and have no right to change it just because due to our upbringing we see it as wrong

Lord George, The Escapist 5 Comments [7/15/2018 6:50:46 AM]
Fundie Index: 3

Quote# 138880

And this is not unusual with lesbian relationships. Weird spiritualism, abuse, bullying, convincing others to act as sex-workers.... LGBT is a tiny fraction of the population, yet extremely prominent in cults, cons, and abuse of all stripes. Gay magazines often had underage boys posting ads, offering to have sex for money. Prostitution is incredibly common, and young boys are specially popular. That's why 70% of pedophiles identify as gay.?


Van Ivanov, YouTube 5 Comments [7/15/2018 6:50:32 AM]
Fundie Index: 2

Quote# 138877

#HimToo – why Jesus should be recognised as a victim of sexual violence

The season of Lent is an invitation to the churches, and to anyone else who wishes to do so, to reflect on the disturbing story of the torture and crucifixion of Jesus of Nazareth as described in the New Testament. It is one of the most widely known and often retold stories in human history. Yet despite being read and remembered so often, there is a part of the story which typically receives little attention and minimal discussion – the stripping of Jesus.

The #MeToo movement has highlighted the prevalence of sexual assault, sexual harassment and other sexual abuses experienced by women and girls in many different forms. It has also exposed the common tendency to deny, dismiss, or minimise the significance and impact of these experiences.
The stripping of Jesus

With this in mind, during this present Lenten period, it seems especially appropriate to recall the stripping of Jesus – and to name it for what it was intended to be: a powerful display of humiliation and gender-based violence, which should be acknowledged as an act of sexual violence and abuse.

The idea that Jesus himself experienced sexual abuse may seem strange or shocking at first, but crucifixion was a “supreme punishment” and the stripping and exposure of victims was not an accidental or incidental element. It was a deliberate action that the Romans used to humiliate and degrade those they wished to punish. It meant that the crucifixion was more than just physical, it was also a devastating emotional and psychological punishment.

The convention in Christian art of covering Christ’s nakedness on the cross with a loincloth is perhaps an understandable response to the intended indignity of Roman crucifixion. But this should not prevent us from recognising that the historical reality would have been very different.

This is not just a matter of correcting the historical record. If Jesus is named as a victim of sexual abuse it could make a huge difference to how the churches engage with movements like #MeToo, and how they promote change in wider society. This could contribute significantly to positive change in many countries, and especially in societies where the majority of people identify as Christian.

Some sceptics might respond that stripping a prisoner might be a form of violence or abuse, but it is misleading to call this “sexual violence” or “sexual abuse”. Yet if the purpose was to humiliate the captive and expose him to mockery by others, and if the stripping is done against his will and as a way to shame him in public, then recognising it as a form of sexual violence or sexual abuse seems entirely justified. The way that the stripping of Vercingetorix, King of the Arverni, is depicted in the first episode of the first series of the HBO series Rome is an example of this.

The scene highlights the vulnerability of the naked prisoner who is stripped and exposed in front of the assembled ranks of hostile Roman soldiers. The power and control of Roman power is contrasted with the vulnerability and forced submission of the prisoner. The scene also hints at the possibility of even greater sexualised violence which might be in store.

Combating Stigma

Jesus’ gender is central to readers’ seeming unwillingness to recognise the sexual abuse to which he is subjected. Analysis of the gendering of nakedness by Margaret R. Miles demonstrates that we view male and female nakedness differently. In biblical art in the Christian West, Miles argues that the naked male body represents glorious athleticism representing spiritual as well as physical suffering.

Sexual abuse doesn’t form part of the narrative of masculinity inherent in representations of Jesus. Naked women, however, are immediately identified as sexual objects. Seeing a woman being forcibly stripped, then, might be more recognisable as sexual abuse than the stripping of Jesus in the Gospels of Matthew and Mark. If Christ was a female figure we wouldn’t hesitate to recognise her ordeal as sexual abuse.

Some present day Christians are still reluctant to accept that Jesus was a victim of sexual violence and seem to consider sexual abuse as an exclusively female experience.

We may not want to dwell on the disturbing indignity of crucifixion for the whole year, but it is not right to forget about it completely either. The sexual abuse of Jesus is a missing part of Passion and Easter story retellings. It’s appropriate to recognise Jesus as a victim of sexual violence to address the continuing stigma for those who’ve experienced sexual abuse, especially men.

Lent offers a period in which this stark reality of crucifixion might be recalled and connected to the important questions that movements like #MeToo are raising for the churches and for wider society. Once we acknowledge the sexual abuse of Jesus perhaps we’ll be more willing to acknowledge sexual abuse in our own contexts.


Katie Edwards, David Tombs, The Conversation 4 Comments [7/15/2018 6:49:17 AM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: Denizen

Quote# 138876

I think this applies to most of the world then. Israel was stolen from the Jews some thousand years ago so of course they deserve to settle the whole of Palestine. Of course, anyone can now go to Australia as that was taken from the natives. Everyone feel free to move to South Africa as well. Hey didn't Germany used to be much much bigger? Maybe open the borders to Austria since that was stolen from the Reich. Didn't some Amazonian tribe win a patch of land from another in 1764? Let's flood their isolated Amazonian settlements with some Ghanans?

Acrylic_Light, Reddit 0 Comments [7/15/2018 6:48:57 AM]
Fundie Index: -2

Quote# 138867

[LifeFuel] why don't we start dressing like slutty women

govt's are only going to bring about laws to regulate what women wear if men start doing it, cause then it will be "why doesn't somebody think of the children"

I'm going to go out in yoga pants with a raging erection, I'm sure no one will complain right, how dare they slut shame me

refmd, incels.me 6 Comments [7/15/2018 6:47:14 AM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 138865

(=A response to a homosexual interpretation of David and Jonathan=)

That story is not about homosexuality and homosexuality is not about love!

Martin, Premier 5 Comments [7/15/2018 6:46:13 AM]
Fundie Index: 5

Quote# 138852

THE CONSPIRACY WAS STRONG IN 1066

KING HAROLD OF ENGLAND WAS KILLED BY VIKING KING HARALD HARDRADA OF NORWAY
AT THE BATTLE OF STAMFORD BRIDGE ON SEPTEMBER 25,1066. HARDRADA MEANS
"RUTHLESS" AND HE BELIEVED THAT HE WAS THE VIKING CONSTANTINE!!
The Old Covenant strong conspiracy happened about 950 BC when King David's son Absolom conspired to kill his father and take over the kingdom. Absolom's mother was named Maachah (rebellion), the daughter of Talmai, king of Geshur:

And Absalom sent for Ahithophel the Gilonite, David's counsellor, from his city, even from Giloh, while he offered sacrifices. And the conspiracy was strong; for the people increased continually with Absalom. And there came a messenger to David, saying, "the hearts of the men of Israel are with Absalom" (II Samuel 15:12-13).

Those men of Israel were circumcised, and kept a kosher diet, but that didn't prevent them from rebelling against their lawful king.

That strong conspiracy failed, and Absolom was killed, but not before thousands of Isrealites were slain at the Battle of the Wood of Ephraim.

The strong conspiracy called "Operation Babylonian Captivity" was accomplished in just one year and it took split second timing. The year 1066 was not chosen at random. King Nebuchadnezzar's statue was 60 cubits high and 6 cubits wide (Daniel 3:1). The image in Daniel Chapter 2 had 10 toes, and the beast in Daniel Chapter 7 had 10 horns. Additionally, the Apocalypse predicted intense Satanic activity after the year 1000:

And when the thousand years shall be finished, Satan shall be loosed out of his prison, and shall go forth, and seduce (Gk. planeo: deceive) the nations, which are over the four quarters (Gk. gonia: corners) of the earth, Gog and Magog, and shall gather them together to battle, the numbers of whom is as the sand of the sea (Apocalypse 20:7, Douay-Rheims Version).

The Bayeux Tapestry is a complete fabrication. King Harold was not killed at the "Battle of Hastings" in 1066 because the "Battle of Hastings never happened. Duke William (the so-called Conqueror), landed unopposed, and then marched his army to London accompanied by the plunder of the surrounding countryside!


Patrick Scrivener , Reformation 5 Comments [7/15/2018 6:45:19 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Jacob Harrison

Quote# 138851

Until recently, everyone in power everywhere in the world was culturally aligned with the Blue Empire, or at least reluctant to be openly unaligned. Every government, every head of government, every government school, every university everywhere, every television station (including Fox), every newspaper (including the Murdoch newspapers). The Cathedral would from time to time go into high dudgeon because not everyone was as enthusiastic as they would like, but anyone who outright opposed them was low status and powerless.

Universities and their endowments are still converged, and all the mass media and internet giants are converged. Trump has few loyalists among his political appointees in government. But it is a start. A start that denies the inevitability of Blue Empire power, a start that tells us that surrender is not the only option. That Trump had the last laugh over Gay Mulatto gives every man a shot of testosterone. That Melanie is hot, while Michelle belongs in a zoo, makes every progressive everywhere look and feel bad.

When we successfully do the Dissolution of the Monasteries on the universities, confiscating their endowments, and ending their power as gatekeepers to high status high pay jobs, when we are no longer ruled by the clergy, that will be victory, and the rest will be mopping up operations. It is a long way from here to there, some very bad things will happen on the way, and there may well be a red terror and a civil war along the route, but in the far distance, we can see hope for victory. If Trump fails, he will nonetheless have pointed the way for one that will follow.

The best outcome would be that Democrats launch a coup prematurely, leading to civil war prematurely, and lose it, leaving Trump as King, as happened in the Social War of the Roman Republic, when the Populares played their hand too soon and too recklessly. Worst outcome would be that they launch their coup, get away with it, leading to a rapid succession of coups by ever more extreme factions, as in the coups against Czar Nicolas and King Louis XVI, and, as in those coups, we launch the civil war too late, and lose it. But we have something that they did not have. We can see the pattern, making it possible to step off that path early rather than late, getting an outcome more like that of Social War of Rome, than the French and Russian Revolutions. That would buy us time enough for technological progress in gene editing technologies to save the day, assuming we can fix the fertility problem. The failure of the Roman elite to reproduce led to endless waves of elite replacement, resulting in chaos and instability, so Sulla’s restoration failed to last. To fix the fertility problem, we have to restrict sexual female choice. We have to force women to get married, to stay with their husbands, to refrain from sex with anyone other than their husbands, and to obey their husband. Even if we have gene editing, still takes two to raise a child. A high IQ species necessarily has a long childhood, which requires cooperate/cooperate equilibrium between husbands and wives, which equilibrium requires substantial external enforcement. Peoples that allow female sexual choice disappear. Rome got in trouble despite Sulla’s restoration because its elite kept disappearing, resulting a dangerous degree of social mobility at the top.

Jim, Jim's Blog 5 Comments [7/15/2018 6:45:08 AM]
Fundie Index: 2

Quote# 138850

Truthfully, I do believe America is indeed in a death-spiral. Economically, culturally, and morally decaying. When I see so much of America embracing deviant crap like homo-marriage, I view it a symbol that America has given itself over to evil, and its days are numbered.

greene66, Free Republic 1 Comments [7/15/2018 6:44:36 AM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 138834

[Why does the Bible say a mother is unclean for twice as long after giving birth to a girl?]

It takes lots more hormones for a girl to be made and the mother needed more time to recover from the stress on here body and there might of been more girls than boys at the time and perhaps that is why the rule was made.

anonymous, Y! answers 6 Comments [7/15/2018 6:42:56 AM]
Fundie Index: 3

Quote# 138833



CAPTION: At a theater in hell:

COMEDY TIME WITH DON LEMON

Man (presumably Don Lemon): It's a modern horror story: Trump's SCOTUS pick will deprive women of their God-given right to abortion.

BACKGROUND SLOGAN: CNN: All communist. All the time.

Mick Williams, Disqus - Faith & Religion 6 Comments [7/15/2018 6:42:42 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Jocasta

Quote# 138831

(=Progressive vs Homophobic Christian=)

Jon Davis: Still missed it!! Jesus addressed this DIRECTLY. Right here!
Matthew 19:4-5
4 “Haven’t you read,” he replied, “that at the beginning the Creator ‘made them male and female,’[a] 5 and said, ‘For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and the two will become one flesh’[b]
One only need to reference THE DESIGN to understand THE PERVERSION.

blind poet38: Not necessarily true. Translated into English, the Bible condemns homosexuality. But looking at the original text, the Hebrew word that is used is very vague. And Jesus never said that gay people couldn't get married, but it was just God's design that they don't get married.

Jon Davis: "Do not have sexual relations with a man as one does with a woman; that is detestable" is not a word, it is a description to eliminate the confusion.
Jesus didn't need to say that "gay people can't get married", he referenced the design and that settled it. One only need to reference THE DESIGN to understand THE PERVERSION.
Penis is designed for vagina. *blush* Vagina is for penis. *blush* Anus is for pooping. *pffrrt*
It's not homophobia. It's basic biology.

blind poet38: If it is basic biology, how is it that scientists have found over 1500 animal species that practice homosexual acts. You are just assuming homosexuality is a sin. But the Bible really does not say that. And I am a Christian by the way.

Jon Davis: It is basic biology because that is how we procreate, and to do things differently promotes bad health (bleeding butts anyone?) and is not conducive to humankind's continuity.
Animals do all kinds of disgusting things. Dogs eat poop. Cats pee on clothes. Are you just an animal? No. Mankind was made in God's image.
As for everything else you just said ("You are just assuming homosexuality is a sin" etc) you're obviously trolling. I just quoted the text that called it "detestable". And while neither Old nor New Testaments use the term "homosexual" (a term that modern English coined) they both describe the sexual act and describe it with disgust and contempt.

blind poet38: You can think I am trolling if you want to, but you have to understand that the original Hebrew uses terminology that is not as clear-cut as people think it is when it deals with condemning homosexuality.

Jon Davis: Read the OP. Matthew 19:4-5 has no dependency upon Leviticus 18:22; indeed it goes the other way around. You're barking at the wrong argument. I myself was trolled by actually responding to it.

blind poet38: Sorry dude, I don't get your point. All I am saying is that in the original Hebrew, the word that is used is not as clear-cut as people think it is to condemn homosexuality.

Jon Davis: Now you're spamming. Stop repeating yourself. Even if it was true, it's irrelevant, and I already explained why. Now go read Romans 1:18-32 (originated as Greek, not Hebrew), study it with an exhaustive study Bible which provides insight on the original language, and come back when you've studied more than the ridiculous false "truths" and FUD you've found on the Internet.

blind poet38: You can be dismissive all you want, and that is fine. But why is it irrelevant? We are talking about homosexuality and the Bible aren't we?

blind poet38: It is obvious you have no answers to anything. I have already done the research.

AskariStudios: But God Said that all sex outside of Marriage is wrong. Since Marriage is in between only a man and a women. this makes homosexuality wrong. in no way shap or form has marriage ben said to take place between a man and a man or a woman and a woman. ONLY a MAN and a Woman.this has been stated numerous times in the bible. Not only this but in Levitcus, it is clear stated that homosexuality is an abomination. clear cut. in Jude, it its written that Sodom and Gomorrah gave themselves up to sexual perversion (homosexuality) and where thus made an example of. So with Just Common Logic, and the fact that through multiple translations, the same wording has shown up., its clear that the bible is against homosexuality.

blind poet38: The Bible never says that sex outside of marriage is a sin.

Jon Davis: "Fornication" is quite elaborately spoken against. That you would say such a thing speaks volumes about modern society being so casually hedonistic; sex outside of marriage was universally taboo and expected to be everyone's struggle, it didn't need to be spelled out in detail like it spelled out homosexuality, it was simply referred to as "fornication".
http://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/Bible-Verses-About-Fornication/
http://www.openbible.info/topics/fornication
http://www.gotquestions.org/sex-before-arriage.html

AskariStudios: 1 Cor 7 states : "Now concerning the matters about which you wrote: t“It is good for a man not to have sexual relations with a woman.” 2 But because of the temptation to sexual immorality, each man should have his own wife and each woman her own husband." Its clear that Paul(I do believe he wrote this) implies that Sex before marriage is sexual immorality and that do to this temptation, a man should marry.
want more proof? look up : (Acts 15:20; 1 Corinthians 5:1; 6:13, 18; 10:8; 2 Corinthians 12:21; Galatians 5:19; Ephesians 5:3; Colossians 3:5; 1 Thessalonians 4:3; Jude 7) and Hebrews 13:4.

blind poet38: The only sexual sins that are mentioned in the Bible are adultery, incest and sex with animals. Fornication means "sexual sin." Which sins? Adultery, incest and sex with animals. Premarital sex is not mentioned as a sin.

Jon Davis: "Fornication" does not mean "sexual sins in general". It means "extramarital sex". If you want to discuss Greek or Hebrew, say so, but you didn't. Look up the word and stop speaking assertions about our English words when you don't even know your own English language.

blind poet38: Fornication does not mean "extramarital sex." That is what someone told you it means. Fornication means "sexual sin." Learn the facts.

Jon Davis: There's a fine line between idiocy and trolling. That line is knowledgable intent. I'm not sure what you're doing in your case. http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/fornication

blind poet38: OK Jon, you are right. Translated into English, premarital sex is a sin, despite the fact that Solomon and David and Samson, etc etc etc all did it and were never punished for it in the Bible. But the question is in the NT,, what does porneia mean? That is not the Greek word for adultery or any specific sexual sin. It generally means any kind of sexual immorality. And what is sexual immorality in the Bible? Adultery and incest and sex with animals.

Jon Davis: what do you mean "they weren't punished for it"? OT figures who engaged in fornication took a pounding for it. Most of their stories are used as case lessons for the hell people go through when they do it.
To answer your question: Fundamentally, in the Bible there are only two types of sex: sex within marriage (one man and one woman) and sexual immorality, porneia. Read the OP in this thread if you don't understand.

Jon Davis, Youtube 2 Comments [7/15/2018 6:42:21 AM]
Fundie Index: 2

Quote# 138697

I don't really think that this should be a debate over how friendly or intelligent an immigrant group is. Most White Western expats are extremely nice, are better educated than the local population, commit low crime rates, and contribute more to the society through taxes than they take out through government handouts. And yet non-White people still don't want millions of us to flood into their countries and make them minorities in their own cities.
Heck, I don't even like seeing White expats in non-White countries. It's fucking weird seeing White expats wearing traditional Japanese attire and taking part in traditional Japanese cultural events. It would be even weirder if these White expats had these "fuck you" attitudes that non-White immigrants have in White Western countries where they unapologetically colonize your country while maintaining their own native culture. Could you imagine if Americatowns spread across Japan where you have entire cities speaking English and refusing to adopt the native culture?
And brown and black people don't have any problems with being racist towards us in our own countries and openly declaring their desire to keep us out of "their" communities. Just look at the huge number of brown and black people that now live in White Western societies freaking the fuck out whenever we White people start to recolonize our own cities. Brown and black people are completely flipping their shit over "gentrification", which is obviously a euphemistic dog whistle for racist brown and black people wanting to keep White people out of "their" neighborhoods (even though those neighborhoods were White and better off a few decades ago).
Tolerating immigrant groups like Sikhs might seem harmless at first, but if you understand the long-term consequences of adopting these dangerously permissive and welcoming attitudes towards foreign immigrants, then you'll quickly realize that your permissive and tolerant attitudes will result in White people becoming minorities in one neighborhood after the next, and then one city after the next, and then eventually becoming minorities in one country after the next - as is predicted to happen in America, Canada, Britain, Sweden, et cetera, over the next few decades.
When is it morally acceptable for we White people to put our foot down and stop our racial dispossession? When we're down to comprising only 75% of our national population? 65%? 60%? 55%? 51%? Or is it never morally acceptable to close our borders and prevent our racial dispossession? Are we just supposed to warmly welcome and celebrate our racial demise because Sikhs are supposedly model minorities, and because not doing so is dangerously racist and akin to slavery, lynchings, and the holocaust?
Pushing all of those ridiculous - and yet commonly presented - arguments against White nativism aside, I'd argue that keeping Sikhs and other non-White groups out of our countries can be justified on simple demographic mathematics alone. After all, there's more Indians in the world than there is White people. One fucking brown country has more people in it than the entire global White community combined. And so obviously we have to be hyper-vigilant when it comes to preventing mass Indian immigration into our societies because only 1% of their population migrating to a small White country will cause those White people to become minorities in their own homeland. That's why it's extremely important to realize that a certain level of racism - such as opposing non-White immigration into our countries - is simply necessary if we want to exist 100+ years from now.
It's nothing personal, but you Sikhs (and non-White people in general) have to be kept out of our countries if we simply want to survive as a race. Go be model citizens back in your own countries. Your native countries need all of the help that they can get. We'll be just fine without you.
And besides, why would you want to be a minority anyway? Wouldn't you rather live in a country dominated by our own people where you're completely free to be yourself? Don't you yearn to be back in India surrounded by your own kind? Don't you wish that you could see people that look like you respected in the media that you consume? Why would you want to put up with racist stereotypes like Apu and "thank you, come again"? Why would you want to be forced to conform to our social norms? Why would you want to worry about some random yahoo confusing your turban as Islamic terrorist garb and assaulting you? And why would you want to live in a country that will never fully accept you?
And don't you care that you're making the native population feel uncomfortable by colonizing their country? I'd personally be racked with guilt if millions of White people flooded into Japan and tried to force the locals to bend to our will and represent us in their media. And yet I don't think that I've even seen a single non-White person express guilt for making White people minorities in their own countries. On the contrary, they act as if we White Westerners have some kind of moral obligation to just completely bend over for them even though they'd never bend over for us if the roles were reversed.
Non-White immigrants actually have the balls to get in our face, denounce us as racists, physically assault us, and even show up with loaded semi-automatic rifles to shut down our speech by force if we try to stand up for our own racial interests in our own countries. Non-White people would never tolerate that level of disrespect in their own countries unless we forced ourselves upon them through old school military imperialism.
What a perfect testament to how cucked White people have become, which non-White people have picked up on instinctually. Much like how wild animals have become increasingly aggressive towards man after the environmental and conservationist movement severely reduced hunting, so too have people of color lost their fear of the White man due to the liberal "anti-racist" cultural revolution in recent decades. They know that we've become a bunch of pathologically ethnomasochistic cowards. And they know that the liberal media and countless extremely well-funded "anti-hate" NGOs have their back. And so they have no respect for us and absolutely zero fear of us retaliating against them as they brazenly get in our faces and push us around in our own countries.
And it's not like appealing to them morally will make a difference. The only thing that they'll respect is a reemergence and reassertion of unapologetic White ethnocentrism. And that's ultimately why the Alt-Right exists, and that's why people of color and self-hating Whites are so militantly opposed to us. They know that we have a liberal boot on our necks which is keeping us down, and they have absolutely zero interest in letting us get back on our own feet again. They instead want to finish off we "bad" Whites ("good" Whites hate themselves and support open borders) and kill us off for good by putting even more weight on our necks through increased mass non-White immigration and suppression of our speech.
And the supposedly nice and friendly Sikhs will reveal their shared animosity towards we "bad" Alt-Right Whites as they join in with the other non-White and White leftist mobs that violently attack our real world events and advocate for laws that criminalize our speech. And that's why the "model minorities" rhetoric doesn't fool the Alt-Right. Whether these non-White people in our countries are model minorities or degenerate ghetto brown trash, they're completely united in preventing White Westerners from reclaiming their own countries and preventing their racial demise.
And as you pointed out in a previous post on this subreddit, a lot of these people are hardcore ethnic nationalists themselves who are basically only living in White Western countries in order to make more money. So they're a 5th column security threat on top of being a unwanted foreign colonizer.

CertifiedRabbi, /r/DebateAltRight 0 Comments [7/15/2018 6:41:22 AM]
Fundie Index: 1

Quote# 138869

[It's Over] Teenage love

If you missed out on teenage love it is over. Teenage love is the only pure form of love as it is without the pressure of bills, time , baby making ect.

If you missed out on this very narrow window of opportunity then a foid will never truely love you.

It isn't over.

It never began.

AfrikanCel, incels.me 13 Comments [7/14/2018 9:31:41 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep